Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Octupole-driven spin-transfer torque switching of all-antiferromagnetic tunnel junctions

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper reports current-induced switching of the magnetic octupole order in all-antiferromagnetic PtMn3|MgO|PtMn3 tunnel junctions, a reciprocal spin-transfer torque they call OTT, with 363% room-temperature TMR at ~10 MA/cm2.

desk verdict A credible, important experimental result with a mechanism that is argued, not proven; the paper deserves peer review and should be pushed for controls. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.03026 v1 pith:5DNCBT6J submitted 2025-09-03 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.app-ph

Jaimin Kang , Mohammad Hamdi , Shun Kong Cheung , Lin-Ding Yuan , Mohamed Elekhtiar , William Rogers , Andrea Meo , Peter G. Lim
show 18 more authors
M.S. Nicholas Tey Anthony D'Addario Shiva T. Konakanchi Eric Matt Jordan Athas Sevdenur Arpaci Lei Wan Sanjay C. Mehta Pramey Upadhyaya Mario Carpentieri Vinayak P. Dravid Mark C. Hersam Jordan A. Katine Gregory D. Fuchs Giovanni Finocchio Evgeny Y. Tsymbal James M. Rondinelli Pedram Khalili Amiri
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hallphysics.app-ph
keywords octupole-drivenspin-transfertorqueall-antiferromagnetictunneljunctionclustermagneticoctupolePtMn3tunnelingmagnetoresistancecurrent-inducedswitchingantiferromagneticspintronicsrandom-accessmemory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that the read and write effects of magnetic tunnel junctions are not confined to ferromagnets: a vertical current through an all-antiferromagnetic PtMn3|MgO|PtMn3 junction can switch the magnetic order electrically, just as spin-transfer torque switches a ferromagnetic electrode. The authors report nanoscale junctions with room-temperature tunneling magnetoresistance up to 363% and current-induced, bidirectional, reversible switching at current densities around 10 MA/cm2, with no applied magnetic field. They attribute the switching to a reciprocal effect they call octupole-driven spin-transfer torque (OTT), which arises because the tunneling current, though spin-neutral overall, carries unequal spin weight on different Mn sublattices due to the cluster magnetic octupole order. If correct, this closes the loop for all-antiferromagnetic tunnel junctions: the same device can read its magnetic state through TMR and write it with current, opening a path to memory and terahertz devices that do not rely on ferromagnets.

What carries the argument

Cluster magnetic octupole moment (CMO): a T1g symmetry-adapted order parameter for the 120-degree noncollinear Mn spin arrangement in the Kagome (111) planes of cubic PtMn3; it is the quantity reversed by current and read out by TMR. Octupole-driven spin-transfer torque (OTT): the reciprocal torque exerted on a PtMn3 electrode by a tunneling current, arising from the imbalance β1−β2 between intra- and inter-sublattice spin currents. The analysis works with k||-resolved operator-projected conduction channels N||(O)(k||), counting Bloch states at the Fermi energy that propagate along ⟨111⟩ weighted by atomic-site, spin, or octupole projection; their anisotropic distribution across the Brilloui

What would settle it

Grow identical stacks with a collinear antiferromagnet or nonmagnetic spacer in place of PtMn3, or vary MgO thickness and Pt seed/cap layer thickness, and test whether current-induced switching disappears when the cluster octupole moment is absent. If OTT is the cause, switching efficiency should scale with the tunnel magnetoresistance and octupole polarization rather than with the Pt spin Hall angle; direct imaging of the octupole state during pulsing would confirm that the reversed state is the expected octupole domain.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Reports first observation of octupole-driven spin-transfer torque (OTT): a vertical, spin-neutral current through nanoscale PtMn3|MgO|PtMn3 reverses the cluster magnetic octupole (CMO) moment without an external field. Switching is bidirectional and reversible, with TMR up to 363% at room temperature and switching current densities near 10 MA/cm2. The origin is a sublattice imbalance: because tunneling conserves the transverse wavevector, Bloch states retain their sublattice identity and spin, so the intra-sublattice spin current to each Mn sublattice exceeds the inter-sublattice current, producing a net staggered spin-transfer torque proportional to (β1−β2) mi×(mi×pi). This imbalance is equ

