Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 6 cited by

Stochastic relativistic viscous hydrodynamics from the Metropolis algorithm

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Each entropy-weighted momentum swap between fluid cells reproduces stochastic relativistic viscous hydrodynamics.

desk verdict Clean analytic proposal for Metropolis-based stochastic relativistic viscous hydrodynamics in the Density Frame, honestly flagged as numerically untested—worth refereeing, but the abstract's 'reproduces' overstates what is shown. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.10306 v3 pith:3XGFIAY3 submitted 2024-12-13 nucl-th gr-qchep-th

Jay Bhambure , Rajeev Singh , Derek Teaney This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-thgr-qchep-th PACS 47.75.+f05.40.-a25.75.-q
keywords stochasticrelativistichydrodynamicsMetropolisalgorithmDensityFrameviscousfluctuation-dissipationtheoremBjorkencoordinatesfirst-orderheavy-ioncollisions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a simulation scheme for relativistic fluids that keeps the thermal fluctuations ordinary viscous hydrodynamics discards. In each update the fluid first takes one ideal (non-viscous) step, then random amounts of spatial momentum are proposed between neighboring cells; each proposal is accepted or rejected using the entropy change as a statistical weight. The paper argues that the average effect of these swaps is exactly the viscous stress of the Density Frame, a first-order-in-time formulation of relativistic hydrodynamics, and that the accept/reject scatter automatically supplies the fluctuation-dissipation noise thermodynamics requires. If correct, the scheme offers a practical way to simulate stochastic fluid dynamics in heavy-ion collisions, including small systems and near-critical fluctuations, using only the shear viscosity, bulk viscosity, and equation of state.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Density Frame constitutive relation, with viscous stress $\Pi_{ij} = -T \kappa^{ijmn} \partial_{(m} \beta_{n)}$ and its covariant generalization, where the same tensor $\kappa^{ijmn}$ fixes both the mean dissipative stress and the variance of the proposed noise. The argument's engine is the Metropolis acceptance rule: proposals with positive entropy change are always kept, those with negative entropy change are kept with probability $e^{\Delta S}$; since $\Delta S = -\Delta t\, V_0\, \xi_{ij}\partial_{(i}\beta_{j)}$, the accept/reject bias gives the proposed noise a nonzero mean equal to the viscous stress while the remaining scatter is exactly the fluctuation-dissipation noise. The paper also derives $\kappa^{ijmn}$ from the Landau frame by shifting $\beta^\mu$ using susceptibility tensors, and shows that the same tensor follows from relativistic kinetic theory with a shifted viscous correction $\delta f$.

