Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Toward universal steering and monitoring of AI models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.03708 v2 pith:4HCJ4C7F submitted 2025-02-06 cs.CL cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.CLcs.AIstat.ML
keywords modelsrepresentationsmodelcapabilitiessteeringconceptcontenteffective
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Modern AI models contain much of human knowledge, yet understanding of their internal representation of this knowledge remains elusive. Characterizing the structure and properties of this representation will lead to improvements in model capabilities and development of effective safeguards. Building on recent advances in feature learning, we develop an effective, scalable approach for extracting linear representations of general concepts in large-scale AI models (language models, vision-language models, and reasoning models). We show how these representations enable model steering, through which we expose vulnerabilities, mitigate misaligned behaviors, and improve model capabilities. Additionally, we demonstrate that concept representations are remarkably transferable across human languages and combinable to enable multi-concept steering. Through quantitative analysis across hundreds of concepts, we find that newer, larger models are more steerable and steering can improve model capabilities beyond standard prompting. We show how concept representations are effective for monitoring misaligned content (hallucinations, toxic content). We demonstrate that predictive models built using concept representations are more accurate for monitoring misaligned content than using models that judge outputs directly. Together, our results illustrate the power of using internal representations to map the knowledge in AI models, advance AI safety, and improve model capabilities.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can LLMs Lie? Investigation beyond Hallucination

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper localizes LLM lying to sparse attention heads and chat-template 'dummy tokens', and shows steering vectors can modulate deception, but the evidence is weakened by selection and small samples.

  2. Resa: Transparent Reasoning Models via SAEs

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SAE-Tuning, a sparse-autoencoder-guided SFT procedure, elicits RL-comparable reasoning in 1.5B models from CoT-free QA data at about $1 and 20 minutes of training.

  3. The Features at Convergence Theorem: a first-principles alternative to the Neural Feature Ansatz for how networks learn representations

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    FACT is a first-order stationarity identity for weight matrices that matches or beats the Neural Feature Ansatz as a description of learned features at convergence.

Pith tools