Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 6 cited by

Working in the outgoing radiation gauge, this paper builds the explicit quadrupolar tidal metric of a Kerr black hole and shows that ISCO and light-ring tidal shifts are strongly spin dependent, growing for retrograde orbits at high spin.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 12:58 UTC pith:4MKG5J5I

load-bearing objection Solid analytic extension of tidal perturbation theory to Kerr; central risk is the imported spin-independence of the tidal coefficients, but the known-limit checks and the claimed consistency with earlier Kerr matching make it worth refereeing. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2601.00954 v3 pith:4MKG5J5I submitted 2026-01-02 gr-qc hep-th

Tidal perturbations of an extreme mass ratio inspiral around a Kerr black hole

classification gr-qc hep-th
keywords Kerr black holetidal perturbationmetric reconstructionTeukolsky equationextreme-mass-ratio inspiralISCO shiftlight ringsecular Hamiltonian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Using the Teukolsky equation for static, quadrupolar modes and metric reconstruction in the outgoing radiation gauge, the paper produces the explicit tidal metric of a Kerr black hole in a slowly varying external field. With that metric it derives the first-order secular Hamiltonian for a test particle and computes tidal shifts of the innermost stable circular orbit and the light ring. The shifts turn out to depend strongly on both the size and the direction of the black-hole spin: for prograde orbits they are increasingly suppressed as spin grows, while retrograde orbits see progressively larger tidal corrections. The result matters because it gives a fully analytic, strong-field handle on spin–tidal couplings in extreme-mass-ratio inspirals, where small accumulated phase changes may be observable.

Core claim

At the paper's center is the claim that the metric perturbation assembled from its Eqs. (4.3)–(4.8), with coefficients (4.11) fixed by matching to the zero-spin Schwarzschild tidal metric, is the quadrupole-order tidal deformation of a Kerr black hole in the outgoing radiation gauge. From this metric the authors construct the secular Hamiltonian (5.7) for circular equatorial orbits and solve for the tidal shifts of the ISCO and light ring. The finding is a pronounced spin dependence: at high spin, prograde orbits move closer to the horizon and their tidal shifts are suppressed relative to the Schwarzschild case, whereas retrograde orbits sit at larger radius and receive enhanced tidal deform

What carries the argument

The load-bearing construction is the Hertz potential, a spin-weight +2 solution of the adjoint Teukolsky equation in the Hartle–Hawking tetrad, fed through the metric reconstruction operator for the outgoing radiation gauge. The potential is a sum of five modes with coefficients that encode the external electric and magnetic tidal tensors; those coefficients are fixed in the zero-spin limit and then assumed to hold for all spins, so the spin dependence of the final ISCO and light-ring shifts flows entirely from the Kerr background geometry and the radial mode functions.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the coefficients of the tidal modes, fixed in the Schwarzschild limit, being exactly independent of the black-hole spin at quadrupole order; if those coefficients carried spin dependence, every spin-dependent ISCO and light-ring shift computed here would change.

