Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 142 references

The paper proposes an explicit holographic map from semiclassical pure gravity in AdS3 to a single CFT2, so that geodesic lengths become conformal weights and bulk and boundary inner products agree for semiclassical states.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 03:01 UTC pith:5CZEBDKE

load-bearing objection A careful, honest synthesis that makes an implicit AdS3/CFT2 map explicit; the central isometry claim is conditional on an unproven conjecture, but it deserves a serious referee. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.29635 v1 pith:5CZEBDKE submitted 2026-07-31 hep-th

A Holographic Map from AdS₃ to CFT₂

Manish Ramchander , Ronak M Soni This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords AdS3/CFT2holographic mapfixed-area statesWheeler-DeWitt quantizationOPE coefficientssemiclassical gravityclosed universesconformal bootstrap
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proposes an explicit holographic map from the semiclassical Hilbert space of pure general relativity in three-dimensional anti-de Sitter space to the Hilbert space of a single two-dimensional conformal field theory. On a Cauchy slice, states are labelled by a fixed-area network — a maximal set of non-intersecting geodesics with prescribed lengths and angular momenta — and the map sends external geodesics to primary conformal weights while building the wavefunction from OPE coefficients. The map is highly non-isometric in general, but the paper argues it becomes approximately isometric on semiclassical states, so bulk and boundary inner products agree. If correct, this gives a concrete state-level dictionary for pure AdS3 gravity, turns bulk gauge choices into emergent basis changes, provides boundary operators for interior geodesic lengths, and explains a striking failure of semiclassicality for closed universes.

Core claim

The central claim is equation (4.1)/(1.4): a fixed-area network on a Cauchy slice maps to a sum over primaries, V|network⟩ = Σ_P N(P) ∏_I δ(ℓ_I − 4πbP_I) C_{12s}C_{s34}|P1...P4⟩, where external geodesic lengths become conformal weights and internal geodesic lengths appear only through the wavefunction. For 'sufficiently semiclassical' states — those with O(G_N) smearing of lengths — the paper claims that bulk and boundary inner products agree, term by term, in a transseries sense. The agreement rests on the conjecture that microcanonical averages of OPE coefficients in a single holographic CFT reproduce the bulk gravitational path integral including a sum over topologies. The paper is explic

What carries the argument

The central object is the fixed-area network: a maximal non-intersecting set of geodesics on a Cauchy slice, with each geodesic's length and angular momentum fixed. Each pair of pants in the network becomes a trivalent vertex carrying an OPE coefficient, and each external geodesic length ℓ is identified with a Liouville momentum P via ℓ = 4πbP, making it a conformal weight. The load-bearing identity is conjecture (4.5): the microcanonical average of the four-vertex OPE network equals the square root of OPE coefficient products times the bulk inner-product diagram (a Virasoro 6j-symbol / double tetrahedron), which is what lets the boundary inner product reproduce the bulk path integral. This

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is conjecture (4.5) — that microcanonical averages of OPE coefficients in a single holographic CFT reproduce the bulk gravitational path integral, including the sum over topologies — which the paper notes is established only for identity-block-dominated channels and is not rigorously proven for h∼c or h≠h̄; if it fails outside a narrow semiclassical window, the map's approximate isometry collapses.

