Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 35 references

Observation of droplets in dimer model on a triangular lattice

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A triangular-lattice dimer system with fixed polygon area forms one macroscopic rectangular droplet at low temperature.

desk verdict A plausible first numerical sighting of a droplet in a triangular-lattice dimer model, but the evidence is a single seeded run with an unproven area-preserving move set, so the equilibrium claim is not yet supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17497 v1 pith:4G37WNMF submitted 2024-11-26 cond-mat.stat-mech math-phmath.MPphysics.comp-ph

Daria Shvalyuk , Anton Nazarov This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MPphysics.comp-ph MSC 82B2082B2682B80 PACS 05.50.+q05.10.Ln64.60.-i
keywords dimermodeltriangularlatticedropletformationsuperpositionpolygonsMonteCarlosimulationphasetransitionfixed-areaensemblesurfacetension
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether a dimer model on a triangular lattice can show the same kind of equilibrium droplet formation that is known for the Ising model. It reports that, with free boundary conditions, fixed total area inside the superposition polygons, and edge energies $E_{\mathrm{even}}=0$, $E_{\mathrm{odd}}=2$, $E_{\mathrm{right}}=E_{\mathrm{left}}=1$, Monte Carlo sampling at low temperature produces one macroscopic droplet whose average contour is close to a rectangle with smoothed corners. It further reports that this droplet deforms and breaks into many irregular droplets as the temperature rises above about $0.5$. If correct, this extends droplet and phase-separation behaviour from the Ising model to a non-bipartite dimer model and gives a concrete parameter regime in which to study it.

What carries the argument

The construction uses two dimer configurations: a fixed reference configuration and a moving optimal configuration. Their overlap draws closed contours, the superposition polygons, whose total enclosed area is the conserved quantity. Sampling is done in the canonical ensemble by Monte Carlo: pairs or groups of four dimers are flipped using lozenge-type and butterfly-type moves, with extra compensating flips chosen so that the enclosed area does not change. The tuned edge energies, $E_{\mathrm{even}}=0$, $E_{\mathrm{odd}}=2$, $E_{\mathrm{right}}=E_{\mathrm{left}}=1$, are what make the low-temperature droplet the dominant configuration.

What would settle it

Run the same fixed-area protocol from several very different starting configurations with the same total droplet area—one large droplet, many small droplets, and an elongated strip—and compare the shape of the probability-of-inside contour after long runs. If the final average shape depends on the starting configuration, the move set cannot explore all configurations with the same area, and the single droplet is an artifact of the initial condition.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in the non-bipartite triangular-lattice dimer model with the tuned local energies above, the low-temperature Gibbs ensemble conditioned on a fixed superposition-polygon area is dominated by a single macroscopic droplet: the probability of a triangle lying inside the contour is concentrated on a rectangle-like region with rounded corners. The same calculation shows a finite-temperature transition: above $T \approx 0.5$ the droplet loses its smooth closed shape, opposite-phase droplets appear inside it, and the macroscopic droplet fragments into many small irregular pieces. The paper offers this as a dimer analogue of the familiar Ising-model droplet phenomenon and identifies the next step as a variational problem for the exact limiting shape.

