pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.06280 · v1 · pith:4DHU723Hnew · submitted 2019-07-14 · ✦ hep-th

Noncommutative Gauge Theories and Gravity

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 21:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords theoriesgaugegravitynoncommutativebrieflydimensionsfourprocedure
0
0 comments X

The pith

The paper reviews gauge-theoretic formulations of gravity in ordinary and noncommutative spaces based on the authors' earlier works.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors first recall standard ways to write general relativity as a gauge theory in three and four dimensions and extend the same logic to Weyl gravity. They then turn to noncommutative spaces, where coordinates do not commute, and review their own recent papers that build gravity models inside that framework. The goal is to keep the gauge-theory structure while incorporating noncommutativity, which is sometimes proposed as a way to handle quantum effects at very small distances. Because the text is a review, it organizes and connects existing constructions rather than deriving new equations or presenting fresh data.

Core claim

Gravity models can be constructed as gauge theories on noncommutative spaces, as shown in the authors' recent works reviewed here.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the noncommutative deformation of spacetime preserves enough structure to recover classical gravity while allowing a consistent gauge-theory formulation (invoked when moving from the commutative review to the noncommutative constructions).

read the original abstract

First, we briefly review the description of gravity theories as gauge theories in three and four dimensions. Specifically, we recall the procedure in which the results of General Relativity in three and four dimensions are recovered in a gauge-theoretic approach. Also, the procedure is applied for the case of the Weyl gravity, too. Then, after reminding briefly the formulation of gauge theories on noncommutative spaces, we review our most recent works in which gravity models are constructed as gauge theories on noncommutative spaces.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review that first recalls the gauge-theoretic formulations of General Relativity and Weyl gravity in three and four dimensions in the commutative case, including the procedures used to recover the standard results, and then summarizes the formulation of gauge theories on noncommutative spaces together with the authors' recent constructions of gravity models in that setting.

Significance. If the constructions reviewed hold, the paper provides a compact compilation of how gauge-theoretic gravity extends to noncommutative deformations while recovering classical limits. Its value lies in organizing the authors' prior results into a single narrative; no new derivations, theorems, or computations are presented.

minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the transition sentence from the commutative review to the noncommutative constructions does not indicate which specific noncommutative models or dimensions receive the most attention, making the scope of the review harder to assess at first reading.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from an explicit list or table in the introduction or conclusion that maps each reviewed noncommutative construction to its corresponding commutative counterpart and to the original reference, improving traceability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review and recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments were provided in the report, so we will incorporate any minor editorial improvements in the revised version while preserving the review nature of the manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; review paper without internal derivation

full rationale

The manuscript is a review that first recalls standard commutative gauge-theoretic formulations of gravity (including Weyl gravity) and then summarizes the authors' prior constructions on noncommutative spaces. No new derivation, theorem, prediction, or first-principles result is presented whose steps can be examined. The abstract and structure explicitly frame the work as a review of existing results rather than a self-contained derivation chain. No equations or claims reduce by construction to inputs within this paper. Self-citations are present by design of a review but do not create load-bearing circularity here, as the paper makes no independent claim whose validity depends on unverified self-reference.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is a review and introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities in the provided abstract; all content rests on standard gauge-theory and general-relativity assumptions plus the authors' prior constructions.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Gauge theories can be formulated on noncommutative spaces while retaining a consistent notion of curvature and action
    Invoked when the review transitions from commutative to noncommutative constructions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5602 in / 1096 out tokens · 36304 ms · 2026-05-24T21:30:18.442923+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 96 canonical work pages · 54 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Utiyama, Phys

    R. Utiyama, Phys. Rev. 101 (1956) 1597. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.101.1597

  2. [2]

    T. W . B. Kibble, J. Math. Phys. 2 (1961) 212. doi:10.1063/1.1703702

  3. [3]

    K. S. Stelle and P . C. West, Phys. Rev. D 21 (1980) 1466. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.21.1466

  4. [4]

    S. W . MacDowell and F. Mansouri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 739 Erratum: [Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1376]. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.38.1376, 10.1103 /PhysRevLett.38.739

  5. [5]

    E. A. Ivanov and J. Niederle, Conference: C80-06-23.3, p .545-551, 1980; E. A. Ivanov and J. Niederle, Phys. Rev. D 25 (1982) 976. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.25.976; E. A. Ivanov and J. Niederle, Phys. Rev. D 25 (1982) 988. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.25.988

  6. [6]

