REVIEW 4 cited by
A Comprehensive Survey of Large Language Models and Multimodal Large Language Models in Medicine
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A Comprehensive Survey of Large Language Models and Multimodal Large Language Models in Medicine
read the original abstract
Since the release of ChatGPT and GPT-4, large language models (LLMs) and multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have attracted widespread attention for their exceptional capabilities in understanding, reasoning, and generation, introducing transformative paradigms for integrating artificial intelligence into medicine. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the development, principles, application scenarios, challenges, and future directions of LLMs and MLLMs in medicine. Specifically, it begins by examining the paradigm shift, tracing the transition from traditional models to LLMs and MLLMs, and highlighting the unique advantages of these LLMs and MLLMs in medical applications. Next, the survey reviews existing medical LLMs and MLLMs, providing detailed guidance on their construction and evaluation in a clear and systematic manner. Subsequently, to underscore the substantial value of LLMs and MLLMs in healthcare, the survey explores five promising applications in the field. Finally, the survey addresses the challenges confronting medical LLMs and MLLMs and proposes practical strategies and future directions for their integration into medicine. In summary, this survey offers a comprehensive analysis of the technical methodologies and practical clinical applications of medical LLMs and MLLMs, with the goal of bridging the gap between these advanced technologies and clinical practice, thereby fostering the evolution of the next generation of intelligent healthcare systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
ErrorRadar: Benchmarking Complex Mathematical Reasoning of Multimodal Large Language Models Via Error Detection
ErrorRadar is a new benchmark of 2,500 multimodal K-12 math problems for MLLM error step identification and categorization, where GPT-4o trails human experts by ~10%.
-
Deterministic Hallucination Detection in Medical VQA via Confidence-Evidence Bayesian Gain
A fixed, sampling-free score — per-token log-probability variance times (1 + average |image-vs-text probability shift|) — detects medical-VQA hallucinations better than semantic-entropy baselines in 13 of 16 settings.
-
UniReason-Med: A Shared Grounded Reasoning Interface for 2D-to-3D Transfer in Medical VQA
UniReason-Med introduces a unified framework for 2D and 3D medical VQA with shared grounded reasoning, trained on a 220K dataset, claiming that joint 2D+3D supervision improves 3D performance over 3D-only training.
-
Selective Token-Level Cryptographic Redaction for Privacy-Preserving Clinical Deployment of Large Language Models
HERALD selectively encrypts sensitive tokens via medical NER, POS policies, and deterministic ciphertext substitution to enable privacy-preserving clinical LLM use while recovering near-plaintext task performance.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.