What would settle it

Take the reconstructed metric for a rapidly spinning hole, say spin a/M = 0.9, compute its Weyl scalar, and asymptotically match it to a prescribed external tidal field; if the inferred mode coefficients differ from their zero-spin values, the claimed spin hierarchy for the ISCO and light-ring shifts is not the one the true Kerr tidal response produces. A numerical Teukolsky solution at small nonzero frequency could similarly test the static-mode assumption.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • In a slowly varying quadrupolar tidal field, the ISCO radius, energy, angular momentum, orbital frequency, and redshift invariant all acquire first-order shifts in the tidal parameter; all are given in closed analytic form.
  • For prograde orbits around rapidly spinning holes, tidal corrections shrink toward zero relative to the Schwarzschild tidal shifts.
  • For retrograde orbits, tidal corrections grow with spin, making retrograde extreme-mass-ratio inspirals the most sensitive probes of an external tidal environment.
  • The magnetic part of the tidal field drops out of the secular Hamiltonian at this order, so the electric tidal field alone controls the leading secular orbital shifts.
  • The reconstructed metric reduces to the known Schwarzschild tidal metric at zero spin, and at linear order in spin it reproduces earlier slow-rotation Weyl-scalar results.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the spin-independence of the mode coefficients breaks at quadrupole order, the prograde-versus-retrograde hierarchy in the ISCO and light-ring shifts would need revision; a direct check is to match the Weyl scalar of this metric to an external tidal field at nonzero spin.
  • Because only the axisymmetric mode survives secular averaging on circular equatorial orbits, eccentric or inclined orbits may expose the other azimuthal modes and could reveal spin-dependent precession or resonance effects not visible here.
  • The smooth approach to extremal spin rests on the static, zero-frequency approximation; including time-dependent tidal modes near extremality could reintroduce the strong near-horizon amplification seen in other extremal black-hole studies.
  • The vanishing magnetic contribution suggests that tidal torquing and heating enter extreme-mass-ratio dynamics only through radiative fluxes or at higher order, so a companion flux calculation would test whether magnetic tidal effects are truly absent at leading secular order.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs the static, quadrupolar linear metric perturbation of a Kerr black hole in the outgoing radiation gauge. It solves the Teukolsky master equation in the Hartle-Hawking tetrad for ω=0, ℓ=2 modes, uses Hertz-potential metric reconstruction, and presents fully explicit metric components for the m=0, ±1, ±2 modes. The five mode coefficients c2m are fixed by taking the a=0 limit and matching to the known Schwarzschild tidal metric of Binnington–Poisson; the paper asserts, on the basis of earlier ψ0-matching analyses, that these coefficients are spin-independent. The reconstructed metric is then used to derive a first-order secular Hamiltonian for circular equatorial orbits, from which the paper computes tidal shifts of ISCO and light-ring quantities. The central reported result is that these shifts are strongly spin-dependent, with suppression for prograde orbits and enhancement for retrograde orbits around rapidly rotating black holes.