    T. W . B. Kibble and K. S. Stelle, In Ezawa, H. ( Ed.), Kamefu chi, S. ( Ed.): Progress In Quantum Field Theory, 57-81

  7. [7]

    Gauge Theory of the Conformal and Superconformal Group,

    M. Kaku, P . K. Townsend and P . van Nieuwenhuizen, “Gauge Theory of the Conformal and Superconformal Group,” Phys. Lett. 69B (1977) 304. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(77)90552-4

  8. [8]

    Conformal Supergravit y,

    E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, “Conformal Supergravit y,” Phys. Rept. 119 (1985) 233. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(85)90138-3

  9. [9]

    Supergravity,

    D. Z. Freedman and A. V an Proeyen “Supergravity,” Cambri dge University Press, 2012

  10. [10]

    Supersymmetry and higher spin field s

    A. H. Chamseddine, “Supersymmetry and higher spin field s”, PhD Thesis, (1976)

  11. [11]

    A. H. Chamseddine and P . C. West, Nucl. Phys. B 129 (1977) 39. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90018-9

  12. [12]

    (2+1)-Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly So luble System,

    E. Witten, “(2+1)-Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly So luble System,” Nucl. Phys. B 311 (1988) 46

  13. [13]

    Connes A., Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA, 1994

  14. [14]

    257, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999

    Madore J., London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Se ries, V ol. 257, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999

  15. [15]

    Madore, Class

    J. Madore, Class. Quant. Grav. 9 (1992) 69. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/9/1/008 18 Noncommutatve gravity G. Manolakos

  16. [16]

    Buric M., Grammatikopoulos T., Madore J., Zoupanos G., JHEP 0604 (2006) 054; Buric M., Madore J., Zoupanos G., SIGMA 3:125,2007, arXiv:0712.4024 [hep-t h]

  17. [17]

    On the ultraviolet behaviour of quantum fields over noncommutative manifolds

    T. Filk, Phys. Lett. B 376 (1996) 53; J. C. Várilly and J. M . Gracia-Bondía, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 14 (1999) 1305 [hep-th/9804001]; M. Chaichian, A. Demichev an d P . Presnajder, Nucl. Phys. B 567 (2000) 360, hepth/ 9812180; S. Minwalla, M. V an Raamsdonk an d N. Seiberg, JHEP 0002 (2000) 020, hep-th/9912072

  18. [18]

    Renormalisation of \phi^4-theory on noncommutative R^4 to all orders

    H. Grosse and R. Wulkenhaar, Lett. Math. Phys. 71 (2005) 13, hep-th/0403232

  19. [19]

    Exact renormalization of a noncommutative \phi^3 model in 6 dimensions

    H. Grosse and H. Steinacker, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 12 ( 2008) 605, hep-th/0607235; H. Grosse and H. Steinacker, Nucl. Phys. B 707 (2005) 145, hep-th/0407089

  20. [20]

    Connes A., Lott J., Nuclear Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 18 (1991 ), 29-47; Chamseddine A.H., Connes A., Comm. Math. Phys. 186 (1997), 731-750, hep-th/9606001; Cha mseddine A.H., Connes A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007), 191601, arXiv:0706.3690

  21. [21]

    Martín C.P ., Gracia-Bondía M.J., Várilly J.C., Phys. R ep. 294 (1998), 363-406, hep-th/9605001

  22. [22]

    Dubois-Violette M., Madore J., Kerner R., Phys. Lett. B 217 (1989), 485-488; Dubois-Violette M., Madore J., Kerner R., Classical Quantum Gravity 6 (1989), 17 09-1724; Dubois-Violette M., Kerner R., Madore J., J. Math. Phys. 31 (1990), 323-330

  23. [23]

    Madore J., Phys. Lett. B 305 (1993), 84-89; Madore J., (S obotka Castle, 1992), Fund. Theories Phys., V ol. 52, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 1993, 285-298. hep-ph/9209226

  24. [24]

    Connes A., Douglas M.R., Schwarz A., JHEP (1998), no.2, 003, hep-th/9711162

  25. [25]

    Seiberg N., Witten E., JHEP (1999), no.9, 032, hep-th/9 908142

  26. [26]

    N.Ishibashi, H.Kawai, Y .Kitazawa and A.Tsuchiya, Nuc l. Phys. B498 (1997) 467, arXiv:hep-th/9612115

  27. [27]

    Jur ˇco B., Schraml S., Schupp P ., Wess J., Eur. Phys. J. C 17 (2000) , 521-526, hep-th/0006246; Jur ˇco B., Schupp P ., Wess J., Nuclear Phys. B 604 (2001), 148-180, h ep-th/0102129; Jur ˇco B., Moller L., Schraml S., Schupp S., Wess J., Eur. Phys. J. C 21 (2001), 383- 388, hep-th/0104153; Barnich G., Brandt F., Grigoriev M., JHEP (2002), no.8, 023, hep...

