Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 86 references

Transition-path sampling for Run-and-Tumble particles

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Run-and-tumble particles can be studied with transition-path sampling, and alternating passive and active phases is found to minimize the mean barrier-crossing time.

desk verdict A sound extension of TPS to run-and-tumble particles with a plausible speedup result, held back by missing error analysis and path-space validation. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.12368 v1 pith:4LMZH3XV submitted 2024-11-19 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mechphysics.comp-ph

Thomas Kiechl , Thomas Franosch , Michele Caraglio This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.stat-mechphysics.comp-ph
keywords transition-pathsamplingrun-and-tumbleparticlesactivematterrareeventstimeMetropolisacceptanceprobabilitytargetsearchmicroscopicreversibility
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper generalizes transition-path sampling (TPS), a Monte Carlo method that samples the rare reactive trajectories connecting two basins, to run-and-tumble particles (RTPs) that switch between passive diffusion and self-propelled runs. Because RTPs lack microscopic reversibility, the standard backward dynamics used by TPS is not available; the authors instead prescribe a backward dynamics with a well-defined path probability and derive the corresponding Metropolis acceptance probability, Eq. (17). They benchmark the resulting sampler against direct Langevin simulation and obtain matching transition-path-time distributions across all tested rate pairs. The physics payoff is that alternating passive and active phases with tumbling shortens the mean transition-path time below both the fully passive and the fully active cases, with a minimum of about $8.5\tau$ at rates $\lambda_{0\to1}=0.2/\tau$ and $\lambda_{1\to0}=0.7/\tau$. This matters because barrier-crossing events in active systems, such as bacteria searching for targets, are rare and otherwise costly to simulate directly.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the backward propagator $\bar{P}_{\Delta t}(\omega_i|\omega_{i+1})$ of Eq. (13) together with the Metropolis factor of Eq. (17). The backward dynamics is chosen so that trajectories generated backward in time look like forward trajectories, and the passive-particle detailed balance relation (Eq. 16) lets the position propagators be rewritten in terms of Boltzmann weights and force--velocity exponentials. A telescoping identity (Eq. 18) collapses the phase-switching probabilities into endpoint factors, so the final acceptance ratio depends on the ratio of steady-state reactant densities, endpoint Boltzmann weights, and products over old and new path segments. In the passive limit the formula reduces to standard TPS, and in the fully active limit it reduces to the earlier active-Brownian-particle result, which is what allows shooting moves to sample the correct reactive-path ensemble.

What would settle it

Run the TPS algorithm and a direct Langevin simulation for a rate pair outside the benchmarked set, for example $\lambda_{0\to1}=8/\tau$ and $\lambda_{1\to0}=3/\tau$, and compare the full transition-path-time distributions; a statistically significant mismatch would show that the acceptance rule or the numerical reactant density is not generally valid.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the irreversibility of RTP dynamics is not an obstacle to transition-path sampling. The authors define a backward dynamics (Eqs. 10--12) in which the self-propulsion velocity is odd under time reversal and the potential force is even, giving a single-step backward propagator with a well-defined path probability; joining forward and backward branches from an unperturbed shooting point, they derive the closed acceptance probability in Eq. (17). The only non-analytic input is the steady-state distribution $\rho(\omega_0)$ in the reactant basin, estimated numerically from Langevin simulations. With that input, the sampled transition-path-time distribution reproduces the brute-force result for rate pairs across $[0,10/\tau]$, including the passive limit, the fully active limit, and the intermittent regime. The paper further claims that tumbling improves crossing by randomizing the propulsion direction and detaching trajectories from the potential walls, so a tuned passive-active mixture can outperform both pure passive diffusion and pure active swimming.

