Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 64 references

Canonical ensemble of a $d$-dimensional Reissner-Nordstr\"om black hole in a cavity

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A d-dimensional Reissner-Nordström black hole in a cavity has two stable phases below a critical charge, and one stable phase above it.

desk verdict A careful, self-contained d-dimensional canonical ensemble for Reissner-Nordström in a cavity, with real new results, though the stability labels are only proven for the spherically symmetric mode. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.15339 v1 pith:4K3SQCWJ submitted 2025-04-21 hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechgr-qc

Tiago V. Fernandes , José P. S. Lemos This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thcond-mat.stat-mechgr-qc PACS 04.70.-s04.70.Dy05.70.Fh
keywords Reissner-NordströmblackholecanonicalensemblecavityheatreservoirEuclideanpathintegralphasetransitioncapacityhigherdimensionsBuchdahlbound
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper constructs the canonical ensemble of a d-dimensional Reissner-Nordström black hole enclosed in a cavity with fixed temperature, radius, and electric charge, using the Euclidean path integral in the zero-loop approximation. It claims that the number of equilibrium black hole solutions is controlled by a single critical charge $Q_s$: below or at $Q_s$ there are three horizon-radius solutions, the smallest and largest stable and the middle one unstable; above $Q_s$ only one stable solution remains. The two stable solutions compete in free energy, giving a first-order phase transition for $Q

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the reduced Euclidean action $I^*(\beta,R,Q;r_+)$ obtained by imposing the Hamiltonian and Gauss constraints on the spherically symmetric Euclidean metric and Maxwell field, together with regularity conditions at the horizon and boundary conditions fixing $\beta$, $R$, and $Q$. Stationary points solve $\beta=\iota(r_+)$, where $\iota$ is the inverse-temperature function; the number and stability of solutions are governed by the saddle points of $\iota$, found analytically from a quartic equation in $x^{d-3}$, with $x=r_+/R$ and $y=\mu Q^2/R^{2d-6}$. Stability of a solution is determined by the sign of the second derivative of $I^*$ with respect to $r_+$, equivalently by positivity of the heat capacity at constant area and charge; the critical charge $y_s$ is where the two saddle points of $\iota$ merge and the third derivative of the action also vanishes. This machinery yields the free energy, entropy, pressure, electric potential, and mean energy, plus the first law, Euler relation, and Gibbs-Duhem relation.

What would settle it

Compute the one-loop determinant of the Euclidean action around the saddle points $r_{+1}$ and $r_{+3}$ (for $y<y_s$) and around $r_{+4}$ (for $y>y_s$), including all non-spherical metric and Maxwell perturbations with the same boundary conditions; a negative eigenvalue on either stable branch would overturn the claimed stability and phase diagram, while its absence would support the spherical-sector result.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that, in the canonical ensemble at fixed cavity radius $R$, temperature $T$, and charge $Q$, the stationary points of the reduced Euclidean action organize according to the dimensionless charge $y=\mu Q^2/R^{2d-6}$. For $0\leq y<y_s$, the inverse-temperature curve $\iota(r_+)$ has two saddle points, giving three black hole solutions $r_{+1}<r_{+2}<r_{+3}$; the first and third are local minima of the action (stable), the second is a saddle (unstable). At $y=y_s$ the two saddles merge, the middle solution becomes a single neutrally stable point, and the transition between $r_{+1}$ and $r_{+3}$ turns from first order to second order; for $y_s<y<1$ only one stable solution $r_{+4}$ remains. The heat capacity at constant area and charge is positive on the stable branches, negative on the unstable branch, and diverges at the saddle temperatures; at $y_s$ the divergence marks a genuine second-order phase transition. In the infinite-cavity limit the small and intermediate solutions reproduce the known stable/unstable pair for charged black holes, while the largest solution becomes a Rindler horizon with the cavity boundary at the Unruh temperature, and the zero-charge limit gives back the known two-branch cavity solutions.

