Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 1 cited by

String probes, simple currents, and the no global symmetries conjecture

T0 review · 1 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-05-14 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Chiral simple currents extending the worldsheet algebra of faithful string probes reproduce obstructions to gauging center one-form symmetries in six and eight dimensions.

desk verdict The paper identifies chiral simple currents as the worldsheet signature of gauged center one-form symmetries for faithful string probes, which reproduces known obstructions but assumes the mapping rather than deriving it generally. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.12594 v1 pith:4SWISXW2 submitted 2026-05-12 hep-th

Guglielmo Lockhart , Luca Novelli , Yann Proto This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords centerone-formsymmetriessimplecurrentsstringprobesheteroticcompactificationsgaugegrouptopologyquantumgravityBPSparticlesworldsheet
topics Quantum Gravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper examines center one-form symmetries through the lens of faithful string probes, which are extended objects where the gauge symmetry is realized as a holomorphic current algebra. It argues that gauged versions of these symmetries correspond to chiral simple currents that extend the current algebra on the worldsheet. The consistency conditions required for these extensions match and generalize known field-theoretic and geometric obstructions in six and eight dimensions. This is checked in heterotic string compactifications and used to find the gauge group topology for a class of six-dimensional models. The results also clarify why certain BPS particles are needed for consistency in six-dimensional supergravity after circle reduction.

What carries the argument

Faithful string probes realizing the gauge symmetry as a holomorphic current algebra, extended by chiral simple currents.

What would settle it

A consistent string compactification with a gauged center one-form symmetry but no corresponding chiral simple current extension for its faithful string probes would falsify the proposed correspondence.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The worldsheet counterpart of gauged center one-form symmetries is the existence of chiral simple currents extending the current algebra for faithful string probes that realize the gauge symmetry as a holomorphic current algebra. The consistency condition for such extensions reproduce and generalize known field theoretic and geometric obstructions to the gauging of center one-form symmetries in six and eight dimensions.

Load-bearing premise

The worldsheet counterpart of gauged center one-form symmetries is precisely the existence of chiral simple currents extending the current algebra for faithful string probes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The gauge group topology of recently identified six-dimensional models with no known F-theoretic realization can be inferred from the presence of such currents.
  • In six-dimensional supergravity, gauged center one-form symmetries require specific BPS particles for consistency upon circle reduction.
  • The consistency conditions generalize known obstructions to gauging in both six and eight dimensions.
  • Composite higher-spin chiral currents appear in several models, suggesting a stringy generalization of center one-form symmetries.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This worldsheet approach could be applied to test similar symmetry constraints in compactifications beyond the heterotic string.
  • The higher-spin currents may point to new bulk structures in the effective theory that go beyond standard one-form symmetry descriptions.
  • Analogous probes using other extended objects could help classify global symmetry possibilities across quantum gravity models.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that the worldsheet counterpart of gauged center one-form symmetries is the existence of chiral simple currents extending the holomorphic current algebra for faithful string probes realizing gauge symmetry as a current algebra. It argues that consistency conditions on such extensions reproduce and generalize known field-theoretic and geometric obstructions to gauging center one-form symmetries in six and eight dimensions. This is verified in heterotic string compactification examples, applied to infer gauge group topology in a class of six-dimensional models without known F-theory realizations, and used to clarify the Kim-Vafa observation on required BPS particles upon circle reduction in 6d supergravity. The work also notes composite higher-spin chiral currents in several models, suggesting a possible stringy generalization of center symmetries.

Significance. If the proposed worldsheet-bulk correspondence holds, the manuscript offers a useful string-theoretic lens on the no global symmetries conjecture by connecting worldsheet current algebra extensions to bulk gauge group topology constraints. It reproduces established obstructions in 6d and 8d while extending the approach to new models, and the explicit checks in heterotic examples provide concrete grounding. The clarification of BPS particle requirements adds a link to effective field theory consistency. The observation of higher-spin currents hints at broader implications, though the overall significance depends on strengthening the foundational mapping.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract: The central claim that consistency conditions on chiral simple current extensions reproduce field-theoretic obstructions assumes that such extensions are precisely the worldsheet signature of gauged center one-form symmetries. This identification is motivated by heterotic examples but lacks a general derivation establishing necessity and sufficiency (as opposed to a sufficient condition in specific cases), which is load-bearing for the reproduction of obstructions and the generalization beyond the probe construction.
minor comments (1)
  1. The terms 'faithful string probes' and the precise notion of current algebra extension would benefit from an earlier, more formal definition or reference to standard CFT literature on simple currents to improve accessibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed reading and the constructive comment on the foundational identification in the abstract. We address the point below and will make targeted revisions to clarify the scope of the argument without overstating the generality of the derivation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: The central claim that consistency conditions on chiral simple current extensions reproduce field-theoretic obstructions assumes that such extensions are precisely the worldsheet signature of gauged center one-form symmetries. This identification is motivated by heterotic examples but lacks a general derivation establishing necessity and sufficiency (as opposed to a sufficient condition in specific cases), which is load-bearing for the reproduction of obstructions and the generalization beyond the probe construction.