Load-bearing premise

The acceptance probability requires the steady-state distribution of microstates inside the reactant basin, which is not known analytically for active particles and is estimated here by counting occupation frequencies in long Langevin simulations; for rate pairs or potentials outside the benchmarked range, an inaccurate estimate would bias the sampled reactive trajectories.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Rare barrier-crossing events of RTPs can be sampled efficiently without knowing a reaction coordinate beforehand, using the same trajectory-space Metropolis logic as equilibrium TPS.
  • Transition-path-time distributions for RTPs can be computed across the whole rate plane, so the effect of tumbling duration and frequency on rare transitions can be mapped systematically.
  • The finding that an intermittent passive-active mixture minimizes mean transition-path time identifies tumbling as a kinetic control parameter, not just a search-strategy parameter.
  • The authors argue the same backward-dynamics strategy applies to other irreversible active models, including chiral ABPs, anisotropic-diffusion particles, active Ornstein-Uhlenbeck particles, and gradient-orienting particles.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The numerical estimation of $\rho(\omega_0)$ is the practical bottleneck of the method; an on-the-fly or self-consistent estimate would make the sampler effectively black-box for arbitrary potentials, which the paper does not demonstrate.
  • The reported location of the TPT minimum ($\lambda_{0\to1}=0.2/\tau$, $\lambda_{1\to0}=0.7/\tau$) is specific to the double-well parameters used; scanning barrier height, Péclet number, and persistence would test whether the tumbling-speedup effect is universal or parameter-dependent.
  • Because TPS yields reactive trajectories without a reaction coordinate, the same algorithm could serve as a reference for forward-flux and machine-learning rare-event methods on active-particle problems, though no such comparison is made here.
  • The wall-surfing-versus-detachment mechanism suggests an experimental signature: in microfluidic barrier landscapes, tracking individual bacteria should show that cells with intermittent tumbling produce transition paths that are more concentrated near the minimum energy path than persistently swimming cells.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript elaborates a transition-path-sampling (TPS) scheme for run-and-tumble particles (RTPs) that alternate between passive and active Brownian phases. The key theoretical step is the definition of a backward dynamics (Eqs. (10)-(12)) and the derivation of the corresponding Metropolis acceptance probability (Eq. (17)), which accounts for the lack of microscopic reversibility through a ratio involving the numerically estimated steady-state density ρ(ω0). The method is validated by comparing transition-path-time (TPT) distributions against brute-force Langevin simulations in a double-well potential (Figs. 3 and 7). The authors use the sampled transition-path ensemble to show that tumbling reduces the mean transition-path time below both the fully passive and fully active limits, with a minimum near λ0→1 ≈ 0.2/τ and λ1→0 ≈ 0.7/τ (Fig. 4).

Significance. The extension is significant because it brings a widely used rare-event sampling method to a paradigmatic active-matter model, complementing the earlier ABP adaptation of Ref. [32]. The derivation is self-contained and free of fitted parameters, and the validation against direct simulation is an appropriate external benchmark. The observation that tumble-induced randomization shortens transition paths is a concrete, testable prediction. The appendices (Fokker-Planck equations and stochastic path integral) strengthen the formal basis. The main caveat, discussed below, is that the acceptance rule relies on a numerical steady-state density whose accuracy is not quantified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III, Eq. (17)] The acceptance probability uses ρ(ω0^new)/ρ(ω0^old), where ρ is estimated as the relative occupation frequency of microstates in the reactant basin. No binning, equilibration time, simulation length, or statistical uncertainty is reported for this estimate. Because backward-shooting endpoints typically lie on the boundary of R, where the stationary density is small, the estimate may be poorly converged there. A biased ρ biases the whole sampled transition-path ensemble, not only P(t_TPT). Please add a convergence analysis of ρ (e.g., dependence on bin size and sampling time) and report its statistical error, or show that the acceptance statistics are insensitive to this input.
  2. [Sec. III, Fig. 5] The reactive density m(r) and current J(r) are presented only for TPS ensembles, with no comparison to direct Langevin simulation. Since Figs. 3 and 7 benchmark only the TPT distribution, which is a one-dimensional projection of the path ensemble, agreement in P(t_TPT) does not by itself establish that the sampled path-space distribution is unbiased. Please benchmark m(r) and J(r) against brute-force MD for at least the cases in Fig. 5, or provide an argument why the TPT match suffices.
  3. [Sec. III, Fig. 4] Fig. 4 reports ⟨t_TPT⟩ without error bars, and the text states that P(t_TPT) was checked 'across all combinations of rates λ0→1, λ1→0 ∈ [0,10/τ]' although only the points A–G are shown (Fig. 7). Please report statistical errors (e.g., block averages over the 10^8 reactive paths) and either show the full grid or qualify the statement to 'the tested set of rate combinations'.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. IV, Conclusions] There is a typo: 'findinds' should be 'findings', and 'RPTs' should be 'RTPs' in the sentence 'for RPTs not only the average TPT is decreased'.
  2. [Sec. III, Fig. 4] The optimal rates are given as λ0→1 = 0.2/τ in the text but as λ0→1 = 0.24/τ in the caption of Fig. 4; please reconcile these values.
  3. [Eq. (18)] The index ℓ is not defined before its use in the product; please define it (presumably the length of the path segment).
  4. [Fig. 5] The colorbar labels show '-0.0000' and '0.0000' for the minimum m(r); the negative zero is confusing and should be replaced by 0.
  5. [Appendix B] The phrase 'RTP particles' is redundant; use 'RTPs'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the RTP extension of TPS is derived from detailed balance in this paper and validated against brute-force Langevin simulation; no prediction reduces to a fitted input or to a self-citation by construction.