Significance. If the central matching assumption is justified, this is a useful and potentially important analytic result. The paper provides explicit closed-form components (4.3)–(4.8), a secular Hamiltonian (5.7)–(5.10), and first-order ISCO/LR shift formulas, together with a Mathematica notebook and an explicit verification that each mode satisfies the linearized Einstein equations. It also reproduces known Schwarzschild limits and first-order-in-spin Weyl scalars. These are genuine strengths. However, the quantitative and even qualitative spin dependence in Sec. 6 rests on the unproven assumption that the coefficients c2m are independent of the black-hole spin. Because the ISCO and LR shifts scale linearly with c2m, the claimed rapid-spin behavior is conditional on this step. If the all-spin matching is supplied, the paper would be a strong contribution to strong-field tidal dynamics and EMRI modeling.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.1, §4.4, Eq. (4.11)] The coefficients c2m are fixed by taking a=0 and matching to the Schwarzschild tidal metric. The assertion in Sec. 3.1 that previous ψ0-matching analyses imply the tidal multipole moments, and therefore c2m, are spin-independent is not demonstrated for the present reconstruction. The map from c2m to the physical tidal tensors in Eqs. (3.13)–(3.14) involves the a-dependent reconstruction operator S†_4 in Eq. (3.5b), the a-dependent HH tetrad in Eq. (2.10), and the a-dependent radial function R2m in Eq. (3.9). Unless one verifies that this composition yields the same asymptotic Weyl tensor normalization for all a, a spin-dependent coefficient c2m(a)=k(a)c2m(0) is not excluded. Since Eqs. (5.5) and all of Sec. 6 scale linearly with c2m, the claimed strong spin dependence at high spin is conditional on this unproven step. I request an explicit all-spin asymptotic matching calculation, or an
  2. [§4, §6 (rapid-spin regime)] The check quoted in Sec. 4—agreement of the Weyl scalars to first order in a with Refs. [38,48]—covers only the linear-in-spin regime. The qualitative effect highlighted in the abstract and Sec. 6 (suppression for prograde, enhancement for retrograde at large a) is dominated by a^2 and higher terms, and the first-order check cannot detect an O(a^2) correction to c2m. To make the central claim robust, the paper should quantify the matching residual as a function of a, for example by plotting the ratio of the reconstructed asymptotic tidal moments to the input c2m over the spin range, or by comparing with an independent all-spin calculation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (2.23)] The displayed static radial equation has unbalanced parentheses; the first term in the potential appears to be missing a denominator or an extra factor. Please typeset the equation carefully and verify it against the source used.
  2. [§4.3, Eq. (4.8g)] There are notational inconsistencies: Eq. (4.8g) uses 'N2 2±2' in its first line, and Eq. (4.5g) uses 'N2,±1' inside a later term. These should be N2±2 and N2±1 respectively.
  3. [Eq. (3.9)] The regularized hypergeometric function is denoted F without specifying that it is the regularized function; since c = −1 + 2imγ can be non-positive, it would be clearer to use a barred symbol or explicitly define the regularization convention.
  4. [§6, Figs. 1–2] The radial ISCO shift and radial LR shift are coordinate-gauge dependent quantities. The invariants Ω, U, and b are the more robust observables. The paper should state this explicitly and perhaps present the invariant quantities as primary in the figures, especially since the qualitative spin-dependence claims are phrased in terms of 'tidal effects' generally.
  5. [§7] The statement that the extremal limit a→M is approached smoothly is not demonstrated. Although the final metric components shown in Sec. 4 are polynomial in a, the static radial solution in Eq. (3.9) contains Γ(3+2imγ) with γ→∞ as a→M. A sentence explaining the cancellation, or a plot of the final observables near a=M, would strengthen this claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the Kerr tidal metric and ISCO/LR shifts are derived from an external a=0 calibration plus a spin-dependent reconstruction, not from the target results.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained in the relevant sense: the external tidal coefficients c2m are fixed once at a=0 by matching the Schwarzschild tidal metric of Ref. [23], and the Kerr spin dependence then emerges from the spin-dependent reconstruction operators S†_4, the HH tetrad, and the radial functions R2m(a), none of which encode the ISCO or light-ring shifts that are later computed. The statement that c2m are spin-independent is explicitly presented as a result of external asymptotic-matching analyses (Refs. [9,13,23,37]), not derived from the paper's own conclusions; even if that assumption were wrong, it would be a validity/limitation issue, not circularity. The only self-citations (e.g., Refs. [73,74]) are used as consistency checks or physical analogies, not as load-bearing justifications of the main claim. The reconstructed metric is additionally checked against the linearized Einstein equations and against the known slow-rotation Weyl-scalar results of Refs. [38,48], providing external anchors. No step was found in which a 'prediction' reduces by construction to a fitted input or to a self-citation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new constants are fitted to data; the c2m coefficients encode the external tidal moments and are calibrated in the Schwarzschild limit. The central derivation assumes slow tides, quadrupole order, the near zone, circular equatorial orbits, and spin-independent matching coefficients. No new particles, forces, or geometric entities are postulated.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Static (omega=0) Teukolsky modes accurately describe slowly varying tidal fields.
    Sec. 2.1 and Sec. 3.1: time derivatives are neglected because the tidal field varies on timescales much longer than the black-hole dynamical timescale.
  • domain assumption The coefficients c2m are independent of the black-hole spin a and are fixed by matching to the Schwarzschild tidal metric.
    Sec. 3.1 and Sec. 4.4: the paper relies on prior asymptotic matching in Refs. [9,13,23,37] for spin independence; it does not rederive this for the reconstructed Kerr metric.
  • domain assumption The Hertz-potential reconstruction in the outgoing radiation gauge yields the physical tidal metric perturbation.
    Sec. 3: the reconstruction operator S†_4 and Hertz potential formalism are taken from Refs. [18,19,42]; no independent proof is given inside the paper.
  • domain assumption The near-zone hierarchy M << R and quadrupole truncation are sufficient for the EMRI application.
    Sec. 1 and Sec. 6.2: all results are stated only at leading quadrupolar order and for r << R.
  • domain assumption Circular equatorial orbits and first-order-in-h secular averaging capture the long-term tidal dynamics.
    Sec. 5.1: self-force effects are neglected, the perturbation is kept to linear order in h, and only the m=0 mode survives azimuthal averaging.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 28735 in / 13430 out tokens · 306421 ms · 2026-08-03T12:58:38.115294+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We determine the metric of a Kerr black hole subject to external tidal fields using metric reconstruction techniques. Working within the Newman-Penrose formalism, we solve the Teukolsky master equation for static, quadrupolar modes associated with a slowly varying tidal environment, and reconstruct the corresponding metric perturbation in the outgoing radiation gauge. As an application, we derive the secular Hamiltonian governing the motion of a test particle in the tidally deformed Kerr spacetime and investigate long-term tidal effects relevant to extreme-mass-ratio inspirals. In particular, we compute tidal-induced shifts of the innermost stable circular orbit and the light ring. We find that these tidal corrections are strongly spin dependent, with significantly larger effects for retrograde orbits around rapidly rotating black holes. Our results provide a fully analytic framework for studying tidal interactions and secular dynamics in rotating black-hole spacetimes, with direct applications to gravitational-wave modeling and tests of gravity in the strong-field regime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.00954 by David Pere\~niguez, Gianluca Grignani, Maarten van de Meent, Marta Cocco, Marta Orselli, Troels Harmark.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Secular tidal perturbations to the radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Secular tidal perturbations to the radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_2.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Relativistic Tidal Transitions of Saturated Kerr Boson Clouds