Load-bearing premise

The central interpretation assumes that the resistance jumps are caused by reversal of the magnetic octupole order in PtMn3 driven by the tunneling current itself, not by spin-orbit torque from the Pt layers, Oersted fields, or Joule-heating-assisted magnetization motion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • All-antiferromagnetic tunnel junctions can be both read and written electrically, completing the two functions needed for magnetic memory without ferromagnetic electrodes.
  • Because the memory state is an octupole order with no net magnetization, arrays should be immune to external magnetic fields and free of bit-to-bit dipole coupling.
  • The measured ~39 kT barrier at room temperature and switching near 10 MA/cm2 suggest practical nanoscale memory cells, if the barrier can be tuned.
  • The same OTT mechanism may apply to other noncollinear antiferromagnets with octupolar order, broadening the material set for antiferromagnetic spintronics.
  • Fully electrical access to exchange-dominated dynamics opens a route to terahertz-frequency devices such as OTT-driven oscillators or rectifiers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If OTT is a generic consequence of octupolar polarization, then materials with larger sublattice anisotropy in their Fermi-surface conduction channels should switch at lower current density; engineering β1−β2 via strain or doping is a testable route the paper only sketches.
  • A decisive control experiment would vary the MgO thickness or replace PtMn3 with a collinear antiferromagnet; if OTT is the cause, switching efficiency should track the TMR/octupole polarization rather than the spin Hall angle of the Pt seed and cap layers.
  • The gradual multilevel switching observed in some devices suggests OTT can move octupole domain walls, not only reverse monodomain bits; this points toward domain-wall or multi-level memory concepts beyond two-state switching.
  • Because the torque is exerted on each sublattice separately while the total current is spin-neutral, similar hidden torques may exist in other systems with multipolar order, where a conventional spin-current analysis would miss them.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports current-induced, bidirectional resistance switching in nanoscale PtMn3|MgO|PtMn3 all-antiferromagnetic tunnel junctions (AFMTJs), with TMR up to 363% at room temperature and switching current densities of order 10 MA/cm2. The authors attribute the switching to a new reciprocal mechanism, octupole-driven spin-transfer torque (OTT), in which a spin-neutral tunneling current exerts opposite torques on the three Mn sublattices because of an imbalance between intra- and inter-sublattice conduction channels. The central evidence is two-terminal resistance hysteresis, a statistical TMR distribution across 36 devices, temperature dependence that tracks the PtMn3 magnetic transition near 360 K, and pulse-width-dependent switching used to estimate a ~39 kT energy barrier. The microscopic mechanism is supported by DFT-based k||-resolved conduction-channel projections and a three-sublattice LLG simulation. The paper claims the first experimental observation of OTT and its use for switching an all-antiferromagnetic junction.

Significance. If the OTT interpretation is correct, this is an important advance: it would establish the reciprocal counterpart of TMR in all-antiferromagnetic tunnel junctions, provide a write mechanism for noncollinear antiferromagnetic memory, and open a route to all-antiferromagnetic MRAM. The paper has several genuine strengths: the temperature cutoff of switching is an internally consistent magnetic check; the TMR statistics and the use of industrial deposition tools support practical relevance; the DFT calculations are fully specified with model parameters; and the micromagnetic model is transparently presented. However, the central claim currently rests on an indirect resistance readout and a theory that assumes coherent k||-conserving tunneling through a barrier that the paper's own structural data describe as not well crystallized. The missing control devices and parameter inconsistencies are load-bearing, because they determine whether the observed switching is specifically OTT.