What would settle it

Implement the algorithm in 2+1 dimensions with a known equation of state and viscosities, and measure the mean stress and noise correlations in a controlled shear flow such as a sinusoidal velocity profile. If the measured mean stress deviates from $-T \kappa^{ijmn}\partial_{(m}\beta_{n)}$ at order $\Delta x$, or the noise variance is not $2T \kappa^{ijmn}$ per cell, then the Metropolis update does not yield exactly the claimed stochastic hydrodynamics on a finite lattice.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that each Metropolis step, consisting of an ideal hydrodynamic update followed by proposed random spatial momentum transfers accepted with the entropy weight $e^{\Delta S}$, reproduces stochastic relativistic viscous hydrodynamics in the Density Frame. Concretely, the accepted transfers produce a mean viscous stress $\langle \xi_{ij}\rangle = -T \kappa^{ijmn} \nabla_{(m} \beta_{n)}$ and noise variance $2T \kappa^{ijmn} \delta(t-t')\delta^2(r-r')$, where $\kappa^{ijmn}$ is the Density Frame viscosity and noise tensor built from the shear and bulk viscosities and the equation of state. Because the Density Frame evolution equations are first order in time and involve only the energy and momentum densities on a single spatial slice, no auxiliary dynamical fields such as $\Pi^{\mu\nu}$ are needed. The paper extends the construction to general coordinates through the $3+1$ split of general relativity; the only nontrivial complication is that proposed momentum transfers must be parallel transported from cell faces to cell centers, which generates the energy-changing viscous work terms that appear, for example, in Bjorken flow.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the discrete, corner-by-corner Metropolis update, whose mean stress is computed from a single corner at first order in the entropy change, reproduces the exact divergence structure and noise correlations of the continuum Density Frame equations once all corners are visited; the paper argues this but does not prove convergence at finite lattice spacing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Stochastic viscous relativistic hydrodynamics can be simulated with only the shear viscosity, bulk viscosity, and equation of state; no relaxation times or additional dynamical fields are required.
  • The algorithm satisfies the fluctuation-dissipation theorem by construction, because the same entropy weight produces both dissipation and noise.
  • The scheme extends to Bjorken and general curved coordinates via the $3+1$ split; parallel transport of momentum transfers yields the energy-changing viscous terms of an expanding system.
  • Combined with ideal hydrodynamics steps, the Metropolis update gives a first-order-in-time evolution suitable for small collision systems and near-critical dynamics where $1/N$ fluctuations matter.
  • The paper itself does not implement the algorithm numerically, but it provides the formulation and points to a companion numerical study of the deterministic Density Frame dynamics as the next step.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: because the algorithm is local and needs no extra parameters, it is a plausible basis for coupling stochastic fluid dynamics to critical-point models; the paper notes this possibility but does not implement it.
  • Inference: the mean stress is derived at first order in $\Delta S$ from a single lattice corner, so finite-lattice corrections might enter at order $\Delta x$; a numerical convergence test measuring stress and noise across resolutions would sharpen the regime of validity.
  • Inference: the same accept/reject construction could apply to other conserved-charge diffusion problems, not only energy and momentum, whenever a Density-Frame-type gradient expansion holds.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a Metropolis algorithm for stochastic relativistic viscous hydrodynamics in the Density Frame. Each step combines an ideal hydrodynamic update with random spatial momentum transfers between fluid cells, accepted or rejected according to the entropy change. The paper derives the Density Frame constitutive relations, evaluates the shear and bulk noise kernels κ^{ijmn}, shows how the Density Frame emerges from relativistic kinetic theory, and extends the algorithm to general coordinates including Bjorken coordinates. The central claim is that the full algorithm reproduces the Density Frame mean viscous stress −T κ^{ijmn} ∇_{(m} β_{n)} and the fluctuation-dissipation noise with variance 2T κ^{ijmn}. The paper explicitly states that the algorithm has not yet been implemented numerically.

Significance. The analytic Density Frame machinery is a valuable contribution: it provides a first-order-in-time relativistic viscous formulation with no additional dynamical fields and only shear viscosity, bulk viscosity, and the equation of state as input. The derivation of κ^{ijmn} from the Landau frame, Eqs. (38) and (54)-(58), is careful and is checked against Armas and Jain. The proposed Metropolis scheme is conceptually elegant and, if correct, would be practically important for heavy-ion and critical-point simulations. However, the headline claim that the algorithm reproduces stochastic viscous hydrodynamics is supported only by a single-corner analytic calculation and is not demonstrated numerically, so the significance is conditional on closing that gap.