full rationale

The central methodological claim is the derivation of the Metropolis acceptance probability, Eq. (17), for Run-and-Tumble particles. That derivation is self-contained: Eq. (5) is the standard detailed-balance condition in trajectory space, Eq. (6) defines the path weight, Eqs. (7) and (13) give the forward and chosen backward propagators, and Eq. (17) follows by direct algebra using the passive-particle detailed-balance relation, Eq. (16). No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The steady-state density rho(omega) in the reactant basin is an input, estimated as the authors state: 'we first numerically estimate rho(omega) as the relative occupation frequency of microstates in the reactant basin omega in R by performing standard Langevin simulations'; it is not tuned to reproduce the transition-path ensemble. The output TPT distributions are then benchmarked against brute-force integration of the same equations of motion (Figs. 3 and 7, Appendix D), which is an external check on the sampling algorithm itself. The tumble-induced speedup reported in Fig. 4 emerges from the simulated reactive path ensemble, not from the form of the acceptance rule. The cited prior work, Ref. [32] by two of the present authors, supplies the general idea that arbitrary backward dynamics can be corrected through the acceptance probability, but this paper re-derives that principle in the RTP context, so the self-citation is not load-bearing. The lack of an analytic rho for active particles is a practical accuracy limitation for untested parameters, but it is not a circular step because no claimed result is equivalent by construction to that numerical estimate.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation rests on standard stochastic calculus (Itô discretization, passive detailed balance), on the well-definedness of the chosen backward dynamics, and on a numerical estimate of the reactant steady-state distribution. No new physical entities are introduced, and no parameters are fitted to data.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Passive detailed balance for Brownian dynamics in a conservative potential, Eq. (16).
    Used to rewrite the backward propagator in Eq. (15) and to derive the acceptance probability Eq. (17). It holds exactly for the passive sector of the model.
  • domain assumption The chosen backward dynamics, Eqs. (10)-(13), defines a well-defined path probability density.
    Correctness of the TPS acceptance rule requires a normalized path probability for the backward shooting, following the argument of Ref. [32]. This is stated in the text and implemented through the discrete backward propagator.
  • domain assumption The steady-state distribution ρ(ω0) in the reactant basin is accessible via numerical Langevin simulation.
    Eq. (17) requires ρ(ω0). For active particles no general analytic form is known, so it is estimated from simulation. The MD benchmarks support this for the tested parameters.
  • domain assumption A Fokker-Planck equation and path integral can be formulated for the discrete RTP model.
    The authors state the algorithm works provided such a formulation exists; Appendices A and C derive it under Itô discretization and a symbolic path-integral representation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Transition-path sampling for Run-and-Tumble particles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4LMZH3XV

@misc{pith2026241112368,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Transition-path sampling for Run-and-Tumble particles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4LMZH3XV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.12368}
}
read the original abstract

We elaborate and validate a generalization of the renowned transition-path-sampling algorithm for a paradigmatic model of active particles, namely the Run-and-Tumble particles. Notwithstanding the non-equilibrium character of these particles, we show how the consequent lack of the microscopical reversibility property, which is usually required by transition-path sampling, can be circumvented by identifying reasonable backward dynamics with a well-defined path-probability density. Our method is then applied to characterize the structure and kinetics of rare transition pathways undergone by Run-and-Tumble particles having to cross a potential barrier in order to find a target.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.12368 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Potential landscape as given in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Illustration of the TPS algorithm. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Transition-Path-Time distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Reactive probability density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Transition-Path-time distribution of an RTP with infinite passive-to-active rate and an active-to-passive rate of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Transition-Path-Time distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [32]

    Transition path sam- pling for non-equilibrium dynamics without predefined reaction coordinates,

    P. Buijsman and P. G. Bolhuis, “Transition path sam- pling for non-equilibrium dynamics without predefined reaction coordinates,” J. Chem. Phys. 152, 044108 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [1]

    Scholz, The mechanics of earthquakes and faulting (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002)

    C. Scholz, The mechanics of earthquakes and faulting (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002)

    2002

  3. [2]

    Scale-free networks of earth- quakes and aftershocks,

    M. Baiesi and M. Paczuski, “Scale-free networks of earth- quakes and aftershocks,” Phys. Rev. E69, 066106 (2004)

    2004

  4. [3]