    Authors: We agree that the identification is presented as an argument motivated by the faithful probe construction and verified explicitly in heterotic examples, rather than derived from first principles as a necessary and sufficient condition in full generality. The manuscript frames the statement with 'we argue that' and 'the worldsheet counterpart,' and the obstructions are reproduced within this framework. To address the concern, we will revise the abstract and the opening of Section 2 to state explicitly that the correspondence is established as a sufficient condition for the probe sector and that consistency of the simple-current extensions reproduces the known obstructions in all checked cases; we will also add a brief discussion of why the heterotic realizations provide supporting evidence for the broader applicability while acknowledging the absence of a model-independent necessity proof at this stage. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; consistency conditions match external obstructions via argued but non-reductive correspondence

full rationale

The paper posits an identification between gauged center one-form symmetries and the existence of chiral simple current extensions for faithful string probes, then shows that consistency conditions on such extensions reproduce and generalize known field-theoretic and geometric obstructions in 6d and 8d. This reproduction is checked against external benchmarks (prior obstructions) and verified in heterotic examples before application to new models. No step reduces a claimed prediction or derivation to an input by construction, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the central claim retains independent content from the CFT consistency analysis and external matching, qualifying as self-contained against benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 2 invented entities

Relies on standard quantum gravity assumptions about center one-form symmetries and introduces new concepts like faithful string probes and their current algebra realization without external independent evidence.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Center one-form symmetries in consistent quantum gravity theories are expected to be either broken or gauged.
    Opening expectation stated in the abstract that frames the entire analysis.
  • domain assumption Gauge symmetry is realized as a holomorphic current algebra for faithful string probes.
    Core premise enabling the worldsheet perspective on bulk symmetries.
invented entities (2)
  • faithful string probes
    purpose: Distinguished extended objects realizing gauge symmetry as holomorphic current algebra to probe center one-form symmetries.
    Newly introduced objects central to the argument; no independent evidence outside the framework provided.
  • chiral simple currents
    purpose: Worldsheet counterpart of gauged center one-form symmetries that extend the current algebra.
    Key new connection argued to reproduce bulk obstructions; no independent falsifiable handle given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of String probes, simple currents, and the no global symmetries conjecture." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4SWISXW2

@misc{pith2026260512594,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: String probes, simple currents, and the no global symmetries conjecture},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4SWISXW2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.12594}
}
read the original abstract

Center one-form symmetries in consistent quantum gravity theories are expected to be either broken or gauged, thereby determining the global form of the gauge group. We shed light on this expectation from the perspective of distinguished extended objects, which we denote by faithful string probes, for which the gauge symmetry is realized as a holomorphic current algebra. We argue that the worldsheet counterpart of gauged center one-form symmetries is the existence of chiral simple currents extending the current algebra. Accordingly, we show that the consistency condition for such extensions reproduce and generalize known field theoretic and geometric obstructions to the gauging of center one-form symmetries in six and eight dimensions. We verify this picture in a number of examples arising from heterotic string compactifications, and apply it to infer the gauge group topology of a recently identified class of six-dimensional models with no known F-theoretic realization. In 6d supergavity, our results also clarify an observation of Kim and Vafa on the existence of BPS particles required for consistency upon circle reduction: these particles arise from worldsheet simple currents whose existence is dictated by the presence of a gauged center one-form symmetry. Intriguingly, in several models across different dimensions we find composite higher-spin chiral currents beyond the current algebra, hinting at a stringy generalization of center one-form symmetries in the bulk.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. 6d Supergravity Blocks

    hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Any consistent 6d (1,0) supergravity is assembled by gluing supergravity blocks (one H-string LST plus positively intersecting external tensors whose Gram matrix has one positive eigenvalue) and enhancing gauges; non-...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

136 extracted references · 136 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    McNamara and C

    J. McNamara and C. Vafa,Cobordism Classes and the Swampland,1909.10355

    work page arXiv 1909

  2. [2]

    Monopoles, Duality, and String Theory

    J. Polchinski,Monopoles, duality, and string theory,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A19S1 (2004) 145–156, [hep-th/0304042]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2004

  3. [3]

    Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity

    T. Banks and N. Seiberg,Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 084019, [1011.5120]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  4. [4]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand,Tensionless Strings and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,JHEP10(2018) 164, [1808.05958]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand,A Stringy Test of the Scalar Weak Gravity Conjecture,Nucl. Phys. B938(2019) 321–350, [1810.05169]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    H.-C. Kim, G. Shiu and C. Vafa,Branes and the Swampland,Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 066006, [1905.08261]

    work page arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    Four-dimensionalN=4SYM theory and the swampland,

    H.-C. Kim, H.-C. Tarazi and C. Vafa,Four-dimensionalN=4SYM theory and the swampland,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 026003, [1912.06144]

    work page arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Katz, H.-C

    S. Katz, H.-C. Kim, H.-C. Tarazi and C. Vafa,Swampland Constraints on 5dN= 1 Supergravity,JHEP07(2020) 080, [2004.14401]

    work page arXiv 2020

Show all 136 references
  1. [9]

    Angelantonj, Q

    C. Angelantonj, Q. Bonnefoy, C. Condeescu and E. Dudas,String Defects, Supersymmetry and the Swampland,JHEP11(2020) 125, [2007.12722]

    2020

  2. [10]

    Tarazi and C

    H.-C. Tarazi and C. Vafa,On The Finiteness of 6d Supergravity Landscape, 2106.10839

  3. [11]

    Hamada and G

    Y. Hamada and G. J. Loges,Enumerating 6D supergravities with T≤1,JHEP12 (2024) 167, [2404.08845]

    2024

  4. [12]

    H.-C. Kim, C. Vafa and K. Xu,Finite landscape of 6d N=(1,0) supergravity,SciPost Phys.20(2026) 016, [2411.19155]

    2026

  5. [13]

    Hamada and G

    Y. Hamada and G. J. Loges,A finite 6d supergravity landscape from anomalies, 2507.20949

  6. [14]

    Hamada and C

    Y. Hamada and C. Vafa,8d supergravity, reconstruction of internal geometry and the Swampland,JHEP06(2021) 178, [2104.05724]

    2021

  7. [15]

    Bedroya, Y

    A. Bedroya, Y. Hamada, M. Montero and C. Vafa,Compactness of brane moduli and the String Lamppost Principle in d>6,JHEP02(2022) 082, [2110.10157]

    2022

  8. [16]

    Lockhart and L

    G. Lockhart and L. Novelli,The hyperplane string, RCFTs, and the swampland, JHEP11(2025) 065, [2506.05173]

    2025

  9. [17]

    Lockhart and Y

    G. Lockhart and Y. Proto,Rational points in the 6d supergravity landscape and simple current extensions,2603.17713. – 78 –

  10. [18]

    O. J. Ganor and A. Hanany,Small E(8) instantons and tensionless noncritical strings,Nucl. Phys. B474(1996) 122–140, [hep-th/9602120]

    1996 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Seiberg and E

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten,Comments on string dynamics in six-dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B471(1996) 121–134, [hep-th/9603003]

    1996 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Klemm, P

    A. Klemm, P. Mayr and C. Vafa,BPS states of exceptional noncritical strings,Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.58(1997) 177, [hep-th/9607139]

    1997 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Haghighat, A

    B. Haghighat, A. Iqbal, C. Koz¸ caz, G. Lockhart and C. Vafa,M-Strings,Commun. Math. Phys.334(2015) 779–842, [1305.6322]

    2015 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Z. K. Baykara, Y. Hamada, H.-C. Tarazi and C. Vafa,On the string landscape without hypermultiplets,JHEP04(2024) 121, [2309.15152]

    2024

  15. [23]

    Z. K. Baykara, H.-C. Tarazi and C. Vafa,Quasicrystalline string landscape,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 086025, [2406.00129]

    2025

  16. [24]

    Kim and C

    H.-C. Kim and C. Vafa,Exploring new constraints on K¨ ahler moduli space of 6dN= 1 supergravity,JHEP10(2024) 217, [2406.06704]

    2024

  17. [25]

    Heidenreich, M

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius,The Weak Gravity Conjecture and axion strings,JHEP11(2021) 004, [2108.11383]

    2021

  18. [26]

    Cecotti and C

    S. Cecotti and C. Vafa,Theta-problem and the String Swampland,1808.03483

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    Freed, J

    D. Freed, J. A. Harvey, R. Minasian and G. W. Moore,Gravitational anomaly cancellation for M theory five-branes,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 601–618, [hep-th/9803205]

    1998 arXiv

  20. [28]

