Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Aligning (Medical) LLMs for (Counterfactual) Fairness

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.12055 v1 pith:5B75HWNV submitted 2024-08-22 cs.CL cs.LG

Aligning (Medical) LLMs for (Counterfactual) Fairness

classification cs.CL cs.LG
keywords llmsmedicalmethodaligningapplicationsbiasesdifferentevaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising solutions for a variety of medical and clinical decision support applications. However, LLMs are often subject to different types of biases, which can lead to unfair treatment of individuals, worsening health disparities, and reducing trust in AI-augmented medical tools. Aiming to address this important issue, in this study, we present a new model alignment approach for aligning LLMs using a preference optimization method within a knowledge distillation framework. Prior to presenting our proposed method, we first use an evaluation framework to conduct a comprehensive (largest to our knowledge) empirical evaluation to reveal the type and nature of existing biases in LLMs used for medical applications. We then offer a bias mitigation technique to reduce the unfair patterns in LLM outputs across different subgroups identified by the protected attributes. We show that our mitigation method is effective in significantly reducing observed biased patterns. Our code is publicly available at \url{https://github.com/healthylaife/FairAlignmentLLM}.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CLR-voyance: Reinforcing Open-Ended Reasoning for Inpatient Clinical Decision Support with Outcome-Aware Rubrics

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CLR-voyance reformulates inpatient reasoning as POMDP with clinician-validated outcome rubrics, yielding an 8B model that outperforms larger frontier models on the authors' new benchmark.

  2. Afrispeech Semantics: Evaluating Audio Semantic Reasoning in Spoken Language Models Across Domains and Accents

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Audio language models are benchmarked on five semantic and paralinguistic reasoning tasks to reveal limitations in handling spoken audio evidence, accent variation, and domain shifts.

  3. HyMaTE: A Hybrid Mamba and Transformer Model for EHR Representation Learning

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0

    A hybrid Mamba-Transformer architecture with attention pooling reports higher AUROC and AUPRC than several EHR baselines on five clinical prediction tasks, though gains are small relative to reported variance.