pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.07720 · v2 · pith:3OAIZDV7new · submitted 2025-11-11 · 💻 cs.RO

Empowering Robot Teleoperation: Exploring the Synergies Between Devices and Manipulator Controllers in a Comparative Study

Yuxuan Zhao , Yuanchen Tang , Jindi Zhang , Hongyu Yu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 18:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords teleoperationrobot manipulationcontroller strategiesdata collectioninverse kinematicsinverse dynamicscompliant controldevice synergy
0
0 comments X

The pith

Matching teleoperation devices with specific controller strategies improves performance on real manipulation tasks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines data collection for robot manipulation by pairing different teleoperation devices with controller approaches such as position-based inverse kinematic control, torque-based inverse dynamic control, and optimization-based compliant control. Experiments compare how these pairings affect outcomes in actual tasks. The results point to meaningful differences tied to the device-controller combination rather than generic setups. A sympathetic reader cares because higher-quality demonstration data supports better training of robots to handle varied physical work. The study treats the observed synergies as a practical factor for embodied robot learning.

Core claim

Through side-by-side tests, the paper shows that the relationship between a teleoperation device and its paired manipulator controller determines how well real manipulation tasks can be completed, with each combination of position-based IK, torque-based ID, or compliant control producing distinct effects on task execution.

What carries the argument

Comparative evaluation of device-controller pairings (position-based IK control, torque-based ID control, and optimization-based compliant control) applied to teleoperated manipulation for data gathering.

If this is right

  • Certain device-controller pairs deliver higher success rates on concrete manipulation actions.
  • Data gathered under matched pairings can improve downstream robot skill learning from human demonstrations.
  • Task-specific controller choices become a design variable when building teleoperation systems for real use.
  • The observed effects scale with the demands of physical contact and precision in the chosen tasks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Teleoperation hardware vendors might publish recommended controller pairings for common manipulation benchmarks.
  • The same synergy principle could be tested in non-manipulation domains such as mobile robot navigation or assembly sequences.
  • Repeating trials across varied operator experience levels would clarify how much the device-controller effect dominates other variables.

Load-bearing premise

Observed differences in task performance stem primarily from the device-controller match rather than operator skill, task choice, or hardware setup details.