    J. A. Harvey, R. Minasian and G. W. Moore,NonAbelian tensor multiplet anomalies, JHEP09(1998) 004, [hep-th/9808060]

    1998 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Kim and P

    H. Kim and P. Yi,D-brane anomaly inflow revisited,JHEP02(2012) 012, [1201.0762]

    2012 arXiv

  22. [30]

    P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam and N. Seiberg,Comments on One-Form Global Symmetries and Their Gauging in 3d and 4d,SciPost Phys.6(2019) 039, [1812.04716]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [31]

    A. Font, L. E. Ibanez and F. Quevedo,Higher Level Kac-Moody String Models and Their Phenomenological Implications,Nucl. Phys. B345(1990) 389–430

    1990

  24. [32]

    Kaufmann, S

    L. Kaufmann, S. Lanza and T. Weigand,Asymptotics of 5d supergravity theories and the emergent string conjecture,JHEP06(2025) 230, [2412.12251]

    2025

  25. [33]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand,Modular Fluxes, Elliptic Genera, and Weak Gravity Conjectures in Four Dimensions,JHEP08(2019) 104, [1901.08065]

    2019

  26. [34]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche, G. Lockhart and T. Weigand,Quasi-Jacobi forms, elliptic genera and strings in four dimensions,JHEP01(2021) 162, [2005.10837]. – 79 –

    2021

  27. [35]

    Xu,On TCS G 2 manifolds and 4D emergent strings,JHEP10(2020) 045, [2006.02350]

    F. Xu,On TCS G 2 manifolds and 4D emergent strings,JHEP10(2020) 045, [2006.02350]

    2020

  28. [36]

    Grieco, I

    A. Grieco, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela,EFT strings and dualities in 4dN= 1, 2504.16984

  29. [37]

    G. F. Casas and M. Wiesner,Towards the Non-Perturbative Completion of 4d N=1 Effective Theories of Gravity,2510.23698

  30. [38]

    Haghighat, S

    B. Haghighat, S. Murthy, C. Vafa and S. Vandoren,F-theory, spinning black holes and multi-string branches,1509.00455

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    Del Zotto and G

    M. Del Zotto and G. Lockhart,Universal Features of BPS Strings in Six-dimensional SCFTs,JHEP08(2018) 173, [1804.09694]

    2018 arXiv

  32. [40]

    A. N. Schellekens and S. Yankielowicz,Extended Chiral Algebras and Modular Invariant Partition Functions,Nucl. Phys. B327(1989) 673–703

    1989

  33. [41]

    A. N. Schellekens and S. Yankielowicz,Simple Currents, Modular Invariants and Fixed Points,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A5(1990) 2903–2952

    1990

  34. [42]

    A. N. Schellekens and S. Yankielowicz,Modular Invariants From Simple Currents: An Explicit Proof,Phys. Lett. B227(1989) 387–391

    1989

  35. [43]

    K. A. Intriligator,Bonus Symmetry in Conformal Field Theory,Nucl. Phys. B332 (1990) 541–565

    1990

  36. [44]

    Fuchs,Simple WZW currents,Commun

    J. Fuchs,Simple WZW currents,Commun. Math. Phys.136(1991) 345–356

    1991

  37. [45]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu and D. Senechal,Conformal Field Theory. Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997, 10.1007/978-1-4612-2256-9

    1997 doi

  38. [46]

    I. V. Melnikov,An Introduction to Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory with (0,2) Supersymmetry, vol. 951 ofLecture Notes in Physics. Springer, 2019, 10.1007/978-3-030-05085-6

    2019 doi

  39. [47]

    Kapustin and N

    A. Kapustin and N. Seiberg,Coupling a QFT to a TQFT and Duality,JHEP04 (2014) 001, [1401.0740]

    2014 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Gaiotto, A

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett,Generalized Global Symmetries, JHEP02(2015) 172, [1412.5148]

    2015 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Harlow and H

    D. Harlow and H. Ooguri,Symmetries in quantum field theory and quantum gravity, Commun. Math. Phys.383(2021) 1669–1804, [1810.05338]

    2021 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Aharony, N

    O. Aharony, N. Seiberg and Y. Tachikawa,Reading between the lines of four-dimensional gauge theories,JHEP08(2013) 115, [1305.0318]

    2013

  43. [51]

    C´ ordova, D

    C. C´ ordova, D. S. Freed, H. T. Lam and N. Seiberg,Anomalies in the Space of – 80 – Coupling Constants and Their Dynamical Applications II,SciPost Phys.8(2020) 002, [1905.13361]

    2020

  44. [52]