    Pattern formation triggered by rare events: lessons from the spread of rabies,

    F. Jeltsch, M. S. M¨ uller, V. Grimm, C. Wissel, and R. Brandl, “Pattern formation triggered by rare events: lessons from the spread of rabies,” Proc. R. Soc. B 264, 495 (1997)

    1997

  5. [4]

    Embrechts, C

    P. Embrechts, C. Kl¨ uppelberg, and T. Mikosch, Mod- elling Extremal Events: For Insurance and Finance (Springer, Dordrecht, London, 2002)

    2002

  6. [5]

    Theory of protein folding: The energy landscape per- spective,

    J. N. Onuchic, Z. Luthey-Schulten, and P. G. Wolynes, “Theory of protein folding: The energy landscape per- spective,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 48, 545 (1997)

    1997

  7. [6]

    Nonphysical sampling dis- tributions in Monte Carlo free-energy estimation: Um- brella sampling,

    G. Torrie and J. J.P. Valleau, “Nonphysical sampling dis- tributions in Monte Carlo free-energy estimation: Um- brella sampling,” J. Comput. Phys. 23, 187 (1977)

    work page 1977

  8. [7]

    Escaping free-energy min- ima,

    A. Laio and M. Parrinello, “Escaping free-energy min- ima,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 12562 (2002)

    work page 2002

Show all 86 references
  1. [8]

    Transition path sampling and the calculation of rate constants,

    C. Dellago, P. G. Bolhuis, F. S. Csajka, and D. Chandler, “Transition path sampling and the calculation of rate constants,” J. Chem. Phys. 108, 1964 (1998)

    1998

  2. [9]

    TRANSITION PATH SAMPLING: Throwing ropes over rough mountain passes, in the dark,

    P. G. Bolhuis, D. Chandler, C. Dellago, and P. L. Geissler, “TRANSITION PATH SAMPLING: Throwing ropes over rough mountain passes, in the dark,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 53, 291 (2002)

    2002

  3. [10]

    Transition path sampling,

    C. Dellago, P. G. Bolhuis, and P. L. Geissler, “Transition path sampling,” in Advances in Chemical Physics (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2003)

    2003

  4. [11]

    A novel path sampling method for the calculation of rate con- stants,

    T. S. van Erp, D. Moroni, and P. G. Bolhuis, “A novel path sampling method for the calculation of rate con- stants,” J. Chem. Phys. 118, 7762 (2003)

    2003

  5. [12]

    Elaborating transition interface sampling methods,

    T. S. van Erp and P. G. Bolhuis, “Elaborating transition interface sampling methods,” J. Comput. Phys. 205, 157 (2005)

    2005

  6. [13]

    Computing time scales from reaction coordinates by milestoning,

    A. K. Faradjian and R. Elber, “Computing time scales from reaction coordinates by milestoning,” J. Chem. Phys. 120, 10880 (2004)

    2004

  7. [14]

    Exact milestoning,

    J. M. Bello-Rivas and R. Elber, “Exact milestoning,” J. Chem. Phys. 142, 094102 (2015)

    2015

  8. [15]

    For- ward flux sampling for rare event simulations,

    R. J. Allen, C. Valeriani, and P. R. ten Wolde, “For- ward flux sampling for rare event simulations,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 463102 (2009)

    2009

  9. [16]

    Studying rare events using forward-flux sampling: Recent breakthroughs and future outlook,

    S. Hussain and A. Haji-Akbari, “Studying rare events using forward-flux sampling: Recent breakthroughs and future outlook,” J. Chem. Phys. 152, 060901 (2020)

    2020

  10. [17]

    Shear-induced order in suspensions of hard spheres,

    B. J. Ackerson and P. N. Pusey, “Shear-induced order in suspensions of hard spheres,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1033 (1988)

    1988

  11. [18]

    Crystal nucleation of colloidal suspensions under shear,

    R. Blaak, S. Auer, D. Frenkel, and H. L¨ owen, “Crystal nucleation of colloidal suspensions under shear,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 068303 (2004)

    2004

  12. [19]

    Observation of polymer conformation hysteresis in extensional flow,

    C. M. Schroeder, H. P. Babcock, E. S. G. Shaqfeh, and S. Chu, “Observation of polymer conformation hysteresis in extensional flow,” Science 301, 1515 (2003)

    2003

  13. [20]

    Driven DNA transport into an asymmetric nanometer-scale pore,

    S. E. Henrickson, M. Misakian, B. Robertson, and J. J. Kasianowicz, “Driven DNA transport into an asymmetric nanometer-scale pore,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3057 (2000)