Load-bearing premise

The result depends on the assumption that the area-preserving Monte Carlo moves can eventually reach every dimer configuration with the same total polygon area; if some configurations are unreachable, the observed single droplet could be a frozen image of the initial droplet instead of the true equilibrium.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At the stated energies and low temperature, the fixed-area ensemble does not break into many small droplets; it keeps one macroscopic droplet, so the model has a well-defined droplet phase.
  • Raising temperature past about $0.5$ destroys the droplet: first its equilibrium shape deforms, then droplets of the opposite phase nucleate inside it, and finally it splits into many small irregular droplets.
  • The average droplet contour being nearly rectangular provides a target shape that a future variational calculation of surface tension would need to reproduce.
  • Because the lattice is non-bipartite, this is evidence that droplet and phase-separation behaviour is not restricted to bipartite dimer models or to Ising-type height functions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is to start the simulation from many small droplets of the same total area; if they do not merge into the same rectangle-like droplet, the reported single droplet is a remnant of the initial condition rather than the equilibrium state.
  • If the droplet is genuinely equilibrium, its flat edges suggest a piecewise-linear equilibrium crystal shape with strong surface-tension anisotropy, which could be checked by measuring the angle-dependent surface tension directly from interface fluctuations.
  • The reported transition near $T \approx 0.5$ invites a finite-size scaling study to determine whether it sharpens into a true thermodynamic phase transition in the infinite-lattice limit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a classical dimer model on a triangular lattice with four edge types (horizontal coinciding with reference, horizontal non-coinciding, right-leaning, left-leaning). It defines the superposition-polygon area associated with two dimer configurations and implements a Monte Carlo algorithm with pair and four-dimer flips intended to preserve this area (canonical ensemble). With edge energies E_even=0, E_odd=2, E_right=E_left=1, on a 50x50 lattice, the simulation at T=0.1 yields a single macroscopic droplet whose average shape is approximately rectangular. From temperature-dependent snapshots, the paper claims a phase transition in which the droplet deforms and decomposes starting above T=0.5. The conclusions assert that the dimer system exhibits a phenomenon similar to Dobrushin-Kotecky-Shlosman droplets in the Ising model.

Significance. The question whether DKS-like equilibrium droplets can occur in non-bipartite dimer models is original and potentially interesting, and the paper constructs a specific area-preserving Kawasaki dynamics as a tool. The visual evidence at low temperature is suggestive. However, the current support is a single 50x50 run with one initial condition and one parameter set; there are no error bars, no multiple seeds, no finite-size scaling, no quantitative order parameter, and no proof of ergodicity of the constrained move set. The edge energies are also tuned to produce the droplet, so the observation is partially an input. If the authors could supply rigorous ergodicity arguments, a defined order parameter with finite-size analysis, and a clearer distinction between a tuned existence example and a prediction, the result would be a valuable contribution. No code or data is provided, which limits reproducibility.

major comments (3)
  1. [2.2] The area-preserving move set is not proved to be ergodic on the set of dimer configurations with a fixed superposition-polygon area. The cited connectivity results of Kenyon and Rémila and of Røising and Zhang apply to unrestricted dimer configurations; the additional area constraint removes most flips and can split the state space into disconnected components. To support the equilibrium claim, the authors should either prove irreducibility of the move set on the fixed-area component containing the seeded droplet, or provide numerical evidence such as exact enumeration for small lattices, multiple independent initial conditions converging to the same distribution, or histogram-based tests of detailed balance. Without this, the low-temperature droplet may be a metastable artifact of the initial condition.
  2. [1, 3.1] The edge energies were 'selected in such a way as to form a macroscopic droplet' (Introduction), and the simulation starts from an initial droplet occupying 50% of the lattice area. The observation that a droplet is present at low temperature is therefore partly an input to the calculation. The manuscript should clarify whether the claim is an existence statement for this tuned parameter set (which would be legitimate) or a prediction from an independent criterion, such as a Wulff-type variational construction. As written, the conclusion that the dimer system 'tends to form a macroscopic droplet' is not supported because the parameters and initial state were chosen to produce that outcome.
  3. [3.2] The claimed phase transition is not established by the data shown. Figure 5 displays snapshots at unspecified temperatures for a single 50x50 lattice and a single initial area fraction, but there is no quantitative order parameter, no finite-size scaling, no multiple independent runs, and no statistical uncertainties. The statement that the transition 'starts at a temperature above 0.5' requires a definition of the transition observable (e.g., the largest droplet area, its perimeter-to-area ratio, or a susceptibility) and an analysis of its temperature and system-size dependence. At present, 'phase transition' is an interpretation of a few configurations rather than a measured result.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Author information] The affiliation 'Bejing' in the author information should be 'Beijing'.
  2. [Figure 5] Figure 5 does not label the temperatures of the snapshots, so the reader cannot verify the claimed onset of the transition above T=0.5.
  3. [Equation (3)] Equation (3) refers to 'the probability of being a triangle inside the contour', but the term 'triangle' is not defined in the text; please define the elementary plaquette used for this measurement.
  4. [2.1] The phrase 'optimal configuration' in Section 2.1 is ambiguous; it should be clarified whether this means the equilibrium configuration at finite temperature or the zero-temperature ground state.
  5. [References] Reference [34] is cited as 'C. Mathieu and É. Rémila', but the standard attribution is to Kenyon and Rémila; please verify the author list.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The central claim — that a macroscopic droplet forms at low temperature — reduces to the hand-picked energies and the seeded, area-preserving initial condition, rather than being an independent prediction.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 1 (last paragraph) and Section 3.1]
    "Here, we introduce four types of edges ... whose energies were selected in such a way as to form a macroscopic droplet. ... We have established that a macroscopic droplet is produced with the following energies Eeven = 0, Eodd = 2, Eright = Eleft = 1."