Load-bearing premise

The classification of $r_{+1}$ and $r_{+3}$ as stable rests on the sign of the second derivative of the reduced action with respect to the horizon radius, which accounts only for spherically symmetric fluctuations, so the whole phase structure would fail if a non-spherical perturbation around either point carried a negative mode.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Below $Q_s$, for any fixed charge, the canonical ensemble yields two locally stable black hole solutions, so a first-order phase transition between the small and large black hole occurs at the temperature where their free energies cross.
  • At $Q=Q_s$ the unstable intermediate solution becomes a single point, the free-energy crossing becomes a second-order transition, and the heat capacity diverges at the corresponding temperature.
  • The heat capacity is positive on the stable branches, negative on the unstable branch, and discontinuous at the critical charge, giving a concrete thermodynamic signature of the phase structure.
  • In the infinite-cavity limit the small and intermediate branches reproduce the known stable/unstable thermodynamics of charged black holes, while the largest branch becomes a Rindler horizon whose boundary sits at the Unruh temperature; in the zero-charge limit the two-branch cavity structure is recovered.
  • For the large stable black hole, the temperature at which its free energy vanishes corresponds to a horizon radius above the generalized Buchdahl bound, so the paper argues gravitational collapse sets in before the black-hole--hot-flat-space phase competition is resolved.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next calculation is the full one-loop determinant including non-spherical sectors; if any negative mode exists there, the phase diagram may acquire extra branches or the claimed stable solutions may be metastable rather than true minima.
  • The charged hot flat space is modeled by a non-gravitating shell with charge at the boundary; a self-gravitating charged shell with the same boundary data could test whether the first-order transition to the large black hole survives in a fully dynamical setting.
  • The analytic expressions for $x_s$ and $y_s$ in arbitrary dimension suggest a dimension-dependent locus of critical points; comparing these with numerical solutions of the full stationary-point equation would test the accuracy of the saddle-point classification beyond the qualitative analysis.
  • Since the heat capacity diverges at the second-order transition, extracting its critical exponent from the finite-cavity free energy is a possible route to a mean-field-like characterization of charged black hole phase transitions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs the canonical ensemble of a d-dimensional Reissner-Nordström black hole inside a spherical cavity with fixed temperature T, charge Q, and cavity radius R, using the Euclidean path integral and York's reduced-action method. After imposing the Hamiltonian and Gauss constraints, the authors obtain a reduced action depending on r+ and find, for Q below a critical saddle charge Q_s, three stationary solutions r+1 < r+2 < r+3, of which r+1 and r+3 are classified as stable and r+2 as unstable; for Q > Q_s there is one stable solution r+4. The paper then derives thermodynamic quantities, the heat capacity, and the free energy, and studies favorable phases including a model of charged hot flat space. It reports a first-order phase transition between the two stable black holes for Q < Q_s that becomes second order at Q_s, and identifies a first-order transition between the large black hole and charged hot flat space. The infinite-cavity limit recovers the Davies thermodynamic solutions and a Rindler-type solution, and the zero-charge limit recovers the York solutions. Detailed treatments are given for d = 4 and d = 5.