    2000

  14. [21]

    Physics of microswimmers-Single particle motion and collective behavior: a review,

    J. Elgeti, R. G. Winkler, and G. Gompper, “Physics of microswimmers-Single particle motion and collective behavior: a review,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 056601 (2015)

    2015

  15. [22]

    Hydro- dynamics of soft active matter,

    M. C. Marchetti, J. F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, “Hydro- dynamics of soft active matter,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1143 (2013)

    2013

  16. [23]

    Active particles in complex and crowded environments,

    C. Bechinger, R. Di Leonardo, H. L¨ owen, C. Reichhardt, G. Volpe, and G. Volpe, “Active particles in complex and crowded environments,” Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 045006 (2016)

    2016

  17. [24]

    Efficient transition path sampling for nonequilibrium stochastic dynamics,

    G. E. Crooks and D. Chandler, “Efficient transition path sampling for nonequilibrium stochastic dynamics,” Phys. Rev. E 64, 026109 (2001)

    2001

  18. [25]

    Umbrella sampling for nonequilibrium processes,

    A. Warmflash, P. Bhimalapuram, and A. R. Dinner, “Umbrella sampling for nonequilibrium processes,” J. Chem. Phys. 127, 154112 (2007)

    2007

  19. [26]

    Separat- ing forward and backward pathways in nonequilibrium umbrella sampling,

    A. Dickson, A. Warmflash, and A. R. Dinner, “Separat- ing forward and backward pathways in nonequilibrium umbrella sampling,” J. Chem. Phys. 131, 154104 (2009)

    2009

  20. [27]

    3 □1 0 1 x/x0 □1 0 1 y/x0 R T passive phase active phase 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 U/kBTeff -10 0 10 x/L -10 0 10 y/L FIG

    Finally, the time unit is fixed as τ := L2/D. 3 □1 0 1 x/x0 □1 0 1 y/x0 R T passive phase active phase 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 U/kBTeff -10 0 10 x/L -10 0 10 y/L FIG. 1. Potential landscape as given in Eq. (4) for barrier height kxx4 0 = 6kBT and ratio ky/kxx2 0 = 3.3. The r...

  21. [28]

    Weighted-ensemble brownian dynamics simulations for protein association reactions,

    G. Huber and S. Kim, “Weighted-ensemble brownian dynamics simulations for protein association reactions,” Biophys. J. 70, 97 (1996)

    1996

  22. [29]

    The ”weighted ensemble

    B. W. Zhang, D. Jasnow, and D. M. Zuckerman, “The ”weighted ensemble” path sampling method is statisti- cally exact for a broad class of stochastic processes and binning procedures,” J. Chem. Phys. 132, 054107 (2010)

    2010

  23. [30]

    Sampling rare events in nonequilibrium and nonstationary systems,

    J. T. Berryman and T. Schilling, “Sampling rare events in nonequilibrium and nonstationary systems,” J. Chem. Phys. 133, 244101 (2010)

    2010

  24. [31]

    Efficient rare event sampling with unsupervised normalising flows,

    S. Asghar, Q.-X. Pei, G. Volpe, and R. Ni, “Efficient rare event sampling with unsupervised normalising flows,” arXiv:2401.01072 [physics.comp-ph]

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Target search of active agents crossing high energy barriers,

    L. Zanovello, M. Caraglio, T. Franosch, and P. Facci- oli, “Target search of active agents crossing high energy barriers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 018001 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Active Brownian particles,

    P. Romanczuk, M. B¨ ar, W. Ebeling, B. Lindner, and L. Schimansky-Geier, “Active Brownian particles,” Eur. Phys. J.: Spec. Top. 202, 1 (2012)

    2012

  27. [35]

    Self-motile col- loidal particles: From directed propulsion to random walk,

    J. R. Howse, R. A. L. Jones, A. J. Ryan, T. Gough, 15 R. Vafabakhsh, and R. Golestanian, “Self-motile col- loidal particles: From directed propulsion to random walk,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 048102 (2007)

    2007

  28. [36]

    Active motion of a Janus particle by self-thermophoresis in a defocused laser beam,

    H.-R. Jiang, N. Yoshinaga, and M. Sano, “Active motion of a Janus particle by self-thermophoresis in a defocused laser beam,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 268302 (2010)

    2010

  29. [37]

    Microswimmers in patterned environ- ments,

    G. Volpe, I. Buttinoni, D. Vogt, H.-J. K¨ ummerer, and C. Bechinger, “Microswimmers in patterned environ- ments,” Soft Matter 7, 8810 (2011)