    The paper's central observation is that a macroscopic droplet appears at low temperatures for energies that were explicitly chosen to make a macroscopic droplet appear. The later 'established' statement merely reports that the chosen parameter set produces the target phenomenon. The conclusion 'tends to form a macroscopic droplet' therefore restates the construction input rather than deriving a prediction from an independent, fixed model.

  2. self definitional [Section 2.2]
    "The simulation was implemented as follows: an initial droplet of a certain area is generated, and then the dynamics of dimers is constructed through the Metropolis algorithm using the Kawasaki method [31], that is, in such a way that the area inside the contours remains constant."

    The 'emergence' of the droplet is seeded by an explicit macroscopic droplet in the initial condition, and the dynamics is constrained to preserve the area inside the contour. Thus the existence of a low-temperature droplet is partly an input of the algorithm, not an output of the Hamiltonian alone. What remains non-circular is the observed rectangular-like shape and the approximate transition temperature, not the fact of droplet formation itself.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: define edge energies 'selected in such a way as to form a macroscopic droplet', seed the simulation with an initial macroscopic droplet, and use an area-preserving Monte Carlo move set. The paper then reports that a macroscopic droplet is produced. For the existence claim, this is circular: the target phenomenon is put into the Hamiltonian and into the initial condition. The rectangular-like average shape and the T>0.5 phase transition are genuine numerical outputs that were not directly prescribed, so the paper has some independent content. However, the abstract and conclusions present droplet formation itself as a discovered DKS-like phenomenon, although the energies were tuned to produce exactly that. The citations to Kenyon–Remila and Røising–Zhang are external, independent results, not self-citations, and are not the source of circularity. A separate correctness concern — not circularity — is that the area-constrained move set is not proved ergodic, so the droplet could be a metastable artifact of the initial condition. On balance, the central claim does reduce by construction, giving a circularity score of 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on (i) hand-tuned edge energies, (ii) one lattice size and one initial droplet area, (iii) an assumed ergodic area-preserving flip dynamics, (iv) an assumed equivalence of canonical and grand-canonical ensembles, and (v) a visual estimate of the transition temperature. No exact derivation, code, or data is supplied.

