REVIEW
Further Refining Swampland dS Conjecture in Mimetic f(G) Gravity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Further Refining Swampland dS Conjecture in Mimetic f(G) Gravity
abstract
Mimetic gravity analysis has been studied as a theory in various types of general relativity extensions, such as mimetic f(R) gravity, mimetic f(R, T) gravity, mimetic f(R, G) gravity, etc., in the literature. This paper presents a set of equations arising from mimetic conditions and studies cosmic inflation with a combination of mimetic f(G) gravity and swampland dS conjectures. We analyze and evaluate these results. Therefore, we first thoroughly introduce the mimetic f(G) gravity and calculate some cosmological parameters such as the scalar spectral index, the tensor-to-scalar ratio, and the slow-roll parameters. Also, we investigate the potential according to the mimetic f(G) gravity. Then we will challenge the swampland dS conjectures with this condition. By expressing the coefficient of swampland dS conjectures viz $C_{1}$ and $C_2$ in terms of $n_{s}$ and $r$, we plot some figures and determine the allowable range for each of these cosmological parameters and these coefficients, and finally, compare these results with observable data such as Planck and BICEP2/Keck array data. We show $C_{1}$ and $C_2$ are not $\mathcal{O}(1)$, so the refining swampland dS conjecture is not satisfied for this inflationary model. Then we examine it with further refining swampland dS conjecture, which has a series of free parameters such as $a,b>0$, $q>2$, and $a+b=1$. By adjusting these parameters, the compatibility of the mentioned conjecture with the inflationary model can be discussed. We determine the further refining swampland dS conjecture is satisfied. when $a < \frac{1}{1.00489}=0.99513$, we can always find $a$, $b$ and $q$ whose value is larger than 2, viz for $q=2.4$, we find $0.99185\leq a < 1$, which we can choose $a=0.99235$ according to the condition $a < 0.99513$. Also we know $b=1-a$, so we will have $1-0.99235=0.00765 > 0$.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.