Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Bibliometric Review of Large Language Models Research from 2017 to 2023

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.02020 v1 pith:4MU7EIC5 submitted 2023-04-03 cs.DL cs.CLcs.CYcs.SI

classification cs.DLcs.CLcs.CYcs.SI
keywords researchllmslanguagemodelsapplicationsbibliometriccurrentlarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are a class of language models that have demonstrated outstanding performance across a range of natural language processing (NLP) tasks and have become a highly sought-after research area, because of their ability to generate human-like language and their potential to revolutionize science and technology. In this study, we conduct bibliometric and discourse analyses of scholarly literature on LLMs. Synthesizing over 5,000 publications, this paper serves as a roadmap for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to navigate the current landscape of LLMs research. We present the research trends from 2017 to early 2023, identifying patterns in research paradigms and collaborations. We start with analyzing the core algorithm developments and NLP tasks that are fundamental in LLMs research. We then investigate the applications of LLMs in various fields and domains including medicine, engineering, social science, and humanities. Our review also reveals the dynamic, fast-paced evolution of LLMs research. Overall, this paper offers valuable insights into the current state, impact, and potential of LLMs research and its applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 51 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. YouLeQD: Decoding the Cognitive Complexity of Questions and Engagement in Online Educational Videos from Learners' Perspectives

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Learner questions on YouTube lecture videos mostly fall into the lowest Bloom's Taxonomy level, and harder questions receive fewer likes but more replies.

  2. QuIM-RAG: Advancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Inverted Question Matching for Enhanced QA Performance

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    QuIM-RAG retrieves chunks by matching a user question to LLM-generated questions from each chunk in a quantized embedding space, reporting higher QA scores than a traditional RAG baseline on an NDSU website corpus.

Pith tools