free parameters (4)
  • Edge energies E_even, E_odd, E_right, E_left = E_even=0, E_odd=2, E_right=E_left=1
    Chosen by hand 'in such a way as to form a macroscopic droplet' (Sec. 1, Sec. 3.1); the observed droplet is not shown to be robust to nearby values.
  • Initial droplet area fraction = 50% of lattice area
    All droplet runs start from a large droplet of fixed area and the dynamics preserves area, so results may depend on this seeded initial condition.
  • Lattice size = 50x50
    Only one system size is simulated and no finite-size scaling is reported, so the 'macroscopic' claim is not extrapolated to the thermodynamic limit.
  • Transition temperature estimate = above 0.5 (visual)
    The threshold is inferred from visual inspection of snapshots in Fig. 5, without an order parameter, Binder cumulant, or error analysis.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The restricted pair and four-dimer flip moves, with area-compensating choices, generate an ergodic Markov chain on dimer configurations with fixed superposition-polygon area.
    Invoked in Sec. 2.2 when constructing the Kawasaki-type dynamics; no proof of ergodicity or relaxation is given, so equilibrium sampling is assumed.
  • domain assumption Metropolis Monte Carlo with 10^7 thermalization steps and 10^8 measurement steps has converged for the 50x50 lattice.
    No autocorrelation analysis, multiple independent seeds, or convergence diagnostics are reported in Sec. 3.1.
  • domain assumption The canonical ensemble with fixed polygon area is equivalent to the grand canonical ensemble with an external field.
    Stated in Secs. 2.1 and 2.2 via the 'principle of equivalence of ensembles' and used to justify the area-preserving dynamics; no rigorous equivalence is provided for this non-bipartite model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Observation of droplets in dimer model on a triangular lattice." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4G37WNMF

@misc{pith2026241117497,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Observation of droplets in dimer model on a triangular lattice},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4G37WNMF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17497}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we consider the formation of droplets in the dimer model on a triangular lattice. The droplets in the dimer model are superposition polygons formed as two overlapping configurations of dimers: constant and movable. We demonstrate that specific local energies of dimers and low temperatures lead to the emergence of a macroscopic droplet. The motivation for this study was the phenomenon of the formation of equilibrium droplets under certain conditions in the Ising model within the framework of the Dobrushin-Koteck\'y-Shlosman theory. Due to the deep connections between the Ising model and the dimer model, similar behaviour was expected.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17497 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Reference configuration D0 (red dotted lines); (b) example of a droplet; interior the composition cycle (D0, D) is in blue, here D is an optimal configuration (green solid lines). Four types of edges are considered here: horizontal coinciding with reference configuration, horizontal non-coinciding with reference configuration, right-leaning, and left-leaning. Edges have corresponding energies: Eeven, Eodd, Erigh… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Notion of “inside” the contour and “outside”. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Types of the flippable dimers. presented. Here, 107 iterations of the Metropolis algorithm were chosen for thermalisation and 108 for measurements. Additionally, there is shown the probability of being inside the contour which was calculated in such a way: P = number of steps when triangle was inside the contour total number of steps (3) As we can see on average the shape of a droplet can be approximated by a rectan… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Area of the initial droplet is 50% of the total area of the lattice, temperature 0.1: (a) an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Phase transition in the dimer model in the triangular lattice (area of the initial droplet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The adsorption of hydrogen on tungsten,

    J. K. Roberts, “The adsorption of hydrogen on tungsten,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A - Mathematical and Physical Sciences , vol. 152, pp. 445 – 463, 1934

    work page 1934

  2. [2]

    An attempt to extend the statistical theory of perfect solutions,

    R. H. Fowler and G. S. Rushbrooke, “An attempt to extend the statistical theory of perfect solutions,” Transactions of The Faraday Society , vol. 33, pp. 1272–1294, 1937

    work page 1937

  3. [3]

    Dimer Statistics and Phase Transitions,

    P. W. Kasteleyn, “Dimer Statistics and Phase Transitions,” Journal of Mathematical Physics , vol. 4, pp. 287–293, 1963

    work page 1963

  4. [4]

    Planar dimers and Harnack curves,

    R. W. Kenyon and A. Okounkov, “Planar dimers and Harnack curves,” Duke Mathematical Journal, vol. 131, pp. 499–524, 2003

    work page 2003

  5. [5]

    Dimers and amoebae,

    R. W. Kenyon, A. Okounkov, and S. Sheffield, “Dimers and amoebae,” Annals of Mathematics, vol. 163, pp. 1019–1056, 2003

    work page 2003

  6. [6]