What would settle it

Compute the microcanonical average E_μc[C_{12s}C_{s34}C^*_{12s'}C^*_{s'34}] at leading order in 1/c in any large-c CFT with a known spectrum, for weights h, h̄ near c; if it does not equal the square-root combination of OPE coefficients times the bulk double-tetrahedron diagram, the central conjecture (4.5) is false. A cleaner observable: the norm of a closed-universe coherent state should be dominated by the factorized saddle; seeing the kinematical inner product dominate would signal a breakdown consistent with the paper's closed-universe claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Bulk Hamiltonian gauge transformations — changing which geodesics are fixed — map to changes between emergent, overcomplete bases in the boundary, not exact basis changes.
  • Boundary operators can be constructed whose matrix elements reproduce interior geodesic-length operators on semiclassical states, making lengths behind horizons boundary-measurable at this level.
  • For closed universes without matter, any two semiclassical pure states are exponentially close to parallel and no classical phase space emerges; adding a massive probe below the black-hole threshold restores semiclassicality.
  • The map annihilates most fixed-area basis elements, so the bulk Hilbert space contains many non-semiclassical states with no direct boundary meaning; only microcanonically smeared semiclassical states lie in the approximate-isometry domain.
  • The same construction can be adapted to a map into an ensemble of CFTs, connecting the single-CFT map to ensemble-averaged descriptions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If conjecture (4.5) survives direct checks in the h∼c window, the map would make the bulk 'sum over topologies' an emergent consequence of OPE statistics in one CFT, not an added rule.
  • A testable extension: in any large-c CFT with a known spectrum, compute the microcanonical four-vertex OPE density at O(c^0) and compare directly with the bulk 6j-symbol expression; agreement outside identity-dominated channels would strengthen the map.
  • The closed-universe result suggests a general criterion: a bulk topology yields a classical phase space only if a probe or boundary anchor breaks the factorization that makes all pure states parallel; this could be checked in boundary-CFT models with end-of-the-world branes.
  • The reconstruction of interior length operators via typicality assumes OPE densities factorize; verifying this factorization in a concrete CFT would also sharpen the relation between bulk relational observables and boundary operators.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a holographic map from a semiclassical bulk Hilbert space of pure AdS3 gravity with ETW branes, quantized in a fixed-area network basis, to the primary Hilbert space of a single holographic CFT2. The map, given in (4.1) and exemplified for four-boundary wormholes, sends external geodesic lengths and angular momenta to conformal weights and charges, and assigns to each pair-of-pants vertex a normalized OPE coefficient; internal geodesic lengths appear only in the wavefunction. The central claim is that this map becomes approximately isometric on semiclassical states, with the justification reduced to conjecture (4.5), which equates microcanonical OPE averages to the bulk GPI four-vertex diagram. The paper then applies the map to bulk gauge transformations as emergent basis changes, constructs boundary operators for interior geodesic lengths under a typicality assumption, and studies closed universes, finding a breakdown of semiclassicality that can be partially cured by massive probes.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a substantial contribution: it packages recent results on OPE statistics and Virasoro TQFT into a concrete, state-dependent bulk-to-boundary map for pure 3d gravity, and it gives explicit proposals for emergent bases and interior length operators. The paper is commendably explicit about the conjectural inputs and the regimes in which they may fail, and the tensor-network formulation in §4.1 is a useful conceptual simplification. However, the approximate isometry is not derived within the paper but imported as conjecture (4.5), and the applications in §§5–6 inherit the same unproven statistical assumptions. As it stands, the paper establishes a framework and a research program rather than a fully established dictionary, though the framework is well-motivated and carefully developed.