major comments (4)
  1. [Experimental observation of OTT-induced switching; Fig. 2] The attribution to octupole reversal is based entirely on two-terminal resistance switching. No control devices are shown that would exclude non-magnetic resistive switching, e.g., filamentary redox effects or electromigration in the MgO barrier. Temperature dependence above 360 K is consistent with the PtMn3 magnetic transition, but it is also consistent with a thermally activated non-magnetic transition. I request control experiments—for example, junctions with PtMn3 replaced by a nonmagnetic metal, varied MgO thickness, or a nonmagnetic spacer—or direct imaging of the octupole state during switching, before the phenomenon can be identified as magnetic octupole reversal.
  2. [Microscopic mechanism of OTT; Fig. 1c and Eq. (3)] The OTT derivation explicitly assumes a crystalline AFMTJ operating in the ballistic transport regime with conserved k||. However, the STEM data in Fig. 1c state that the MgO layer 'did not indicate well-defined crystallization' and that both PtMn3 layers are polycrystalline. In a polycrystalline/amorphous barrier, transverse momentum is not conserved, so the sublattice- and octupole-selective k|| channel distributions shown in Fig. 3 and Extended Data Fig. 6 are effectively averaged. The paper needs to demonstrate that the predicted (β1−β2) imbalance survives disorder, either by including momentum-nonconserving scattering in the transport model or by arguing why the sublattice selectivity is robust. As written, the microscopic mechanism does not apply to the measured junctions.
  3. [Methods: energy barrier and micromagnetic simulations; Extended Data Table 1] The quantitative connection between the energy-barrier model and the micromagnetic simulation is inconsistent. The energy-barrier model uses Ms = 1110 emu/cm3 and extracts Keff = 1 kJ/m3 to match Δ = 39 kT, while the LLG simulation in Extended Data Table 1 uses Ms = 153 kA/m and Ku = 10 kJ/m3. These two parameter sets are not compatible, and no mapping is given between them. Furthermore, the simulation parameters η = 0.53 and βeff = 1 are chosen rather than derived, and no sensitivity analysis is provided. The simulation therefore shows only that a torque of this assumed form can switch the octupole; it does not verify that the DFT-derived OTT magnitude can produce the observed switching current density.
  4. [Pulse-width-dependent barrier extraction; Fig. 2d] The 39 kT energy barrier is obtained from a linear fit to J versus ln(tp/t0) using an assumed attempt time t0 = 1 ps, with no error bars or confidence interval. The barrier estimate is strongly dependent on t0, and the pulse-width range (0.1–50 ms) is narrow for a thermal-activation analysis. Please provide the fit uncertainties, justify the attempt frequency, and discuss how the systematic uncertainty affects the claimed consistency with the theoretical barrier.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Author contributions] Typo: 'theorectical' should be 'theoretical'.
  2. [Fig. 2d] The figure would benefit from explicit error bars on each data point and a note on how J was averaged over repeated switching events.
  3. [Methods, Eq. (3)] The notation N_||^{Ô}(k||) is defined after the equation but would be clearer if the operator projection were introduced before the formula. Also specify whether the Fermi-energy delta is evaluated at zero temperature and how smearing affects the result.
  4. [Experimental section] Please state the TMR definition used (e.g., (R_AP−R_P)/R_P) and whether the 363% value is from a single device or the maximum of the 36-device distribution.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No central circularity; minor fitted-parameter confirmation in the energy-barrier estimate.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Experimental observation of OTT-induced switching (Fig. 2d); Methods, 'Calculation of the energy barrier in a PtMn3 free layer']
    "From a linear fit, we obtained an energy barrier of 39 kT at room temperature, consistent with our theoretical estimation (Methods and Extended Data Fig. 3). ... Matching the numerics to Δ = 39 kT evaluated from OTT switching currents, the effective anisotropy for our samples may be extracted as Keff = 1 kJ/m3, which is consistent with the values reported in the literature11,60,61."

