Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Shedding Light on the Galaxy Luminosity Function

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1106.2039 v3 pith:3XML4X5P submitted 2011-06-10 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GAastro-ph.IM

Shedding Light on the Galaxy Luminosity Function

classification astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GAastro-ph.IM
keywords statisticalfunctiongalaxyluminositymethodssomebeeneffects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

From as early as the 1930s, astronomers have tried to quantify the statistical nature of the evolution and large-scale structure of galaxies by studying their luminosity distribution as a function of redshift - known as the galaxy luminosity function (LF). Accurately constructing the LF remains a popular and yet tricky pursuit in modern observational cosmology where the presence of observational selection effects due to e.g. detection thresholds in apparent magnitude, colour, surface brightness or some combination thereof can render any given galaxy survey incomplete and thus introduce bias into the LF. Over the last seventy years there have been numerous sophisticated statistical approaches devised to tackle these issues; all have advantages -- but not one is perfect. This review takes a broad historical look at the key statistical tools that have been developed over this period, discussing their relative merits and highlighting any significant extensions and modifications. In addition, the more generalised methods that have emerged within the last few years are examined. These methods propose a more rigorous statistical framework within which to determine the LF compared to some of the more traditional methods. I also look at how photometric redshift estimations are being incorporated into the LF methodology as well as considering the construction of bivariate LFs. Finally, I review the ongoing development of completeness estimators which test some of the fundamental assumptions going into LF estimators and can be powerful probes of any residual systematic effects inherent magnitude-redshift data.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Formalizing Galaxy Population Evolution: Drift and Mergers as Transport Processes on Manifolds

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Galaxy evolution is recast as transport of probability measures on a state manifold, with luminosity functions emerging as projections of a single dynamics.

  2. Little Red Dots at z~2 in EIGER reveal a gentle decline with respect to their peak number density at z~5

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Five LRDs at z≈2 yield number density ≈7×10^{-6} cMpc^{-3}, confirming a decline from the z≈5 peak but gentler than prior photometric estimates.