Significance. If the stability classification and phase structure hold beyond the restricted sector analyzed, this is a valuable contribution: it unifies the York and Davies formalisms, gives analytic formulas for the saddle charge and saddle temperatures in arbitrary d, and provides explicit thermodynamic quantities consistent with the first law, Euler relation, and Smarr formula. Strengths of the manuscript include the self-contained derivation of the reduced action from the Euclidean Einstein-Maxwell action with boundary terms, the analytic solution for the saddle points, the recovery of known four-dimensional results and the Schwarzschild/York limits, and the careful treatment of the d = 5 case. The paper also checks thermodynamic consistency (Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, pressure, electric potential, energy, heat capacity) and connects the finite-cavity ensemble to the Davies point in the infinite-radius limit. However, the central phase-diagram claims are conditional on the one-loop stability analysis and on the ad hoc model of charged hot flat space; these limitations are acknowledged in part but need to be either removed or explicitly qualified in the claims.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III C, Eqs. (40)-(42)] The stability classification is based solely on the sign of ∂²I*/∂r+², i.e., on the Gaussian integration over δr+ only. Non-spherical metric and Maxwell perturbations are not analyzed. Since the labels 'stable' for r+1 and r+3, and hence the first-order and second-order phase transitions between them, are defined by comparing free energies of these branches, the presence of an uncomputed non-spherical negative mode could alter the phase structure. The paper itself cites Refs. [10,20] where cavity-dependent negative modes for Schwarzschild are known; the analogous Reissner-Nordström calculation is absent. Please either provide such an analysis or explicitly state that the stability and phase-transition claims hold only within the spherically symmetric, constrained sector.
  2. [Sec. V B, Eq. (60)] Charged hot flat space is modeled by a nongravitating electrically charged shell, and the choice r_shell = R is made so that F_hfs = 0. This configuration is not a saddle point of the Euclidean action derived in Sec. II, and the shell model is not obtained from the same path integral. The first-order phase transition between the large black hole and charged hot flat space reported in Sec. V C therefore rests on an external toy model. The manuscript does acknowledge that the shell is a surrogate, but the abstract and conclusions present the transition as a result of the ensemble. Please separate the black-hole-sector results from the model-dependent hot-flat-space comparison, and state the latter as a physically motivated but non-derivative model.
  3. [Sec. IV C and Sec. V C] The identification of a second-order phase transition at Q_s is based on the continuity of the free energy and the divergence of the heat capacity at RT_s. A continuous free energy alone does not distinguish a first-order from a second-order transition; the first derivatives of F with respect to T and Q (i.e., S and φ) should be shown to be continuous at the critical point to justify the 'second-order' designation. The equality of r+ on the two branches at the critical point suggests this is true, but the explicit check is missing from the manuscript.
  4. [Sec. V C and Appendix B] The statement that the system 'must suffer gravitational collapse' when r+ exceeds the generalized Buchdahl bound is an inference from a mechanical bound, not from the canonical-ensemble thermodynamics. The manuscript itself notes that this reasoning is 'strictly outside our approach' (Sec. V C). This point should be labeled as a dynamical/speculative comment in the conclusions and should not be counted among the main thermodynamic achievements unless a dynamical stability analysis is supplied.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Reference [32]] The arXiv identifier given for Ref. [32], arXiv:2409.00000, is a placeholder and must be replaced with the correct number before submission.
  2. [Sec. I A and throughout] There are several typographical inconsistencies in the rendering of 'Reissner-Nordström' (e.g., 'Reissner-Nordstr¨ om' and 'Reissner-Nordstr¨ om-Tangherlini'). These should be cleaned up in the final version.
  3. [Sec. III D and Fig. 2] The description of the y = y_s case as 'the solution r+2 is now reduced to a point' is clear, but the text also says 'All solutions are stable, more precisely, x1 is stable, x2 is neutrally stable, and x3 is stable.' The term 'neutrally stable' should be defined, since it is used to describe a saddle point of the action.
  4. [Sec. VI B 5] In the discussion of the heat capacity near the Davies point, the phrases 'infinitely positive' and 'infinitely negative' should be replaced by 'diverges to +∞' and 'diverges to −∞' to avoid ambiguity.
  5. [Eq. (8) and Appendix A] The regularity condition (1/α)(b'/α)'|_0 = 0 is derived and noted as new relative to Refs. [14,30], but it is not used anywhere in the subsequent construction. A brief comment on why this condition is automatically satisfied by the on-shell Reissner-Nordström solution would help the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the branch structure, critical charge, and phase transitions follow from the paper's own reduced action and are not fitted or imported by self-citation.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained. The reduced action (Eq. 23) is obtained from the stated Euclidean Einstein-Maxwell action (Eq. 2) by imposing the Hamiltonian and Gauss constraints (Eqs. 15-16), rather than by assuming the three-solution structure. The stationary-point equation (Eq. 28) is analyzed at the level of its saddle points (Eqs. 33-38), from which the critical charge parameter y_s is obtained analytically; no parameter is fitted to the existence or stability data. Stability is defined by the sign of the second derivative of the reduced action (Eq. 41), and the heat capacity is computed from the same action (Eq. 56), so the branch labels r+1, r+2, r+3, r+4 and the claimed first-order/second-order phase transitions follow from the model's own equations. The main caveat, stated explicitly in Section III C, is that the one-loop test in Eq. (40) covers only spherically symmetric, constraint-preserving perturbations; non-spherical Euclidean modes are not computed. That is a genuine correctness limitation, not circularity, because it concerns the completeness of the stability analysis rather than the derivation of the reduced action from inputs. Self-citations to [30], [32], and [40] are used for comparisons or cross-checks, not to define the central result, and the recovery of York and Davies limits in Section VI is obtained by taking explicit limits of the same formulas rather than by invoking prior work as the source of the conclusion.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central derivation has no fitted parameters. It rests on the standard Euclidean path integral and zero loop approximation, a spherically symmetric reduction, and a stability criterion limited to the spherical mode. The charged hot flat space phase is an auxiliary toy model, and the Buchdahl collapse argument is explicitly outside the thermodynamic formalism.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Euclidean path integral can be restricted to spherically symmetric metrics, and the zero loop approximation selects the stationary points of the reduced action.
    Sections II and III: the path integral is taken over the spherically symmetric line element (3), and the saddle point approximation is used. This is standard in the subfield but is not derived from first principles.
  • domain assumption Stability of a solution is determined solely by the second derivative of the reduced action with respect to r+ (the spherical mode), i.e., positivity of the heat capacity at constant A and Q.
    Section III C, Eq. (41). Non-spherical perturbations are not analyzed, so the stability criterion may miss negative modes.
  • ad hoc to paper Hot flat space with electric charge at the boundary is modeled by a non-gravitating charged shell with r_shell = R.
    Section V B: the shell is introduced to emulate hot flat space; it is not a solution of the Einstein-Maxwell system with gravity.
  • domain assumption The generalized Buchdahl bound can be applied to the thermodynamic system to infer gravitational collapse.
    Section V C and Appendix B: the bound is a mechanical, not thermodynamic, criterion, and the paper says the inference comes from dynamics and is outside the approach.
invented entities (1)
  • Non-gravitating electrically charged shell used as a surrogate for hot flat space
    purpose: To emulate the hot flat space phase with electric charge at the cavity boundary (F_shell = 0) for phase comparison.
    Introduced in Section V B; it is not a solution of the full theory, only a toy model with gravity turned off.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Canonical ensemble of a $d$-dimensional Reissner-Nordstr\"om black hole in a cavity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4K3SQCWJ

