Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Classification of Quasars, Galaxies, and Stars in the Mapping of the Universe Multi-modal Deep Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.10745 v1 pith:4Q4QJK5T submitted 2022-05-22 cs.CV cs.AI

Classification of Quasars, Galaxies, and Stars in the Mapping of the Universe Multi-modal Deep Learning

classification cs.CV cs.AI
keywords learninglayersmulti-modaldataaccuracyarchitecturearchitecturesdeep
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, the fourth version the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-4), Data Release 16 dataset was used to classify the SDSS dataset into galaxies, stars, and quasars using machine learning and deep learning architectures. We efficiently utilize both image and metadata in tabular format to build a novel multi-modal architecture and achieve state-of-the-art results. In addition, our experiments on transfer learning using Imagenet weights on five different architectures (Resnet-50, DenseNet-121 VGG-16, Xception, and EfficientNet) reveal that freezing all layers and adding a final trainable layer may not be an optimal solution for transfer learning. It is hypothesized that higher the number of trainable layers, higher will be the training time and accuracy of predictions. It is also hypothesized that any subsequent increase in the number of training layers towards the base layers will not increase in accuracy as the pre trained lower layers only help in low level feature extraction which would be quite similar in all the datasets. Hence the ideal level of trainable layers needs to be identified for each model in respect to the number of parameters. For the tabular data, we compared classical machine learning algorithms (Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Decision Trees, Adaboost, LightGBM etc.,) with artificial neural networks. Our works shed new light on transfer learning and multi-modal deep learning architectures. The multi-modal architecture not only resulted in higher metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score) than models using only image data or tabular data. Furthermore, multi-modal architecture achieved the best metrics in lesser training epochs and improved the metrics on all classes.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.