REVIEW 1 cited by
The Limitations of Model Uncertainty in Adversarial Settings
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
The Limitations of Model Uncertainty in Adversarial Settings
read the original abstract
Machine learning models are vulnerable to adversarial examples: minor perturbations to input samples intended to deliberately cause misclassification. While an obvious security threat, adversarial examples yield as well insights about the applied model itself. We investigate adversarial examples in the context of Bayesian neural network's (BNN's) uncertainty measures. As these measures are highly non-smooth, we use a smooth Gaussian process classifier (GPC) as substitute. We show that both confidence and uncertainty can be unsuspicious even if the output is wrong. Intriguingly, we find subtle differences in the features influencing uncertainty and confidence for most tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
LiST: Lipschitz Scaling Training for Robust and Calibrated Neural Networks
There exists a non-trivial Lipschitz constant L* that makes a network intrinsically calibrated; LiST finds it automatically via temperature feedback and produces calibrated robust models on CIFAR and Tiny-ImageNet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.