major comments (4)
  1. [§1, Eq. (1.4) vs §4, Eq. (4.2)] There is an inconsistency of a factor of 2 in the central definition of the map. For a non-rotating scalar geodesic (ℓ = ℓ̄, P = P̄), Eq. (4.2) gives δ(2ℓ − 4πbP) = δ(ℓ − 2πbP), whereas Eq. (1.4) states δ(ℓ − 4πbP). Since (4.1)–(4.2) are the operative definition of the map and the identification of external lengths with conformal weights is load-bearing for every application, this must be corrected or the conventions reconciled.
  2. [§4, Eq. (4.5)] The approximate isometry of the holographic map is precisely the content of conjecture (4.5), not a derived consequence. The paper lists three regimes where (4.5) is known to fail, and the semiclassicality conditions (4.3) do not exclude those regimes: states smeared over O(G_N) windows can have support at h ∼ c or on configurations where identity-block domination is not established (see footnote 18 and App. B). The abstract's statement that 'there is an agreement between bulk and boundary inner products' is therefore conditional on a conjecture that is not proved here. The authors should either prove (4.5) in a sharply delimited regime of validity, add an independent check, or state the isometry as a conjecture in the abstract and conclusions.
  3. [§6, Eq. (6.11)] The reconstruction of interior length operators relies on the typicality/factorization assumption (6.11), which the text immediately admits is not known how to calculate for a single CFT. Since interior operators are one of the advertised applications, this is a second load-bearing unproven input. The reconstruction should be presented as conditional on (6.11), and ideally a testable consequence of that assumption should be identified so that the claim 'we have found a candidate reconstruction' is not read as a derivation.
  4. [§2.4, §3.3, App. B; Eq. (4.5)] There is a circularity concern that deserves attention: the bulk inner products are assembled from degenerate double tori and Virasoro 6j symbols, and those same crossing kernels are used to derive the OPE statistics (Eqs. (3.18)–(3.22), App. B). Equation (4.5) then identifies two objects with essentially identical diagrammatic content. The paper would be materially strengthened by an independent check in a case where the bulk and boundary sides are evaluated without invoking the same elementary kernels — for example, a four-boundary example with non-trivial moduli where the OPE density is not simply the kernel used to construct the bulk inner product. Without such a check, the 'agreement' may be partly a consistency condition of the diagrammatic calculus.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Footnote 8] Attributing a mathematical proof to 'Deepseek v4' inside a proof footnote is unconventional and may conflict with journal policy on AI assistance/disclosure. Please clarify authorship or remove the attribution.
  2. [Eq. (2.43) and surrounding text] The exponential factor appears as 'e^{ℓ_s+ℓ'_s}_{8GN}' without a clearly typeset denominator/division symbol. This makes the formula hard to read; please reformat.
  3. [Eq. (3.19)] The displayed OPE-statistics formula is garbled: the terms involving δ-functions, ρ_p factors, and the C_{123} coefficient are not cleanly separated. A clearer layout or an explicit 'where' block would improve readability.
  4. [§4.1] The tensor-network notation involving abstract indices and the FANOUT and Π_spec operators is terse. A figure explicitly matching the network of (4.11) to the map (4.1) would help the reader verify that the tensor network represents the same object.
  5. [§A.1] Small grammar issue: 'there is an infinity of saddles' should be 'there is an infinite number of saddles' or 'there are infinitely many saddles.'

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Approximate isometry is the conjecture (4.5) restated: the bulk and boundary inner products are assembled from the same Virasoro 6j symbols, so the claimed agreement reduces to an input assumption.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [§4, eqs. (4.4)–(4.5)]
    "By the conjecture of [13, 14, 45], E [four-vertex OPE network] = sqrt(C12s Cs34 C*_{12s'} C*_{s'34}) [bulk inner-product diagram] so that (4.4) has the same transseries as (ϕ|η|ψ)."

    The central claim 'there is an agreement between bulk and boundary inner products' is exactly the content of (4.5), not a consequence derived from the map. Equation (4.4) only rewrites the V†V matrix element as a microcanonical average of OPE coefficients; (4.5) then asserts that this boundary average equals the bulk GPI diagram. Substituting (4.5) into (4.4) produces the advertised agreement verbatim. The paper's own failure list (bulk-field condensation, non-handlebody contributions without CFT derivation, off-shell topologies) shows that the isometry domain is precisely the domain where (4.5) is assumed to hold. Thus the abstract's prediction reduces, by construction, to the input conjecture.

  2. other [§2.4 (2.60) and App. B (B.20)]
    "'The Generalised Tetrahedron ... the RHS is known as the Virasoro 6j-symbol [85,86]' and 'Fst(2 1 / 3 4) = ρp(s) sqrt(C12s Cs34 / C41t Ct23) {2 3s / 1 4t}. The last factor is known as the Virasoro 6j-symbol, already seen in the bulk inner product.'"