    The experimental barrier Δ = 39 kT is first obtained from a linear fit of pulse-width-dependent switching currents (Fig. 2d). In the Methods, the free-energy model is then 'matched' to this same experimental Δ to fix the otherwise unknown Keff. The main text calls the result 'consistent with our theoretical estimation,' but the theoretical barrier is not independent: the model is calibrated to the very number it is said to confirm. This is a fitted input presented as confirmation. It is not load-bearing for the central OTT mechanism, which is grounded in DFT conduction-channel projections rather than in the switching data.

full rationale

The paper's central experimental claim—bidirectional, reversible resistance switching at ~11 MA/cm2 with TMR up to 363%—is an external two-terminal measurement, not a fitted output. The OTT mechanism is supported by first-principles DFT conduction-channel calculations (Eq. 3, Fig. 3), which are not fitted to the switching data. The micromagnetic simulations use chosen parameters (β_eff = 1, η = 0.53) and inject the experimentally observed current density J = 10.0 MA/cm2; they function as illustrative consistency checks rather than independent predictions, so they do not by themselves make the derivation circular. The only reduction-by-construction I can identify is the energy-barrier 'theoretical estimation': Keff is extracted by matching the model to the experimentally measured Δ = 39 kT, after which the measurement is said to be consistent with theory. This is a minor fitted-parameter confirmation and does not affect the central OTT claim. There is no load-bearing self-citation chain, no uniqueness imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz smuggled in via citation that forces the main conclusion. The paper is largely self-contained against its own measurements, with this one auxiliary circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The experimental claim rests on interpreting resistance switching as octupole reversal and on a series of modeling assumptions for the torque mechanism. The DFT calculations are the main first-principles content but involve a Hubbard U parameter and a ballistic-transport assumption. The micromagnetic simulation demonstrates plausibility but uses several free parameters.

free parameters (7)
  • Hubbard U = 2 eV
    PBE+U correction for Mn d-electrons; this choice affects the DFT conduction channels and spin projections.
  • Effective uniaxial anisotropy Keff = 1 kJ/m3
    Extracted by matching the micromagnetic energy barrier to the 39 kT value obtained from pulse-width switching data; used in the free-energy model Eq. (2).
  • Attempt time t0 = 1 ps (assumed)
    Assumed in the pulse-width dependent switching analysis to obtain 39 kT from the linear fit; a different t0 would shift the barrier estimate.
  • Sublattice spin polarization eta = 0.53
    Used in the LLG simulation torque amplitude; not derived from DFT for this specific device, taken from simulation parameters.
  • Effective OTT efficiency beta_eff = 1
    Set to 1 in the micromagnetic simulation; the magnitude of the torque is not computed from first principles.
  • Uniaxial anisotropy energy density Ku = 10.0 kJ/m3
    Used in the LLG simulation (Extended Data Table 1), distinct from the Keff value extracted from experiment.
  • Exchange energy A_AB = -10.0 pJ/m
    Used in the LLG simulation; taken from model parameters, not measured for this stack.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Ballistic tunneling with transverse momentum conservation (k|| is conserved)
    Invoked in the theory section to compute k||-resolved conduction channels; assumes no diffusive scattering in the junction.
  • domain assumption Torques have the Slonczewski form T_ij = beta_ij A_ij m_i x (m_i x p_j)
    Assumed in Methods Eq. (4); the existence and form of the sublattice torque are postulated before combining with DFT-derived beta weights.
  • domain assumption The free-energy model of PtMn3 with exchange, DMI, and uniaxial anisotropy (Eq. 1) captures the octupole dynamics
    Used to derive Eq. (2) and the energy barrier; parameters J, D, and K are taken from literature or fitted.
  • domain assumption DFT/PBE+U with SOC accurately describes the conduction channels of PtMn3
    All conduction-channel projections used to infer the torque mechanism rely on this electronic-structure calculation.
  • domain assumption The two resistance states correspond to two octupole orientations, and current-induced resistance switching is due to octupole reversal
    Central to the experimental claim; no direct imaging of the octupole state is provided, though temperature dependence and NV domain-size measurements support a magnetic origin.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Octupole-driven spin-transfer torque switching of all-antiferromagnetic tunnel junctions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5DNCBT6J

@misc{pith2026250903026,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Octupole-driven spin-transfer torque switching of all-antiferromagnetic tunnel junctions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5DNCBT6J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.03026}
}
read the original abstract

Magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) based on ferromagnets are canonical devices in spintronics, with wide-ranging applications in data storage, computing, and sensing. They simultaneously exhibit mechanisms for electrical detection of magnetic order through the tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR) effect, and reciprocally, for controlling magnetic order by electric currents through spin-transfer torque (STT). It was long assumed that neither of these effects could be sizeable in tunnel junctions made from antiferromagnetic materials, since they exhibit no net magnetization. Recently, however, it was shown that all-antiferromagnetic tunnel junctions (AFMTJs) based on chiral antiferromagnets do exhibit TMR due to their non-relativistic momentum-dependent spin polarization and cluster magnetic octupole moment, which are manifestations of their spin-split band structure. However, the reciprocal effect, i.e., the antiferromagnetic counterpart of STT driven by currents through the AFMTJ, has been assumed non-existent due to the total electric current being spin-neutral. Here, in contrast to this common expectation, we report nanoscale AFMTJs exhibiting this reciprocal effect, which we term octupole-driven spin-transfer torque (OTT). We demonstrate current-induced OTT switching of PtMn3|MgO|PtMn3 AFMTJs, fabricated on a thermally oxidized silicon substrate, exhibiting a record-high TMR value of 363% at room temperature and switching current densities of the order of 10 MA/cm2. Our theoretical modeling explains the origin of OTT in terms of the imbalance between intra- and inter-sublattice spin currents across the AFMTJ, and equivalently, in terms of the non-zero net cluster octupole polarization of each PtMn3 layer. This work establishes a new materials platform for antiferromagnetic spintronics and provides a pathway towards deeply scaled magnetic memory and room-temperature terahertz technologies.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Tunnel magnetoresistance effect with a Cr-doped $\mathrm{RuO_{2}}(110)$ altermagnet

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DFT calculations predict a ~300% tunnel magnetoresistance in Cr-doped RuO2(110)/TiO2(110) magnetic tunnel junctions.

  2. Piezomagnetic Switching of Nonvolatile Antiferromagnetic States

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Piezomagnetic strain in Mn3Ir enables deterministic, nonvolatile switching of antiferromagnetic states when combined with interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction.

  3. Effects of Band Symmetry on Spin-Dependent Transport in Noncollinear Antiferromagnetic Tunnel Junctions

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Band symmetry suppresses interband transmission in parallel configuration but enables symmetry-compatible channels in antiparallel configuration, yielding TMR exceeding 2000% while reducing it relative to spin-polariz...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    S., Kinder, L

    Moodera, J. S., Kinder, L. R., Wong, T. M. & Meservey, R. Large magnetoresistance at room temperature in ferromagnetic thin film tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3273- 3276 (1995)

    work page 1995

  2. [2]

    & Tezuka, N

    Miyazaki, T. & Tezuka, N. Giant magnetic tunneling effect in Fe/Al 2O3/Fe junction. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 139, L231-L234 (1995)

    work page 1995

  3. [3]

    Y ., Mryasov, O

    Tsymbal, E. Y ., Mryasov, O. N. & LeClair, P. R. Spin-dependent tunnelling in magnetic tunnel junctions. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, R109-R142 (2003)

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    Parkin, S. S. et al. Giant tunnelling magnetoresistance at room temperature with MgO (100) tunnel barriers. Nat. Mater. 3, 862-867 (2004)

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    & Ando, K

    Yuasa, S., Nagahama, T., Fukushima, A., Suzuki, Y . & Ando, K. Giant room-temperature magnetoresistance in single-crystal Fe/MgO/Fe magnetic tunnel junctions. Nat. Mater. 3, 868-871 (2004)

    work page 2004

  6. [6]

    Slonczewski, J. C. Current -driven excitation of magnetic multilayers. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 159, L1-L7 (1996)

    1996

  7. [7]

    Emission of spin waves by a magnetic multilayer traversed by a current

    Berger, L. Emission of spin waves by a magnetic multilayer traversed by a current. Phys. Rev. B 54, 9353 (1996)

    work page 1996

  8. [8]