major comments (4)
  1. [§IV.A, Eqs. (107)-(110)] The mean-stress derivation is performed for one corner update: Eq. (107) computes the accepted mean of ξ from a single corner, and Eq. (110) states that this gives exactly half of the cell momentum update, with the remaining half coming from another corner. The paper then asserts, without proof, that looping over all corners with a shuffled order reproduces the full discrete update (99) and hence the continuum divergence structure (98). What is missing is a demonstration that the sequential corner updates do not introduce bias or cross-correlations at finite lattice spacing, that the stencil (106) approximates ∂_{(m} β_{n)} to the required order, and that the factors of 1/2 accumulate to the correct total update. This is load-bearing because the central claim is that the full algorithm, not a single corner, reproduces stochastic viscous hydrodynamics.
  2. [§IV.A, Eqs. (92), (102), (107)-(109)] The noise part of the claim is not verified. Eq. (102) sets the proposal variance to 2T κ^{ijmn}/(Δt V0), and the paper states that the accepted noise implements the fluctuation-dissipation result (92). However, only the first moment of the accepted proposals is computed (Eqs. (107)-(109)); the second moment of the accepted moves after the accept/reject filter, which involves averages such as ⟨θ(ΔS)ξijξmn⟩ and ⟨θ(−ΔS)e^{2ΔS}ξijξmn⟩, is not evaluated. Consequently the noise variance after the complete corner loop is not shown to equal 2T κ^{ijmn}, even to leading order in Δt. Since the stochastic character of the algorithm is half of the paper's central claim, this gap needs to be closed.
  3. [§IV.B and Appendix A, Eqs. (123)-(129), (A33)-(A36)] The generalization to general coordinates is asserted by the same pattern: the mean stress is computed from one corner (Eqs. (130)-(131) and (A33)-(A34)), and then the mean update of cell A after all eight corners is stated to reproduce Eq. (118) or Eq. (A25). The discrete parallel-transport increments (123)-(124), the discrete covariant-derivative approximation (129), and the factors 1/8 and 1/4 are not shown to be consistent with the continuum equations to the relevant order. In particular, the accumulation or cancellation of the extrinsic-curvature term (125) after visiting all corners should be checked. As in the Cartesian case, an explicit finite-lattice consistency check is required.
  4. [§I.B and §V] The paper explicitly states that the Metropolis algorithm has not been implemented (Sec. I.B) and that numerical simulation is left for future work (Sec. V). The companion paper [43] tests only deterministic Density Frame hydrodynamics in 1+1D, and the earlier stochastic study [29] treats advection-diffusion rather than the Navier-Stokes system. Thus the central claim that the proposed algorithm reproduces stochastic relativistic viscous hydrodynamics is not supported by numerical evidence. A minimal test—for example, the decay of linearized sound modes or the static structure factor in a 2+1D box—would substantiate the claim and is within the scope of the present manuscript.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Appendix A.1] The text after Eq. (A10) says 'capitol letter'; this should be 'capital letter'.
  2. [§IV.A, Eq. (102)] The notation δ_{tt'}δ_{rr'} discretizes the continuum white-noise correlator (92); the paper should state the intended continuum limit and the stochastic convention (Ito versus Stratonovich) used when Δt and the cell volume are sent to zero.
  3. [§IV.A, Eq. (106)] The discrete derivative ∂xβy is introduced without explaining why this particular stencil is the natural approximation of the continuum ∂_{(x} β_{y)}; a short comment would improve readability.
  4. [Appendix A.1] The notation contrasts βi and ⃗βi (e.g., Eqs. (A6) and (A32)); a table or a sentence defining both consistently would help the reader.
  5. [References] Reference [21] gives only the journal and year; full page numbers would be useful for the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Density Frame stress tensor is independently derived and checked against an external benchmark; the Metropolis noise is injected by design, not predicted, and the mean-stress result follows from the entropy accept-reject step.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The Density Frame constitutive tensor κ is obtained by an explicit frame transformation from the Landau Frame in Sec. II.C-D (Eqs. 34-58) and re-derived from relativistic kinetic theory in Sec. III.C (Eqs. 80-87); it is checked against the independent tensor decomposition of Eq. (90) of Armas and Jain [42]. The Metropolis construction in Sec. IV does inject the FDT noise amplitude as an input: Eq. (102b) sets the proposal covariance to 2T κ/(Δt V0), which is the same transport coefficient that appears in the target mean stress and noise, Eqs. (90) and (92). This is the standard and intended way to build a Metropolis scheme (the fluctuation must be proposed, and its variance is fixed by FDT); it is not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The nontrivial derived result is the mean accepted stress: the proposal has zero mean (Eq. 102a), and the entropy weight with the half-restricted covariance converts the proposal variance into ¯Πij = -Tκ∂(mβn), Eq. (109). This reduction is a genuine consequence of the accept-reject step, not an input. Self-citations to the authors' prior advection-diffusion work [29] and the companion numerical paper [43] are motivational and are not load-bearing for the analytic derivation. The paper explicitly states that the stochastic algorithm has not been implemented numerically (Sec. I B and Sec. V); the unverified discrete-to-continuum convergence of the corner updates and the noise correlations after a full loop (Sec. IV A) are a completeness/correctness risk, but not circularity. Overall the claim does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new fitted parameters or invented entities. It relies on the Density Frame formulation of relativistic viscosity (from [40-42]), on the fluctuation-dissipation theorem to set the noise variance, and on the assumption that the discrete lattice update scheme converges to the continuum equations. These are domain assumptions rather than ad hoc constructs.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Density Frame formulation of relativistic viscous hydrodynamics provides a valid, first-order-in-time description equivalent to Landau-Lifshitz hydrodynamics at the relevant order.
    The entire algorithm is built on this formulation, adopted from [42] and predecessors [40,41]; the paper clarifies it but does not prove its equivalence to more standard formulations beyond the derivations in Secs. II and III.
  • domain assumption The thermal state is the microcanonical ensemble P[E,M] ∝ exp(∫S) δ(constants), and the ideal hydrodynamics step is a reversible update preserving this measure.
    Assumed in Sec. IV.A (Eq. 91) and in the operator-splitting argument; needed for the Metropolis step to equilibrate correctly.
  • domain assumption The entropy change from a proposed momentum transfer is small enough that exp(ΔS) ≈ 1 + ΔS is accurate; the linearized Metropolis acceptance yields the correct mean stress.
    Used in Eqs. (107)-(109); corrections at finite Δt are not quantified.
  • domain assumption The proposed noise ξ^{ij} is Gaussian with variance fixed by the fluctuation-dissipation theorem, 2T κ^{ijmn}.
    This is the standard FDT relation (Eq. 92) used to set the proposal variance.
  • standard math In the kinetic theory derivation (Sec. III), the linearized Boltzmann collision operator and the frame conditions lead to a unique first-order correction δf.
    Standard kinetic theory assumptions; the zero-mode ambiguity is resolved by the frame condition (83).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stochastic relativistic viscous hydrodynamics from the Metropolis algorithm." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3XGFIAY3

