REVIEW 1 cited by
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
IS-CAM: Integrated Score-CAM for axiomatic-based explanations
read the original abstract
Convolutional Neural Networks have been known as black-box models as humans cannot interpret their inner functionalities. With an attempt to make CNNs more interpretable and trustworthy, we propose IS-CAM (Integrated Score-CAM), where we introduce the integration operation within the Score-CAM pipeline to achieve visually sharper attribution maps quantitatively. Our method is evaluated on 2000 randomly selected images from the ILSVRC 2012 Validation dataset, which proves the versatility of IS-CAM to account for different models and methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
How Can One Choose the Best CAM-Based Explainability Method for a CNN Model?
Manhattan and Correlation distance metrics best align CAM saliency maps with human perception on ImageNet chihuahuas, ranking LayerCAM, Score-CAM, and IS-CAM highest when compared to crowdsourced choices via RBO.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.