REVIEW 2 cited by
Communication and Storage Efficient Federated Split Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Federated learning (FL) is a popular distributed machine learning (ML) paradigm, but is often limited by significant communication costs and edge device computation capabilities. Federated Split Learning (FSL) preserves the parallel model training principle of FL, with a reduced device computation requirement thanks to splitting the ML model between the server and clients. However, FSL still incurs very high communication overhead due to transmitting the smashed data and gradients between the clients and the server in each global round. Furthermore, the server has to maintain separate models for every client, resulting in a significant computation and storage requirement that grows linearly with the number of clients. This paper tries to solve these two issues by proposing a communication and storage efficient federated and split learning (CSE-FSL) strategy, which utilizes an auxiliary network to locally update the client models while keeping only a single model at the server, hence avoiding the communication of gradients from the server and greatly reducing the server resource requirement. Communication cost is further reduced by only sending the smashed data in selected epochs from the clients. We provide a rigorous theoretical analysis of CSE-FSL that guarantees its convergence for non-convex loss functions. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that CSE-FSL has a significant communication reduction over existing FSL techniques while achieving state-of-the-art convergence and model accuracy, using several real-world FL tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
How Can Incentives and Cut Layer Selection Influence Data Contribution in Split Federated Learning?
A closed-form Nash equilibrium and Stackelberg search show how an SFL owner should set incentives and cut layer to elicit client data contributions.
-
SFL-LEO: Asynchronous Split-Federated Learning Design for LEO Satellite-Ground Network Framework
An asynchronous split-federated learning framework for LEO satellite-ground networks enables local updates during disconnection and heterogeneous model splitting, with simulated accuracy gains over split learning and ...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.