    The bulk inner product's non-degenerate building block is the Virasoro 6j-symbol, and the CFT OPE-statistics crossing kernel Fst is the same Virasoro 6j-symbol. Therefore (4.5) equates two expressions whose diagrammatic content is already the same 6j data. The 'agreement' is a consistency condition between two imported formalisms (bulk GPI ≃ Virasoro TQFT and CFT OPE statistics ≃ Virasoro TQFT), not an independent first-principles verification that the bulk GPI and the single-CFT OPE statistics agree.

full rationale

The central result is conditional rather than independently established: eq. (4.5) is explicitly labeled a conjecture from [13,14,45] and is admitted to fail in known regimes. Because (4.4) is only a rewriting of the map's inner product in terms of that same conjecture, the approximate-isometry theorem is the input assumption restated. This is a genuine circular reduction of the main claim. However, the paper is transparent about the status: it never pretends (4.5) is proved, and some independent anchors exist (Wilson-loop/Verlinde-loop identification for external geodesics, on-shell classical action checks). The one author self-citation [20] is used in the interior-operator application, not in the central isometry step. The structural reuse of Virasoro 6j symbols on both sides makes the equality diagrammatically self-consistent, while reducing the 'prediction' to an equality of objects defined from the same CFT representation-theoretic kernel. Weighting the centrality of (4.5), score 6: the central prediction reduces to an input conjecture, but the paper's claims are conditional and partly anchored by independent checks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal contributes a dictionary rather than a parameter-free derivation: its central matching depends on previously conjectured OPE statistics and on two unspecified ingredients (the exact microcanonical smearing partition of unity and the N(P) normalisations). The geometry axioms are standard, but one uniqueness proof is LLM-generated and unverified.

free parameters (2)
  • Microcanonical smearing functions f_ℓ(P) = width O(G_N^0), peaked at P = ℓ/(4πb)
    Used to define semiclassical states and the reconstructed operator (6.7)–(6.9); the exact partition of unity is a choice that affects normalisation of V and the reconstruction, with no canonical prescription given.
  • Normalisation factors N(P) in the map
    In (1.4) and (4.1) N(P) 'collect[s] primary densities of states and averages of three-point functions' but is never specified; the approximate isometry claim depends on this unknown normalisation.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption A single holographic CFT2 exists with sparse spectrum and universal OPE statistics (3.4), (3.5), extended to h, h̄ ~ c even though a rigorous derivation is lacking.
    §3.1 and footnote 18; the universality of density and OPE averages in the h~c regime is assumed from [33,37,38] and related works.
  • domain assumption Identity block domination in some channel (App. B (B.6)) for the OPE-statistics calculations.
    Used throughout §3.3 and App. B; known to fail when a light bulk field condenses ([91,105]) as acknowledged in §4.
  • ad hoc to paper Conjecture (4.5): OPE statistics of a single CFT equal the bulk fixed-area gravitational path integral.
    Central matching condition making V approximately isometric; not derived in the paper, and listed failure modes accompany it in §4.
  • ad hoc to paper Typicality of OPE densities with repeated primaries (6.11).
    Needed for interior operator reconstruction; paper states 'It is currently not known how to calculate these for a single CFT' (§6).
  • standard math Standard 3d hyperbolic geometry facts: uniqueness of maximal slices, hyperbolic pair-of-pants metrics, uniqueness of geodesics in a homotopy class in AdS3/H3, uniqueness of the holomorphic quadratic differential (footnote 8).
    Used in §2.2–2.4 to define phase space coordinates and simplify inner products; footnote 8's proof is attributed to an LLM and is not machine-checked.
  • domain assumption GKPW/AdS-CFT dictionary maps EPI states to GPI boundary conditions.
    Background throughout §2–4.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 52930 in / 16431 out tokens · 141700 ms · 2026-08-03T03:01:28.756990+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose a holographic map from the semiclassical Hilbert space of pure general relativity in $\text{AdS}_{3}$ to that of $\text{CFT}_{2}$. We define the bulk Hilbert space by semiclassically quantising the phase space in the basis of a fixed-area network on a Cauchy slice $\Sigma$. A fixed-area network is a maximal non-intersecting set of geodesics on $\Sigma$ whose lengths and angular momenta have been fixed. Our holographic map differentiates between `external' geodesics that are homotopic to a connected component of $\partial \Sigma$, and `internal' geodesics which are not. The lengths and angular momenta of external geodesics become conformal weights of primaries in the Hilbert space of the CFT living on the corresponding component of $\partial \Sigma$. The fixed-area network determines the wave function, which is given by a network of OPE coefficients of primaries whose weights are determined by the corresponding lengths. For sufficiently semiclassical states, there is an agreement between bulk and boundary inner products. We apply this proposal to various physics questions. The boundary dual of a bulk gauge turns out to be an emergent basis for sufficiently semiclassical states. We also define boundary operators that measure the lengths of geodesics behind the horizon, again in semiclassical states. Finally, we apply our map to closed universes and find a failure of semiclassicality in simple cases, which can be partially alleviated by the addition of a massive probe.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