@misc{pith2026250415339,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Canonical ensemble of a $d$-dimensional Reissner-Nordstr\"om black hole in a cavity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4K3SQCWJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.15339}
}
abstract

We construct the canonical ensemble of a $d$-dimensional Reissner-Nordstr\"om black hole spacetime in a cavity surrounded by a heat reservoir through the Euclidean path integral formalism. The heat reservoir is described by the boundary of the cavity with fixed radius $R$, fixed temperature $T$, and fixed electric charge $Q$. We use York's approach to find the reduced action, and then perform a zero loop approximation. We find that the number of solutions for the black hole depends on the electric charge being smaller or larger than a critical $Q_s$, having two stable and one unstable solutions for the former case, and one stable solution for the latter. We obtain the system's thermodynamic properties from the partition function. We analyze thermodynamic stability, controlled by the positivity of the heat capacity at constant area and electric charge. We show that there is a discontinuity in the heat capacity, signaling a turning point. We investigate the favorable stable phases and the phase diagram of the system. We show that the two stable black hole solutions can suffer a first order phase transition from one to the other, and at the critical charge $Q_s$ this turns into a second order one. We introduce a model of charged hot flat space, i.e., hot flat space with charge near the boundary. We find that a first order phase transition between the large stable black hole and charged hot flat space occurs at a horizon radius larger than the Buchdahl bound, and comment on the physics. Finally, we recover the Davies thermodynamic solutions and a Rindler solution in the limit of infinite cavity, and the York solutions in the limit of zero charge. Hence, both York and Davies formalisms are unified and connected in our approach. In all instances we mention carefully the four-dimensional case, for which we accomplish new results, and study in detail all aspects of the five-dimensional case.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.15339 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Plots of the saddle point ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Plots of the solutions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Plots of the solutions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The heat capacity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Free energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Favorable states of the canonical ensemble of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: which is d = 5, the generalized Davies temperature, i.e., the temperature when R → ∞, has the expression Ts = 4 10π √ 5µQ2 1 2 , and so for µQ2 = 0.005 as in the figure it yields Ts = 0.320, with the last equality being approximate. The Rindler solution is the larges…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Plot of the two solutions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: The heat capacity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [32]

    Schwarzschild-anti-de Sitter black holes within isothermal cavity: Thermodynamics, phase tran- sitions, and the Dirichlet problem

    M. M. Akbar, “Schwarzschild-anti-de Sitter black holes within isothermal cavity: Thermodynamics, phase tran- sitions, and the Dirichlet problem”, Phys. Rev. D 82, 064001 (2010); arXiv:hep-th/0401228

    arXiv 2010

  2. [1]

    It is this R→ +∞ limit that in four dimensions gives Davies results [6]

