The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2406.18842 · v3 · pith:3YZDDGNZ · submitted 2024-05-26 · cs.CY · cs.AI· cs.CL

The global landscape of academic guidelines for generative AI and Large Language Models

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:3YZDDGNZrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CY cs.AIcs.CL
keywords ethicalaccessgloballlmsacademiaacademicbenefitsconsiderations
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) in academia has spurred a global discourse on their potential pedagogical benefits and ethical considerations. Positive reactions highlight some potential, such as collaborative creativity, increased access to education, and empowerment of trainers and trainees. However, negative reactions raise concerns about ethical complexities, balancing innovation and academic integrity, unequal access, and misinformation risks. Through a systematic survey and text-mining-based analysis of global and national directives, insights from independent research, and eighty university-level guidelines, this study provides a nuanced understanding of the opportunities and challenges posed by GAI and LLMs in education. It emphasizes the importance of balanced approaches that harness the benefits of these technologies while addressing ethical considerations and ensuring equitable access and educational outcomes. The paper concludes with recommendations for fostering responsible innovation and ethical practices to guide the integration of GAI and LLMs in academia.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.