142 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Gibbons and S.W

    G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking,Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2752

    1977

  2. [2]

    Almheiri, T

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini,Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,JHEP05(2020) 013 [1911.12333]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  3. [3]

    Penington,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,1905.08255

    G. Penington,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,1905.08255

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1905

  4. [4]

    Saad, S.H

    P. Saad, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford,JT gravity as a matrix integral,1903.11115

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903

  5. [5]

    Penington, S.H

    G. Penington, S.H. Shenker, D. Stanford and Z. Yang,Replica wormholes and the black hole interior, 1911.11977

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1911

  6. [6]

    Hsin, L.V

    P.-S. Hsin, L.V. Iliesiu and Z. Yang,A violation of global symmetries from replica wormholes and the fate of black hole remnants,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 194004 [2011.09444]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Balasubramanian, A

    V. Balasubramanian, A. Lawrence, J.M. Magan and M. Sasieta,Microscopic Origin of the Entropy of Black Holes in General Relativity,Phys. Rev. X14(2024) 011024 [2212.02447]. – 61 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Balasubramanian, A

    V. Balasubramanian, A. Lawrence, J.M. Magan and M. Sasieta,Microscopic Origin of the Entropy of Astrophysical Black Holes,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 141501 [2212.08623]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Iliesiu, S

    L.V. Iliesiu, S. Murthy and G.J. Turiaci,Black hole microstate counting from the gravitational path integral,JHEP08(2025) 152 [2209.13602]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Mathur,What is the dual of two entangled CFTs?,1402.6378

    S.D. Mathur,What is the dual of two entangled CFTs?,1402.6378

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    Chandra, S

    J. Chandra, S. Collier, T. Hartman and A. Maloney,Semiclassical 3D gravity as an average of large-c CFTs,JHEP12(2022) 069 [2203.06511]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    Belin, J

    A. Belin, J. de Boer, D.L. Jafferis, P. Nayak and J. Sonner,Approximate CFTs and random tensor models,JHEP09(2024) 163 [2308.03829]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Hartman,Conformal Turaev-Viro Theory,2507.11652

    T. Hartman,Conformal Turaev-Viro Theory,2507.11652

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    Hartman,Triangulating quantum gravity in AdS3,2507.12696

    T. Hartman,Triangulating quantum gravity in AdS3,2507.12696

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    Jafferis and D

    D.L. Jafferis and D. Wang,The many facets of a hyperbolic tetrahedron: open and closed triangulations of 3d gravity,2604.09396

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    Liu,”Filtering” CFTs at large N: Euclidean Wormholes, Closed Universes, and Black Hole Interiors,2512.13807

    H. Liu,”Filtering” CFTs at large N: Euclidean Wormholes, Closed Universes, and Black Hole Interiors,2512.13807

    arXiv

  17. [17]

    Wu,Filtering out Erratic Observables: Wormholes from Gauging Nonlocal Symmetries, 2605.28748

    Q.-F. Wu,Filtering out Erratic Observables: Wormholes from Gauging Nonlocal Symmetries, 2605.28748

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Chandra and T

    J. Chandra and T. Hartman,Toward random tensor networks and holographic codes in CFT,JHEP 05(2023) 109 [2302.02446]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Chandra,Euclidean wormholes for individual 2d CFTs,JHEP04(2024) 051 [2305.07183]

    J. Chandra,Euclidean wormholes for individual 2d CFTs,JHEP04(2024) 051 [2305.07183]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Soni,Emergent Area Operators in the Boundary,2511.01382

    R.M. Soni,Emergent Area Operators in the Boundary,2511.01382

    arXiv

  21. [21]