    Apruzzi, M

    F. Apruzzi, M. Dierigl and L. Lin,The fate of discrete 1-form symmetries in 6d, SciPost Phys.12(2022) 047, [2008.09117]

    2022

  45. [53]

    Cvetiˇ c, M

    M. Cvetiˇ c, M. Dierigl, L. Lin and H. Y. Zhang,String Universality and Non-Simply-Connected Gauge Groups in 8d,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 211602, [2008.10605]

    2020

  46. [54]

    Benetti Genolini and L

    P. Benetti Genolini and L. Tizzano,Instantons, symmetries and anomalies in five dimensions,JHEP04(2021) 188, [2009.07873]

    2021

  47. [55]

    A. Font, B. Fraiman, M. Gra˜ na, C. A. N´ u˜ nez and H. Parra De Freitas,Exploring the landscape of CHL strings on T d,JHEP08(2021) 095, [2104.07131]

    2021

  48. [56]

    Cvetic, M

    M. Cvetic, M. Dierigl, L. Lin and H. Y. Zhang,Gauge group topology of 8D Chaudhuri-Hockney-Lykken vacua,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 086018, [2107.04031]

    2021

  49. [57]

    Hsieh, Y

    C.-T. Hsieh, Y. Tachikawa and K. Yonekura,Anomaly Inflow and p-Form Gauge Theories,Commun. Math. Phys.391(2022) 495–608, [2003.11550]

    2022

  50. [58]

    G. W. Moore and N. Seiberg,Naturality in Conformal Field Theory,Nucl. Phys. B 313(1989) 16–40

    1989

  51. [59]

    G. W. Moore and N. Seiberg,Taming the Conformal Zoo,Phys. Lett. B220(1989) 422–430

    1989

  52. [60]

    D. R. Morrison and W. Taylor,Classifying bases for 6D F-theory models,Central Eur. J. Phys.10(2012) 1072–1088, [1201.1943]

    2012 arXiv

  53. [61]

    J. J. Heckman, D. R. Morrison, T. Rudelius and C. Vafa,Atomic Classification of 6D SCFTs,Fortsch. Phys.63(2015) 468–530, [1502.05405]

    2015 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Dierigl, P.-K

    M. Dierigl, P.-K. Oehlmann and F. Ruehle,Non-Simply-Connected Symmetries in 6D SCFTs,JHEP10(2020) 173, [2005.12929]

    2020

  55. [63]

    Cvetic and L

    M. Cvetic and L. Lin,The Global Gauge Group Structure of F-theory Compactification with U(1)s,JHEP01(2018) 157, [1706.08521]

    2018 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Cvetiˇ c and L

    M. Cvetiˇ c and L. Lin,TASI Lectures on Abelian and Discrete Symmetries in F-theory,PoST ASI2017(2018) 020, [1809.00012]

    2018 arXiv

  57. [65]

    P. S. Aspinwall and D. R. Morrison,Nonsimply connected gauge groups and rational points on elliptic curves,JHEP07(1998) 012, [hep-th/9805206]

    1998 arXiv

  58. [66]

    D. R. Morrison and D. S. Park,F-Theory and the Mordell-Weil Group of Elliptically-Fibered Calabi-Yau Threefolds,JHEP10(2012) 128, [1208.2695]

    2012 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Mayrhofer, D

    C. Mayrhofer, D. R. Morrison, O. Till and T. Weigand,Mordell-Weil Torsion and the Global Structure of Gauge Groups in F-theory,JHEP10(2014) 016, [1405.3656]. – 81 –

    2014 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Shioda,Mordell-Weil lattices and Galois representation, I,Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series A, Mathematical Sciences65(1989) 268 – 271

    T. Shioda,Mordell-Weil lattices and Galois representation, I,Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series A, Mathematical Sciences65(1989) 268 – 271

    1989

  61. [69]

    Shioda,On the Mordell-Weil Lattices,Commentarii Mathematici Universitatis Sancti Pauli39(01, 1990)

    T. Shioda,On the Mordell-Weil Lattices,Commentarii Mathematici Universitatis Sancti Pauli39(01, 1990)

    1990

  62. [70]

    Miranda and U

    R. Miranda and U. Persson,Configurations of Infibers on elliptic K 3 surfaces, Mathematische Zeitschrift201(Sept., 1989) 339–361

    1989

  63. [71]

    Witten,Toroidal compactification without vector structure,JHEP02(1998) 006, [hep-th/9712028]

    E. Witten,Toroidal compactification without vector structure,JHEP02(1998) 006, [hep-th/9712028]

    1998 arXiv

  64. [72]

    K. S. Narain, M. H. Sarmadi and C. Vafa,Asymmetric Orbifolds,Nucl. Phys. B288 (1987) 551

    1987

  65. [73]

