Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 4 cited by

Interactions do not change the universality class of the Majorana measurement-induced transition: the interaction-induced mass is dangerously irrelevant at the critical point.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 07:48 UTC pith:4UYNE4ME

load-bearing objection A well-posed conjecture with honest caveats: the epsilon-expansion evidence is real but uncontrolled, and the dangerously-irrelevant conclusion rests on a fitted parameter. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2510.23706 v2 pith:4UYNE4ME submitted 2025-10-27 cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.str-elquant-ph

Free-Fermion Measurement-Induced Volume- to Area-Law Entanglement Transition in the Presence of Fermion Interactions

Matthew S. Foster , Haoyu Guo , Chao-Ming Jian , Andreas W. W. Ludwig This is my paper
classification cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords measurement-induced phase transitionentanglement transitionmonitored Majorana fermionsclass DIIIreplica nonlinear sigma modeldangerously irrelevant massR=2−ε expansionvolume-law phase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

What happens to the volume-law–to–area-law entanglement transition of a monitored fermion chain when interactions are switched on? This paper argues that for one-dimensional, monitored, interacting Majorana fermions with no conserved quantities (symmetry class DIII), the transition is controlled by exactly the same critical theory as the noninteracting system. The interaction-generated 'mass' term in the field theory — which encodes interparticle scattering and drives volume-law entanglement — becomes dangerously irrelevant at the critical point: it flows to zero exactly at the transition, restoring the free-fermion critical point, while any deviation from the critical surface sends the system into the volume-law phase. The argument uses a replicated Keldysh nonlinear sigma model and a controlled ε-expansion in the replica number, and it yields concrete numerical predictions that would confirm or refute the conjecture.

Core claim

The central claim is that the measurement-induced phase transition (MIPT) in a one-dimensional chain of monitored, interacting Majorana fermions (symmetry class DIII, no conserved quantities) has exactly the same critical point as the noninteracting transition. The interaction-induced replica-anisotropic 'mass' operator O_M = ∑_{j,k} X_{jk}^4 — which represents a local interparticle scattering rate, i.e., the entangling rate density — becomes dangerously irrelevant at the critical fixed point. At the transition the mass flows to zero and the noninteracting SO(R)×SO(R)-symmetric critical theory (a non-unitary conformal field theory) is recovered; a nonzero mass deviation instead drives the sy

What carries the argument

The central object is the replicated Keldysh nonlinear sigma model (a field theory whose field X is an SO(R) rotation matrix), with action S = (λ/16) tr(∇X^T·∇X) − (M/16) O_M, where λ is the stiffness (inversely proportional to the measurement rate) and the 'mass' term O_M = ∑_{j,k} X_{jk}^4 represents the interaction-induced scattering (entangling) rate. The mass breaks the continuous replica symmetry SO(R)×SO(R) down to discrete permutations S_R×S_R. The analysis proceeds through a technical duality to the SO(R)_q Wess-Zumino-Novikov-Witten model at level q = 8, which allows an ε-expansion in the replica number R = 2 − ε; the resulting one-loop RG flow shows the mass to be dangerously irre

Load-bearing premise

The entire argument rests on the ε-expansion in the replica number R = 2 − ε, combined with non-abelian bosonization at level q = 8 and analytic continuation to R = 1, correctly describing the strong-coupling physical fixed point; the authors explicitly state this approach is 'not fully controlled.'