  28. [28]

    Chaichian M., Prešnajder P ., Sheikh-Jabbari M.M., Tur eanu A., Eur. Phys. J. C 29 (2003), 413-432, hep-th/0107055

  29. [29]

    Calmet X., Jur ˇco B., Schupp P ., Wess J., Wohlgenannt M., Eur. Phys. J. C 23 (2 002), 363-376, hep-ph/0111115; Aschieri P ., Jurˇco B., Schupp P ., Wess J., Nuclear Phys. B 651 (2003), 45-70, hep-th/0205214; Behr W ., Deshpande N.G., Duplancic G., Schupp P ., Trampetic J., Wess J., Eur.Phys.J.C29: 441-446, 2003

  30. [30]

    Dimensional Reduction over Fuzzy Coset Spaces

    Aschieri P ., Madore J., Manousselis P ., Zoupanos G., JH EP (2004), no. 4, 034, hep-th/0310072; Aschieri P ., Madore J., Manousselis P ., Zoupanos G., Fortschr. Phys. 52 (2004), 718-723, hep-th/0401200; Aschieri P ., Madore J., Manousselis P ., Zoupanos G., Conference: C04-08-20.1 (2005) 135-146, hep-th/0503039

  31. [31]

    Dynamical generation of fuzzy extra dimensions, dimensional reduction and symmetry breaking

    Aschieri P ., Grammatikopoulos T., Steinacker H., Zoup anos G., JHEP (2006), no. 9, 026, hep-th/0606021; Aschieri P ., Steinacker H., Madore J., Manousselis P ., Zoupanos G., arXiv:0704.2880

  32. [32]

    Fermions on spontaneously generated spherical extra dimensions

    Steinacker H., Zoupanos G., JHEP (2007), no. 9, 017, arX iv:0706.0398. 19 Noncommutatve gravity G. Manolakos

  33. [33]

    On the fermion spectrum of spontaneously generated fuzzy extra dimensions with fluxes

    A. Chatzistavrakidis, H. Steinacker and G. Zoupanos, F ortsch.Phys. 58 (2010) 537-552, arXiv:0909.5559 [hep-th]

  34. [34]

    Orbifolds, fuzzy spheres and chiral fermions

    A. Chatzistavrakidis, H. Steinacker and G. Zoupanos, J HEP 1005 (2010) 100, arXiv:hep-th/1002.2606 A. Chatzistavrakidis and G. Zoupanos, SIGMA 6 (2010) 063, ar Xiv:hep-th/1008.2049

  35. [35]

    Higher-Dimensional Unification with continuous and fuzzy coset spaces as extra dimensions

    D. Gavriil, G. Manolakos, G. Orfanidis and G. Zoupanos, Fortsch. Phys. 63 (2015) 442 doi:10.1002/prop.201500022 [arXiv:1504.07276 [hep-th] ]; G. Manolakos and G. Zoupanos, Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 14 (2017) no.2, 322. doi:10.1134/S1547477117020194; G. Mano lakos and G. Zoupanos, Springer Proc. Math. Stat. 191 (2016) 203 doi:10.1007/978-981-10-2636-2-13 [ar...

  36. [36]

    Gauge Theory on Noncommutative Spaces

    J. Madore, S. Schraml, P . Schupp and J. Wess, Eur. Phys. J . C 16 (2000) 161 doi:10.1007/s100520050012 [hep-th/0001203]

  37. [37]

    Deforming Einstein's Gravity

    A. H. Chamseddine, “Deforming Einstein’s gravity,” Ph ys. Lett. B 504 (2001) 33 doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00272-6 [hep-th/0009153]

  38. [38]

    A. H. Chamseddine, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 024015 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.024015 [hep-th/0309166]

  39. [39]

    Noncommutative D=4 gravity coupled to fermions

    P . Aschieri and L. Castellani, JHEP 0906 (2009) 086 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/06/086 [arXiv:0902.3817 [hep-th]]

  40. [40]

    Noncommutative supergravity in D=3 and D=4

    P . Aschieri and L. Castellani, JHEP 0906 (2009) 087 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/06/087 [arXiv:0902.3823 [hep-th]]

