Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Towards Linguistically-Aware and Language-Independent Tokenization for Large Language Models (LLMs)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.03568 v1 pith:3ODL5KLA submitted 2024-10-04 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords tokenizationbaselanguagesembeddingsllmsmodelsacrossdevelopment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive study on the tokenization techniques employed by state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) and their implications on the cost and availability of services across different languages, especially low resource languages. The analysis considers multiple LLMs, including GPT-4 (using cl100k_base embeddings), GPT-3 (with p50k_base embeddings), and DaVinci (employing r50k_base embeddings), as well as the widely used BERT base tokenizer. The study evaluates the tokenization variability observed across these models and investigates the challenges of linguistic representation in subword tokenization. The research underscores the importance of fostering linguistically-aware development practices, especially for languages that are traditionally under-resourced. Moreover, this paper introduces case studies that highlight the real-world implications of tokenization choices, particularly in the context of electronic health record (EHR) systems. This research aims to promote generalizable Internationalization (I18N) practices in the development of AI services in this domain and beyond, with a strong emphasis on inclusivity, particularly for languages traditionally underrepresented in AI applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Why Do Large Language Models (LLMs) Struggle to Count Letters?

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLMs' letter-counting errors are driven mainly by repeated letters in a word, not by how common the word is.

Pith tools