What would settle it

A numerical simulation of the interacting class-DIII monitored circuit could measure the entanglement central charge at the transition: if c_ent differs from the noninteracting value 0.39 ± 0.02 reported in the paper by more than the statistical error, or if the correlation-length exponent ν departs significantly from ≈ 2.1, then the conjecture that interactions do not alter the critical point would be falsified.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The interacting and noninteracting DIII MIPTs share the same critical exponents and effective (central) charges; this can be tested by comparing c_eff and c_ent in numerical simulations of the two circuits.
  • At the critical point, interactions flow to zero and an emergent continuous replica symmetry appears, so free-fermion techniques can be used to compute universal properties of the interacting transition.
  • A nonzero interaction strength only matters away from the critical point, where it induces the volume-law phase; the area-law phase is unaffected by interactions at sufficiently low measurement rates.
  • The correlation-length exponent satisfies ν ≈ 2.1 (for x = 3), consistent with the Chayes–Harris bound; the same exponent should govern the interacting transition.
  • For monitored fermions with extra continuous symmetries (e.g., conserved U(1) charge), interaction-induced terms from Noether currents are not dangerously irrelevant and the critical theory is expected to differ.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This suggests a broader principle: in monitored fermion systems without continuous symmetries, the dangerously-irrelevant-mass mechanism could protect free-fermion criticality, potentially unifying MIPT universality classes across interacting circuits.
  • The Fermi-golden-rule logic — that a continuous transition forces the entangling rate to vanish — implies that the mass scaling dimension at any continuous MIPT must exceed 2; a future example with a relevant mass would challenge the picture.
  • One could test the dangerously-irrelevant scenario directly by measuring the time-decay of the fermion-bilinear correlation function as the critical point is approached from the volume-law side; the mass-induced decay rate should vanish continuously at the transition.
  • The ε-expansion predicts that the effective central charge of the interacting transition equals that of the noninteracting one; a numerical measurement differing by more than a few percent would constitute evidence against the conjecture.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the measurement-induced entanglement transition (MIPT) in one-dimensional monitored, interacting Majorana fermions with no conserved quantities (class DIII). It formulates a replicated Keldysh nonlinear sigma model with an SO(R) target manifold and an interaction-induced replica-anisotropic 'mass' term OM. The paper conjectures that the interacting DIII MIPT is in the same universality class as the noninteracting DIII MIPT, because the mass term is a dangerously irrelevant perturbation at the critical point and only becomes relevant away from criticality, generating the volume-law phase. As analytic support, the authors use a non-abelian bosonization (SO(R)_q WZNW) description and an R=2−ε expansion, identifying a noninteracting fixed point and computing RG eigenvalues with a level-deformation parameter x. Setting x=3 reproduces the known noninteracting correlation-length exponent ν≈2.1. The paper also proposes several concrete numerical tests (effective central charge, entanglement central charge, fermion-correlation exponents, reduced-density-matrix level statistics) to test the conjecture. The manuscript is explicit that the central claim is a conjecture and that the epsilon expansion is 'not fully controlled.'

Significance. If correct, the conjecture is significant: it would show that interactions can leave the MIPT universality class unchanged even though they are essential for the existence of a true volume-law phase, and it would distinguish class DIII from class AIII where interactions are known to modify the transition. The paper gives credit for proposing falsifiable numerical tests and for being transparent about the status of the central claim. However, the analytic evidence is not a derivation from the microscopic model: the dangerous-irrelevance conclusion rests on an uncontrolled analytic continuation in the replica number and on a free parameter x that is fixed by matching the very noninteracting physics whose stability is being asserted. The numerical tests, if carried out, would be a genuine test of the conjecture, but they are not part of the present manuscript.