  41. [41]

    NC $SO(2,3)_\star$ gravity: noncommutativity as a source of curvature and torsion

    M. Dimitrijevi ´c ´Ciri´c, B. Nikoli ´c and V . Radovanovi´c, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) no.6, 064029 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.064029 [arXiv:1612.00768 [hep-th]]

  42. [42]

    Noncommutative Einstein-AdS Gravity in three Dimensions

    S. Cacciatori, D. Klemm, L. Martucci and D. Zanon, Phys. Lett. B 536 (2002) 101 doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)01823-3 [hep-th/0201103]

  43. [43]

    Cacciatori, A

    S. Cacciatori, A. H. Chamseddine, D. Klemm, L. Martucci , W . A. Sabra and D. Zanon, Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002) 4029 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/19/15/310 [hep-th/02 03038]

  44. [44]

    Noncommutative Chern-Simons gauge and gravity theories and their geometric Seiberg-Witten map

    P . Aschieri and L. Castellani, JHEP 1411 (2014) 103 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2014)103 [arXiv:1406.4896 [hep-th]]

  45. [45]

    Three-dimensional Noncommutative Gravity

    M. Banados, O. Chandia, N. E. Grandi, F. A. Schaposnik an d G. A. Silva, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 084012 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.084012 [hep-th/0104264 ]

  46. [46]

    String Theory and Noncommutative Geometry

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, JHEP 9909 (1999) 032 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/09/032 [hep-th/9908142]

  47. [47]

    M Theory As A Matrix Model: A Conjecture

    T. Banks, W . Fischler, S. H. Shenker and L. Susskind, Phy s. Rev. D 55 (1997) 5112 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.5112 [hep-th/9610043]

  48. [48]

    A Large-N Reduced Model as Superstring

    N. Ishibashi, H. Kawai, Y . Kitazawa and A. Tsuchiya, Nuc l. Phys. B 498 (1997) 467 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00290-3 [hep-th/9612115]

  49. [50]

    Describing Curved Spaces by Matrices

    M. Hanada, H. Kawai and Y . Kimura, Prog. Theor. Phys. 114 (2006) 1295 doi:10.1143/PTP .114.1295 [hep-th/0508211]

  50. [51]

    Field Equations of Massless Fields in the New Interpretation of the Matrix Model

    K. Furuta, M. Hanada, H. Kawai and Y . Kimura, Nucl. Phys. B 767 (2007) 82 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.01.003 [hep-th/0611093]. 20 Noncommutatve gravity G. Manolakos

  51. [52]

    H. S. Y ang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 24 (2009) 4473 doi:10.1142/S0217751X0904587X [hep-th/0611174]

  52. [53]

    Emergent Geometry and Gravity from Matrix Models: an Introduction

    H. Steinacker, Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 133001 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/13/133001 [arXiv:1003.4134 [hep-th]]

  53. [54]

    S. W . Kim, J. Nishimura and A. Tsuchiya, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 011601 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.011601 [arXiv:1108.1540 [hep-th]]

  54. [55]

    The origin of space-time as seen from matrix model simulations

    J. Nishimura, PTEP 2012 (2012) 01A101 doi:10.1093/ptep/pts004 [arXiv:1205.6870 [hep-lat]]

  55. [56]

    V . P . Nair, Nucl. Phys. B 651 (2003) 313 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(02)01061-1 [hep-th/0 112114]

  56. [57]

    Noncommutative gravity: fuzzy sphere and others

    Y . Abe and V . P . Nair, Phys. Rev. D68 (2003) 025002 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.68.025002 [hep-th/0212270]

  57. [58]

    Gravity on a fuzzy sphere

    P . V altancoli, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19 (2004) 361 doi:10.1142/S0217751X04017598 [hep-th/0306065]

  58. [59]

    V . P . Nair, Nucl. Phys. B 750 (2006) 321 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.06.009 [hep-th /0605008]

  59. [60]

    Gravity and the Structure of Noncommutative Algebras

    M. Buri ´c, T. Grammatikopoulos, J. Madore and G. Zoupanos, JHEP 0604 (2006) 054 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/04/054 [hep-th/0603044]

  60. [61]

    WKB Approximation in Noncommutative Gravity

    M. Buri ´c, J. Madore and G. Zoupanos, SIGMA 3 (2007) 125 doi:10.3842/SIGMA.2007.125 [arXiv:0712.4024 [hep-th]]

  61. [62]