    Bianchi, G

    M. Bianchi, G. Bossard and D. Consoli,Perturbative higher-derivative terms inN= 6 asymmetric orbifolds,JHEP06(2022) 088, [2203.15130]

    2022

  66. [74]

    B. S. Acharya, G. Aldazabal, A. Font, K. Narain and I. G. Zadeh,Heterotic strings onT 3/Z2, Nikulin involutions and M-theory,JHEP09(2022) 209, [2205.09764]

    2022

  67. [75]

    Fraiman and H

    B. Fraiman and H. Parra De Freitas,Unifying the 6DN= (1, 1) string landscape, JHEP02(2023) 204, [2209.06214]

    2023

  68. [76]

    Gkountoumis, C

    G. Gkountoumis, C. Hull, K. Stemerdink and S. Vandoren,Freely acting orbifolds of type IIB string theory on T 5,JHEP08(2023) 089, [2302.09112]

    2023

  69. [77]

    A. E. Faraggi, S. Groot Nibbelink and B. Percival,Free fermionic webs of heterotic T folds,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) L051701, [2306.16443]

    2024

  70. [78]

    Gkountoumis, C

    G. Gkountoumis, C. Hull and S. Vandoren,Exact moduli spaces forN= 2, D = 5 freely acting orbifolds,JHEP07(2024) 126, [2403.05650]

    2024

  71. [79]

    Z. K. Baykara, H.-C. Tarazi and C. Vafa,New Nonsupersymmetric Tachyon-Free Strings,Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026) 061602, [2406.00185]

    2026

  72. [80]

    Angelantonj, I

    C. Angelantonj, I. Florakis, G. Leone and D. Perugini,Non-supersymmetric non-tachyonic heterotic vacua with reduced rank in various dimensions,JHEP10 (2024) 216, [2407.09597]

    2024

  73. [81]

    Hamada and A

    Y. Hamada and A. Ishige,Investigating 9d/8d non-supersymmetric branes and theories from supersymmetric heterotic strings,JHEP01(2025) 141, [2409.04770]

    2025

  74. [82]

    Hamada, A

    Y. Hamada, A. Ishige and Y. Koga,More on 8D nonsupersymmetric branes and heterotic strings,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 046012, [2505.15144]

    2026

  75. [83]

    Aldazabal, E

    G. Aldazabal, E. Andr´ es, A. Font, K. Narain and I. G. Zadeh,Asymmetric orbifolds, rank reduction and heterotic islands,JHEP08(2025) 083, [2501.17228]

    2025

  76. [84]

    Z. K. Baykara, H. P. De Freitas and H.-C. Tarazi,String islands, discrete theta angles and the 6DN= (1,1)string landscape,2502.19468. – 82 –

  77. [85]

    Larotonda, M

    V. Larotonda, M. Montero and M. Tartaglia,Asymmetric orbifolds with vanishing one-loop vacuum energy,2602.07113

    arXiv

  78. [86]

    Gkountoumis, C

    G. Gkountoumis, C. Hull, G.-E. Nian and S. Vandoren,Duality and infinite distance limits in asymmetric freely acting orbifolds,JHEP09(2025) 198, [2506.11699]

    2025

  79. [87]

    Reece and T

    M. Reece and T. Rudelius,Nonabelian Lattice Weak Gravity Conjecture and Monopole Confinement,2603.04494

  80. [88]

    Cheng and H

    P. Cheng and H. P. De Freitas,Dai-Freed anomalies and level matching in heterotic asymmetric orbifolds,2604.19634

    arXiv

  81. [89]

    Chaudhuri, G

    S. Chaudhuri, G. Hockney and J. D. Lykken,Maximally supersymmetric string theories in D<10,Phys. Rev. Lett.75(1995) 2264–2267, [hep-th/9505054]

    1995 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Chaudhuri and J

    S. Chaudhuri and J. Polchinski,Moduli space of CHL strings,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 7168–7173, [hep-th/9506048]

    1995 arXiv

  83. [91]

    A. N. Schellekens,Meromorphic C = 24 conformal field theories,Commun. Math. Phys.153(1993) 159–186, [hep-th/9205072]

    1993 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Niemeier,Definite quadratische formen der dimension 24 und diskriminante 1, Journal of Number Theory5(1973) 142–178

    H.-V. Niemeier,Definite quadratische formen der dimension 24 und diskriminante 1, Journal of Number Theory5(1973) 142–178

    1973

  85. [93]

    Cheng, I

    P. Cheng, I. V. Melnikov and R. Minasian,Flat equivariant gerbes: holonomies and dualities,JHEP04(2023) 074, [2207.06885]

