REVIEW 4 cited by
MedExQA: Medical Question Answering Benchmark with Multiple Explanations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper introduces MedExQA, a novel benchmark in medical question-answering, to evaluate large language models' (LLMs) understanding of medical knowledge through explanations. By constructing datasets across five distinct medical specialties that are underrepresented in current datasets and further incorporating multiple explanations for each question-answer pair, we address a major gap in current medical QA benchmarks which is the absence of comprehensive assessments of LLMs' ability to generate nuanced medical explanations. Our work highlights the importance of explainability in medical LLMs, proposes an effective methodology for evaluating models beyond classification accuracy, and sheds light on one specific domain, speech language pathology, where current LLMs including GPT4 lack good understanding. Our results show generation evaluation with multiple explanations aligns better with human assessment, highlighting an opportunity for a more robust automated comprehension assessment for LLMs. To diversify open-source medical LLMs (currently mostly based on Llama2), this work also proposes a new medical model, MedPhi-2, based on Phi-2 (2.7B). The model outperformed medical LLMs based on Llama2-70B in generating explanations, showing its effectiveness in the resource-constrained medical domain. We will share our benchmark datasets and the trained model.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Between Knowledge and Care: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Generative AI for T2DM Self-Management from Patient and Physician Perspectives
Generative AI aids T2DM self-management on facts and lifestyle but fails on meds and emotion; patients and physicians converge on role limits, emotional gaps, and personalization needs, informing four design directions.
-
BioHopR: A Benchmark for Multi-Hop, Multi-Answer Reasoning in Biomedical Domain
BioHopR introduces 1-hop and 2-hop question-answer benchmarks over PrimeKG with multiple correct answers, and shows LLMs achieve low precision, dropping sharply from 1-hop (best 37.93%) to 2-hop (14.57%).
-
Silence is Not Consensus: Disrupting Agreement Bias in Multi-Agent LLMs via Catfish Agent for Clinical Decision Making
A "catfish" agent that injects structured dissent into multi-agent LLM teams improves clinical question-answering accuracy by reducing premature consensus.
-
TAGS: A Test-Time Generalist-Specialist Framework with Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning and Verification
Without any parameter updates, a retrieval-augmented generalist-specialist agent pair with consistency-based verification raises accuracy on 862 hard medical QA questions for GPT-4o, DeepSeek-R1, and Qwen2.5-7B.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.