    The action for the canonical ensemble in the R → +∞ limit The limit of infinite cavity radius for the small and in- termediate solutions yields that the canonical ensemble is essentially defined by the temperature T and the elec- tric chargeQ at infinity. It is this R→ +∞ limit that in four dimensions gives Davies results [6]. This means that Davies’ ther...

    work page

  3. [2]

    (66) to get r+(β,Q ), i.e., r+(T,Q )

    Solutions and stability of the canonical ensemble in the R → +∞ limit To find the solutions of this canonical ensemble, we must invert Eq. (66) to get r+(β,Q ), i.e., r+(T,Q ). This can be done by solving the following equation (d− 3) 4πT (r2d−6 + −µQ2)−r2d−5 + = 0, (67) which generally is not solvable analytically for generic d, although one can perform ...

    work page

  4. [3]

    (65) evaluated at the extrema of Eq

    Thermodynamics in the R → +∞ limit (i) Entropy, electric potential, and energy With the solutions of the canonical ensemble found in the limit of infinite radius of the cavity, R→ +∞, one can find I0, i.e., the action in the zero loop approximation given in Eq. (65) evaluated at the extrema of Eq. (66). The thermodynamics for the system follows through th...

    work page

  5. [4]

    The small black hole r+1 and hot flat space with electric charge at infinity

    Favorable phases There are two stable phases. The small black hole r+1 and hot flat space with electric charge at infinity. Since the black hole r+1 has positive free energy and hot flat space with electric charge at infinity has zero free energy, and systems with lower free energy are preferred, whenever the system finds itself in the black hole r+1 solu...

    work page

  6. [5]

    In this setting, the reservoir of temperature T and electric charge Q is at infinity

    d = 4: Analysis leading to Davies’ thermodynamic theory of black holes and Davies point The dimension d = 4 is specially interesting since in the R→∞ gives the results of Davies’ thermodynamic theory of black holes [6]. In this setting, the reservoir of temperature T and electric charge Q is at infinity. The reduced action in Eq. (65) in d = 4 gives I∗ = ...

    work page

  7. [6]

    (88) the redefinitions S→ 8πS, T→ 1 8πT and CQ 8π →CQ

    by performing in Eq. (88) the redefinitions S→ 8πS, T→ 1 8πT and CQ 8π →CQ

    work page

  8. [7]

    We present here the summary for this specific case in the R→ +∞ limit

    d = 5: Analysis The dimensiond = 5 is a typical higher dimension that we have been analyzing. We present here the summary for this specific case in the R→ +∞ limit. The reduced action in Eq. (65) in d = 5 can be written simply as I∗ = β 2 3πr2 + 4 + Q2 r2 + − π2r3 + 2 , (89) where we have used µ = 4 3π and Ω3 = 2π2. The station- ary points are described b...

    arXiv

Show all 64 references
  1. [8]

    We want to compare this mass to the Buchdahl bound mass in d dimensions

    The electric uncharged case: Canonical ensemble radius and the generalized Buchdahl radius in d dimensions We want to analyze a thermodynamic energy or mass to radius ratio for the d-dimensional canonical ensemble, namely, the energy or mass for which the black hole free energ...

  2. [9]

    The electric charged case: Canonical and grand canonical ensembles radii and the generalized Buchdahl radius in d dimensions We now want to analyze a thermodynamic energy or mass to radius ratio for two ensembles, one is the d- dimensional canonical ensemble with electric char...

  3. [10]

    Black holes and the second law

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and the second law”, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 4, 737 (1972)

    1972

  4. [11]

    Mass formula for Kerr black holes

    L. Smarr, “Mass formula for Kerr black holes”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 71 (1973)

    1973

  5. [12]

    The four laws of black hole mechanics

    J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter, and S. W. Hawking, “The four laws of black hole mechanics”, Commun. Math. Phys.31, 161 (1973)

    1973

  6. [13]

    Particle creation by black holes

    S. W. Hawking, “Particle creation by black holes”, Com- mun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975)

    1975

  7. [14]

    Path-integral derivation of black hole radiance

    J. B. Hartle and S. Hawking, “Path-integral derivation of black hole radiance”, Phys. Rev. D 13, 2188 (1976)

    1976

  8. [15]

    The thermodynamic theory of black holes

    P. C. W. Davies, “The thermodynamic theory of black holes”, Proc. R. Soc. A 353, 499 (1977)

    1977

  9. [16]