    Lin,Ryu-Takayanagi area from Virasoro modular data,2606.30723

    J. Lin,Ryu-Takayanagi area from Virasoro modular data,2606.30723

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    Iliesiu, A

    L.V. Iliesiu, A. Levine, H.W. Lin, H. Maxfield and M. Mezei,On the non-perturbative bulk Hilbert space of JT gravity,JHEP10(2024) 220 [2403.08696]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Brill,Multi - black hole geometries in (2+1)-dimensional gravity,Phys

    D.R. Brill,Multi - black hole geometries in (2+1)-dimensional gravity,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 4133 [gr-qc/9511022]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  24. [24]

    Brill,Geometry of black holes and multi - black holes in (2+1)-dimensions, inInternational Conference on Gravitation and Cosmology, 12, 1995 [gr-qc/9607026]

    D.R. Brill,Geometry of black holes and multi - black holes in (2+1)-dimensions, inInternational Conference on Gravitation and Cosmology, 12, 1995 [gr-qc/9607026]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  25. [25]

    Aminneborg, I

    S. Aminneborg, I. Bengtsson, D. Brill, S. Holst and P. Peldan,Black holes and wormholes in (2+1)-dimensions,Class. Quant. Grav.15(1998) 627 [gr-qc/9707036]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  26. [26]

    Aminneborg, I

    S. Aminneborg, I. Bengtsson and S. Holst,A Spinning anti-de Sitter wormhole,Class. Quant. Grav. 16(1999) 363 [gr-qc/9805028]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  27. [27]

    Aminneborg and I

    S. Aminneborg and I. Bengtsson,Anti-de Sitter Quotients: When Are They Black Holes?,Class. Quant. Grav.25(2008) 095019 [0801.3163]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  28. [28]

    Krasnov,Analytic continuation for asymptotically AdS 3-D gravity,Class

    K. Krasnov,Analytic continuation for asymptotically AdS 3-D gravity,Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 2399 [gr-qc/0111049]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  29. [29]

    Skenderis and B.C

    K. Skenderis and B.C. van Rees,Holography and wormholes in 2+1 dimensions,Commun. Math. Phys.301(2011) 583 [0912.2090]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  30. [30]

    Van Raamsdonk,Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,Gen

    M. Van Raamsdonk,Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,Gen. Rel. Grav.42(2010) 2323 [1005.3035]. [Int. J. Mod. Phys.D19,2429(2010)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  31. [31]

    Balasubramanian, P

    V. Balasubramanian, P. Hayden, A. Maloney, D. Marolf and S.F. Ross,Multiboundary Wormholes and Holographic Entanglement,Class. Quant. Grav.31(2014) 185015 [1406.2663]. – 62 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  32. [32]

    Van Raamsdonk,Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement II: It from BC-bit, 1809.01197

    M. Van Raamsdonk,Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement II: It from BC-bit, 1809.01197

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Collier, A

    S. Collier, A. Maloney, H. Maxfield and I. Tsiares,Universal dynamics of heavy operators in CFT2, JHEP07(2020) 074 [1912.00222]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  34. [34]

    Belin and J

    A. Belin and J. de Boer,Random statistics of OPE coefficients and Euclidean wormholes,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 164001 [2006.05499]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Belin, J

    A. Belin, J. de Boer and D. Liska,Non-Gaussianities in the statistical distribution of heavy OPE coefficients and wormholes,JHEP06(2022) 116 [2110.14649]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    Anous, A

    T. Anous, A. Belin, J. de Boer and D. Liska,OPE statistics from higher-point crossing,JHEP06 (2022) 102 [2112.09143]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    Kusuki,Analytic bootstrap in 2D boundary conformal field theory: towards braneworld holography, JHEP03(2022) 161 [2112.10984]

    Y. Kusuki,Analytic bootstrap in 2D boundary conformal field theory: towards braneworld holography, JHEP03(2022) 161 [2112.10984]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  38. [38]

    Numasawa and I

    T. Numasawa and I. Tsiares,Universal dynamics of heavy operators in boundary CFT2,JHEP08 (2022) 156 [2202.01633]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Kusuki and Z

