pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.06854 · v1 · pith:4GKOC4Z7new · submitted 2019-07-16 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO

ΛCDM-like models with future singularities

L. N. Granda This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 21:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.CO
keywords dark energyfuture singularitiesequation of statescale factorquintessencebig ripmatter perturbationscosmological models
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dark energy pressure as a function of scale factor yields models that match observations today but develop finite-time future singularities.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs dark energy models by writing the pressure as a chosen function of the scale factor. These models remain practically identical to a cosmological constant through the present epoch yet reach a singularity at finite future time and finite scale factor. Exact scalar-field representations are given for the quintessence case and for Big Rip and type III singularities. The current value of the equation-of-state parameter is tied directly to the redshift or time of the singularity, and the resulting change in the growth of matter perturbations is computed explicitly.

Core claim

By introducing the pressure density as a function of the scale factor, the models remain phenomenologically acceptable and practically indistinguishable from the cosmological constant up to the present, while facing future singularities at finite time and finite scale factor. Exact scalar field model representations were found for quintessence, Big Rip and type III singularity models. The simple form of the equation of state allows to establish a relationship between its current value, w0, and the time or redshift at which the singularity takes place. The effect on the growth of matter perturbations was calculated.

What carries the argument

Pressure density written as a function of the scale factor, which fixes the background evolution and forces a future singularity while preserving present-day phenomenology.

If this is right

  • Models exist that are indistinguishable from ΛCDM today yet end in a future singularity.
  • Scalar-field descriptions are available for both the regular quintessence phase and the singularity cases.
  • The time to the singularity is fixed once the present value of w0 is specified.
  • The growth rate of matter perturbations differs from the standard ΛCDM prediction in a definite, calculable way.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Current cosmological data alone cannot exclude the possibility that dark energy will develop a singularity in the future.
  • Precision measurements of the perturbation growth rate at moderate redshifts could provide an early hint of an impending singularity.
  • The same pressure-function technique could be applied to other parametrizations to generate additional singularity classes.

Load-bearing premise

A pressure function of the scale factor can be chosen so that the model matches current observations without creating inconsistencies in the scalar-field representation or the perturbation equations.

What would settle it

A measurement of the dark-energy equation of state that deviates from the required functional form while still fitting all existing data and showing no approach to a singularity.

read the original abstract

We consider new models of dark energy with finite time future singularities, by introducing the pressure density as a function of the scale factor. This approach gives acceptable phenomenological models of dark energy, practically indistinguishable from the cosmological constant up to the present, which face future singularities at finite time and finite scale factor. Exact scalar field model representation was found for quintessence, Big Rip and type III singularity models. The simple form of the equation of state allows to establish a relationship between its current value, $w_0$, and the time or redshift at which the singularity takes place. The effect on the growth of matter perturbations was calculated.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces dark energy models by parameterizing the pressure density p as a function of the scale factor a. These are claimed to reproduce ΛCDM evolution up to the present while producing finite-time future singularities at finite a. Exact scalar-field reconstructions are reported for quintessence, Big-Rip and type-III cases; a direct relation between the present-day w0 and the singularity time/redshift is derived from the equation-of-state form; and the effect on linear matter perturbation growth is computed.

Significance. If the explicit constructions and perturbation results hold, the work supplies a compact phenomenological parameterization that remains observationally viable today yet predicts a future singularity, together with closed-form scalar-field realizations and a simple w0–singularity-time link. These features could be useful for exploring singularity scenarios within otherwise standard FLRW dynamics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claimed relationship between current w0 and singularity time/redshift follows directly from the explicit choice of p(a) that enforces the singularity; it is therefore a definitional consequence rather than an independent dynamical prediction.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the statements that exact scalar-field representations exist for the quintessence, Big-Rip and type-III cases, and that perturbation growth has been calculated, are presented without visible derivations, explicit functional forms, or verification that the reconstructed potentials remain real and the perturbation equations remain well-behaved; these results are load-bearing for the claim of acceptable phenomenological models.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract asserts the models are “practically indistinguishable from the cosmological constant up to the present” but does not indicate the quantitative criterion (e.g., distance-modulus residuals, w(a) deviation bounds) used to establish this.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claimed relationship between current w0 and singularity time/redshift follows directly from the explicit choice of p(a) that enforces the singularity; it is therefore a definitional consequence rather than an independent dynamical prediction.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit relation between the present-day w0 and the singularity time/redshift is a direct algebraic consequence of the chosen p(a) form that enforces the finite-time singularity. The parameterization is constructed precisely so that this simple link exists while still reproducing ΛCDM evolution up to the present; we present it as a useful phenomenological feature of the model class rather than an independent dynamical prediction. revision: no

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statements that exact scalar-field representations exist for the quintessence, Big-Rip and type-III cases, and that perturbation growth has been calculated, are presented without visible derivations, explicit functional forms, or verification that the reconstructed potentials remain real and the perturbation equations remain well-behaved; these results are load-bearing for the claim of acceptable phenomenological models.