    2023

  86. [94]

    Israel, I

    D. Israel, I. V. Melnikov, R. Minasian and Y. Proto,Topology change and heterotic flux vacua,JHEP06(2024) 204, [2312.08923]

    2024

  87. [95]

    K. S. Narain, M. H. Sarmadi and E. Witten,A Note on Toroidal Compactification of Heterotic String Theory,Nucl. Phys. B279(1987) 369–379

    1987

  88. [96]

    P. H. Ginsparg,Comment on Toroidal Compactification of Heterotic Superstrings, Phys. Rev. D35(1987) 648

    1987

  89. [97]

    V. V. Nikulin,Integral symmetric bilinear forms and some of their applications, Mathematics of the USSR-Izvestiya14(feb, 1980) 103

    1980

  90. [98]

    Fraiman, M

    B. Fraiman, M. Gra˜ na and C. A. N´ u˜ nez,A new twist on heterotic string compactifications,JHEP09(2018) 078, [1805.11128]

    2018 arXiv

  91. [99]

    A. Font, B. Fraiman, M. Gra˜ na, C. A. N´ u˜ nez and H. P. De Freitas,Exploring the landscape of heterotic strings onT d,JHEP10(2020) 194, [2007.10358]

    2020

  92. [100]

    Goddard and D

    P. Goddard and D. Olive,Algebras, lattices and strings, inVertex Operators in Mathematics and Physics(J. Lepowsky, S. Mandelstam and I. M. Singer, eds.), (New York, NY), pp. 51–96, Springer US, 1985

    1985

  93. [101]

    F. A. Cachazo and C. Vafa,Type I’ and real algebraic geometry,hep-th/0001029. – 83 –

    arXiv

  94. [102]

    J. H. Conway and N. J. A. Sloane,Sphere Packings, Lattices and Groups, vol. 290 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer, 1999, 10.1007/978-1-4757-6568-7

    1999 doi

  95. [103]

    Israel, I

    D. Israel, I. V. Melnikov and Y. Proto,Shift orbifolds, decompactification limits, and lattices,2502.18453

  96. [104]

    Mikhailov,Momentum lattice for CHL string,Nucl

    A. Mikhailov,Momentum lattice for CHL string,Nucl. Phys. B534(1998) 612–652, [hep-th/9806030]

    1998 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Shimada,On elliptic K3 surfaces,math/0505140

    I. Shimada,On elliptic K3 surfaces,math/0505140

    arXiv

  98. [106]

    Forgacs, Z

    P. Forgacs, Z. Horvath, L. Palla and P. Vecsernyes,Higher Level Kac-Moody Representations and Rank Reduction in String Models,Nucl. Phys. B308(1988) 477–508

    1988

  99. [107]

    Collazuol and I

    V. Collazuol and I. V. Melnikov,A twist at infinite distance in the CHL string,JHEP 10(2024) 074, [2402.01606]

    2024

  100. [108]

    Kumar, D

    V. Kumar, D. R. Morrison and W. Taylor,Global aspects of the space of 6D N = 1 supergravities,JHEP11(2010) 118, [1008.1062]

    2010 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Seiberg and W

    N. Seiberg and W. Taylor,Charge Lattices and Consistency of 6D Supergravity,JHEP 06(2011) 001, [1103.0019]

    2011 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Monnier, G

    S. Monnier, G. W. Moore and D. S. Park,Quantization of anomaly coefficients in 6d N= (1,0)supergravity,JHEP02(2018) 020, [1711.04777]

    2018 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Lee and T

    S.-J. Lee and T. Weigand,Swampland Bounds on the Abelian Gauge Sector,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 026015, [1905.13213]

    2019

  104. [112]

    Hamada and G

    Y. Hamada and G. J. Loges,Towards a complete classification of 6D supergravities, JHEP02(2024) 095, [2311.00868]

    2024

  105. [113]

    H.-C. Kim, S. Kim and J. Park,6d strings from new chiral gauge theories, 1608.03919

    arXiv

  106. [114]

    Shimizu and Y

    H. Shimizu and Y. Tachikawa,Anomaly of strings of 6dN= (1,0)theories,JHEP 11(2016) 165, [1608.05894]

    2016 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Kumar, D

    V. Kumar, D. S. Park and W. Taylor,6D supergravity without tensor multiplets, JHEP04(2011) 080, [1011.0726]

    2011 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Bonetti and T

    F. Bonetti and T. W. Grimm,Six-dimensional (1,0) effective action of F-theory via M-theory on Calabi-Yau threefolds,JHEP05(2012) 019, [1112.1082]