    2011

  30. [38]

    Probing the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Catalytic Janus Particles with Single-Particle Tracking and Differential Dynamic Microscopy,

    C. Kurzthaler, C. Devailly, J. Arlt, T. Franosch, W. C. K. Poon, V. A. Martinez, and A. T. Brown, “Probing the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Catalytic Janus Particles with Single-Particle Tracking and Differential Dynamic Microscopy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 078001 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    Freezing and phase separation of self-propelled disks,

    Y. Fily, S. Henkes, and M. C. Marchetti, “Freezing and phase separation of self-propelled disks,” Soft Matter 10, 2132 (2013)

    2013

  32. [40]

    Dynamical clustering and phase separation in suspensions of self-propelled colloidal particles,

    I. Buttinoni, J. Bialk´ e, F. K¨ ummel, H. L¨ owen, C. Bechinger, and T. Speck, “Dynamical clustering and phase separation in suspensions of self-propelled colloidal particles,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 238301 (2013)

    2013

  33. [41]

    Active Brownian particles and run-and-tumble particles separate inside a maze,

    M. Khatami, K. Wolff, O. Pohl, M. R. Ejtehadi, and H. Stark, “Active Brownian particles and run-and-tumble particles separate inside a maze,” Sci. Rep. 6, 37670 (2016)

    2016

  34. [42]

    Interme- diate scattering function of an anisotropic active Brown- ian particle,

    C. Kurzthaler, S. Leitmann, and T. Franosch, “Interme- diate scattering function of an anisotropic active Brown- ian particle,” Sci. Rep. 6, 36702 (2016)

    2016

  35. [43]

    Steady state of an active Brownian particle in a two-dimensional harmonic trap,

    K. Malakar, A. Das, A. Kundu, K. V. Kumar, and A. Dhar, “Steady state of an active Brownian particle in a two-dimensional harmonic trap,” Phys. Rev. E 101, 022610 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    Optimal navigation strategy of active Brownian par- ticles in target-search problems,

    L. Zanovello, P. Faccioli, T. Franosch, and M. Caraglio, “Optimal navigation strategy of active Brownian par- ticles in target-search problems,” J. Chem. Phys. 155, 084901 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    Analytic solution of an active Brownian particle in a harmonic well,

    M. Caraglio and T. Franosch, “Analytic solution of an active Brownian particle in a harmonic well,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 158001 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    Microscopic derivation of the hydrodynamics of active-Brownian- particle suspensions,

    S. Steffenoni, G. Falasco, and K. Kroy, “Microscopic derivation of the hydrodynamics of active-Brownian- particle suspensions,” Phys. Rev. E 95, 052142 (2017)

    2017

  39. [47]

    H. Berg, E. coli in Motion (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2004)

    2004

  40. [48]

    Theory of continuum random walks and application to chemotaxis,

    M. J. Schnitzer, “Theory of continuum random walks and application to chemotaxis,” Phys. Rev. E 48, 2553 (1993)

    1993

  41. [49]

    Hy- drodynamic surface interactions enable escherichia coli to seek efficient routes to swim upstream,

    J. Hill, O. Kalkanci, J. L. McMurry, and H. Koser, “Hy- drodynamic surface interactions enable escherichia coli to seek efficient routes to swim upstream,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 068101 (2007)

    2007

  42. [50]

    Statistical mechanics of interacting run-and-tumble bacteria,

    J. Tailleur and M. E. Cates, “Statistical mechanics of interacting run-and-tumble bacteria,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 218103 (2008)

    2008

  43. [51]

    Sedimentation, trapping, and rectification of dilute bacteria,

    J. Tailleur and M. E. Cates, “Sedimentation, trapping, and rectification of dilute bacteria,” Europhys. Lett. 86, 60002 (2009)

    2009

  44. [52]

    Self- starting micromotors in a bacterial bath,

    L. Angelani, R. Di Leonardo, and G. Ruocco, “Self- starting micromotors in a bacterial bath,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 048104 (2009)

    2009

  45. [53]

    Probability distributions for the run-and-tumble bacterial dynamics: An analogy to the Lorentz model,

    K. Martens, L. Angelani, R. Di Leonardo, and L. Boc- quet, “Probability distributions for the run-and-tumble bacterial dynamics: An analogy to the Lorentz model,” Eur. Phys. J. E 35, 84 (2012)

    2012

  46. [54]

    Characteriza- tion and control of the Run-and-Tumble dynamics of Es- cherichia Coli,