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Relativistic Kerr wavefunctions change tidal transition matrix elements of saturated boson clouds by up to 21.7% relative to the hydrogenic approximation, with the radial profile responsible for ~80% of the change.

  2. Dynamics of Binary System around a Supermassive Black Hole :Binary Scattering and Eccentric vZLK Oscillations

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Binaries around supermassive black holes exhibit four periapsis-dependent scattering regimes in unbound orbits and scattering-type eccentric vZLK oscillations in bound orbits within Kerr spacetime.

  3. Ringdown and lensing of triple systems

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Numerical relativity simulations of triple black hole systems reveal redshift effects and gravitational lensing in ringdown signals from head-on mergers, with no additional black hole formation from amplified waves.

  4. Ringdown and lensing of triple systems

    gr-qc 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    Head-on black-hole mergers next to a companion show Doppler- and redshift-shifted ringdown, lensing magnification behind the lens, and delayed echo images, with only tentative signs of resonant mode excitation.

  5. The relativistic restricted three-body problem: geometry and motion around tidally perturbed black holes

    gr-qc 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Increasing tidal deformation around a black hole drives bound geodesics through weak chaos, plunging, unbinding, and eventual depletion of all bound motion, with semi-analytic critical amplitudes for each transition.

  6. Dynamics of Binary System around a Supermassive Black Hole :Binary Scattering and Eccentric vZLK Oscillations

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Binaries around SMBHs exhibit four scattering regimes in unbound orbits and scattering-type eccentric vZLK oscillations in bound orbits, yielding a unified periapsis-driven tidal dynamics picture in galactic nuclei.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 69 linked inside Pith · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    S. A. Teukolsky,Rotating black holes - separable wave equations for gravitational and electromagnetic perturbations,Phys. Rev. Lett.29(1972) 1114–1118

  2. [2]

    S. A. Teukolsky,Perturbations of a rotating black hole. 1. Fundamental equations for gravitational electromagnetic and neutrino field perturbations,Astrophys. J.185(1973) 635–647

  3. [3]

