Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Adversarial Token Attacks on Vision Transformers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.04337 v1 pith:4GDVCL6U submitted 2021-10-08 cs.CV cs.CRcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.CRcs.LG
keywords tokenmodelsattacksconvolutionaltransformeradversarialpatchtransformers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Vision transformers rely on a patch token based self attention mechanism, in contrast to convolutional networks. We investigate fundamental differences between these two families of models, by designing a block sparsity based adversarial token attack. We probe and analyze transformer as well as convolutional models with token attacks of varying patch sizes. We infer that transformer models are more sensitive to token attacks than convolutional models, with ResNets outperforming Transformer models by up to $\sim30\%$ in robust accuracy for single token attacks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Safety at Scale: A Comprehensive Survey of Large Model and Agent Safety

    cs.CR 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A comprehensive survey that taxonomizes safety threats to large models and agents, reviews defenses and benchmarks, and outlines open challenges.

Pith tools