major comments (3)
  1. [Epsilon expansion, Eq. (5) and Appendix C, Eq. (14)] The central claim — that the mass operator is dangerously irrelevant at the interacting DIII MIPT — is extracted from the one-loop beta functions (5), obtained by writing the R=2 theory as an SO(R)_q WZNW model and continuing to R=2−ε. The authors explicitly state that Eq. (1) has no WZNW term for generic R and that the WZNW encoding is 'a technical trick (dualization)' (Introduction). Thus the beta functions used to locate the fixed point (15) and to compute the mass eigenvalue are not beta functions of the actual sigma model away from R=2. The dangerous-irrelevance conclusion is therefore an extrapolation, not a derivation from the microscopic model. This is load-bearing evidence for the conjecture, so the manuscript should either provide an independent check (e.g., a direct RG calculation in the sigma model, or a numerical test that constrains x) or state prominently that the result i
  2. [Epsilon expansion, text after Eq. (5) and Eq. (15)] The parameter x is a free input, not fixed by the microscopic Hamiltonian. It is set to x=3 by matching the noninteracting correlation-length exponent ν≈2.1. The mass eigenvalue at the noninteracting fixed point is (ε/4)(5−2x), so dangerous irrelevance requires x>5/2. The fitted x=3 satisfies this, but the conclusion is therefore contingent on a fit to the very noninteracting universality class whose stability is being asserted. If an independent calculation or numerical simulation gave x≤5/2, the mass would be relevant and the interacting MIPT would belong to a new universality class. This fitted-parameter dependence should be quantified or removed; at minimum, the paper should explicitly flag that the entire 'same universality class' claim hinges on the value of x.
  3. [Field theory and nature of the MIPT] The physical argument for the dangerous irrelevance of the mass relies on the assumption that the entanglement-generation rate vanishes continuously at a continuous MIPT. This is plausible but is an assumption, not a consequence of the RG calculation. If the transition is continuous only in some coarse-grained sense while the local rate remains finite at criticality, the mass could be relevant and the interacting MIPT could differ from the noninteracting one. The paper should explicitly separate this physical assumption from the field-theoretic calculation, and note that the proposed numerical tests are also needed to test this assumption directly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Title] The title has a broken space: 'Entanglement T ransition' should be 'Entanglement Transition'.
  2. [Epsilon expansion, text near Eq. (5)] The sentence 'We conjecture that x > 2/5' appears to contain a typo. The fixed-point analysis requires 5/2 < x < 4, so the conjecture should read x > 5/2. Please check all occurrences of this inequality.
  3. [Figure 2 caption] The caption states that the mass parameter yM is 'an irrelevant perturbation' in subpanel (a). It would be clearer to say 'dangerously irrelevant' and to explain that the relevance of yM away from the critical surface is what generates the volume-law phase.
  4. [Appendix B] The argument that the fermion-bilinear correlation exponent is exactly 2 for the noninteracting circuit relies on the Noether-current argument at the SO(R)×SO(R) symmetric fixed point. It would help to state explicitly that this argument does not apply to the interacting case, which is precisely why it is a useful diagnostic.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; the central claim is a transparently labeled conjecture with a calibrated, not circular, epsilon expansion.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that the interacting class-DIII MIPT is the same as the noninteracting one because the interaction-induced mass is dangerously irrelevant—is explicitly framed as a conjecture, and the analytic support does not reduce to its inputs by construction. The free parameter x in the R=2−ε WZNW-based RG flow [Eq. (5)] is set to 3 by matching the independent numerical noninteracting correlation-length exponent ν≈2.1 [Ref. 34]. The mass eigenvalue at the noninteracting fixed point, 2(5−2x)(ε/8), is a different quantity from the fitted exponent; fixing x to reproduce ν determines the mass eigenvalue as a genuine prediction of the same flow. The calculation is admittedly 'not fully controlled,' and the paper explicitly states that the microscopic action for generic R 'does not possess a WZNW term,' so the WZNW encoding is an acknowledged technical trick rather than a smuggled ansatz. These are limitations in rigor/control, not circularity. Self-citations (Refs. 34, 49) supply numerical and field-theoretic inputs that are externally reproducible or independently co-authored (Ref. 50); they are not load-bearing in a way that defines the target result into existence. Therefore no circular step meeting the evidentiary bar is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a small set of assumptions: the physical identification of the mass with the entangling rate, the validity of the R=2-ε analytic continuation, and the known properties of the noninteracting DIII MIPT. One free parameter x is fitted to existing numeric data.

free parameters (1)
  • x (level deformation parameter) = 3 (to match noninteracting ν~2.1)
    Appears in RG equations Eq. (5) via q=8-xε; the fixed point exists for 5/2<x<4, and x=3 is chosen to reproduce the numerically known noninteracting exponent ν~2.1.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption The mass operator OM in Eq. (1) encodes the interparticle scattering (entangling) rate, which must vanish continuously at a continuous MIPT.
    Physical heuristic argued from analogy to Fermi's golden rule and many-body localization; not derived from the model.
  • ad hoc to paper The R→1 replica limit can be obtained by analytic continuation from R=2-ε in the SO(R)_q WZNW bosonization; the level deformation parameter x spans a real range.
    Technical trick introduced for the epsilon expansion; no rigorous justification that the flow at R=1 is captured by this continuation.
  • domain assumption The noninteracting class-DIII MIPT exists and is characterized by a correlation-length exponent ν~2.1 (from numerics of Ref [34]).
    Used as input to fix the parameter x; if this input is incorrect, the epsilon-expansion conclusions change.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 18341 in / 9866 out tokens · 93473 ms · 2026-08-04T07:48:50.309065+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