What would settle it

Run the same tasks with several operators of matched skill levels and fully standardized calibration; if performance gaps shrink or vanish, the claimed device-controller synergy is not the main driver.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.07720 by Hongyu Yu, Jindi Zhang, Yuanchen Tang, Yuxuan Zhao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Framework of the teleoperation process for data collection 3. Joint limit constraints for mechanical safety For singularity management, our method continuously evaluates the Jacobian’s joint manipulability to dynamically reconfigure null-space priorities. This enables smooth tra￾jectory execution near singular configurations—where con￾ventional IK/ID methods exhibit velocity spikes or torque saturation—whi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Descriptions of the mechanical modifications for Unitree H1 humanoid robot. 3.2. Forward Kinematics The Unitree H1 robot studied in this paper employs screw theory for kinematic modeling, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Schematic Diagram of Screw-Theoretic Modeling for the Unitree H1 Robot [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Rokoko Suit integrated with Rokoko Gloves 5. Experiment 5.1. Experiment Setup and Implementation This study is conducted with the Unitree Robotics H1 humanoid robot system with the focus of the upper body ma￾nipulation task for teleoperated data collection for specific power grid scenario, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Camera integrated with WilorR In addition to the camera interface, the motion capture suit facilitated direct tracking of the end effector targets from the human operator, allowing for precise adjustments 1Body tracking SDK: https://packages.microsoft.com First Author et al.: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 6 of 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Camera Integrated with WiLoR vs Rokoko Smart Suit Integrated with Rokoko Gloves (Cartesian Space) of the robot’s physical measurements, such as height, fore￾arm length, shoulder width, and similar parameters. For the implementation of three controllers, we utilized RBDL [44] for robot kinematics and dynamics modeling and the C++ Eigen interface of the OSQP [45] solver named osqp-eigen. The parameters for t… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The QP controller in different Weight (Joint Torque) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The QP Controller in different Weight (Cartesian Space) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The QP Controller in different Weight (Joint Position) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The QP Controller in different Weight (Joint Velocity) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The QP controller in different Stiffness Matrix (Cartesian Space) 5.4. The Comparison of QP Controller between Dynamic Null Space and Fixed Null Space To compare the advantages and disadvantages of dy￾namic versus fixed null-space algorithms, this paper col￾lected the same Cartesian-space trajectory using motion capture equipment. The experimental results under both dynamic null-space and fixed null-space… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The Comparison of QP Controller between Dynamic Null Space and Fixed Null Space (Joint Velocity) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: The Comparison of QP Controller between Dynamic Null Space and Fixed Null Space (Joint Torque) Additionally, near singularity positions, the fixed null space may experience lost control. Figures 12 - 15 and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: The comparison between IK, ID and QP (Cartesian Space) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: The comparison between IK, ID and QP (Joint Velocity) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: The comparison between IK, ID and QP (Joint Torque) 6. Conclusion From the fair evaluation in the same teleoperation plat￾form for different teleoperation devices, and manipulator controllers, we found the trade-offs in different aspects of First Author et al.: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 10 of 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_19.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Robot learning empowers the robot system with human brain-like intelligence to autonomously acquire and adapt skills through experience, enhancing flexibility and adaptability in various environments. Aimed at achieving a similar level of capability in large language models (LLMs) for embodied intelligence, data quality plays a crucial role in training a foundational model with diverse robot skills. In this study, we investigate the collection of data for manipulation tasks using teleoperation devices. Different devices yield varying effects when paired with corresponding controller strategies, including position-based inverse kinematic (IK) control, torque-based inverse dynamic (ID) control, and optimization-based compliant control. Analysis of experimental results suggests the importance of the relationship between teleoperation devices and controllers for real tasks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper investigates data collection for robot manipulation tasks via teleoperation, comparing different devices paired with position-based inverse kinematics (IK) control, torque-based inverse dynamics (ID) control, and optimization-based compliant control. It claims that experimental results demonstrate varying effects from these pairings and that the relationship between devices and controllers is important for real tasks.

Significance. If the central claim holds after proper isolation of effects, the work could provide practical guidance for selecting teleoperation hardware and controllers to improve data quality for training embodied AI models. However, the absence of reported quantitative metrics, statistical tests, or controls for confounds limits its immediate impact on the field.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim that performance differences arise primarily from device-controller synergies (position IK, torque ID, optimization-based compliant) is load-bearing but unsupported by any reported quantitative results, error bars, sample sizes, or statistical tests in the provided analysis. This directly weakens the empirical observation in the abstract.
  2. No details are given on experimental design elements such as within-subjects counterbalancing, operator training protocols, task difficulty standardization, or hardware calibration procedures. Without these, observed differences remain compatible with alternative explanations including operator skill variance or unmeasured confounds, as the weakest assumption in the stress-test note.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract and title could more precisely define the specific teleoperation devices under study rather than referring generically to 'different devices'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and are prepared to revise the paper to strengthen its empirical rigor and methodological transparency.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that performance differences arise primarily from device-controller synergies (position IK, torque ID, optimization-based compliant) is load-bearing but unsupported by any reported quantitative results, error bars, sample sizes, or statistical tests in the provided analysis. This directly weakens the empirical observation in the abstract.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the initial submission presented results primarily through qualitative descriptions of observed trends rather than detailed statistical analysis. The experiments did collect quantitative metrics including task completion times, success rates, and error measurements across multiple trials per condition. In the revised manuscript, we will include these data with sample sizes, error bars, and appropriate statistical tests (such as paired t-tests or ANOVA) to provide stronger quantitative support for the device-controller synergy claims. revision: yes

  2. Referee: No details are given on experimental design elements such as within-subjects counterbalancing, operator training protocols, task difficulty standardization, or hardware calibration procedures. Without these, observed differences remain compatible with alternative explanations including operator skill variance or unmeasured confounds, as the weakest assumption in the stress-test note.