    Y. Kusuki and Z. Wei,AdS/BCFT from conformal bootstrap: construction of gravity with branes and particles,JHEP01(2023) 108 [2210.03107]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    Belin, S

    A. Belin, S. Bintanja, A. Castro and W. Knop,Symmetric product orbifold universality and the mirage of an emergent spacetime,JHEP05(2025) 190 [2502.01734]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Kusuki,Modern Approach to 2D Conformal Field Theory,2412.18307

    Y. Kusuki,Modern Approach to 2D Conformal Field Theory,2412.18307

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    Jafferis, L

    D.L. Jafferis, L. Rozenberg and D. Wang,Open-closed 3d gravity as a random ensemble,JHEP10 (2025) 228 [2506.19817]

    arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Jafferis, L

    D.L. Jafferis, L. Rozenberg, D. Sarkar and D. Wang,On random matrix statistics of 3d gravity, 2512.05045

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    D. Wang, Z. Wang and Z. Wei,Wormholes with ends of the world,JHEP09(2025) 166 [2504.12278]

    arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Belin, S

    A. Belin, S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, D. Liska and B. Post,A universal sum over topologies in 3d gravity,2601.07906

    arXiv

  46. [46]

    Teitelboim,Quantum Mechanics of the Gravitational Field,Phys

    C. Teitelboim,Quantum Mechanics of the Gravitational Field,Phys. Rev. D25(1982) 3159

    1982

  47. [47]

    Parrikar and S.K

    O. Parrikar and S.K. Sake,York time in JT gravity,JHEP04(2026) 010 [2505.19231]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  48. [48]

    Belin and J

    A. Belin and J. de Boer,Baby Universes in AdS3,2512.02098

    arXiv

  49. [49]

    Abdalla, S

    A.I. Abdalla, S. Antonini, R. Bousso, L.V. Iliesiu, A. Levine and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam, Consistent Evaluation of the No-Boundary Proposal,2602.02682

    arXiv

  50. [50]

    X. Dong, D. Harlow and D. Marolf,Flat entanglement spectra in fixed-area states of quantum gravity, JHEP10(2019) 240 [1811.05382]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    Akers and P

    C. Akers and P. Rath,Holographic Renyi Entropy from Quantum Error Correction,JHEP05(2019) 052 [1811.05171]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  52. [52]

    Dong and D

    X. Dong and D. Marolf,One-loop universality of holographic codes,JHEP03(2020) 191 [1910.06329]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  53. [53]

    Marolf, S

    D. Marolf, S. Wang and Z. Wang,Probing phase transitions of holographic entanglement entropy with fixed area states,JHEP12(2020) 084 [2006.10089]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  54. [54]

    X. Dong, D. Marolf and P. Rath,Constrained HRT Surfaces and their Entropic Interpretation,JHEP 02(2024) 151 [2311.18290]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    X. Dong, D. Marolf, P. Rath, A. Tajdini and Z. Wang,The spacetime geometry of fixed-area states in gravitational systems,JHEP08(2022) 158 [2203.04973]. – 63 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  56. [56]

    Takayanagi,Holographic Dual of BCFT,Phys

    T. Takayanagi,Holographic Dual of BCFT,Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011) 101602 [1105.5165]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  57. [57]

    Fujita, T

    M. Fujita, T. Takayanagi and E. Tonni,Aspects of AdS/BCFT,JHEP11(2011) 043 [1108.5152]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  58. [58]

    Brown and M

    J.D. Brown and M. Henneaux,Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,Commun. Math. Phys.104(1986) 207

    1986

  59. [59]

    Mess,Lorentz spacetimes of constant curvature,arXiv preprint arXiv:0706.1570(2007)

    G. Mess,Lorentz spacetimes of constant curvature,arXiv preprint arXiv:0706.1570(2007)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  60. [60]

    Scarinci and K

    C. Scarinci and K. Krasnov,The universal phase space ofAdS3 gravity,Commun. Math. Phys.322 (2013) 167 [1111.6507]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  61. [61]

    Krasnov and J.-M

    K. Krasnov and J.-M. Schlenker,Minimal surfaces and particles in 3-manifolds,Geom. Dedicata126 (2007) 187 [math/0511441]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  62. [62]