At a generic volume- to area-law entanglement transition in a many-body system, quantum chaos is arrested. We argue that this tends to imply the vanishing of a certain "mass" term in the field theory of the measurement-induced phase transition (MIPT) for monitored, interacting fermions. To explore this idea, we consider the MIPT with no conserved quantities that describes 1D monitored, interacting Majorana fermions in class DIII. This is the most general problem of interacting fermions with weak fermion parity measurements. Without interactions, it is known that a noninteracting MIPT separates the area-law phase from a log-enhanced "thermal metal" phase at sufficiently weak monitoring. We conjecture that the MIPT with interactions is the same as the noninteracting one in this case; the volume-law phase arises through the dangerously irrelevant mass. The physical picture is that the mass represents a local Fermi's golden rule interparticle scattering rate density that is tantamount to the entangling rate density. The latter must vanish continuously at a continuous MIPT. On the other hand, the field theory capturing the MIPT for monitored fermions with additional continuous symmetries is expected to be different, because the interactions introduce additional terms associated to conserved Noether currents. We propose numerical tests of our conjecture. In addition, we analytically identify a candidate noninteracting critical point representing the MIPT, using a controlled $\epsilon$-expansion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.23706 by Andreas W. W. Ludwig, Chao-Ming Jian, Haoyu Guo, Matthew S. Foster.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The mass operator for the NLsM encodes interparticle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. RG flows in the negative stiffness deviation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Super-Logarithmic Entanglement Scaling in a Monitored Superconducting Chain

    quant-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    Rare measurements on a 1D spinful s-wave BCS chain dynamically project soft modes onto an SO(R) NLSM whose R→1 weak-anti-localization flow yields steady-state entanglement S(L) ~ ln² L without a WZW term.

  2. Measurement-enhanced entanglement in a monitored superconducting chain

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Measurements enhance steady-state entanglement in a paired fermionic chain by suppressing pairing correlations, but the enhancement scales as ln squared L and vanishes in the thermodynamic limit.

  3. Measurement-induced phase transitions in disordered fermions

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Disorder does not alter the presence or absence of measurement-induced phase transitions in noninteracting fermions; the long-time behavior is controlled by the same nonlinear sigma model with renormalized parameters.

  4. Noisy Monitored Quantum Circuits

    quant-ph 2025-12 accept novelty 2.0

    A review showing that in noisy monitored quantum circuits, any noise enforces area-law entanglement with characteristic q^{-1/3} scaling and noise-correlation-dependent information-protection timescales.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 17 linked inside Pith · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    The noninteracting theory in Eq

    to fermion bi- linears via Xj,k ⇔ c+,j ¯c−,k and X † j,k ⇔ c−,j ¯c+,k, where c+,j (¯c−,k) denotes an annihilation (creation) field on the forward (backward) Keldysh contour [ 49]. The noninteracting theory in Eq. ( 1) but with M = 0 has SO( R)×SO(R) symmetry, corresponding to inde- pendent replica rotations on the forward and backward Keldysh contours. (Co...

  2. [2]

    OM can be viewed as an entanglement-sector jump term , due to the correspondence (see also Fig

    [ 49]. OM can be viewed as an entanglement-sector jump term , due to the correspondence (see also Fig. 1) OM ⇔ R∑ j,k=1 ¯c+,j c+,j ¯c+,j c+,j ¯c−,k c−,k ¯c−,k c−,k. (2) This operator implements “hopping” between different many-fermion states in Fock space, and plays a similar role as inelastic processes in theories of many-body lo- calization [ 63, 64]. Ju...

  3. [3]

    strong”) symmetry SR×SR of the “mass term

    has SR×SR symme- try under ˆX → ˆW+ ˆX ˆW−, where ˆW± represent inde- pendent permutations acting on forward- and backward- branch fermions. The RG flow M → ∞ of the mass induces spontaneous symmetry breaking, so that a non- vanishing expectation value ⟨Xij⟩ ̸= 0 appears, reducing the (“strong”) symmetry SR×SR of the “mass term” to a diagonal (“weak”) perm...

  4. [4]

    effective cen- tral charge

    with M = 0, which gives λ(L) ∼ (1/π) ln(L/a), with a the short-distance cutoff. From the symmetry perspective, the mass term M is the leading anisotropy in reducing the replica symmetry from the continuous SO( R)×SO(R) group to SR × SR. If the mass term is irrelevant, when placed on the critical man- ifold, the interactions flow to zero, recovering an emer-...