    Newman and R

    E. Newman and R. Penrose,An Approach to gravitational radiation by a method of spin coefficients,J. Math. Phys.3(1962) 566–578

  4. [4]

    Carter,Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields,Phys

    B. Carter,Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields,Phys. Rev.174(1968) 1559–1571

  5. [5]

    Chandrasekhar,The mathematical theory of black holes

    S. Chandrasekhar,The mathematical theory of black holes. Oxford Classic Texts in the Physical Sciences, 1985

  6. [6]

    W. H. Press and S. A. Teukolsky,Floating Orbits, Superradiant Scattering and the Black-hole Bomb,Nature238(1972) 211–212

  7. [7]

    S. A. Teukolsky and W. H. Press,Perturbations of a rotating black hole. III - Interaction of the hole with gravitational and electromagnetic radiation,Astrophys. J.193(1974) 443–461

  8. [8]

    P. L. Chrzanowski,Vector Potential and Metric Perturbations of a Rotating Black Hole, Phys. Rev. D11(1975) 2042–2062

  9. [9]

    Poisson,Absorption of mass and angular momentum by a black hole: Time-domain formalisms for gravitational perturbations, and the small-hole / slow-motion approximation, Phys

    E. Poisson,Absorption of mass and angular momentum by a black hole: Time-domain formalisms for gravitational perturbations, and the small-hole / slow-motion approximation, Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 084044, [gr-qc/0407050]

  10. [10]

    E. W. Leaver,An Analytic representation for the quasi normal modes of Kerr black holes, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A402(1985) 285–298

  11. [11]

    S. R. Green, S. Hollands, L. Sberna, V. Toomani and P. Zimmerman,Conserved currents for a Kerr black hole and orthogonality of quasinormal modes,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 064030, [2210.15935]. 25

  12. [12]

    Damour and A

    T. Damour and A. Nagar,Effective One Body description of tidal effects in inspiralling compact binaries,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 084016, [0911.5041]

  13. [13]

    Chatziioannou, E

    K. Chatziioannou, E. Poisson and N. Yunes,Tidal heating and torquing of a Kerr black hole to next-to-leading order in the tidal coupling,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 044022, [1211.1686]

  14. [14]

    van de Meent and A

    M. van de Meent and A. G. Shah,Metric perturbations produced by eccentric equatorial orbits around a Kerr black hole,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 064025, [1506.04755]

  15. [15]

    Pound,Second-order gravitational self-force,Phys

    A. Pound,Second-order gravitational self-force,Phys. Rev. Lett.109(2012) 051101, [1201.5089]

  16. [16]

    Loutrel, J

    N. Loutrel, J. L. Ripley, E. Giorgi and F. Pretorius,Second Order Perturbations of Kerr Black Holes: Reconstruction of the Metric,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 104017, [2008.11770]

  17. [17]

    J. L. Ripley, N. Loutrel, E. Giorgi and F. Pretorius,Numerical computation of second order vacuum perturbations of Kerr black holes,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 104018, [2010.00162]

  18. [18]

    L. S. Kegeles and J. M. Cohen,Constructive Procedure for Perturbations of Space-Times, Phys. Rev. D19(1979) 1641–1664

  19. [19]

    R. M. Wald,Construction of solutions of gravitational, electromagnetic, or other perturbation equations from solutions of decoupled equations,Phys. Rev. Lett.41(Jul,

  20. [20]

    R. P. Geroch, A. Held and R. Penrose,A space-time calculus based on pairs of null directions,J. Math. Phys.14(1973) 874–881

  21. [21]

    Le Tiec, M

    A. Le Tiec, M. Casals and E. Franzin,Tidal Love Numbers of Kerr Black Holes,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 084021, [2010.15795]

  22. [22]

    Yunes and J

    N. Yunes and J. Gonzalez,Metric of a tidally perturbed spinning black hole,Phys. Rev. D 73(2006) 024010, [gr-qc/0510076]

  23. [23]