    Authors: We agree that additional methodological details are necessary for reproducibility and to address potential confounds. The revised manuscript will expand the Methods section to explicitly describe the within-subjects design with counterbalancing of device-controller pairings, standardized operator training protocols, task difficulty standardization using fixed scenarios and object placements, and hardware calibration procedures. This will help rule out alternative explanations such as operator skill variance. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical results from device-controller comparisons do not reduce to fitted inputs or self-definitions

full rationale

The paper is an empirical comparative study of teleoperation devices paired with position IK, torque ID, and optimization-based compliant controllers for manipulation tasks. The central claim—that device-controller synergies matter for real tasks—is presented as arising directly from analysis of experimental performance data. No equations, parameter fits, predictions derived from subsets of the same data, self-citations as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work appear in the abstract or described structure. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained: observed differences are reported as evidence rather than being redefined or forced by construction from the inputs themselves. This is the expected non-finding for a straightforward experimental robotics paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the claim rests on an unstated assumption that experimental differences are attributable to device-controller pairing.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5658 in / 935 out tokens · 42627 ms · 2026-05-21T18:44:31.505126+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Mahya Shahbazi, Seyed Farokh Atashzar, and Rajni V. Patel. A systematic review of multilateral teleoperation systems.IEEE Trans- actions on Haptics, 11(3):338–356, 2018

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    A concentrated-flux-type pm machine with irregular magnets and iron poles

    Pengjie Xiang, Liang Yan, Yiming Guo, Xinghua He, Chris Ger- ada, and I-Ming Chen. A concentrated-flux-type pm machine with irregular magnets and iron poles. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 29(1):691–702, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    A comparative study of manipulator teleoperation meth- ods for debris retrieval phase in nuclear power plant decommission- ing

    Tatsuya Hashimoto Naoki Mizuno, Yuichi Tazaki and Yasuyoshi Yokokohji. A comparative study of manipulator teleoperation meth- ods for debris retrieval phase in nuclear power plant decommission- ing. Advanced Robotics, 37(9):541–559, 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    A unifying framework for transparencyoptimizedcontrollerdesigninmultilateralteleoperation with time delays.Control Engineering Practice, 117:104931, 2021

    Ugur Tumerdem and Nural Yilmaz. A unifying framework for transparencyoptimizedcontrollerdesigninmultilateralteleoperation with time delays.Control Engineering Practice, 117:104931, 2021

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    A simplified grasping strategy for under-driven dexterous hand based on geometric structure

    Yuanchen Tang and Liang He. A simplified grasping strategy for under-driven dexterous hand based on geometric structure. In2024 6th International Academic Exchange Conference on Science and Technology Innovation (IAECST), pages 1877–1881, 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Symmetric operational force compensator for bilateral teleoperation under time delay based on power flow direction

    ShuheiShimmyo,YukiSaito,TakahiroNozaki,andKouheiOhnishi. Symmetric operational force compensator for bilateral teleoperation under time delay based on power flow direction. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics (ICM), volume 1, pages 700–705, 2019

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Neural network-based passivity control of teleoperation system under time-varying delays

    Da Sun, Fazel Naghdy, and Haiping Du. Neural network-based passivity control of teleoperation system under time-varying delays. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 47(7):1666–1680, 2017

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    G. V. A. G. Asanka Perera and A. M. Harsha S. Abeykoon. Review on bilateral teleoperation with force, position, power and impedance scaling. In7thInternationalConferenceonInformationandAutoma- tion for Sustainability, pages 1–7, 2014

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    Adevelopmentofaradial-fluxmachinewithmixed-magnetrotorand non-ferromagnetic yoke for low torque ripple and rotor mass.IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2025

