REVIEW 2 cited by
Be Careful What You Smooth For: Label Smoothing Can Be a Privacy Shield but Also a Catalyst for Model Inversion Attacks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Label smoothing -- using softened labels instead of hard ones -- is a widely adopted regularization method for deep learning, showing diverse benefits such as enhanced generalization and calibration. Its implications for preserving model privacy, however, have remained unexplored. To fill this gap, we investigate the impact of label smoothing on model inversion attacks (MIAs), which aim to generate class-representative samples by exploiting the knowledge encoded in a classifier, thereby inferring sensitive information about its training data. Through extensive analyses, we uncover that traditional label smoothing fosters MIAs, thereby increasing a model's privacy leakage. Even more, we reveal that smoothing with negative factors counters this trend, impeding the extraction of class-related information and leading to privacy preservation, beating state-of-the-art defenses. This establishes a practical and powerful novel way for enhancing model resilience against MIAs.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
How Breakable Is Privacy: Probing and Resisting Model Inversion Attacks in Collaborative Inference
A mutual-information-based criterion, Dmia, predicts model inversion attack difficulty in collaborative inference, and the SiftFunnel defense suppresses the criterion's factors to raise reconstruction error with only ...
-
Deep Learning Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses: A Comprehensive Survey
A structured literature review that taxonomizes model inversion attacks and defenses and provides a public resource repository.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.