  5. [5]

    possesses two nontrivial fixed points: a multicritical interacting one with yM ̸= 0, and a noninteracting one [Eq. ( 15)]. Linearizing the flow around the latter fixed point gives the RG eigenval- ues {( 1 ± √ 33 − 8 x ) , 2(5 − 2 x) } (ε/8). This fixed point possesses a single relevant direction for 5 /2 < x < 4. Be- cause the noninteracting MIPT is driven b...

  6. [6]

    thermal metal

    then implies that x < 4. We conjecture that x > 2/5, so that Eq. ( 15) locates the MIPT for both the interacting and nonin- teracting monitored fermions. In this case, the single relevant direction sets the correlation length exponent ν = (1 + √ 33 − 8 x)−1(8/ε). This satisfies the Chayes- Harris criterion [ 77, 78] for all ε ≤ 1. Large-scale numeri- cal r...

  7. [7]

    Zhou and A

    T. Zhou and A. Nahum, Emergent statistical mechanics of entanglement in random unitary circuits, Phys. Rev. B 99, 174205 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    Y. Li, X. Chen, and M. P. Fisher, Quantum zeno effect and the many-body entanglement transition, Phys. Rev. B 98, 205136 (2018)

    2018

  9. [9]

    Y. Li, X. Chen, and M. P. Fisher, Measurement-driven entanglement transition in hybrid quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B 100, 134306 (2019)

    2019

  10. [10]

    Skinner, J

    B. Skinner, J. Ruhman, and A. Nahum, Measurement- induced phase transitions in the dynamics of entangle- ment, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031009 (2019)

    2019

  11. [11]

    A. Chan, R. M. Nandkishore, M. Pretko, and G. Smith, Unitary-projective entanglement dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 99, 224307 (2019)

    2019

  12. [12]

    M. P. A. Fisher, V. Khemani, A. Nahum, and S. Vijay, Random quantum circuits, Ann. Rev. Cond. Mat. Phys. 14, 335 (2023)

    2023

  13. [13]

    A. C. Potter and R. Vasseur, Entanglement dy- namics in hybrid quantum circuits, arXiv preprint 10.48550/arXiv.2111.08018 (2021), arXiv:2111.08018 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.08018 2021

  14. [14]

    Nahum and B

    A. Nahum and B. Skinner, Entanglement and dynamics of diffusion-annihilation processes with majorana defects, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023288 (2020)

    2020

  15. [15]

    Noise-robust Phases of Quantum Matter

    with 5 /2 < x < 4, the mass operator is dan- gerously irrelevant. I.e., setting the stiffness and fugacity couplings to their fixed-point values yK,V = y∗ K,V , a devi- ation yM > 0 induces an instability that ultimately flows into the volume-law phase with yM → ∞ . This is illus- trated in Fig. 2. By contrast, tuning the fugacity and/or stiffness away from t...

  16. [16]

    X. Cao, A. Tilloy, and A. De Luca, Entanglement in a fermion chain under continuous monitoring, SciPost Physics 7, 024 (2019)

    2019

  17. [17]

    Vasseur, A

    R. Vasseur, A. C. Potter, Y.-Z. You, and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Entanglement transitions from holographic random tensor networks, Phys. Rev. B 100, 134203 (2019)

    2019

  18. [18]

    Zabalo, M

    A. Zabalo, M. J. Gullans, J. H. Wilson, S. Gopalakr- ishnan, D. A. Huse, and J. Pixley, Critical properties of the measurement-induced transition in random quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B 101, 060301 (2020)

    2020

  19. [19]

    S. Choi, Y. Bao, X.-L. Qi, and E. Altman, Quan- tum Error Correction in Scrambling Dynamics and Measurement-Induced Phase Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 030505 (2020) , arXiv:1903.05124 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Jian, Y.-Z

    C.-M. Jian, Y.-Z. You, R. Vasseur, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Measurement-induced criticality in random quantum cir- cuits, Phys. Rev. B 101, 104302 (2020)

    2020

  21. [21]

    Y. Bao, S. Choi, and E. Altman, Theory of the phase 6 transition in random unitary circuits with measurements, Phys. Rev. B 101, 104301 (2020) , arXiv:1908.04305 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    Lang and H