    PXiang,LYan,LGe,XHe,NDu,XLiu,XYang,WHua,andIChen. Adevelopmentofaradial-fluxmachinewithmixed-magnetrotorand non-ferromagnetic yoke for low torque ripple and rotor mass.IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2025

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Attitude measurement and zero offset calibration for a novel spherical actuator with tiltable stator.IEEE Transactions on Instru- mentation and Measurement, 74:1–9, 2025

    Xinghua He, Pengjie Xiang, Liang Yan, Xiaoshuai Liu, and Xuxu Yang. Attitude measurement and zero offset calibration for a novel spherical actuator with tiltable stator.IEEE Transactions on Instru- mentation and Measurement, 74:1–9, 2025

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Vision-guided manipulator operating system based on csrt algorithm

    Suwan Bu, Liang Yan, Xiaoshan Gao, Peiran Zhao, and Chee Kian Lim. Vision-guided manipulator operating system based on csrt algorithm. International Journal of Hydromechatronics, 5(3):260– 274, 2022

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Zhao, Vikash Kumar, Sergey Levine, and Chelsea Finn

    Tony Z. Zhao, Vikash Kumar, Sergey Levine, and Chelsea Finn. Learning fine-grained bimanual manipulation with low-cost hard- ware, 2023

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    A generalist agent, 2022

    Scott Reed, Konrad Zolna, Emilio Parisotto, Sergio Gomez Col- menarejo, Alexander Novikov, Gabriel Barth-Maron, Mai Gimenez, YurySulsky,JackieKay,JostTobiasSpringenberg,TomEccles,Jake Bruce, Ali Razavi, Ashley Edwards, Nicolas Heess, Yutian Chen, Raia Hadsell, Oriol Vinyals, Mahyar Bordbar, and Nando de Freitas. A generalist agent, 2022

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    HarveyStedman,BasaranBahadirKocer,MirkoKovac,andVijayM. Pawar. Vrtab-map: A configurable immersive teleoperation frame- workwithonline3dreconstruction. In 2022IEEEInternationalSym- posium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct), pages 104–110, 2022

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Task- orientatedrobotteleoperationusingwearableimus

    Qilong Yuan, Teoh Yee Seng, Qinghua Lu, and I-Ming Chen. Task- orientatedrobotteleoperationusingwearableimus. In 2017IEEEIn- ternational Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems (CIS) and IEEE Conference on Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics (RAM), pages 111–115, 2017

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Universal Manipulation Interface: In-The-Wild Robot Teaching Without In-The-Wild Robots

    ChengChi,ZhenjiaXu,ChuerPan,EricCousineau,BenjaminBurch- fiel,SiyuanFeng,RussTedrake,andShuranSong. Universalmanipu- lationinterface:In-the-wildrobotteachingwithoutin-the-wildrobots. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.10329v3, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    A first look at immersive telepresence on apple visionpro

    Ruizhi Cheng, Nan Wu, Matteo Varvello, Eugene Chai, Songqing Chen, and Bo Han. A first look at immersive telepresence on apple visionpro. InProceedingsofthe2024ACMonInternetMeasurement Conference, IMC ’24, page 555–562, New York, NY, USA, 2024. Association for Computing Machinery

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Z. Fu, T. Z. Zhao, and C. Finn. Mobile ALOHA: Learning bimanual mobile manipulation with low-cost whole-body teleoperation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.11111, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Monica M.Q. Li. A motion capture quality comparison between rokoko and kinect. In2024 IEEE International Conference on Ar- tificial Intelligence in Engineering and Technology (IICAIET), pages 239–242, 2024

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    R. A. Potamias, J. L. Zhang, J. K. Deng, and Z. Stefanos. Wilor: End-to-end3dhandlocalizationandreconstructionin-the-wild. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12259, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Safepdebacksteppingqpcontrol with high relative degree cbfs: Stefan model with actuator dynamics