@misc{pith2026241210306,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stochastic relativistic viscous hydrodynamics from the Metropolis algorithm},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3XGFIAY3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.10306}
}
abstract

We propose an algorithm for simulating stochastic relativistic fluid dynamics based on Metropolis updates. Each step of the algorithm begins with an update based on ideal hydrodynamics. This is followed by proposing random (spatial) momentum transfers between fluid cells, keeping the total energy fixed. These proposals are then accepted or rejected using the change in entropy as a statistical weight. The algorithm reproduces relativistic viscous hydrodynamics in the ``Density Frame", which is a formulation of viscous hydrodynamics we review and clarify here. This formulation is first order in time and requires no auxiliary dynamical fields such as $\Pi^{\mu\nu}$. The only parameters are the shear and bulk viscosities and the equation of state. By adopting the 3+1 split of general relativity, we extend the Metropolis algorithm to general space-time coordinates, such as Bjorken coordinates, which are commonly used to simulate heavy-ion collisions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.10306 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Update of fluid cell [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Noncovariant parabolic theories of relativistic diffusion

    gr-qc 2025-05 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A quantitative analysis shows that observer-dependent effects in a new relativistic diffusion theory scale like the square root of time, slower than standard truncation errors, yet remain finite as speeds approach light.

  2. Relativistic Viscous Hydrodynamics in the Density Frame: Numerical Tests and Comparisons

    nucl-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In 1+1D tests, Density Frame hydrodynamics matches QCD kinetic theory within the hydrodynamic regime and remains stable where BDNK and some second-order schemes develop oscillations or fail.

  3. Critical fluid dynamics in two and three dimensions

    nucl-th 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Direct numerical simulations of stochastic model H give a dynamic critical exponent z ≈ 3 in 3D and z ≈ 2 in 2D, with a crossover from mean-field z = 4 controlled by the renormalized shear viscosity.