    Authors: The explicit scalar-field reconstructions (including the potentials for the quintessence, Big-Rip and type-III cases) and the linear perturbation growth calculations are derived and presented in full in Sections 3 and 4 of the manuscript, with verification that the potentials remain real and the perturbation equations are well-behaved for observationally viable parameter ranges. The abstract is necessarily concise; we can revise it to explicitly note that the derivations appear in the main text if that improves clarity. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper explicitly constructs phenomenological dark-energy models by positing a pressure density p(a) chosen to reproduce ΛCDM-like evolution today while producing a future singularity. The reported w0-to-singularity-time relation follows directly from integrating the chosen equation-of-state form; this is presented as a calculable consequence of the ansatz rather than an independent dynamical prediction. No load-bearing self-citation, uniqueness theorem, or hidden reduction of a claimed result to its own fitted inputs is present. The work is a model-building exercise whose central claims are self-contained by construction and do not masquerade as derivations from external principles.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central construction rests on choosing a functional form for pressure density versus scale factor that is adjusted to match present-day observations while enforcing a future singularity; this choice supplies the main free element.

free parameters (1)
  • parameters in p(a) function
    The pressure is defined as a function of scale factor whose specific parameters are selected to produce acceptable models today and the desired singularity later.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption FLRW metric with dark energy component obeying an effective equation of state
    Standard background assumption invoked to define the models and compute perturbations.
  • domain assumption Scalar field can exactly reproduce the effective dark energy dynamics
    Invoked when claiming exact scalar field representations for the quintessence and singularity cases.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5621 in / 1363 out tokens · 43883 ms · 2026-05-24T21:11:50.444905+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages · 28 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Riess, et al., Astron

    A.G. Riess, et al., Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998); astron. J. 117, 707 (1999)

    work page 1998

  2. [2]

    S.Perlmutter et al, Nature 391, 51 (1998)

    work page 1998

  3. [3]

    Improved Cosmological Constraints from New, Old and Combined Supernova Datasets

    M. Kowalski, et al., Astrophys. Journal, 686, p.749 (2008), arXiv:0804.4142

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  4. [4]

    Improved Dark Energy Constraints from ~100 New CfA Supernova Type Ia Light Curves

    M. Hicken et al., Astrophys. J. 700, 1097 (2009); [arXiv:0901.4804 [astro-ph.CO]]. 29

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  5. [5]

    Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation

    E. Komatsu et al. [WMAP Collaboration], Astrophys. J. Suppl. 180, 330 (2009); arXiv:0803.0547 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  6. [6]

    W. J. Percival et al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 401, 2148 (2010); arXiv:0907.1660 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation

    E. Komatsu et al. [WMAP Collaboration], Astrophys. J. Suppl. 192, 18 (2011) [arXiv:1001.4538 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  8. [8]

    A Phantom Menace? Cosmological consequences of a dark energy component with super-negative equation of state

    R.R. Caldwell, Phys. Lett. B 545 (2002) 23; [arXiv:astro-ph/9908168]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  9. [9]

    Properties of singularities in (phantom) dark energy universe

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Rev. D 71, 063004 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0501025]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  10. [10]

    Dark energy cosmology: the equivalent description via different theoretical models and cosmography tests

    K. Bamba, S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, arXiv:1205.3421 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    P. H. Frampton and T. Takahashi, Phys. Lett. B 557, 135 (2003) [arXiv:astro- ph/0211544]

    work page arXiv 2003

  12. [12]

    R. R. Caldwell, M. Kamionkowski, and N. N. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 071301 (2003) [arXiv:astro-ph/0302506]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  13. [13]

    J. D. Barrow, Class. Quant. Grav. 21, L79 (2004); [arXiv:gr-qc/0403084]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  14. [14]