    Soni and A.C

    R.M. Soni and A.C. Wall,A New Covariant Entropy Bound from Cauchy Slice Holography, 2407.16769

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [63]

    Jafferis,Bulk reconstruction and the Hartle-Hawking wavefunction,1703.01519

    D.L. Jafferis,Bulk reconstruction and the Hartle-Hawking wavefunction,1703.01519

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [64]

    Stanford and L

    D. Stanford and L. Susskind,Complexity and Shock Wave Geometries,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 126007 [1406.2678]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  65. [65]

    DeWitt,Quantum Theory of Gravity

    B.S. DeWitt,Quantum Theory of Gravity. 1. The Canonical Theory,Phys. Rev.160(1967) 1113

    1967

  66. [66]

    DeWitt,Quantum Theory of Gravity

    B.S. DeWitt,Quantum Theory of Gravity. 2. The Manifestly Covariant Theory,Phys. Rev.162 (1967) 1195

    1967

  67. [67]

    DeWitt,Quantum Theory of Gravity

    B.S. DeWitt,Quantum Theory of Gravity. 3. Applications of the Covariant Theory,Phys. Rev.162 (1967) 1239

    1967

  68. [68]

    Kuchar,Time and interpretations of quantum gravity,Int

    K.V. Kuchar,Time and interpretations of quantum gravity,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D20(2011) 3

    2011

  69. [69]

    Isham,Canonical quantum gravity and the question of time,Lect

    C.J. Isham,Canonical quantum gravity and the question of time,Lect. Notes Phys.434(1994) 150

    1994

  70. [70]

    Araujo-Regado, R

    G. Araujo-Regado, R. Khan and A.C. Wall,Cauchy slice holography: a new AdS/CFT dictionary, JHEP03(2023) 026 [2204.00591]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  71. [71]

    Held and H

    J. Held and H. Maxfield,Gravitational Hilbert spaces: invariant and co-invariant states, inner products, gauge-fixing, and BRST,JHEP07(2026) 021 [2509.05412]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  72. [72]

    Carlip,Quantum gravity in 2+1 dimensions, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (12, 2003), 10.1017/CBO9780511564192

    S. Carlip,Quantum gravity in 2+1 dimensions, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (12, 2003), 10.1017/CBO9780511564192

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511564192 2003

  73. [73]

    Chua and Y

    W.Z. Chua and Y. Jiang,Hartle-Hawking state and its factorization in 3d gravity,JHEP03(2024) 135 [2309.05126]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    Kaushal, N.S

    A. Kaushal, N.S. Prabhakar and S.R. Wadia,(2+1)-dimensional gravity in asymptotically AdS spacetimes with spatial wormhole slices: Reduced phase space dynamics and the BTZ black hole,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 106018 [2510.21923]

    arXiv 2026

  75. [75]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt and M. Zhang,Solving 3d gravity with Virasoro TQFT,SciPost Phys.15 (2023) 151 [2304.13650]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  76. [76]

    Hayward,Gravitational action for space-times with nonsmooth boundaries,Phys

    G. Hayward,Gravitational action for space-times with nonsmooth boundaries,Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 3275

    1993

  77. [77]

    Lehner, R.C

    L. Lehner, R.C. Myers, E. Poisson and R.D. Sorkin,Gravitational action with null boundaries,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 084046 [1609.00207]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  78. [78]

    Krishnan and A

    C. Krishnan and A. Raju,A Neumann Boundary Term for Gravity,Mod. Phys. Lett. A32(2017) 1750077 [1605.01603]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  79. [79]

    Diaz Dorronsoro, J.J

    J. Diaz Dorronsoro, J.J. Halliwell, J.B. Hartle, T. Hertog and O. Janssen,Real no-boundary wave function in Lorentzian quantum cosmology,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 043505 [1705.05340]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  80. [80]

    Marolf,Refined algebraic quantization: Systems with a single constraint,gr-qc/9508015

    D. Marolf,Refined algebraic quantization: Systems with a single constraint,gr-qc/9508015. – 64 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

Showing first 80 references.