REVIEW 2 cited by
ToViLaG: Your Visual-Language Generative Model is Also An Evildoer
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Warning: this paper includes model outputs showing offensive content. Recent large-scale Visual-Language Generative Models (VLGMs) have achieved unprecedented improvement in multimodal image/text generation. However, these models might also generate toxic content, e.g., offensive text and pornography images, raising significant ethical risks. Despite exhaustive studies on toxic degeneration of language models, this problem remains largely unexplored within the context of visual-language generation. This work delves into the propensity for toxicity generation and susceptibility to toxic data across various VLGMs. For this purpose, we built ToViLaG, a dataset comprising 32K co-toxic/mono-toxic text-image pairs and 1K innocuous but evocative text that tends to stimulate toxicity. Furthermore, we propose WInToRe, a novel toxicity metric tailored to visual-language generation, which theoretically reflects different aspects of toxicity considering both input and output. On such a basis, we benchmarked the toxicity of a diverse spectrum of VLGMs and discovered that some models do more evil than expected while some are more vulnerable to infection, underscoring the necessity of VLGMs detoxification. Therefore, we develop an innovative bottleneck-based detoxification method. Our method could reduce toxicity while maintaining comparable generation quality, providing a promising initial solution to this line of research.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
REVEAL: Multi-turn Evaluation of Image-Input Harms for Vision LLM
REVEAL, a new automated benchmark, reports that vision-language models show higher conversation-level defect rates in multi-turn image-input conversations than in single-turn ones across sexual harm, violence, and mis...
-
Align Anything: Training All-Modality Models to Follow Instructions with Language Feedback
The paper proposes learning from language feedback to synthesize multimodal preference pairs, but the evidence is weakened by an undefined improvement metric and small, unvalidated effect sizes.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.