REVIEW 5 cited by
Machine Unlearning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Once users have shared their data online, it is generally difficult for them to revoke access and ask for the data to be deleted. Machine learning (ML) exacerbates this problem because any model trained with said data may have memorized it, putting users at risk of a successful privacy attack exposing their information. Yet, having models unlearn is notoriously difficult. We introduce SISA training, a framework that expedites the unlearning process by strategically limiting the influence of a data point in the training procedure. While our framework is applicable to any learning algorithm, it is designed to achieve the largest improvements for stateful algorithms like stochastic gradient descent for deep neural networks. SISA training reduces the computational overhead associated with unlearning, even in the worst-case setting where unlearning requests are made uniformly across the training set. In some cases, the service provider may have a prior on the distribution of unlearning requests that will be issued by users. We may take this prior into account to partition and order data accordingly, and further decrease overhead from unlearning. Our evaluation spans several datasets from different domains, with corresponding motivations for unlearning. Under no distributional assumptions, for simple learning tasks, we observe that SISA training improves time to unlearn points from the Purchase dataset by 4.63x, and 2.45x for the SVHN dataset, over retraining from scratch. SISA training also provides a speed-up of 1.36x in retraining for complex learning tasks such as ImageNet classification; aided by transfer learning, this results in a small degradation in accuracy. Our work contributes to practical data governance in machine unlearning.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Unlearning as Distribution Restoration: A Controlled Counterfactual Study, a Validated Selective Screen, and the Limits of Oracle-Free Certification
Matching a retrained oracle on trained probes can certify models that still retain held-out forget knowledge, and oracle-free unlearning certification is only possible for counterfactual, non-inferable facts.
-
GUDA: Counterfactual Group-wise Training Data Attribution for Diffusion Models via Unlearning
GUDA approximates leave-one-group-out counterfactual models with unlearning and ranks group influence by ELBO differences.
-
Evaluating the Dynamics of Membership Privacy in Deep Learning
Per-sample membership vulnerability is established early in training, especially for hard-to-learn examples, and can be tracked on an FPR-TPR plane.
-
When unlearning is free: leveraging low influence points to reduce computational costs
Low-influence training points can be dropped from forget/retain sets before unlearning, cutting runtime up to ~50% with little measured loss in accuracy or MIA-based privacy.
-
Forget-MI: Machine Unlearning for Forgetting Multimodal Information in Healthcare Settings
Forget-MI unlearns unimodal and joint embeddings of patient data in a multimodal chest X-ray model, reducing membership inference attack success by 0.202 while preserving only part of the original test performance.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.