Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Adaptive Semi-Supervised Segmentation of Brain Vessels with Ambiguous Labels

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.03613 v1 pith:4Q22LGDA submitted 2023-08-07 eess.IV cs.CVcs.LG

Adaptive Semi-Supervised Segmentation of Brain Vessels with Ambiguous Labels

classification eess.IV cs.CVcs.LG
keywords vesselssegmentationsemi-supervisedadaptiveambiguouslyapproachbrainchallenges
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Accurate segmentation of brain vessels is crucial for cerebrovascular disease diagnosis and treatment. However, existing methods face challenges in capturing small vessels and handling datasets that are partially or ambiguously annotated. In this paper, we propose an adaptive semi-supervised approach to address these challenges. Our approach incorporates innovative techniques including progressive semi-supervised learning, adaptative training strategy, and boundary enhancement. Experimental results on 3DRA datasets demonstrate the superiority of our method in terms of mesh-based segmentation metrics. By leveraging the partially and ambiguously labeled data, which only annotates the main vessels, our method achieves impressive segmentation performance on mislabeled fine vessels, showcasing its potential for clinical applications.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Just Keep Prompting: Evaluating Repetitive Socratic Prompting in VLMs

    cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    Repeated conversational pressure destabilizes VLM video answers — correct answers regress, wrong ones sometimes recover, and models differ sharply in how they respond.