    The Energy-momentum of a Poisson structure

    M. Buri ´c, J. Madore and G. Zoupanos, Eur. Phys. J. C 55 (2008) 489 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0602-x [arXiv:0709.3159 [hep-th]]

  62. [63]

    Dimensional Reduction over Fuzzy Coset Spaces

    P . Aschieri, J. Madore, P . Manousselis and G. Zoupanos, JHEP 0404 (2004) 034 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/04/034 [hep-th/0310072]; ibid, Fortsch. Phys. 52 (2004) 718 doi:10.1002/prop.200410168 [hep-th/0401200]; ibid, hep -th/0503039

  63. [64]

    H. S. Snyder, Phys. Rev. 71 (1947) 38. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.71.38

  64. [65]

    C. N. Y ang, Phys. Rev. 72 (1947) 874. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.72.874

  65. [66]

    Covariant Non-Commutative Space-Time

    J. Heckman and H. V erlinde, “Covariant non-commutativ e space ˝Utime,” Nucl. Phys. B 894 (2015) 58 [arXiv:1401.1810 [hep-th]]

  66. [67]

    Noncommutative de Sitter and FRW spaces

    M. Buri ´c and J. Madore, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) no.10, 502 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3729-6 [arXiv:1508.06058 [hep-th]]

  67. [68]

    Covariant 4-dimensional fuzzy spheres, matrix models and higher spin

    M. Sperling and H. C. Steinacker, J. Phys. A 50 (2017) no.37, 375202 doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa8295 [arXiv:1704.02863 [hep-th]]

  68. [69]

    Fuzzy de Sitter Space

    M. Buri ´c, D. Latas and L. Nenadovi ´c, arXiv:1709.05158 [hep-th]

  69. [70]

    H. C. Steinacker, JHEP 1612 (2016) 156 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2016)156 [arXiv:1606.007 69 [hep-th]]

  70. [71]

    Noncommutative Gauge Theory and Gravity in Three Dimensions

    A. Chatzistavrakidis, L. Jonke, D. Jurman, G. Manolako s, P . Manousselis and G. Zoupanos, Fortsch. Phys. 66 (2018) no.8-9, 1800047 doi:10.1002/prop.201800047 [arXi v:1802.07550 [hep-th]]

  71. [72]

    Gravity as a Gauge Theory on Three-Dimensional Noncommutative spaces

    D. Jurman, G. Manolakos, P . Manousselis and G. Zoupanos , PoS CORFU 2017 (2018) 162 doi:10.22323/1.318.0162 [arXiv:1809.03879 [gr-qc]]

  72. [73]

    Non-commutativity in Un ified Theories and Gravity,

    G. Manolakos and G. Zoupanos, “Non-commutativity in Un ified Theories and Gravity,” Springer Proc. Math. Stat. 263 (2017) 177 doi:10.1007/978-981-13-2715-5-10 [arXiv:180 9.02954 [hep-th]]. 21 Noncommutatve gravity G. Manolakos

  73. [74]

    A. B. Hammou, M. Lagraa and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, Phys. R ev. D 66 (2002) 025025 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.025025 [hep-th/0110291]

  74. [75]

    Noncommutative field theory on $\mathbb{R}^3_\lambda$

    P . Vitale, Fortsch. Phys. 62 (2014) 825 doi:10.1002/prop.201400037 [arXiv:1406.1372 [hep-th]]

  75. [76]

    The velocity operator in quantum mechanics in noncommutative space

    S. Ková ˇcik and P . Prešnajder, J. Math. Phys. 54 (2013) 102103 doi:10.1063/1.4826355 [arXiv:1309.4592 [math-ph]]

  76. [77]

    2D fuzzy Anti-de Sitter space from matrix models

    D. Jurman and H. Steinacker, JHEP 1401 (2014) 100 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2014)100 [arXiv:1309.1598 [hep-th]]

  77. [78]

    Manolakos, P

    G. Manolakos, P . Manousselis and G. Zoupanos, arXiv:19 02.10922 [hep-th]

  78. [80]

    Group Theory of the Spontaneously Broken Gaug e Symmetries,

    L. F. Li, “Group Theory of the Spontaneously Broken Gaug e Symmetries,” Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974)

  79. [81]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.9.1723

  80. [82]

    An Invariant Action for Noncommutative Gravity in Four-Dimensions

    A. H. Chamseddine, “Invariant actions for noncommutat ive gravity,” J. Math. Phys. 44 (2003) 2534 doi:10.1063/1.1572199 [hep-th/0202137]

Showing first 80 references.