REVIEW 4 cited by
MathGenie: Generating Synthetic Data with Question Back-translation for Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning of LLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited great potential in mathematical reasoning. However, there remains a performance gap in this area between existing open-source models and closed-source models such as GPT-4. In this paper, we introduce MathGenie, a novel method for generating diverse and reliable math problems from a small-scale problem-solution dataset (denoted as seed data). We augment the ground-truth solutions of our seed data and train a back-translation model to translate the augmented solutions back into new questions. Subsequently, we generate code-integrated solutions for the new questions. To ensure the correctness of the code-integrated solutions, we employ rationale-based strategy for solution verification. Various pretrained models, ranging from 7B to 70B, are trained on the newly curated data to test the effectiveness of the proposed augmentation technique, resulting in a family of models known as MathGenieLM. These models consistently outperform previous open-source models across five representative mathematical reasoning datasets, achieving state-of-the-art performance. In particular, MathGenieLM-InternLM2 achieves an accuracy of 87.7% on GSM8K and 55.7% on MATH, securing the best overall score among open-source language models.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
R1-SyntheticVL: Is Synthetic Data from Generative Models Ready for Multimodal Large Language Model?
A collective adversarial data-synthesis pipeline produces 20K synthetic multimodal training examples whose GRPO-trained 7B model beats several listed open-source MLLMs on reasoning benchmarks.
-
Does Learning Mathematical Problem-Solving Generalize to Broader Reasoning?
Long chain-of-thought and RL training on math problems improves general reasoning benchmarks, while short chain-of-thought math fine-tuning often degrades performance.
-
ACT: Bridging the Gap in Code Translation through Synthetic Data Generation & Adaptive Training
An automated synthetic-data and adaptive-finetuning framework improved 7 of 8 execution-based pass@k comparisons for Java-to-Go and C++-to-Rust, but one pass@1 regressed and no external benchmark was used.
-
MDPO: Multi-Granularity Direct Preference Optimization for Mathematical Reasoning
MDPO applies a SimPO-style length-normalized reward to preference pairs built at solution, inference, and step granularities, yielding small accuracy gains on math benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.