The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2504.12585 · v1 · pith:522F4VHV · submitted 2025-04-17 · cs.CL · cs.AI· cs.LG

Identifying and Mitigating the Influence of the Prior Distribution in Large Language Models

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:522F4VHVrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords priortasksllmsfinetuninginformationlanguagemodelsperformance
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) sometimes fail to respond appropriately to deterministic tasks -- such as counting or forming acronyms -- because the implicit prior distribution they have learned over sequences of tokens influences their responses. In this work, we show that, in at least some cases, LLMs actually compute the information needed to perform these tasks correctly, and we identify some interventions that can allow them to access this information to improve their performance. First, we show that simply prompting the language model to not rely on its prior knowledge leads to dramatic improvements in prior-dominated tasks. We then use mechanistic interpretability techniques to localize the prior within the LLM and manipulate the extent to which that prior influences its responses. Specifically, we show that it is possible to identify layers of the underlying neural network that correlate with the prior probability of a response and that lightweight finetuning of these layers with basic prompts on prior-dominated tasks achieves high performance on held-out answers. These results suggest that the information required to produce a correct response is contained within the representations of the problems formed by the models. Furthermore, we show that this finetuning is significantly more effective for prior-dominated tasks, and that the error after finetuning is no longer correlated with the prior. Our results suggest that it may be possible to define effective methods for manipulating the extent to which LLMs rely upon their priors in solving problems, potentially increasing their performance in settings where LLMs hallucinate for reasons related to the prior probability of token sequences.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Reconstruction of Personally Identifiable Information from Supervised Finetuned Models

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PII can be reconstructed from SFT models via prefix attacks, with the new COVA algorithm improving success rates and leakage varying by attacker knowledge and PII type.

  2. From `May' to `Is': Certainty Distortion in Language Model Rewriting

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LMs systematically inflate expressed certainty during rewriting, affecting up to 75% of outputs with a 1.5-2x bias toward increasing rather than decreasing certainty, and the effect compounds over iterations.