    A., Albert, F

    Katine, J. A., Albert, F. J. & Buhrman, R. A. Current -driven magnetization reversal and spin-wave excitations in Co/Cu/Co pillars. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3149 (2000)

    work page 2000

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    Diao, Z. et al. Spin transfer switching and spin polarization in magnetic tunnel junctions with MgO and AlOx barriers Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 232502 (2005)

    2005

  2. [10]

    Dong, J. et al. Tunneling magnetoresistance in noncollinear antiferromagnetic tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 197201 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Qin, P. et al. Room -temperature magnetoresistance in an all -antiferromagnetic tunnel junction. Nature 613, 485-489 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    Chen, X. et al. Octupole-driven magnetoresistance in an antiferromagnetic tunnel junction. Nature 613, 490-495 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    Shi, J. et al. Electrically controlled all -antiferromagnetic tunnel junctions on silicon with large room-temperature magnetoresistance. Adv. Mater. 36, e2312008 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    Wolf, S. A. et al. Spintronics: a spin -based electronics vision for the future. Science 294, 1488-1495 (2001)

    2001

  7. [15]

    Tulapurkar, A. A. et al. Spin-torque diode effect in magnetic tunnel junctions. Nature 438, 339-342 (2005)

    2005

  8. [16]

    Železný, J. et al . Relativistic Néel -order fields induced by electrical current in antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 157201 (2014)

    2014

  9. [17]

    & Wunderlich, J

    Jungwirth, T., Marti, X., Wadley, P. & Wunderlich, J. Antiferromagnetic spintronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 231-241 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    Wadley, P. et al. Electrical switching of an antiferromagnet. Science 351, 587-590 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    Baltz, V . et al. Antiferromagnetic spintronics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (2018)

    2018

  12. [20]

    Olejnik, K. et al. Terahertz electrical writing speed in an antiferromagnetic memory. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar3566 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    & MacDonald, A

    Šmejkal, L., Mokrousov, Y ., Yan, B. & MacDonald, A. H. Topological antiferromagnetic spintronics. Nat. Phys. 14, 242-251 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    DuttaGupta, S. et al. Spin-orbit torque switching of an antiferromagnetic metallic heterostructure. Nat. Commun. 11, 5715 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Shi, J. et al. Electrical manipulation of the magnetic order in antiferromagnetic PtMn pillars. Nat. Electron. 3, 92-98 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Tsai, H. et al. Electrical manipulation of a topological antiferromagnetic state. Nature 580, 608-613 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Arpaci, S. et al. Observation of current -induced switching in non -collinear antiferromagnetic IrMn 3 by differential voltage measurements. Nat. Commun. 12, 3828 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    Du, A. et al. Electrical manipulation and detection of antiferromagnetism in magnetic tunnel junctions. Nat. Electron. 6, 425–433 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    Shao, D. -F. & Tsymbal, E. Y . Antiferromagnetic tunnel junctions for spintronics. npj Spintronics 2 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Ahn, K.-H., Hariki, A., Lee, K. -W. & Kuneš, J. Antiferromagnetism in RuO 2 as d-wave Pomeranchuk instability. Phys. Rev. B 99, 184432 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Yuan, L.-D., Wang, Z., Luo, J.-W., Rashba, E. I. & Zunger. A. Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-Z antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    M., Eom, C

    Shao, D.-F., Zhang, S.-H., Li. M., Eom, C. -B. & Tsymbal, E. Y . Spin-neutral currents for spintronics. Nat. Commun. 12, 7061 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    & Jungwirth, T

    Šmejkal, L., Sinova , J. & Jungwirth, T. Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism. Phys. Rev. X 12 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Feng, Z. et al. An anomalous Hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide. Nat. Electron. 5, 735-743 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    Krempaský, J. et al. Altermagnetic lifting of Kramers spin degeneracy . Nature 626, 517- 522 (2024)

    2024

  26. [35]