    ShumonKogaandMiroslavKrstic. Safepdebacksteppingqpcontrol with high relative degree cbfs: Stefan model with actuator dynamics. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 68(12):7195–7208, 2023

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Motionaccuracyandcomputationaleffortinqp-based robot control

    Sélim Chefchaouni, Mehdi Benallegue, Adrien Escande, and Pierre- BriceWieber. Motionaccuracyandcomputationaleffortinqp-based robot control. In2024 IEEE-RAS 23rd International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), pages 129–134, 2024

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Anovelqp-basedkinematicre- dundancyresolutionmethodwithjointconstraintssatisfaction

    ŁukaszWolińskiandMarekWojtyra. Anovelqp-basedkinematicre- dundancyresolutionmethodwithjointconstraintssatisfaction. IEEE First Author et al.:Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 11 of 13 Short Title of the Article Access, 10:41023–41037, 2022

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Qp- based adaptive-gains compliance control in humanoid falls

    VincentSamy,KarimBouyarmane,andAbderrahmaneKheddar. Qp- based adaptive-gains compliance control in humanoid falls. In2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 4762–4767, 2017

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Consensus in op- erational space for robotic manipulators with task and input con- straints

    Muhammad Ali Murtaza and Seth Hutchinson. Consensus in op- erational space for robotic manipulators with task and input con- straints. In2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automa- tion (ICRA), pages 10148–10154, 2022

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Damped least-squares optimization-based singularity configuration avoidance for manipulator

    Yang li, Yukun Zheng, Yixiang Liu, Song Gao, and Rui Song. Damped least-squares optimization-based singularity configuration avoidance for manipulator. In Proceedings of the 2024 2nd Inter- national Conference on Frontiers of Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation,CFIMA’24,page560–565,NewYork,NY,USA,2025. Association for Computing Machinery

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Singularity avoidancemethodfordual-armclosed-chainsystembasedondamped least squares

    Qin Zhang, Zhenyu Liu, Hui Chai, and Yueyang Li. Singularity avoidancemethodfordual-armclosed-chainsystembasedondamped least squares. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 20(5):17298806231206940, 2023

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Hashem, Khaled A

    Muhamed M. Hashem, Khaled A. Ghamry, Amr Saleh, and Ibrahim A. Elsherif. A comparative study of pseudoinverse and dampedleastsquaresapproachesininversekinematicsfora5-dofhy- draulicarm. JournalofPhysics:ConferenceSeries ,2811(1):012002, jul 2024

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Inverse kinematicsforautonomousunderwatermanipulationsusingweighted damped least squares

    Gun Rae Cho, Mun-Jik Lee, Min-Gyu Kim, and Ji-Hong Li. Inverse kinematicsforautonomousunderwatermanipulationsusingweighted damped least squares. In 2017 14th International Conference on UbiquitousRobotsandAmbientIntelligence(URAI) ,pages765–770, 2017

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Daniele Di Vito, Ciro Natale, and Gianluca Antonelli. A comparison of damped least squares algorithms for inverse kinematics of robot manipulators **this work was supported by the european commu- nity through theprojectsrobust(h2020-690416),euroc(fp7-608849), dexrov (h2020-635491) and aeroarms (h2020-644271). IFAC- PapersOnLine, 50(1):6869–6874, 2017. 20t...

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    Motion planning for bandaging task with abnormal posture detectionandavoidance

    Zhifeng Huang, Juncheng Li, Jianping Huang, Jun Ota, and Yun Zhang. Motion planning for bandaging task with abnormal posture detectionandavoidance. IEEE/ASMETransactionsonMechatronics , 25(5):2364–2375, 2020

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Tianyu Zhang, Xiangjia Chen, Guoxin Fang, Yingjun Tian, and Charlie C. L. Wang. Singularity-aware motion planning for multi- axis additive manufacturing.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 6(4):6172–6179, 2021

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Singularity analysis and singularity avoidance trajectory planning for industrial robots