    Binnington and E

    T. Binnington and E. Poisson,Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers,Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 084018, [0906.1366]

  24. [24]

    J. B. Hartle,Tidal Friction in Slowly Rotating Black Holes,Phys. Rev. D8(1973) 1010–1024

  25. [25]

    H. S. Chia,Tidal deformation and dissipation of rotating black holes,Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 024013, [2010.07300]

  26. [26]

    O’Sullivan and S

    S. O’Sullivan and S. A. Hughes,Strong-field tidal distortions of rotating black holes: Formalism and results for circular, equatorial orbits,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 124039, [1407.6983]

  27. [27]

    Tagoshi, S

    H. Tagoshi, S. Mano and E. Takasugi,PostNewtonian expansion of gravitational waves from a particle in circular orbits around a rotating black hole: Effects of black hole absorption,Prog. Theor. Phys.98(1997) 829–850, [gr-qc/9711072]

  28. [28]

    Alvi,Energy and angular momentum flow into a black hole in a binary,Phys

    K. Alvi,Energy and angular momentum flow into a black hole in a binary,Phys. Rev. D 64(2001) 104020, [gr-qc/0107080]

  29. [29]

    Yunes, A

    N. Yunes, A. Buonanno, S. A. Hughes, M. Coleman Miller and Y. Pan,Modeling Extreme Mass Ratio Inspirals within the Effective-One-Body Approach,Phys. Rev. Lett.104(2010) 091102, [0909.4263]. 26

  30. [30]

    Yunes, A

    N. Yunes, A. Buonanno, S. A. Hughes, Y. Pan, E. Barausse, M. C. Miller et al.,Extreme Mass-Ratio Inspirals in the Effective-One-Body Approach: Quasi-Circular, Equatorial Orbits around a Spinning Black Hole,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 044044, [1009.6013]

  31. [31]

    E. E. Flanagan and T. Hinderer,Constraining neutron star tidal Love numbers with gravitational wave detectors,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 021502, [0709.1915]

  32. [32]

    Hinderer,Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars,Astrophys

    T. Hinderer,Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars,Astrophys. J.677(2008) 1216–1220, [0711.2420]

  33. [33]

    Baiotti, T

    L. Baiotti, T. Damour, B. Giacomazzo, A. Nagar and L. Rezzolla,Analytic modelling of tidal effects in the relativistic inspiral of binary neutron stars,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 261101, [1009.0521]

  34. [34]

    Chatziioannou,Neutron star tidal deformability and equation of state constraints,Gen

    K. Chatziioannou,Neutron star tidal deformability and equation of state constraints,Gen. Rel. Grav.52(2020) 109, [2006.03168]

  35. [35]

    Cardoso, E

    V. Cardoso, E. Franzin, A. Maselli, P. Pani and G. Raposo,Testing strong-field gravity with tidal Love numbers,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 084014, [1701.01116]

  36. [36]

    Cardoso and A

    V. Cardoso and A. Foschi,Geodesic structure and quasinormal modes of a tidally perturbed spacetime,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 024004, [2106.06551]

  37. [37]

    Poisson and I

    E. Poisson and I. Vlasov,Geometry and dynamics of a tidally deformed black hole,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 024029, [0910.4311]

  38. [38]

    Poisson,Tidal deformation of a slowly rotating black hole,Phys

    E. Poisson,Tidal deformation of a slowly rotating black hole,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 044004, [1411.4711]

  39. [39]

    P. Pani, L. Gualtieri, A. Maselli and V. Ferrari,Tidal deformations of a spinning compact object,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 024010, [1503.07365]

  40. [40]

    C. P. L. Berry, S. A. Hughes, C. F. Sopuerta, A. J. K. Chua, A. Heffernan, K. Holley-Bockelmann et al.,The unique potential of extreme mass-ratio inspirals for gravitational-wave astronomy,Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51(2019) 42, [1903.03686]

  41. [41]