    2012 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Bonetti, T

    F. Bonetti, T. W. Grimm and S. Hohenegger,One-loop Chern-Simons terms in five dimensions,JHEP07(2013) 043, [1302.2918]

    2013 arXiv

  110. [118]

    T. W. Grimm and A. Kapfer,Anomaly Cancelation in Field Theory and F-theory on a Circle,JHEP05(2016) 102, [1502.05398]. – 84 –

    2016 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Corvilain, T

    P. Corvilain, T. W. Grimm and D. Regalado,Chiral anomalies on a circle and their cancellation in F-theory,JHEP04(2018) 020, [1710.07626]

    2018

  112. [120]

    Corvilain,6dN= (1, 0) anomalies on S 1 and F-theory implications,JHEP08 (2020) 133, [2005.12935]

    P. Corvilain,6dN= (1, 0) anomalies on S 1 and F-theory implications,JHEP08 (2020) 133, [2005.12935]

    2020

  113. [121]

    Cheng, R

    P. Cheng, R. Minasian and S. Theisen,Anomalies as obstructions: from dimensional lifts to swampland,JHEP01(2022) 068, [2106.14912]

    2022

  114. [122]

    Cheng, M

    P. Cheng, M. N. Milam and R. Minasian,Integral cubic form of 5D minimal supergravities and non-perturbative anomalies in 6D (1,0) theories,2509.18042

  115. [123]

    D. J. Duque, A.-K. Kashani-Poor and T. Schimannek,The twisted geometry of 6d F-theory vacua with discrete gauge symmetries,2508.16500

  116. [124]

    D. R. Morrison and W. Taylor,Charge completeness and the massless charge lattice in F-theory models of supergravity,JHEP12(2021) 040, [2108.02309]

    2021

  117. [125]

    Taylor and A

    W. Taylor and A. P. Turner,An infinite swampland of U(1) charge spectra in 6D supergravity theories,JHEP06(2018) 010, [1803.04447]

    2018

  118. [126]

    Dijkgraaf and E

    R. Dijkgraaf and E. Witten,Topological Gauge Theories and Group Cohomology, Commun. Math. Phys.129(1990) 393

    1990

  119. [127]

    Braun and D

    V. Braun and D. R. Morrison,F-theory on Genus-One Fibrations,JHEP08(2014) 132, [1401.7844]

    2014 arXiv

  120. [128]

    S. L. Shatashvili and C. Vafa,Superstrings and manifold of exceptional holonomy, Selecta Math.1(1995) 347, [hep-th/9407025]

    1995 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Haghighat, A

    B. Haghighat, A. Klemm, G. Lockhart and C. Vafa,Strings of Minimal 6d SCFTs, Fortsch. Phys.63(2015) 294–322, [1412.3152]

    2015 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Huang, S

    M.-x. Huang, S. Katz and A. Klemm,Topological String on elliptic CY 3-folds and the ring of Jacobi forms,JHEP10(2015) 125, [1501.04891]

    2015 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Del Zotto, J

    M. Del Zotto, J. Gu, M.-X. Huang, A.-K. Kashani-Poor, A. Klemm and G. Lockhart, Topological Strings on Singular Elliptic Calabi-Yau 3-folds and Minimal 6d SCFTs, JHEP03(2018) 156, [1712.07017]

    2018 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Oberdieck and J

    G. Oberdieck and J. Shen,Curve counting on elliptic Calabi–Yau threefolds via derived categories,J. Eur. Math. Soc.22(2019) 967–1002, [1608.07073]

    2019

  125. [133]

    Oberdieck and A

    G. Oberdieck and A. Pixton,Gromov-Witten theory of elliptic fibrations: Jacobi forms and holomorphic anomaly equations,Geom. Topol.23(2019) 1415–1489, [1709.01481]

    2019 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Z. Duan, D. J. Duque and A.-K. Kashani-Poor,Weyl invariant Jacobi forms along Higgsing trees,JHEP04(2021) 224, [2012.10427]. – 85 –

    2021

  127. [135]

    Schimannek,Modular curves, the Tate-Shafarevich group and Gopakumar-Vafa invariants with discrete charges,JHEP02(2022) 007, [2108.09311]

    T. Schimannek,Modular curves, the Tate-Shafarevich group and Gopakumar-Vafa invariants with discrete charges,JHEP02(2022) 007, [2108.09311]

    2022

  128. [136]

    C. F. Cota, A. Klemm and T. Schimannek,Topological strings on genus one fibered Calabi-Yau 3-folds and string dualities,JHEP11(2019) 170, [1910.01988]. – 86 –

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed May 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.