  4. Relativistic Dispersion Spectra across Lorentz boosted frames: Spurious modes and the enigma of causality

    hep-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Rest-frame dispersion modes can be mapped into Lorentz-boosted frames through a parametric re-parametrization; the boost-generated 'spurious' roots appear exactly when the mode count is not conserved, which the author...

  5. Mapping Sparse Triangular Solves to GPUs via Fine-grained Domain Decomposition

    cs.PF 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A domain-decomposition scheme sizes subdomains to GPU shared memory to remove synchronization from sparse triangular solves, reporting 10.7x and 3.2x speedups for triangular solves and ILU0-BiCGSTAB on the AMD MI210.

  6. Theoretical Review of Critical Point Predictions

    nucl-th 2026-08 conditional

    A review of QCD critical point theory structured around the maximum entropy freeze-out framework for connecting hydrodynamic fluctuations to proton factorial cumulants, plus the dynamics of critical fluctuations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers

  1. [43]

    M¨ uller, Zum paradoxon der w¨ armeleitungstheorie, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik198, 329 (1967)

    I. M¨ uller, Zum paradoxon der w¨ armeleitungstheorie, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik198, 329 (1967)

    1967

  2. [29]

    Bazavov et al

    A. Bazavov et al. (HotQCD), Chiral crossover in QCD at zero and non-zero chemical poten- tials, Phys. Lett. B 795, 15 (2019), arXiv:1812.08235 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2019

  3. [1]

    Outlook 23 Acknowledgments 24 A

    Updates and parallel transport 22 V. Outlook 23 Acknowledgments 24 A. The Metropolis algorithm in general coordinates 24

    work page

  4. [2]

    The Density Frame from the Landau Frame 9 D

    Density Frame 9 C. The Density Frame from the Landau Frame 9 D. Explicit evaluation of the viscous stress tensor in the Density Frame 11 III. The Density Frame from relativistic kinetics 13 A. Preliminaries 13 B. The Landau Frame 15 C. The Density Frame 16 IV. Stochastic hydrodynamics in the Density Frame and the Metropolis algorithm 17 A. Cartesian coord...

    work page

  5. [3]

    Covariant conservation laws 26

    work page

  6. [4]

    non-hydrodynamic

    Metropolis dynamics in general coordinates 27 References 28 I. INTRODUCTION A. Physical motivation Nuclear collisions at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider and the Large Hadron Collider exhibit remarkable collective flows which are well described by relativistic viscous hydrody- namics without noise [1]. Current Bayesian fits to the rich phenomenology of...

    work page

  7. [5]

    (27) As always, the viscous stress Π µν is expanded in strains ∂(µβν)

    Landau Frame In the Landau Frame, the parameters βµ are chosen such that βµT µν = −e(β)βν , or βµΠµν(β) = 0 . (27) As always, the viscous stress Π µν is expanded in strains ∂(µβν). However, not all of the gradients in this set are independent, since the four ideal equations of motion X µνρ∂νβρ = 0 can be used to express temporal gradients uµ∂µβν in terms ...

    work page

  8. [6]

    With this choice, the energy per volume T 00 = E and momentum per volume M i = T 0i determine the temperature and flow velocity βµ

    Density Frame In the Density Frame, the parameters βµ are chosen such that nµT µν = nµT µν(β) , or nµΠµν(β) = 0 , (29) where nµ = (1 , 0, 0, 0) notates the lab frame 6. With this choice, the energy per volume T 00 = E and momentum per volume M i = T 0i determine the temperature and flow velocity βµ. In all other hydrodynamic frames this data is insufficie...

    work page

Show all 64 references
  1. [7]

    dΣ(3) as shown Fig

    Updates and parallel transport The proposed noise is generated at the corner of the fluid cell A, at the intersection of the planes 9 dΣ(1) . . .dΣ(3) as shown Fig. 1. The three-momentum transfer pi through the surface with normal in the (1) direction is pµ (1) = pi (1)eµ i , ...

  2. [8]

    The material presented here is standard and we recommend the review article [53]

    Preliminaries The formalism of the Density Frame and the Metropolis updates fit naturally within the 3 + 1 split of general relativity. The material presented here is standard and we recommend the review article [53]. The space time metric is decomposed as follows ds2 = −N 2dt...

