REVIEW 1 cited by
Time Delay Between Gravitational Waves and Neutrino Burst From a Supernova Explosion: a Test for the Neutrino Mass
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Time Delay Between Gravitational Waves and Neutrino Burst From a Supernova Explosion: a Test for the Neutrino Mass
read the original abstract
During Supernova explosions two signals, Gravitational burst wave and Neutrino Burst, of different nature, originated within 0.1 s from thesuper nova explosion will be radiated in the outer space. If the neutrinos (as well as the gravitons) are massless particles, than the original interval (if any) between the two signals will be freezed forever. On the contrary, if the neutrinos have a tiny mass, the time delay will increase during the propagation because of the slower velocity of the neutrinos with respect to the massless gravitons. Therefore, two signals, of different nature, originated within 0.1 s from the super nova explosion will be radiated in the outer space. If the neutrinos (as well as the gravitons) are massless particles, than the original interval (if any) between the two signals will be freezed forever. If the neutrino has a mass the time delay will increase during the propagation because of the slower velocity of the neutrinos with respect to the massless gravitons: the time delay detection may measure the neutrino mass or its absence may inferr a severe neutrino mass bound.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Paucity of downward UHE neutrino tracks in IceCube versus unexpected huge KM3-230213A event: solving the puzzles?
The record-energy KM3-230213A event is more likely a tilted-array misreconstruction of an atmospheric muon than a genuine ultra-high-energy neutrino, according to a comparison with IceCube and Auger observations.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.