Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Embedding Words as Distributions with a Bayesian Skip-gram Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1711.11027 v2 pith:3Q5V56ED submitted 2017-11-29 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords worddensitiesembeddingembeddingsmodelpriorbayesiandensity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce a method for embedding words as probability densities in a low-dimensional space. Rather than assuming that a word embedding is fixed across the entire text collection, as in standard word embedding methods, in our Bayesian model we generate it from a word-specific prior density for each occurrence of a given word. Intuitively, for each word, the prior density encodes the distribution of its potential 'meanings'. These prior densities are conceptually similar to Gaussian embeddings. Interestingly, unlike the Gaussian embeddings, we can also obtain context-specific densities: they encode uncertainty about the sense of a word given its context and correspond to posterior distributions within our model. The context-dependent densities have many potential applications: for example, we show that they can be directly used in the lexical substitution task. We describe an effective estimation method based on the variational autoencoding framework. We also demonstrate that our embeddings achieve competitive results on standard benchmarks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Rethinking Word Similarity: Semantic Similarity through Classification Confusion

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Word Confusion measures semantic similarity as classifier confusion between contextual embeddings, matching human judgments as well as or better than cosine similarity, and enables analyst-chosen feature dimensions.

  2. Alcmean's: Unsupervised community detection using local Laplacian, automatic detection of the number of centers

    cs.SI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    ALCMeans combines Laplacian energy-based automatic center identification with DeepWalk embeddings to perform unsupervised community detection without predefining the number of communities and reports 10-20% higher NMI...

Pith tools