Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Understanding the Language Model to Solve the Symbolic Multi-Step Reasoning Problem from the Perspective of Buffer Mechanism

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.15302 v3 pith:4RRFB7NT submitted 2024-05-24 cs.AI cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords reasoningmodelmodelslanguagemulti-stepalgorithmbufferinformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models have consistently struggled with complex reasoning tasks, such as mathematical problem-solving. Investigating the internal reasoning mechanisms of these models can help us design better model architectures and training strategies, ultimately enhancing their reasoning capability. In this study, we constructed a symbolic multi-step reasoning task to investigate the information propagation mechanisms in Transformer models when solving the task through direct answering and Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning. We introduced the concept of buffer mechanism: the model stores various information in distinct buffers and selectively extracts it through the query-key matrix. We proposed a random matrix-based algorithm to enhance the model's reasoning ability. This algorithm introduces only 132 trainable parameters, yet leads to significant performance improvements on 7 multi-step reasoning datasets, including PrOntoQA, LogicAsker, and LogicInference. These findings provide new insights into understanding the large language models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An Analysis for Reasoning Bias of Language Models with Small Initialization

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Initialization scale controls whether a transformer learns compositional reasoning or memorized mappings, because reasoning tokens acquire more differentiated embeddings early in training.

  2. Reinforcement Learning in hyperbolic space for multi-step reasoning

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Hyperbolic transformer policies are claimed to beat vanilla transformer policies by 32-45% on a handful of reasoning and control problems, but the evidence is too weak to support the claim.

Pith tools