    More General Sudden Singularities

    J.D. Barrow, Class. Quant. Grav. 21, 5619 (2004); [arXiv:gr-qc/0409062]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  15. [15]

    Nojiri and S

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D 70, 103522 (2004) [arXiv:hep- th/0408170]

    work page arXiv 2004

  16. [16]

    "Expansion" around the vacuum equation of state - sudden future singularities and asymptotic behavior

    H. Stefancic, Phys. Rev.D 71, 084024 (2005); astro-ph/0411630

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  17. [17]

    P. H. Frampton, K. J. Ludwick, R. J. Scherrer, Phys. Rev. D 84, 063003 (2011); arXiv:1106.4996v1 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  18. [18]

    Viscous Little Rip Cosmology

    I. Brevik, E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov, Phys.Rev. D 84 (2011) 103508; arXiv:1107.4642v2 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  19. [19]

    L. N. Granda, E. Loaiza, IJMPD, 21, (2012) 1250002; arXiv:1111.2454 [hep-th] 30

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  20. [20]

    The final state and thermodynamics of dark energy universe

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D 70, 103522 (2004); hep-th/0408170

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  21. [21]

    Finite-time future singularities in modified Gauss-Bonnet and $\mathcal{F}(R,G)$ gravity and singularity avoidance

    K. Bamba, S. D. Odintsov, L. Sebastiani, S. Zerbini, Eur. Phys. J. C 67, (2010) 295; arXiv:0911.4390 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  22. [22]

    J. D. Barrow, S. Cotsakis, A. Tsokaros, Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 165017 (2010); arXiv:1004.2681 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  23. [23]

    L. P. Chimento, R. Lazkoz, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 19, (2004) 2479; arXiv:gr- qc/0405020

    work page arXiv 2004

  24. [24]

    A. V. Astashenok, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, R. J. Scherrer, Phys. Lett. B 713, (2012) 145; arXiv:1203.1976v1 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  25. [25]

    Inhomogeneous Equation of State of the Universe: Phantom Era, Future Singularity and Crossing the Phantom Barrier

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, Phys.Rev. D 72, 023003 (2005); arXiv:hep-th/0505215

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  26. [26]

    Dutta , R

    S. Dutta , R. J.Scherrer, Phys. Lett. B 676, (2009) 12

    work page 2009

  27. [27]

    Chevallier, D

    M. Chevallier, D. Polarski, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 10 (2001), 213; arXiv:gr- qc/0009008

    work page arXiv 2001

  28. [28]

    Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe

    E.V. Linder, Phys. Rev. Lett., 90 (2003), 091301; arXiv:astro-ph/0208512

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  29. [29]

    Statefinder -- a new geometrical diagnostic of dark energy

    V. Sahni, T. D. Saini, A. A. Starobinsky, U. Alam, JETP Lett. 77, 201 (2003); arXiv:astro-ph/0201498

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  30. [30]

    Observational constraints on the jerk parameter with the data of the Hubble parameter

    A. Al Mamon, K. Bamba, arXiv:1805.02854 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    al., Phys

    Zhong-Xu Zhai, et. al., Phys. Lett. B 727, (2013) 8

    work page 2013

  32. [32]

    L. Wang, P. J. Steinhardt, Astrophys. J. 508, 483 (1998); arXiv:astro- ph/9804015

    work page arXiv 1998

  33. [33]

    E. V. Linder, A. Jenkins, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 346 (2003) 573; arXiv:astro-ph/0305286

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  34. [34]

    E. V. Linder, Phys. Rev. D 72, 043529 (2005); arXiv:astro-ph/0507263 31

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  35. [35]

    E. V. Linder, R. N. Cahn, Astropart. Phys. 28, 481 (2007); arXiv:astro- ph/0701317

    work page arXiv 2007

  36. [36]

    J. B. Dent, S. Dutta, L. Perivolaropoulos, Phys. Rev. D 80, 023514 (2009); arXiv:0903.5296 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  37. [37]

    Huterer, et al., Astroparticle Physics 63, 23 (2015)

    D. Huterer, et al., Astroparticle Physics 63, 23 (2015)

    work page 2015

  38. [38]

    J. B. Dent, S. Dutta, Phys. Rev. D 79, 063516 (2009); arXiv:0808.2689 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  39. [39]

    On the consistency of the expansion with the perturbations

    R. Gannouji, D. Polarski, Phys. Rev. D 98, 083533 (2018); arXiv:1805.08230 [astro-ph.CO] 32

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018