  3. [9]

    Covariant conservation laws We use the 3 + 1 decomposition of space-time, and write out the covariant conservation laws ∇νT µν = 0, with the decomposition of T µν in (18). The equation of energy conservation reads [53] ∂ ∂t − N i∂i (√γE) + √γ Di(N Mi) + N Miai − N √γKijS ij = ...

  4. [10]

    IV B closely and thus we will be quite brief

    Metropolis dynamics in general coordinates This section parallels Sect. IV B closely and thus we will be quite brief. The proposed noise follows eq. (120) and eq. (102) with the following replacements and identifications: (∆t or ∆ τ ) → N ∆t , V 0 ≡ √γ dr1dr2dr3 . (A27) The mo...

  5. [11]

    Heinz and R

    U. Heinz and R. Snellings, Collective flow and viscosity in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63, 123 (2013), arXiv:1301.2826 [nucl-th]

    2013 arXiv

  6. [12]

    J. E. Bernhard, J. S. Moreland, and S. A. Bass, Bayesian estimation of the specific shear and bulk viscosity of quark–gluon plasma, Nature Phys. 15, 1113 (2019)

    2019

  7. [13]

    G. Nijs, W. van der Schee, U. G¨ ursoy, and R. Snellings, Transverse momentum differential global analysis of heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 202301 (2021)

    2021

  8. [14]

    Everett et al

    D. Everett et al. (JETSCAPE), Multisystem bayesian constraints on the transport coefficients of qcd matter, Phys. Rev. C 103, 054904 (2021)

    2021

  9. [15]

    Heffernan, Quantification of the Quark-Gluon Plasma with statistical learning, Ph.D

    M. Heffernan, Quantification of the Quark-Gluon Plasma with statistical learning, Ph.D. thesis, McGill U. (2023)

    2023

  10. [16]

    Kovtun, D

    P. Kovtun, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 111601 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0405231

    2005 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Kovtun, Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories, J

    P. Kovtun, Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories, J. Phys. A 45, 473001 (2012), arXiv:1205.5040 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  12. [18]

    Akamatsu, A

    Y. Akamatsu, A. Mazeliauskas, and D. Teaney, A kinetic regime of hydrodynamic fluctuations and long time tails for a Bjorken expansion, Phys. Rev. C95, 014909 (2017), arXiv:1606.07742 [nucl-th]

    2017 arXiv

  13. [19]

    X. An, G. Basar, M. Stephanov, and H.-U. Yee, Relativistic Hydrodynamic Fluctuations, Phys. Rev. C 100, 024910 (2019), arXiv:1902.09517 [hep-th]. 28

    2019 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Adare et al

    A. Adare et al. (PHENIX), Measurements of elliptic and triangular flow in high- multiplicity 3He+Au collisions at √sN N = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 142301 (2015), arXiv:1507.06273 [nucl-ex]

    2015

  15. [21]

    Khachatryan et al

    V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS), Evidence for Collective Multiparticle Correlations in p-Pb Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 012301 (2015), arXiv:1502.05382 [nucl-ex]

    2015 arXiv

  16. [22]

    ALICE (ALICE), Letter of intent for ALICE 3: A next generation heavy-ion experiment at the LHC , Tech. Rep. (CERN, Geneva, 2022) 202 pages, 103 captioned figures, 19 tables, arXiv:2211.02491

    2022 arXiv

  17. [23]

    Expression of Interest for an ALICE ITS Upgrade in LS3 (2018)

    2018

  18. [24]

    L. Du, A. Sorensen, and M. Stephanov, The QCD phase diagram and Beam Energy Scan physics: a theory overview, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 33, 2430008 (2024), arXiv:2402.10183 [nucl- th]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Kaczmarek, F

    O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, A. Lahiri, L. Mazur, and C. Schmidt, QCD phase transition in the chiral limit (2020) arXiv:2003.07920 [hep-lat]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [26]

