Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Can GPT Improve the State of Prior Authorization via Guideline Based Automated Question Answering?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.18419 v2 pith:4YIUMDRC submitted 2024-02-28 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords healthpromptingquestionansweringauthorizationcompaniesinsurancepatient
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Health insurance companies have a defined process called prior authorization (PA) which is a health plan cost-control process that requires doctors and other healthcare professionals to get clearance in advance from a health plan before performing a particular procedure on a patient in order to be eligible for payment coverage. For health insurance companies, approving PA requests for patients in the medical domain is a time-consuming and challenging task. One of those key challenges is validating if a request matches up to certain criteria such as age, gender, etc. In this work, we evaluate whether GPT can validate numerous key factors, in turn helping health plans reach a decision drastically faster. We frame it as a question answering task, prompting GPT to answer a question from patient electronic health record. We experiment with different conventional prompting techniques as well as introduce our own novel prompting technique. Moreover, we report qualitative assessment by humans on the natural language generation outputs from our approach. Results show that our method achieves superior performance with the mean weighted F1 score of 0.61 as compared to its standard counterparts.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Advice for Diabetes Self-Management by ChatGPT Models: Challenges and Recommendations

    cs.AI 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    ChatGPT models still give risky, generic diabetes advice and often fail to ask clarifying questions, with only slight improvement from GPT-3.5 to GPT-4 and GPT-4o.

Pith tools