    HangZhao,BangchengZhang,XiaojingYin,ZiqiangZhang,QiXia, and Fan Zhang. Singularity analysis and singularity avoidance trajectory planning for industrial robots. In2021 China Automation Congress (CAC), pages 6164–6169, 2021

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Trajectory optimization with geometry-aware singularity avoidance for robot motion planning

    Luka Petrović, Filip Marić, Ivan Marković, Jonathan Kelly, and Ivan Petrović. Trajectory optimization with geometry-aware singularity avoidance for robot motion planning. In 2021 21st International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), pages 1760–1765, 2021

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Trajectoryplanning of omnidirectional mobile robots with active casters: Multi-motor coordination and singularity avoidance

    PeiyaoShen,YongchunFang,andXueboZhang. Trajectoryplanning of omnidirectional mobile robots with active casters: Multi-motor coordination and singularity avoidance. In2015 IEEE International Conference on Cyber Technology in Automation, Control, and Intel- ligent Systems (CYBER), pages 151–156, 2015

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    Null space projection-based design of multibeam for joint communicationandsensingsystems

    JinbaeSuh,JoonhyukKang,KawonHan,SongcheolHong,andGye- Tae Gil. Null space projection-based design of multibeam for joint communicationandsensingsystems. IEEECommunicationsLetters , 27(8):2162–2166, 2023

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Passi- vation of projection-based null space compliance control via energy tanks

    Alexander Dietrich, Christian Ott, and Stefano Stramigioli. Passi- vation of projection-based null space compliance control via energy tanks. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 1(1):184–191, 2016

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    Introducing common null space of gradients for gradient projection methods in continual learning

    Chengyi Yang, Mingda Dong, Xiaoyue Zhang, Jiayin Qi, and Aimin Zhou. Introducing common null space of gradients for gradient projection methods in continual learning. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, MM ’24, page 5489–5497, New York, NY, USA, 2024. Association for Computing Machinery

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Anantinoisedisturbancefuzzyneuraldynamicsformanipula- bilityoptimizationofomnidirectionalmobileredundantmanipulator

    Shijun Tang, Xingtian Xiao, Zhongbo Sun, Yunfeng Hu, and Hong Chen. Anantinoisedisturbancefuzzyneuraldynamicsformanipula- bilityoptimizationofomnidirectionalmobileredundantmanipulator. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 33(7):2189–2202, 2025

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Lynch and Frank C

    Kevin M. Lynch and Frank C. Park.Modern Robotics: Mechanics, Planning, and Control. Cambridge University Press, USA, 1st edition, 2017

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Quadraticprogrammingformultirobotandtask-space force control.IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 35(1):64–77, 2019

    Karim Bouyarmane, Kevin Chappellet, Joris Vaillant, and Abderrah- maneKheddar. Quadraticprogrammingformultirobotandtask-space force control.IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 35(1):64–77, 2019

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    Impedance control: An approach to manipulation

    Neville Hogan. Impedance control: An approach to manipulation. In 1984 American Control Conference, pages 304–313, 1984

    work page 1984

  43. [43]

    Albu-Schaffer, C

    A. Albu-Schaffer, C. Ott, U. Frese, and G. Hirzinger. Cartesian impedance control of redundant robots: recent results with the dlr- light-weight-arms. In 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422), volume 3, pages 3704–3709 vol.3, 2003

    work page 2003

  44. [44]

    Martin L. Felis. Rbdl: an efficient rigid-body dynamics library using recursive algorithms.Autonomous Robots, pages 1–17, 2016

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    OSQP: an operator splitting solver for quadratic programs.Mathematical Programming Computation, 12(4):637–672, 2020

    B.Stellato,G.Banjac,P.Goulart,A.Bemporad,andS.Boyd. OSQP: an operator splitting solver for quadratic programs.Mathematical Programming Computation, 12(4):637–672, 2020. Yuxuan Zhao received his BEng de- greewithadoublemajorinMechanical Engineering and Computer Engineer- ing from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. He is cur- rentlypursuing...

    work page 2020