    N. Lang and H. P. B¨ uchler, Entanglement transition in the projective transverse field ising model, Phys. Rev. B 102, 094204 (2020)

    2020

  23. [23]

    M. J. Gullans and D. A. Huse, Dynamical purifica- tion phase transition induced by quantum measurements, Phys. Rev. X 10, 041020 (2020)

    2020

  24. [24]

    M. J. Gullans and D. A. Huse, Scalable probes of measurement-induced criticality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 070606 (2020)

    2020

  25. [25]

    Fidkowski, J

    L. Fidkowski, J. Haah, and M. B. Hastings, How Dynam- ical Quantum Memories Forget, Quantum 5, 382 (2021)

    2021

  26. [26]

    Lavasani, Y

    A. Lavasani, Y. Alavirad, and M. Barkeshli, Measurement-induced topological entanglement transi- tions in symmetric random quantum circuits, Nat. Phys. 17, 342 (2021)

    2021

  27. [27]

    S. Sang, Y. Li, T. Zhou, X. Chen, T. H. Hsieh, and M. P. A. Fisher, Entanglement Negativity at Measurement-Induced Criticality, PRX Quantum 2, 030313 (2021) , arXiv:2012.00031 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Turkeshi, R

    X. Turkeshi, R. Fazio, and M. Dalmonte, Measurement- induced criticality in (2+1)-dimensional hybrid quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014315 (2020)

    2020

  29. [29]

    Zabalo, M

    A. Zabalo, M. J. Gullans, J. H. Wilson, R. Vasseur, A. W. W. Ludwig, S. Gopalakrishnan, D. A. Huse, and J. H. Pixley, Operator Scaling Dimensions and Mul- tifractality at Measurement-Induced Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 050602 (2022) , arXiv:2107.03393 [cond- mat.dis-nn]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Y. Li, X. Chen, A. W. W. Ludwig, and M. P. A. Fisher, Conformal invariance and quantum nonlocality in critical hybrid circuits, Phys. Rev. B 104, 104305 (2021)

    2021

  31. [31]

    Nahum, S

    A. Nahum, S. Roy, B. Skinner, and J. Ruhman, Mea- surement and entanglement phase transitions in all-to- all quantum circuits, on quantum trees, and in landau- ginsburg theory, PRX Quantum 2, 010352 (2021)

    2021

  32. [32]

    Alberton, M

    O. Alberton, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Entanglement transition in a monitored free-fermion chain: From ex- tended criticality to area law, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 170602 (2021)

    2021

  33. [33]

    Buchhold, Y

    M. Buchhold, Y. Minoguchi, A. Altland, and S. Diehl, Ef- fective Theory for the Measurement-Induced Phase Tran- sition of Dirac Fermions, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041004 (2021)

    2021

  34. [34]

    C.-M. Jian, B. Bauer, A. Keselman, and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Criticality and entanglement in nonunitary quantum circuits and tensor networks of noninteracting fermions, Phys. Rev. B 106, 134206 (2022)

    2022

  35. [35]

    Agrawal, A

    U. Agrawal, A. Zabalo, K. Chen, J. H. Wilson, A. C. Pot- ter, J. H. Pixley, S. Gopalakrishnan, and R. Vasseur, En- tanglement and Charge-Sharpening Transitions in U(1) Symmetric Monitored Quantum Circuits, Phys. Rev. X 12, 041002 (2022)

    2022

  36. [36]

    Barratt, U

    F. Barratt, U. Agrawal, S. Gopalakrishnan, D. A. Huse, R. Vasseur, and A. C. Potter, Field Theory of Charge Sharpening in Symmetric Monitored Quantum Circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 120604 (2022) , arXiv:2111.09336 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    Barratt, U

    F. Barratt, U. Agrawal, A. C. Potter, S. Gopalakrishnan, and R. Vasseur, Transitions in the Learnability of Global Charges from Local Measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 200602 (2022)

    2022

  38. [38]

    Y. Li, Y. Zou, P. Glorioso, E. Altman, and M. P. A. Fisher, Cross entropy benchmark for measurement- induced phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 220404 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    Majidy, U

    S. Majidy, U. Agrawal, S. Gopalakrishnan, A. C. Pot- ter, R. Vasseur, and N. Y. Halpern, Critical phase and spin sharpening in su(2)-symmetric monitored quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B 108, 054307 (2023)