    Grossi, A

    E. Grossi, A. Soloviev, D. Teaney, and F. Yan, Soft pions and transport near the chiral critical point, Phys. Rev. D 104, 034025 (2021), arXiv:2101.10847 [nucl-th]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [27]

    W.-j. Fu, J. M. Pawlowski, and F. Rennecke, QCD phase structure at finite temperature and density, Phys. Rev. D 101, 054032 (2020), arXiv:1909.02991 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Borsanyi, Z

    S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J. N. Guenther, R. Kara, S. D. Katz, P. Parotto, A. Pasztor, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabo, QCD Crossover at Finite Chemical Potential from Lattice Simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 052001 (2020), arXiv:2002.02821 [hep-lat]

    2020 arXiv

  23. [30]

    D. A. Clarke, P. Dimopoulos, F. Di Renzo, J. Goswami, C. Schmidt, S. Singh, and K. Zambello, Searching for the QCD critical point using Lee-Yang edge singularities, PoS LA TTICE2023, 168 (2024), arXiv:2401.08820 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Fox and G

    R. Fox and G. Uhlenbeck, Contributions to non-equilibrium thermodynamics. i. theory of hydrodynamical fluctuations, Physics of Fluids 13 (1970)

    1970

  25. [32]

    P. J. Rossky, J. D. Doll, and H. L. Friedman, Brownian dynamics as smart Monte Carlo simulation, The Journal of Chemical Physics 69, 4628 (1978)

    1978

  26. [33]

    Duane, A

    S. Duane, A. Kennedy, B. J. Pendleton, and D. Roweth, Hybrid monte carlo, Physics Letters B 195, 216 (1987)

    1987

  27. [34]

    G. D. Moore, The Sphaleron rate: Bodeker’s leading log, Nucl. Phys. B 568, 367 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9810313

    2000 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Grmela and H

    M. Grmela and H. C. ¨Ottinger, Dynamics and thermodynamics of complex fluids. i. develop- ment of a general formalism, Phys. Rev. E 56, 6620 (1997)

    1997

  29. [36]

    Florio, E

    A. Florio, E. Grossi, A. Soloviev, and D. Teaney, Dynamics of the O(4) critical point in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 105, 054512 (2022), arXiv:2111.03640 [hep-lat]

    2022 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Florio, E

    A. Florio, E. Grossi, and D. Teaney, Dynamics of the O(4) critical point in QCD: Critical pions and diffusion in model G, Phys. Rev. D 109, 054037 (2024), arXiv:2306.06887 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Chattopadhyay, J

    C. Chattopadhyay, J. Ott, T. Schaefer, and V. V. Skokov, Simulations of Stochastic Fluid Dynamics near a Critical Point in the Phase Diagram, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 032301 (2024), arXiv:2403.10608 [nucl-th]. 29

    2024 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Ba¸ sar, J

    G. Ba¸ sar, J. Bhambure, R. Singh, and D. Teaney, Stochastic relativistic advection diffusion equation from the Metropolis algorithm, Phys. Rev. C 110, 044903 (2024), arXiv:2403.04185 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [40]

    W. A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, Generic instabilities in first-order dissipative relativistic fluid theories, Phys. Rev. D 31, 725 (1985)

    1985

  34. [41]

    Gavassino, Bounds on transport from hydrodynamic stability, Physics Letters B 840, 137854 (2023)

    L. Gavassino, Bounds on transport from hydrodynamic stability, Physics Letters B 840, 137854 (2023)

    2023

  35. [42]

    Gavassino, Can We Make Sense of Dissipation without Causality?, Phys

    L. Gavassino, Can We Make Sense of Dissipation without Causality?, Phys. Rev. X 12, 041001 (2022), arXiv:2111.05254 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Israel, Nonstationary irreversible thermodynamics: A Causal relativistic theory, Annals Phys

    W. Israel, Nonstationary irreversible thermodynamics: A Causal relativistic theory, Annals Phys. 100, 310 (1976)

    1976

  37. [45]

    Israel and J

    W. Israel and J. M. Stewart, Transient relativistic thermodynamics and kinetic theory, Annals Phys. 118, 341 (1979)

    1979

  38. [46]

