Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Tango 2: Aligning Diffusion-based Text-to-Audio Generations through Direct Preference Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.09956 v4 pith:3V4UG476 submitted 2024-04-15 cs.SD cs.AIcs.CLeess.AS

classification cs.SDcs.AIcs.CLeess.AS
keywords audiopreferencetangotext-to-audiogenerationmodelmodelsoutput
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Generative multimodal content is increasingly prevalent in much of the content creation arena, as it has the potential to allow artists and media personnel to create pre-production mockups by quickly bringing their ideas to life. The generation of audio from text prompts is an important aspect of such processes in the music and film industry. Many of the recent diffusion-based text-to-audio models focus on training increasingly sophisticated diffusion models on a large set of datasets of prompt-audio pairs. These models do not explicitly focus on the presence of concepts or events and their temporal ordering in the output audio with respect to the input prompt. Our hypothesis is focusing on how these aspects of audio generation could improve audio generation performance in the presence of limited data. As such, in this work, using an existing text-to-audio model Tango, we synthetically create a preference dataset where each prompt has a winner audio output and some loser audio outputs for the diffusion model to learn from. The loser outputs, in theory, have some concepts from the prompt missing or in an incorrect order. We fine-tune the publicly available Tango text-to-audio model using diffusion-DPO (direct preference optimization) loss on our preference dataset and show that it leads to improved audio output over Tango and AudioLDM2, in terms of both automatic- and manual-evaluation metrics.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unified Audio Intelligence Without Regressing on Text Intelligence

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A unified 30B MoE audio-text LLM achieves state-of-the-art audio understanding, generation, and speech tasks while preserving text reasoning comparable to its text-only backbone.

  2. SemanticAudio: Audio Generation and Editing in Semantic Space

    eess.AS 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SemanticAudio improves text-to-audio alignment by generating a compact semantic plan first with a Flow Matching planner and then rendering acoustic latents from that plan, and it performs training-free audio editing b...

  3. JAM: A Tiny Flow-based Song Generator with Fine-grained Controllability and Aesthetic Alignment

    cs.SD 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    JAM is a 530M-parameter flow-matching song generator that adds word- and phoneme-level timing control and duration control, achieving strong lyric fidelity and musicality scores when ground-truth timings are provided.

  4. Generative Audio Language Modeling with Continuous-valued Tokens and Masked Next-Token Prediction

    eess.AS 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A causal audio language model with continuous-valued tokens and masked next-token prediction matches diffusion-based text-to-audio quality with smaller, streamable models.

Pith tools