    2023

  40. [40]

    Y. Li, S. Vijay, and M. P. A. Fisher, Entanglement do- main walls in monitored quantum circuits and the di- rected polymer in a random environment, PRX Quantum 4, 010331 (2023)

    2023

  41. [41]

    C.-M. Jian, H. Shapourian, B. Bauer, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Measurement-induced entanglement transi- tions in quantum circuits of non-interacting fermions: Born-rule versus forced measurements, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2302.09094 (2023) , arXiv:2302.09094 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    M. Fava, L. Piroli, T. Swann, D. Bernard, and A. Nahum, Nonlinear sigma models for monitored dynamics of free fermions, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041045 (2023)

    2023

  43. [43]

    Poboiko, P

    I. Poboiko, P. P¨ opperl, I. V. Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin, Theory of free fermions under random projective mea- surements, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041046 (2023)

    2023

  44. [44]

    Chahine and M

    K. Chahine and M. Buchhold, Entanglement phases, lo- calization, and multifractality of monitored free fermions in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 110, 054313 (2024) , arXiv:2309.12391 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Nahum and K

    A. Nahum and K. J. Wiese, Renormalization group for measurement and entanglement phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 108, 104203 (2023)

    2023

  46. [46]

    Piroli, Y

    L. Piroli, Y. Li, R. Vasseur, and A. Nahum, Triviality of quantum trajectories close to a directed percolation transition, Phys. Rev. B 107, 224303 (2023)

    2023

  47. [47]

    Y. Li, R. Vasseur, M. P. A. Fisher, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Statistical mechanics model for clifford random tensor networks and monitored quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B 109, 174307 (2024)

    2024

  48. [48]

    Kumar, K

    A. Kumar, K. Aziz, A. Chakraborty, A. W. W. Ludwig, S. Gopalakrishnan, J. H. Pixley, and R. Vasseur, Bound- ary transfer matrix spectrum of measurement-induced transitions, Phys. Rev. B 109, 014303 (2024)

    2024

  49. [49]

    Gonz´ alez-Garc ´ ıa, S

    S. Gonz´ alez-Garc ´ ıa, S. Sang, T. H. Hsieh, S. Boixo, G. Vi- dal, A. C. Potter, and R. Vasseur, Random insights into the complexity of two-dimensional tensor network calcu- lations, Phys. Rev. B 109, 235102 (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    Lovas, U

    I. Lovas, U. Agrawal, and S. Vijay, Quantum coding transitions in the presence of boundary dissipation, PRX Quantum 5, 030327 (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    Poboiko, I

    I. Poboiko, I. V. Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin, Measurement- Induced Phase Transition for Free Fermions above One Dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 110403 (2024) , arXiv:2309.12405 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    M. Fava, L. Piroli, D. Bernard, and A. Nahum, A tractable model of monitored fermions with conserved U(1) charge, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2407.08045 (2024) , arXiv:2407.08045 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Merritt and L

    J. Merritt and L. Fidkowski, Entanglement transitions with free fermions, Phys. Rev. B 107, 064303 (2023) , arXiv:2210.05681 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    Lumia, E

    L. Lumia, E. Tirrito, R. Fazio, and M. Collura, Measurement-induced transitions beyond Gaussianity: A 7 single particle description, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023176 (2024)

    2024

  55. [55]

    Fuji and Y

    Y. Fuji and Y. Ashida, Measurement-induced quantum criticality under continuous monitoring, Phys. Rev. B 102, 054302 (2020)

    2020

  56. [56]

    H. Guo, M. S. Foster, C.-M. Jian, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Field theory of monitored, interacting fermion dynam- ics with charge conservation, Phys. Rev. B 112, 064304 (2025)

    2025

  57. [57]

    Poboiko, P

    I. Poboiko, P. P¨ opperl, I. V. Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin, Measurement-induced transitions for interact- ing fermions, Phys. Rev. B 111, 024204 (2025) , arXiv:2410.07334 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Tiutiakina, H

    A. Tiutiakina, H. L´ oio, G. Giachetti, J. De Nardis, and A. De Luca, Field theory for monitored Brownian SYK clusters, arXiv e-prints , arxiv:2410.08079 (2024) , arXiv:2410.08079 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    [ 24, 38] for a different approach

