Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Uncertainty-Aware Explainable Recommendation with Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.03366 v1 pith:3SULU6V5 submitted 2024-01-31 cs.IR cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.IRcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords recommendationuserapproachexplainableexplanationslanguagelargellms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Providing explanations within the recommendation system would boost user satisfaction and foster trust, especially by elaborating on the reasons for selecting recommended items tailored to the user. The predominant approach in this domain revolves around generating text-based explanations, with a notable emphasis on applying large language models (LLMs). However, refining LLMs for explainable recommendations proves impractical due to time constraints and computing resource limitations. As an alternative, the current approach involves training the prompt rather than the LLM. In this study, we developed a model that utilizes the ID vectors of user and item inputs as prompts for GPT-2. We employed a joint training mechanism within a multi-task learning framework to optimize both the recommendation task and explanation task. This strategy enables a more effective exploration of users' interests, improving recommendation effectiveness and user satisfaction. Through the experiments, our method achieving 1.59 DIV, 0.57 USR and 0.41 FCR on the Yelp, TripAdvisor and Amazon dataset respectively, demonstrates superior performance over four SOTA methods in terms of explainability evaluation metric. In addition, we identified that the proposed model is able to ensure stable textual quality on the three public datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. "This Suits You the Best": Query Focused Comparative Explainable Summarization

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A two-stage LLM pipeline generates query-focused comparative summaries of recommended products, with an evaluation method that reaches 0.74 Spearman correlation with human judgments.

  2. Mind the XAI Gap: A Human-Centered LLM Framework for Democratizing Explainable AI

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An in-context LLM framework that produces dual expert and non-expert explanations, evaluated on well-being clustering with a user study and LIME-alignment metrics.

  3. Rule-Based Moral Principles for Explaining Uncertainty in Natural Language Generation

    cs.CL 2025-09 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A virtue-labeled lookup table maps coarse uncertainty tags to canned warnings or disclaimers; the only quantitative result is 50% tag accuracy on 20 author-written prompts, with trust improvements asserted but untested.

Pith tools