    & MacDonald, A

    Chen, H., Niu, Q. & MacDonald, A. H. Anomalous Hall effect arising from noncollinear antiferromagnetism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 017205 (2014)

    2014

  27. [36]

    Higo, T. et al. Perpendicular full switching of chiral antiferromagnetic order by current. Nature 607, 474-479 (2022)

    2022

  28. [37]

    H., Pal, B

    Rimmler, B. H., Pal, B. & Parkin, S. S. P. Non-collinear antiferromagnetic spintronics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 10, 109-127 (2024)

    2024

  29. [38]

    Takeuchi., Y . et al. Electrical coherent driving of chiral antiferromagnet. Science 389, 830- 834 (2025)

    2025

  30. [39]

    & Higo, T

    Nakatsuji, S., Kiyohara, N. & Higo, T. Large anomalous Hall effect in a non -collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature. Nature 527, 212-215 (2015)

    2015

  31. [40]

    Ikhlas, M. et al. Large anomalous Nernst effect at room temperature in a chiral antiferromagnet. Nat. Phys. 13, 1085-1090 (2017)

    2017

  32. [41]

    Higo, T. et al. Large magneto -optical Kerr effect and imaging of magnetic octupole domains in an antiferromagnetic metal. Nat. Photonics 12, 73-78 (2018)

    2018

  33. [42]

    Chou, C. T. et al. Large spin polarization from symmetry -breaking antiferromagnets in antiferromagnetic tunnel junctions. Nat. Commun. 15, 7840 (2024)

    2024

  34. [43]

    Q., Shao, D

    Gurung, G., Elekhtiar, M., Luo, Q. Q., Shao, D. -F. & Tsymbal, E. Y . Nearly perfect spin polarization of noncollinear antiferromagnets. Nat. Commun. 15, 10242 (2024)

    2024

  35. [44]

    & Mecklenburg, M

    Tserkovnyak, Y . & Mecklenburg, M. Electron transport driven by nonequilibrium magnetic textures. Phys. Rev. B 77 (2008)

    2008

  36. [45]

    Brataas, A., Tserkovnyak, Y ., Bauer, G. E. W. & Kelly, P. J. Spin pumping and spin transfer. In Spin Current 87–135 (eds Maekawa, S., Valenzuela, S. O., Saitoh , E. & Kimura, T.) (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2012)

    2012

  37. [46]

    & Zelezny, J

    Ghosh, S., Manchon, A. & Zelezny, J. Unconventional Robust Spin -Transfer Torque in Noncollinear Antiferromagnetic Junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 097702 (2022)

    2022

  38. [47]

    Liu, S. et al. Mn 3SnN-based antiferromagnetic tunnel junction with giant tunneling magnetoresistance and multi -states: design and theoretical validation. Adv. Sci., e02985 (2025)

    2025

  39. [48]

    & Tsunoda, Y

    Ikeda, T. & Tsunoda, Y . Spin fluctuations in an octahedral antiferromagnet Mn3Pt alloy. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 72, 2614-2621 (2003)

    2003

  40. [49]

    Liu, Z. Q. et al. Electrical switching of the topological anomalous Hall effect in a non - collinear antiferromagnet above room temperature. Nat. Electron. 1, 172-177 (2018)

    2018

  41. [50]

    H., Katine, J

    Koch, R. H., Katine, J. A. & Sun, J. Z. Time-resolved reversal of spin-transfer switching in a nanomagnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004). Methods Sample growth and device fabrication To fabricate the PtMn3|MgO|PtMn3-based AFMTJs for switching experiments, Pt (5 nm) / PtMn3 (7 nm)...

    2004

  42. [51]

    The second term is the anisotropy field for sublattice 𝑖 along the easy-axis direction 𝒆𝑖, given by 𝑯ani,𝑖 = 2 𝐾u 𝑀𝑠,𝑖 𝒎𝑖 ∙ 𝒆𝑖

    is the strength of the field, with 𝐴𝐴𝐵the inter-sublattice exchange coupling and 𝑎0 the lattice constant. The second term is the anisotropy field for sublattice 𝑖 along the easy-axis direction 𝒆𝑖, given by 𝑯ani,𝑖 = 2 𝐾u 𝑀𝑠,𝑖 𝒎𝑖 ∙ 𝒆𝑖 . (11) The easy axes are given by 𝒆1 = (− √3...