    Action integrals and partition functions in quantum gravity

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Action integrals and partition functions in quantum gravity”, Phys. Rev. D 15, 2752 (1977)

    1977

  10. [17]

    Instability of flat space at finite temperature

    D. J. Gross, M. J. Perry, and L. G. Yaffe, “Instability of flat space at finite temperature”, Phys. Rev. D 25, 330 (1982)

    1982

  11. [18]

    Thermodynamics of black holes in anti-de Sitter space

    S. W. Hawking and D. N. Page, “Thermodynamics of black holes in anti-de Sitter space”, Commun. Math. Phys 87, 577 (1983)

    1983

  12. [19]

    Euclidean Schwarzschild negative mode

    B. Allen, “Euclidean Schwarzschild negative mode”, Phys. Rev. D 30, 1153 (1984)

    1984

  13. [20]

    Black hole thermodynamics and the Eu- clidean Einstein action

    J. W. York, “Black hole thermodynamics and the Eu- clidean Einstein action”, Phys. Rev. D 33, 2092 (1986)

    1986

  14. [21]

    Action principle and partition function for the gravitational field in black hole topologies

    B. F. Whiting and J. W. York, “Action principle and partition function for the gravitational field in black hole topologies”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1336 (1988)

    1988

  15. [22]

    Additivity of the en- tropies of black holes and matter in equilibrium

    E. A. Martinez and J. W. York, “Additivity of the en- tropies of black holes and matter in equilibrium”, Phys. Rev. D 40, 2124 (1989)

    1989

  16. [23]

    Charged black hole in a grand canonical ensemble

    H. W. Braden, J. D. Brown, B. F. Whiting, and J. W. York, “Charged black hole in a grand canonical ensemble”, Phys. Rev. D 42, 3376 (1990)

    1990

  17. [24]

    Canonical ensemble for arbitrary con- figurations of self-gravitating systems

    O. B. Zaslavskii, “Canonical ensemble for arbitrary con- figurations of self-gravitating systems”, Phys. Lett. A 152, 463 (1991)

    1991

  18. [25]

    Temper- ature, energy, and heat capacity of asymptotically anti- de Sitter black holes

    J. D. Brown, J. Creighton, and R. B. Mann, “Temper- ature, energy, and heat capacity of asymptotically anti- de Sitter black holes”, Phys. Rev. D 50, 6394 (1994); arXiv:gr-qc/9405007

    1994 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Thermodynamics of the two-dimensional black hole in the Teitelboim-Jackiw theory

    J. P. S. Lemos, “Thermodynamics of the two-dimensional black hole in the Teitelboim-Jackiw theory”, Phys. Rev. D 54, 6206 (1996); arXiv:gr-qc/9608016

    1996 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Thermodynamics of Reissner-Nordstr¨ om-anti-de Sitter black holes in the grand canonical ensemble

    C. S. Pe¸ ca and J. P. S. Lemos, “Thermodynamics of Reissner-Nordstr¨ om-anti-de Sitter black holes in the grand canonical ensemble”, Phys. Rev. D 59, 124007 (1999); arXiv:gr-qc/9805004

    1999 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Thermodynamics of toroidal black holes

    C. S. Pe¸ ca and J. P. S. Lemos, “Thermodynamics of toroidal black holes”, J. Math. Phys. 41, 4783 (2000); arXiv:gr-qc/9809029

    2000 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Stability and the negative mode for a Schwarzschild black hole in a finite cavity

    J. P. Gregory and S. F. Ross, “Stability and the negative mode for a Schwarzschild black hole in a finite cavity”, Phys. Rev. D 64, 124006 (2001); arXiv:hep-th/0106220

    2001 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Phase transitions and critical behaviour for charged black holes

    S. Carlip and S. Vaidya, “Phase transitions and critical behaviour for charged black holes”, Classical Quantum Gravity 20, 3827 (2003); arXiv:gr-qc/0306054

    2003 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Charged black hole in a canonical ensemble

    A. P. Lundgren, “Charged black hole in a canonical ensemble”, Phys. Rev. D 77, 044014 (2008); arXiv:gr- qc/0612119

    2008

  25. [33]

    J. X. Lu, S. Roy, and Z. Xiao, Phase transitions and critical behavior of black branes in canonical en- semble, J. High Energy Phys. JHEP 01 (2011) 133; arXiv:1010.2068 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Thermodynamics of five-dimensional Schwarzschild black holes in the canon- ical ensemble

