REVIEW 2 cited by
Scalar strangeness content of the nucleon and baryon sigma terms
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The scalar strangeness content of the nucleon, characterized by the so-called strangeness-nucleon sigma term, is of fundamental importance in understanding its sea-quark flavor structure. We report a determination of the octet baryon sigma terms via the Feynman-Hellmann theorem by analyzing the latest high-statistics $n_f=2+1$ lattice QCD simulations with covariant baryon chiral perturbation theory up to next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order. In particular, we predict $\sigma_{\pi N}=55(1)(4)$ MeV and $\sigma_{sN}=27(27)(4)$ MeV, while the first error is statistical and the second systematic due to different lattice scales. The predicted $\sigma_{sN}$ is consistent with the latest LQCD results and the results based on the next-to-next-to-leading order chiral perturbation theory. Several key factors in determining the sigma terms are systematically taken into account and clarified for the first time, including the effects of lattice scale setting, systematic uncertainties originating from chiral expansion truncations, and constraint of strong-interaction isospin breaking effects.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Unveiling the Strong Interaction origin of Baryon Masses with Lattice QCD
First-principles lattice QCD decomposes baryon masses into quark sigma terms and a roughly flavor-independent gluon trace anomaly around 1 GeV.
-
Relativistic chiral nuclear forces: status and prospects
A review of the relativistic chiral nuclear force, presenting the Beihang group's own NNLO results for nucleon-nucleon scattering and promising faster convergence than the standard Weinberg approach.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.