  43. [52]

    & Nowak, U

    Szunyogh, L., Lazarovits, B., Udvardi, L., Jackson, J. & Nowak, U. Giant magnetic anisotropy of the bulk antiferromagnets IrMn and IrMn3 from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 79 (2009)

    2009

  44. [53]

    T., Banerjee, S., Rahman, M

    Konakanchi, S. T., Banerjee, S., Rahman, M. M., Yamane, Y ., Kanai, S., Fukami, S. & Upadhyaya, P. Electrically tunable picosecond -scale octupole fluctuations in chiral antiferromagnets. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18978 (2025)

    2025

  45. [54]

    & Sinova, J

    Yamane, Y ., Gomonay, O. & Sinova, J. Dynamics of noncollinear antiferromagnetic textures driven by spin current injection. Phys. Rev. B 100 (2019)

    2019

  46. [55]

    & Rakheja, S

    Shukla, A. & Rakheja, S. Spin -torque-driven terahertz auto -oscillations in noncollinear coplanar antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Appl. 17 (2022)

    2022

  47. [56]

    & Nunez, A

    Ulloa, C. & Nunez, A. S. Solitonlike magnetization textures in noncollinear antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B 93 (2016)

    2016

  48. [57]

    T., Koretsune, T., Ochi, M

    Suzuki, M. T., Koretsune, T., Ochi, M. & Arita, R. Cluster multipole theory for anomalous Hall effect in antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B 95 (2017)

    2017

  49. [58]

    & Tchernyshyov, O

    Dasgupta, S. & Tchernyshyov, O. Theory of spin waves in a hexagonal antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. B 102 (2020)

    2020

  50. [59]

    & Liu, L

    He, Z. & Liu, L. Magnetic dynamics of strained non -collinear antiferromagnet. J. Appl. Phys. 135 (2024)

    2024

  51. [60]

    S., Konakanchi, S

    Nelapudi, L. S., Konakanchi, S. T. & Upadhyaya, P. SPICE-based compact model for chiral antiferromagnet system with spin current injection (Version 1.0.0). nanoHUB https://doi.org/10.21981/W9Z6-YV76 (2025)

    2025 doi

  52. [61]

    & Liu, Y

    Hu, S., Zheng, C., Chen, C., Zhou, Y . & Liu, Y . Current -driven spin oscillations in noncollinear antiferromagnetic tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. B 109 (2024)

    2024

  53. [62]

    Krén, E. et al. Magnetic structures and exchange interactions in the Mn -Pt system. Phys. Rev. 171, 574-585 (1968)

    1968

  54. [63]

    & Furthmüller, J

    Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total -energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  55. [64]

    & Joubert, D

    Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999)

    1999

  56. [65]

    Perdew, J. P. et al. Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136406 (2009)

    2009

  57. [66]

    I., Anisimov, V

    Liechtenstein, A. I., Anisimov, V . I. & Zaanen, J. Density-functional theory and strong interactions: Orbital ordering in Mott-Hubbard insulators. Phys. Rev. B 52, R5467(R) (1995)

    1995

  58. [67]

    Mostofi, A. A. et al. An updated version of wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally - localised Wannier functions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 239 (2014)

    2014

  59. [68]

    Tomasello, R. et al. Domain periodicity in an easy -plane antiferromagnet with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction. Phys. Rev. B 102 (2020)

    2020

  60. [69]

    Studi di concetti innovativi di sistemi spaziali

    Tomasello, R. et al. Antiferromagnetic Parametric Resonance Driven by V oltage - Controlled Magnetic Anisotropy. Phys. Rev. Appl. 17 (2022). Acknowledgements This r esearch was primarily supported as part of the Center for Energy -Efficient Magnonics (CEEMag), an Energy Fronti...

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.