    R. Andr´ e and J. P. S. Lemos, “Thermodynamics of five-dimensional Schwarzschild black holes in the canon- ical ensemble”, Phys. Rev. D 102, 024006 (2020); arXiv:2006.10050 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Thermodynamics of d-dimensional Schwarzschild black holes in the canon- ical ensemble

    R. Andr´ e and J. P. S. Lemos, “Thermodynamics of d-dimensional Schwarzschild black holes in the canon- ical ensemble”, Phys. Rev. D 103, 064069 (2021); arXiv:2101.11010 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Gravitational and gravitoscalar thermo- dynamics

    S. Miyashita, “Gravitational and gravitoscalar thermo- dynamics”, J. High Energy Phys. JHEP 09 (2021) 121; arXiv:2106.12273 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    The minus sign in the first law of de Sitter hori- zons

    B. Banihashemi, T. Jacobson, A. Svesko, and M. Visser, “The minus sign in the first law of de Sitter hori- zons”, J. High Energy Phys. JHEP 01 (2023) 054; arXiv:2208.11706 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Black holes and hot shells in the Euclidean path integral approach to quan- tum gravity

    J. P. S. Lemos and O. B. Zaslavskii, “Black holes and hot shells in the Euclidean path integral approach to quan- tum gravity”, Classical Quantum Gravity 40, 235012 (2023); arXiv:2304.06740 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Grand canonical ensemble of a d-dimensional Reissner-N¨ ordstrom black 39 hole in a cavity

    T. V. Fernandes and J. P. S. Lemos, “Grand canonical ensemble of a d-dimensional Reissner-N¨ ordstrom black 39 hole in a cavity”, Phys. Rev D 108, 084053 (2023); arXiv:2309.12388 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Hot spaces with positive cosmological constant in the canonical ensem- ble: de Sitter solution, Schwarzschild-de Sitter black hole, and Nariai universe

    J. P. S. Lemos and O. B. Zaslavskii, “Hot spaces with positive cosmological constant in the canonical ensem- ble: de Sitter solution, Schwarzschild-de Sitter black hole, and Nariai universe”, Phys. Rev. D 109, 084016 (2024); arXiv:2402.05166 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Gibbons-Hawking action for electrically charged black holes in the canoni- cal ensemble and Davies’ thermodynamic theory of black holes

    T. V. Fernandes and J. P. S. Lemos, “Gibbons-Hawking action for electrically charged black holes in the canoni- cal ensemble and Davies’ thermodynamic theory of black holes”, to be published; arXiv:2409.00000 [hep-th]

  34. [42]

    The evolution of unstable black holes in anti-de Sitter space

    S. S. Gubser and I. Mitra, “The evolution of unstable black holes in anti-de Sitter space”, J. High Energy Phys. JHEP 08 (2001) 018; arXiv:hep-th/0011127

    2001 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Classical and thermodynamic stability of black branes

    H. S. Reall, “Classical and thermodynamic stability of black branes”, Phys. Rev. D 64, 044005 (2001); arXiv:hep-th/0104071

    2001 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Analytic evidence of Gubser-Mitra con- jecture

    U. Miyamoto, “Analytic evidence of Gubser-Mitra con- jecture”, Phys. Lett. B 659, 380 (2008); arXiv:0709.1028 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  37. [45]

    The Gregory-Laflamme insta- bility of the Schwarzschild black string exterior

    S. C. Collingbourne, “The Gregory-Laflamme insta- bility of the Schwarzschild black string exterior”, J. Math. Phys. 62, 032502 (2021); arXiv:2007.08441 [gr- qc]

    2021 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Fundamental thermodynamical equa- tion of a self-gravitating system

    E. A. Martinez, “Fundamental thermodynamical equa- tion of a self-gravitating system”, Phys. Rev. D 53, 7062 (1996); arXiv:gr-qc/9601037

    1996 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Entropy of a self-gravitating electrically charged thin shell and the black hole limit

    J. P. S. Lemos, G. M. Quinta, and O. B. Zaslavskii, “Entropy of a self-gravitating electrically charged thin shell and the black hole limit”, Phys. Rev. D 91, 104027 (2015); arXiv:1503.00018 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Thermody- namics and entropy of self-gravitating matter shells and black holes in d dimensions