    See also Refs. [ 24, 38] for a different approach

  60. [60]

    M. R. Zirnbauer, Riemannian symmetric superspaces and their origin in random-matrix theory, J. Math. Phys. 37, 4986 (1996)

    1996

  61. [61]

    Evers and A

    F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Anderson Transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1355 (2008)

    2008

  62. [62]

    Bhuiyan, H

    A. Bhuiyan, H. Pan, and C.-M. Jian, Free Fermion Dy- namics with Measurements: Topological Classification and Adaptive Preparation of Topological States, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2507.13437 (2025) , arXiv:2507.13437 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Bravyi, M

    S. Bravyi, M. Englbrecht, R. K¨ onig, and N. Peard, Cor- recting coherent errors with surface codes, npj Quantum Information 4, 55 (2018) , arXiv:1710.02270 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  64. [64]

    F. Venn, J. Behrends, and B. B´ eri, Coherent-Error Threshold for Surface Codes from Majorana De- localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 060603 (2023) , arXiv:2211.00655 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Behrends, F

    J. Behrends, F. Venn, and B. B´ eri, Surface codes, quan- tum circuits, and entanglement phases, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 013137 (2024)

    2024

  66. [66]

    Q. Wang, R. Vasseur, S. Trebst, A. W. W. Ludwig, and G.-Y. Zhu, Decoherence-induced self-dual criticality in topological states of matter (2025), arXiv:2502.14034 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    I. A. Gruzberg, N. Read, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Random- bond Ising model in two dimensions: The Nishimori line and supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. B 63, 104422 (2001)

    2001

  68. [68]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. Kane, Topology, Delocalization via Average Symmetry and Symplectic Anderson Localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 246605 (2012)

    2012

  69. [69]

    (1) and for details of the non-Abelian bosonization calculations, and which contains Ref

    See Supplemental Material at [URL] for a symmetry anal- ysis and sketch of the derivation leading to Eq. (1) and for details of the non-Abelian bosonization calculations, and which contains Ref. [ 79]

  70. [70]

    B. L. Altshuler, Y. Gefen, A. Kamenev, and L. S. Levitov, Quasiparticle lifetime in a finite system: A nonperturba- tive approach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2803 (1997)

    1997

  71. [71]

    D. M. Basko, I. L. Aleiner, and B. L. Altshuler, Metal- insulator transition in a weakly interacting many-electron system with localized single-particle states, Annals of Physics (Amsterdam) 321, 1126 (2006)

    2006

  72. [72]

    L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 096001 (2016)

    2016

  73. [73]

    Micklitz, A

    T. Micklitz, A. Morningstar, A. Altland, and D. A. Huse, Emergence of Fermi’s Golden Rule, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 140402 (2022)

    2022

  74. [74]

    Liao and M

    Y. Liao and M. S. Foster, Dephasing Catastrophe in 4 −ε Dimensions: A Possible Instability of the Ergodic (Many- Body Delocalized) Phase, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 236601 (2018)

    2018

  75. [75]

    In this symmetry class (AIII) there is no MIPT in the absence of interactions [ 36]

  76. [76]

    P¨ utz, R

    M. P¨ utz, R. Vasseur, A. W. W. Ludwig, S. Trebst, and G.-Y. Zhu, Flow to Nishimori universality in weakly monitored quantum circuits with qubit loss (2025), arXiv:2505.22720 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    This quantity is a generalization of the analogous quan- tity, introduced in a different context in [ 80], to the set- ting of quantum measurements

  78. [78]

    Zhang, J

    L. Zhang, J. A. Reyes, S. Kourtis, C. Chamon, E. R. Mucciolo, and A. E. Ruckenstein, Nonuniversal entan- glement level statistics in projection-driven quantum cir- cuits, Phys. Rev. B 101, 235104 (2020)

    2020

  79. [79]

    vortices

    For both classes AII and DIII, the homotopy result Π1[G/H] = Z2 (see e.g. [ 81]) for the general number of R replicas ensures that point-like topological defects (“vortices”) are possible. Here G/H denotes the target manifold of the associated sigma model for each class [ 53, 54, 73]

  80. [80]

    A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Classification of topological insulators and super- conductors in three spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 78, 195125 (2008)

    2008

Showing first 80 references.