    C. Kurzthaler, Y. Zhao, N. Zhou, J. Schwarz-Linek, C. Devailly, J. Arlt, J.-D. Huang, W. C. K. Poon, T. Fra- nosch, J. Tailleur, and V. A. Martinez, “Characteriza- tion and control of the Run-and-Tumble dynamics of Es- cherichia Coli,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 038302 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    The topography of the environ- ment alters the optimal search strategy for active parti- cles,

    G. Volpe and G. Volpe, “The topography of the environ- ment alters the optimal search strategy for active parti- cles,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11350 (2017)

    2017

  48. [56]

    Intermittent search strategies,

    O. B´ enichou, C. Loverdo, M. Moreau, and R. Voituriez, “Intermittent search strategies,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 81 (2011)

    2011

  49. [57]

    Optimizing the success of random searches,

    G. M. Viswanathan, S. V. Buldyrev, S. Havlin, M. G. E. da Luz, E. P. Raposo, and H. E. Stanley, “Optimizing the success of random searches,” Nature 401, 911 (1999)

    1999

  50. [58]

    Optimal search strategies for hidden tar- gets,

    O. B´ enichou, M. Coppey, M. Moreau, P.-H. Suet, and R. Voituriez, “Optimal search strategies for hidden tar- gets,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 198101 (2005)

    2005

  51. [59]

    Two-dimensional intermittent search processes: An al- ternative to L´ evy flight strategies,

    O. B´ enichou, C. Loverdo, M. Moreau, and R. Voituriez, “Two-dimensional intermittent search processes: An al- ternative to L´ evy flight strategies,” Phys. Rev. E 74, 020102(R) (2006)

    2006

  52. [60]

    L´ evy flights and superdiffusion in the context of biological en- counters and random searches,

    G. Viswanathan, E. Raposo, and M. da Luz, “L´ evy flights and superdiffusion in the context of biological en- counters and random searches,” Phys. Life Rev. 5, 133 (2008)

    2008

  53. [61]

    Direct observation of transition paths during the folding of proteins and nucleic acids,

    K. Neupane, D. A. N. Foster, D. R. Dee, H. Yu, F. Wang, and M. T. Woodside, “Direct observation of transition paths during the folding of proteins and nucleic acids,” Science 352, 239 (2016)

    2016

  54. [62]

    Quantitative protein dynamics from dom- inant folding pathways,

    M. Sega, P. Faccioli, F. Pederiva, G. Garberoglio, and H. Orland, “Quantitative protein dynamics from dom- inant folding pathways,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 118102 (2007)

    2007

  55. [63]

    The influence of absorbing boundary conditions on the transition path time statistics,

    M. Caraglio, S. Put, E. Carlon, and C. Vanderzande, “The influence of absorbing boundary conditions on the transition path time statistics,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 25676 (2018)

    2018

  56. [64]

    Transition-Path The- ory and Path-Finding Algorithms for the Study of Rare Events,

    W. E and E. Vanden-Eijnden, “Transition-Path The- ory and Path-Finding Algorithms for the Study of Rare Events,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 61, 391 (2010)

    2010

  57. [65]

    Illus- tration of transition path theory on a collection of simple examples,

    P. Metzner, C. Sch¨ utte, and E. Vanden-Eijnden, “Illus- tration of transition path theory on a collection of simple examples,” J. Chem. Phys. 125, 084110 (2006)

    2006

  58. [66]

    Transition path theory from biased simulations,

    G. Bartolucci, S. Orioli, and P. Faccioli, “Transition path theory from biased simulations,” J. Chem. Phys. 149, 072336 (2018)

    2018

  59. [67]

    Irreversibil- ity and biased ensembles in active matter: Insights from stochastic thermodynamics,

    ´E. Fodor, R. L. Jack, and M. E. Cates, “Irreversibil- ity and biased ensembles in active matter: Insights from stochastic thermodynamics,” Annu. Rev. Condens. Mat- ter Phys. 13, 215 (2022)

    2022

  60. [68]

    Experi- mental determination of upper bound for transition path times in protein folding from single-molecule photon-by- photon trajectories,

    H. S. Chung, J. M. Louis, and W. A. Eaton, “Experi- mental determination of upper bound for transition path times in protein folding from single-molecule photon-by- photon trajectories,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 11837 (2009)

    2009

  61. [69]

    Transition-event durations in one-dimensional activated processes,

    B. W. Zhang, D. Jasnow, and D. M. Zuckerman, “Transition-event durations in one-dimensional activated processes,” J. Chem. Phys. 126, 074504 (2007)