    R. Andr´ e, J. P. S. Lemos, and G. M. Quinta, “Thermody- namics and entropy of self-gravitating matter shells and black holes in d dimensions”, Phys. Rev. D 99, 125013 (2019); arXiv:1905.05239 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Electrically charged spherical matter shells in higher dimensions: Entropy, thermodynamic stability, and the black hole limit

    T. V. Fernandes and J. P. S. Lemos, “Electrically charged spherical matter shells in higher dimensions: Entropy, thermodynamic stability, and the black hole limit”, Phys. Rev D 106, 104008 (2022); arXiv:2208.11127 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Thermodynamical and dynamical stability of a self- gravitating charged thin shell

    L. M. Reyes, M. Chiapparini, and S. E. Perez Bergli- affa, “Thermodynamical and dynamical stability of a self- gravitating charged thin shell”, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 151 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    Buchdahl type inequalities in d dimen- sions

    M. Wright, “Buchdahl type inequalities in d dimen- sions”, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 215005 (2015); arXiv:1506.02858 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Black holes: From galactic nuclei to el- ementary particles

    J. P. S. Lemos, “Black holes: From galactic nuclei to el- ementary particles”, in Proceedings of the XXIth Annual Meeting of the Brazilian Astronomical Society , edited by F. Jablonski, F. Elizalde, L. Sodr´ e, and V. Jablonsky (In- stituto Astronˆ omico e Geof´ ısico, USP, S˜...

    1996 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Black holes and high energy physics: From astrophysics to large extra dimensions

    M. F. Wondrak, M. Bleicher, and P. Nicolini, “Black holes and high energy physics: From astrophysics to large extra dimensions”, in Walter Greiner Memorial Volume, edited by P. O. Hess and H. St¨ ocker (World Scientific, Singapore, 2018), p. 359; arXiv:1708.06763 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Hawking emission from quantum gravity black holes

    P. Nicolini and E. Winstanley, “Hawking emission from quantum gravity black holes”, J. High Energy Phys. JHEP 11 (2011) 075; 1108.4419 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  47. [55]

    The path integral approach to quantum gravity

    S. W. Hawking, “The path integral approach to quantum gravity”, in General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, edited by S. Hawking and W. Israel (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979), p. 746

    1979

  48. [56]

    Vacuum polarization and the sponta- neous loss of charge by black holes

    G. W. Gibbons, “Vacuum polarization and the sponta- neous loss of charge by black holes”, Commun. Math. Phys. 44, 245 (1975)

    1975

  49. [57]

    Solitonic black holes in gauged N = 2 supergravity

    V. A. Kosteleck´ y and M. J. Perry, “Solitonic black holes in gauged N = 2 supergravity”, Phys. Lett. B 371, 191 (1996); arXiv:hep-th/9512222

    1996 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Magnetic charge and black hole supersymmetric quantum statistical relation

    P. B. Genolini and C. Toldo, “Magnetic charge and black hole supersymmetric quantum statistical relation”, Phys. Rev. D 107, L121902 (2023); 2304.00605 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  51. [59]

    S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Struc- ture of Space-Time (Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 1973)

    1973

  52. [60]

    Schwarzschild field in n dimensions and the dimensionality of space problem

    F. R. Tangherlini, “Schwarzschild field in n dimensions and the dimensionality of space problem”, Il Nuovo Ci- mento 27, 636 (1963)

    1963

  53. [61]

    Hewitt, Vacuum Polarisation on Higher Dimen- sional Black Hole Spacetimes (Ph.D

    M. Hewitt, Vacuum Polarisation on Higher Dimen- sional Black Hole Spacetimes (Ph.D. thesis, University of Sheffield, 2015); http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/8342/

    2015

  54. [62]

    The large N limit of superconfor- mal field theories and supergravity

    J. M. Maldacena, “The large N limit of superconfor- mal field theories and supergravity”, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998), Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 1113 (1999) (reprint); hep-th/9711200

    1998 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Super- symmetric phases of AdS4/CFT3

    P. B. Genolini, A. Cabo-Bizet, and S. Murthy, “Super- symmetric phases of AdS4/CFT3”, J. High Energy Phys. JHEP 06 (2023) 125; arXiv:2301.00763 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Black holes at the large hadron collider

    G. Landsberg, “Black holes at the large hadron collider”, in Quantum Aspects of Black Holes , edited by X. Calmet (Springer, New York, 2015), p. 267

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.