    Dimers on Surface Graphs and Spin Structures. I,

    D. Cimasoni and N. Reshetikhin, “Dimers on Surface Graphs and Spin Structures. I,” Com- munications in Mathematical Physics , vol. 275, pp. 187–208, 2006. 7

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    Dimers on Surface Graphs and Spin Structures. II,

    D. Cimasoni and N. Reshetikhin, “Dimers on Surface Graphs and Spin Structures. II,” Com- munications in Mathematical Physics , vol. 281, pp. 445–468, 2007

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    General Lattice Model of Phase Transitions,

    C. Fan and F. Y. Wu, “General Lattice Model of Phase Transitions,” Physical Review B, vol. 2, pp. 723–733, 1970

    work page 1970

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    On the Dimer Solution of Planar Ising Models,

    M. E. Fisher, “On the Dimer Solution of Planar Ising Models,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 7, pp. 1776–1781, 1966

    1966

  2. [10]

    Dimer problem in statistical mechanics – an exact result,

    H. N. V. Temperley and M. E. Fisher, “Dimer problem in statistical mechanics – an exact result,” Philosophical Magazine, vol. 6, pp. 1061–1063, 1961

    1961

  3. [11]

    B. M. McCoy and T. T. Wu, The Two-Dimensional Ising Model . Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press, 1973

    1973

  4. [12]

    R. L. Dobrushin, R. Koteck´ y, and S. B. Shlosman, Wulff Construction: A Global Shape from Local Interaction. American Mathematical Society, 1992

    1992

  5. [13]

    Gibbs State Describing Coexistence of Phases for a Three-Dimensional Ising Model,

    R. L. Dobrushin, “Gibbs State Describing Coexistence of Phases for a Three-Dimensional Ising Model,” Theory of Probability and Its Applications , vol. 17, pp. 582–600, 1973

    1973

  6. [14]

    The Wetting and Layering Transitions in the Half-Infinite Ising Model,

    J. Fr¨ ohlich and C. E. Pfister, “The Wetting and Layering Transitions in the Half-Infinite Ising Model,” EPL, vol. 3, pp. 845–852, 1987

    1987

  7. [15]

    Critical prewetting in the 2d Ising model,

    D. Ioffe, S. Ott, S. B. Shlosman, and Y. Velenik, “Critical prewetting in the 2d Ising model,” The Annals of Probability , 2020

    2020

  8. [16]

    Mathematical theory of the wetting phenomenon in the 2D Ising model,

    C.-E. Pfister and Y. A. Velenik, “Mathematical theory of the wetting phenomenon in the 2D Ising model,” Helvetica Physica Acta, vol. 69, pp. 949–973, 1997

    1997

  9. [17]

    XXV. Zur Frage der Geschwindigkeit des Wachsthums und der Aufl¨ osung der Krys- tallfl¨ achen,

    G. Wulff, “XXV. Zur Frage der Geschwindigkeit des Wachsthums und der Aufl¨ osung der Krys- tallfl¨ achen,”Zeitschrift f¨ ur Kristallographie – Crystalline Materials , vol. 34, pp. 449 – 530, 1901

    1901

  10. [18]

    Surface tension in the Ising model,

    D. B. Abraham, G. Gallavotti, and A. Martin-Lof, “Surface tension in the Ising model,” Lettere al Nuovo Cimento (1971-1985) , vol. 2, pp. 143–146, 1971

    1971

  11. [19]

    Diagonal interface in the two-dimensional Ising ferromagnet,

    D. B. Abraham and P. Reed, “Diagonal interface in the two-dimensional Ising ferromagnet,” Journal of Physics A , vol. 10, 1977

    1977

  12. [20]

    Some Theorems on the Free Energies of Crystal Surfaces,

    C. Herring, “Some Theorems on the Free Energies of Crystal Surfaces,” Physical Review , vol. 82, pp. 87–93, 1951

    1951

  13. [21]