    Barack et al.,Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap, Class

    L. Barack et al.,Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap, Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019) 143001, [1806.05195]

  42. [42]

    Berens, T

    R. Berens, T. Gravely and A. Lupsasca,Gravitational Waves on Kerr Black Holes I: Reconstruction of Linearized Metric Perturbations,2403.20311

  43. [43]

    Kinnersley,Type D Vacuum Metrics,J

    W. Kinnersley,Type D Vacuum Metrics,J. Math. Phys.10(1969) 1195–1203

  44. [44]

    S. W. Hawking and J. B. Hartle,Energy and angular momentum flow into a black hole, Commun. Math. Phys.27(1972) 283–290

  45. [45]

    P. A. Cano, K. Fransen, T. Hertog and S. Maenaut,Universal Teukolsky equations and black hole perturbations in higher-derivative gravity,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 024040, [2304.02663]

  46. [46]

    R. M. Wald,On perturbations of a Kerr black hole,J. Math. Phys.14(1973) 1453–1461

  47. [47]

    X. H. Zhang,Multipole expansions of the general-relativistic gravitational field of the external universe,Phys. Rev. D34(1986) 991–1004. 27

  48. [48]

    Landry and E

    P. Landry and E. Poisson,Tidal deformation of a slowly rotating material body. External metric,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 104018, [1503.07366]

  49. [49]

    Berens, T

    R. Berens, T. Gravely and A. Lupsasca,Gravitational Waves on Kerr Black Holes II: Metric Reconstruction with Cosmological Constant,2510.07712

  50. [50]

    Chakraborty, V

    S. Chakraborty, V. De Luca, L. Gualtieri and P. Pani,Dynamical Love numbers of black holes: Theory and gravitational waveforms,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 104015, [2507.22994]

  51. [51]

    Le Tiec and M

    A. Le Tiec and M. Casals,Spinning Black Holes Fall in Love,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 131102, [2007.00214]

  52. [52]

    Gürlebeck,No-hair theorem for Black Holes in Astrophysical Environments,Phys

    N. Gürlebeck,No-hair theorem for Black Holes in Astrophysical Environments,Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 151102, [1503.03240]

  53. [53]

    Kol and M

    B. Kol and M. Smolkin,Black hole stereotyping: Induced gravito-static polarization,JHEP 02(2012) 010, [1110.3764]

  54. [54]

    Damour and O

    T. Damour and O. M. Lecian,On the gravitational polarizability of black holes,Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 044017, [0906.3003]

  55. [55]

    P. Pani, L. Gualtieri and V. Ferrari,Tidal Love numbers of a slowly spinning neutron star, Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 124003, [1509.02171]

  56. [56]

    Chakrabarti, T

    S. Chakrabarti, T. Delsate and J. Steinhoff,New perspectives on neutron star and black hole spectroscopy and dynamic tides,1304.2228

  57. [57]

    Damour and A

    T. Damour and A. Nagar,Relativistic tidal properties of neutron stars,Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 084035, [0906.0096]

  58. [58]

    Pereñiguez and E

    D. Pereñiguez and E. Karnickis,On the non-zero Love numbers of magnetic black holes, 2509.12418

  59. [59]

    Charalambous, S

    P. Charalambous, S. Dubovsky and M. M. Ivanov,On the Vanishing of Love Numbers for Kerr Black Holes,JHEP05(2021) 038, [2102.08917]

  60. [60]

    Perry and M

    M. Perry and M. J. Rodriguez,Dynamical Love Numbers for Kerr Black Holes, 2310.03660

  61. [61]

    Yang and M

    H. Yang and M. Casals,General Relativistic Dynamics of an Extreme Mass-Ratio Binary interacting with an External Body,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 083015, [1704.02022]

  62. [62]

    H. Yang, B. Bonga, Z. Peng and G. Li,Relativistic Mean Motion Resonance,Phys. Rev. D 100(2019) 124056, [1910.07337]

  63. [63]