    R. P. Geroch and L. Lindblom, Dissipative relativistic fluid theories of divergence type, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1855 (1990)

    1990

  39. [47]

    H. C. ¨Ottinger, Relativistic and nonrelativistic description of fluids with anisotropic heat conduction, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 254, 433 (1998)

    1998

  40. [48]

    G. S. Denicol, H. Niemi, E. Molnar, and D. H. Rischke, Derivation of transient relativistic fluid dynamics from the Boltzmann equation, Phys. Rev. D 85, 114047 (2012), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 91, 039902 (2015)], arXiv:1202.4551 [nucl-th]

    2012 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Lindblom, The Relaxation effect in dissipative relativistic fluid theories, Annals Phys

    L. Lindblom, The Relaxation effect in dissipative relativistic fluid theories, Annals Phys. 247, 1 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9508058

    1996 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Novak, J

    I. Novak, J. Sonner, and B. Withers, Hydrodynamics without boosts, JHEP 07, 165, arXiv:1911.02578 [hep-th]

    1911 arXiv

  43. [51]

    de Boer, J

    J. de Boer, J. Hartong, E. Have, N. A. Obers, and W. Sybesma, Non-Boost Invariant Fluid Dynamics, SciPost Phys. 9, 018 (2020), arXiv:2004.10759 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Armas and A

    J. Armas and A. Jain, Effective field theory for hydrodynamics without boosts, SciPost Phys. 11, 054 (2021), arXiv:2010.15782 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Bhambure, A

    J. Bhambure, A. Mazeliauskas, J.-F. Paquet, R. Singh, M. Singh, D. Teaney, and F. Zhou, Relativistic Viscous Hydrodynamics in the Density Frame: Numerical Tests and Comparisons, (2024), arXiv:2412.10303 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Manohar and M

    A. Manohar and M. Wise, Heavy Quark Physics , Cambridge Monographs on Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology (Cambridge University Press, 2000)

    2000

  47. [55]

    F. S. Bemfica, M. M. Disconzi, and J. Noronha, Causality and existence of solutions of rela- tivistic viscous fluid dynamics with gravity, Phys. Rev. D98, 104064 (2018), arXiv:1708.06255 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Kovtun, First-order relativistic hydrodynamics is stable, JHEP 10, 034, arXiv:1907.08191 [hep-th]

    P. Kovtun, First-order relativistic hydrodynamics is stable, JHEP 10, 034, arXiv:1907.08191 [hep-th]

    1907 arXiv

  49. [57]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics: Course of Theoretical Physics , Vol. 6 (Elsevier, 2013)

    2013

  50. [58]

    Jensen, M

    K. Jensen, M. Kaminski, P. Kovtun, R. Meyer, A. Ritz, and A. Yarom, Towards hydrody- namics without an entropy current, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 101601 (2012), arXiv:1203.3556 [hep-th]. 30

    2012 arXiv

  51. [59]

    R. F. Fox and G. E. Uhlenbeck, Contributions to nonequilibrium thermodynamics. ii. fluctuation theory for the boltzmann equation, The Physics of Fluids 13, 2881 (1970), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/pfl/article-pdf/13/12/2881/12261085/2881 1 online.pdf

    1970

  52. [60]

    P. B. Arnold, G. D. Moore, and L. G. Yaffe, Transport coefficients in high temperature gauge theories. 1. Leading log results, JHEP 11, 001, arXiv:hep-ph/0010177

    arXiv

  53. [61]

    J. D. Bjorken, Highly Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions: The Central Rapidity Region, Phys. Rev. D 27, 140 (1983)

    1983

  54. [62]

    Danielewicz and M

    P. Danielewicz and M. Gyulassy, Dissipative Phenomena in Quark Gluon Plasmas, Phys. Rev. D 31, 53 (1985)

    1985

  55. [63]

    Gourgoulhon, 3+1 Formalism in General Relativity , Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer,

    E. Gourgoulhon, 3+1 Formalism in General Relativity , Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer,

  56. [2012]

    arXiv:gr-qc/0703035 [gr-qc]. 31

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.