    Dobrushin–Koteck´ y–Shlosman Theorem up to the Critical Temperature,

    D. Ioffe and R. H. Schonmann, “Dobrushin–Koteck´ y–Shlosman Theorem up to the Critical Temperature,” Communications in Mathematical Physics , vol. 199, pp. 117–167, 1998

    1998

  14. [22]

    Exact large deviation bounds up to Tc for the Ising model in two dimensions,

    D. Ioffe, “Exact large deviation bounds up to Tc for the Ising model in two dimensions,” Probability Theory and Related Fields , vol. 102, pp. 313–330, 1995

    1995

  15. [23]

    On an invariance principle for phase separation lines,

    L. Greenberg and D. Ioffe, “On an invariance principle for phase separation lines,” Annales De L Institut Henri Poincare-probabilites Et Statistiques , 2005. 8

    2005

  16. [24]

    Ornstein-Zernike theory for finite range Ising models above Tc,

    M. Campanino, D. Ioffe, and Y. Velenik, “Ornstein-Zernike theory for finite range Ising models above Tc,” Probability Theory and Related Fields , vol. 125, pp. 305–349, 2001

    2001

  17. [25]

    Large deviations for the 2D ising model: A lower bound without cluster expansions,

    D. Ioffe, “Large deviations for the 2D ising model: A lower bound without cluster expansions,” Journal of Statistical Physics , vol. 74, pp. 411–432, 1994

    1994

  18. [26]

    Wetting in Potts and Blume-Capel models,

    J. Bricmont and J. L. Lebowitz, “Wetting in Potts and Blume-Capel models,” Journal of Statistical Physics, vol. 46, pp. 1015–1029, 1987

    1987

  19. [27]

    A study of perfect wetting for Potts and Blume-Capel models with correlation inequalities,

    J. de Coninck, A. Messager, S. Miracle-Sole, and J. Ruiz, “A study of perfect wetting for Potts and Blume-Capel models with correlation inequalities,” Journal of Statistical Physics , vol. 52, pp. 45–60, 1988

    1988

  20. [28]

    Surface Tension and the Ornstein–Zernike Behaviour for the 2D Blume–Capel Model,

    O. Hryniv and R. Koteck´ y, “Surface Tension and the Ornstein–Zernike Behaviour for the 2D Blume–Capel Model,” Journal of Statistical Physics , vol. 106, pp. 431–476, 2002

    2002

  21. [29]

    Interfaces in the Potts model II: Antonov’s rule and rigidity of the order disorder interface,

    A. Messager, S. Miracle-Sole, J. Ruiz, and S. B. Shlosman, “Interfaces in the Potts model II: Antonov’s rule and rigidity of the order disorder interface,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 140, pp. 275–290, 1991

    1991

  22. [30]

    Classical and Quantum Dimer Models,

    M. Gartner, “Classical and Quantum Dimer Models,” 2014. https://physics.ucsd.edu/ ~mcgreevy/s14/final-papers/2014S-239a-Gartner-Mike.pdf

    2014

  23. [31]

    D. P. Landau and K. Binder, A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulations in Statistical Physics . Cambridge university press, 2021

    2021

  24. [32]

    Classical dimers on the triangular lattice,

    P. Fendley, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, “Classical dimers on the triangular lattice,”Physical Review B, vol. 66, p. 214513, 2002

    2002

  25. [33]

    Resonating valence bond phase in the triangular lattice quan- tum dimer model.,

    R. Moessner and S. L. Sondhi, “Resonating valence bond phase in the triangular lattice quan- tum dimer model.,” Physical review letters , vol. 86 9, pp. 1881–4, 2000

    2000

  26. [34]

    Perfect matchings in the triangular lattice,

    C. Mathieu and ´E. R´ emila, “Perfect matchings in the triangular lattice,” Discret. Math. , vol. 152, pp. 191–210, 1996

    1996

  27. [35]

    Ergodic archimedean dimers,

    H. S. Røising and Z. Zhang, “Ergodic archimedean dimers,” SciPost Physics Core, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 054, 2023. 9

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.