    Bonga, H

    B. Bonga, H. Yang and S. A. Hughes,Tidal resonance in extreme mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 101103, [1905.00030]

  64. [64]

    Gupta, B

    P. Gupta, B. Bonga, A. J. K. Chua and T. Tanaka,Importance of tidal resonances in extreme-mass-ratio inspirals,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 044056, [2104.03422]

  65. [65]

    Gupta, L

    P. Gupta, L. Speri, B. Bonga, A. J. K. Chua and T. Tanaka,Modeling transient resonances in extreme-mass-ratio inspirals,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 104001, [2205.04808]

  66. [66]

    Mino,Perturbative approach to an orbital evolution around a supermassive black hole, Phys

    Y. Mino,Perturbative approach to an orbital evolution around a supermassive black hole, Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 084027, [gr-qc/0302075]. 28

  67. [67]

    Hinderer and E

    T. Hinderer and E. E. Flanagan,Two timescale analysis of extreme mass ratio inspirals in Kerr. I. Orbital Motion,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 064028, [0805.3337]

  68. [68]

    Fujita, S

    R. Fujita, S. Isoyama, A. Le Tiec, H. Nakano, N. Sago and T. Tanaka,Hamiltonian Formulation of the Conservative Self-Force Dynamics in the Kerr Geometry,Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017) 134001, [1612.02504]

  69. [69]

    van de Meent,Analytic solutions for parallel transport along generic bound geodesics in Kerr spacetime,Class

    M. van de Meent,Analytic solutions for parallel transport along generic bound geodesics in Kerr spacetime,Class. Quant. Grav.37(2020) 145007, [1906.05090]

  70. [70]

    Schmidt,Celestial mechanics in Kerr space-time,Class

    W. Schmidt,Celestial mechanics in Kerr space-time,Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 2743, [gr-qc/0202090]

  71. [71]

    Drasco and S

    S. Drasco and S. A. Hughes,Rotating black hole orbit functionals in the frequency domain, Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 044015, [astro-ph/0308479]

  72. [72]

    Drasco, E

    S. Drasco, E. E. Flanagan and S. A. Hughes,Computing inspirals in Kerr in the adiabatic regime. I. The Scalar case,Class. Quant. Grav.22(2005) S801–846, [gr-qc/0505075]

  73. [73]

    Camilloni, G

    F. Camilloni, G. Grignani, T. Harmark, R. Oliveri, M. Orselli and D. Pica,Tidal deformations of a binary system induced by an external Kerr black hole,Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 084011, [2301.04879]

  74. [74]

    Grilli, M

    E. Grilli, M. Orselli, D. Pereñiguez and D. Pica,Charged binaries in gravitational tides, JCAP02(2025) 028, [2411.08089]

  75. [75]

    J. M. Bardeen, W. H. Press and S. A. Teukolsky,Rotating black holes: Locally nonrotating frames, energy extraction, and scalar synchrotron radiation,Astrophys. J.178(1972) 347

  76. [76]

    Narayan,Black holes in astrophysics,New J

    R. Narayan,Black holes in astrophysics,New J. Phys.7(2005) 199, [gr-qc/0506078]

  77. [77]

    S. N. Zhang, W. Cui and W. Chen,Black hole spin in X-ray binaries: Observational consequences,Astrophys. J. Lett.482(1997) L155, [astro-ph/9704072]

  78. [78]

    A. C. Fabian, M. J. Rees, L. Stella and N. E. White,X-ray fluorescence from the inner disc in Cygnus X-1,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.238(1989) 729–736

  79. [79]

    A. C. Fabian, K. Iwasawa, C. S. Reynolds and A. J. Young,Broad iron lines in active galactic nuclei,Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.112(2000) 1145, [astro-ph/0004366]

  80. [80]

    Ori and K

    A. Ori and K. S. Thorne,The Transition from inspiral to plunge for a compact body in a circular equatorial orbit around a massive, spinning black hole,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 124022, [gr-qc/0003032]

Showing first 80 references.