Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Tools and Practices for Responsible AI Engineering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.05647 v1 pith:3OLQXXTF submitted 2022-01-14 cs.LG cs.AIcs.SE

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.SE
keywords toolsresponsiblerobustnessengineeringevaluatingframeworkshydra-zenmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Responsible Artificial Intelligence (AI) - the practice of developing, evaluating, and maintaining accurate AI systems that also exhibit essential properties such as robustness and explainability - represents a multifaceted challenge that often stretches standard machine learning tooling, frameworks, and testing methods beyond their limits. In this paper, we present two new software libraries - hydra-zen and the rAI-toolbox - that address critical needs for responsible AI engineering. hydra-zen dramatically simplifies the process of making complex AI applications configurable, and their behaviors reproducible. The rAI-toolbox is designed to enable methods for evaluating and enhancing the robustness of AI-models in a way that is scalable and that composes naturally with other popular ML frameworks. We describe the design principles and methodologies that make these tools effective, including the use of property-based testing to bolster the reliability of the tools themselves. Finally, we demonstrate the composability and flexibility of the tools by showing how various use cases from adversarial robustness and explainable AI can be concisely implemented with familiar APIs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An Empirical Study on Decision-Making Aspects in Responsible Software Engineering for AI

    cs.SE 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Practitioners in AI software development report that ethical guidelines are rarely operationalized, and decision-making is driven more by personal values and organizational culture than by formal frameworks.

  2. Robust Training with Data Augmentation for Medical Imaging Classification

    eess.IV 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A one-line change to RobustAugMix, applying cross-entropy loss to adversarial examples, is benchmarked on three medical imaging datasets.

Pith tools