    2007

  62. [70]

    Effect of memory and active forces on transition path time distributions,

    E. Carlon, H. Orland, T. Sakaue, and C. Vanderzande, “Effect of memory and active forces on transition path time distributions,” J. Phys. Chem. B 122, 11186 (2018)

    2018

  63. [71]

    Transition path times in asymmetric barriers,

    M. Caraglio, T. Sakaue, and E. Carlon, “Transition path times in asymmetric barriers,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16 22, 3512 (2020)

    2020

  64. [72]

    Dynamics of a Brownian circle swimmer,

    S. van Teeffelen and H. L¨ owen, “Dynamics of a Brownian circle swimmer,” Phys. Rev. E 78, 020101(R) (2008)

    2008

  65. [73]

    Active Ornstein-Uhlenbeck particles,

    L. L. Bonilla, “Active Ornstein-Uhlenbeck particles,” Phys. Rev. E 100, 022601 (2019)

    2019

  66. [74]

    Dynamic clustering and chemo- tactic collapse of self-phoretic active particles,

    O. Pohl and H. Stark, “Dynamic clustering and chemo- tactic collapse of self-phoretic active particles,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 238303 (2014)

    2014

  67. [75]

    Optimal steering of a smart active particle,

    E. Schneider and H. Stark, “Optimal steering of a smart active particle,” Europhys. Lett. 127, 64003 (2019)

    2019

  68. [76]

    Reinforcement learning with arti- ficial microswimmers,

    S. Mui˜ nos-Landin, A. Fischer, V. Holubec, and F. Cichos, “Reinforcement learning with arti- ficial microswimmers,” Sci. Robot. 6 (2021), 10.1126/scirobotics.abd9285

    2021 doi

  69. [77]

    Survival strategies of artificial active agents,

    L. Zanovello, R. J. G. L¨ offler, M. Caraglio, T. Franosch, M. M. Hanczyc, and P. Faccioli, “Survival strategies of artificial active agents,” Sci. Rep. 13, 5616 (2023)

    2023

  70. [78]

    Learn- ing how to find targets in the micro-world: the case of intermittent active brownian particles,

    M. Caraglio, H. Kaur, L. J. Fiderer, A. L´ opez-Incera, H. J. Briegel, T. Franosch, and G. Mu˜ noz-Gil, “Learn- ing how to find targets in the micro-world: the case of intermittent active brownian particles,” Soft Matter 20, 2008 (2024)

    2024

  71. [79]

    Chemotaxis in Eukaryotic Cells: A Focus on Leukocytes and Dic- tyostelium,

    P. N. Devreotes and S. H. Zigmond, “Chemotaxis in Eukaryotic Cells: A Focus on Leukocytes and Dic- tyostelium,” Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 4, 649 (1988)

    1988

  72. [80]

    Neutrophil migration in infection and wound repair: going forward in reverse,

    S. de Oliveira, E. E. Rosowski, and A. Huttenlocher, “Neutrophil migration in infection and wound repair: going forward in reverse,” Nat. Rev. Immunol. 16, 378 (2016)

    2016

  73. [81]

    Sperm guidance in mammals – an unpaved road to the egg,

    M. Eisenbach and L. C. Giojalas, “Sperm guidance in mammals – an unpaved road to the egg,” Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 276 (2006)

    2006

  74. [82]

    Intelligent, self-powered, drug delivery sys- tems,

    D. Patra, S. Sengupta, W. Duan, H. Zhang, R. Pavlick, and A. Sen, “Intelligent, self-powered, drug delivery sys- tems,” Nanoscale 5, 1273 (2013)

    2013

  75. [83]

    Biocompatibility of engineered nanoparticles for drug delivery,

    S. Naahidi, M. Jafari, F. Edalat, K. Raymond, A. Khademhosseini, and P. Chen, “Biocompatibility of engineered nanoparticles for drug delivery,” J. Control. Release 166, 182 (2013)

    2013

  76. [84]

    The Environmental Impact of Micro/Nanomachines: A Review,

    W. Gao and J. Wang, “The Environmental Impact of Micro/Nanomachines: A Review,” ACS Nano 8, 3170 (2014)

    2014

  77. [85]

    Risken, The Fokker-Planck Equation (Springer, Berlin, 1989)

    H. Risken, The Fokker-Planck Equation (Springer, Berlin, 1989)

    1989

  78. [86]

    Calculation of partition functions,

    J. Hubbard, “Calculation of partition functions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 77 (1959)

    1959

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.