Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 79 references

The paper argues that a rotating black hole in modified gravity is dual to a two-dimensional conformal field theory whose entropy and absorption match.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 03:07 UTC pith:5DOWS2VO

load-bearing objection Kerr-MOG gets the CMS/soft-hair template treatment; the temperatures and one central charge are real, but c_L is assumed, not derived, and the 'independence' of the three methods is overstated. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.25205 v1 pith:5DOWS2VO submitted 2026-07-28 hep-th gr-qc

Monodromy, Hidden Conformal Symmetry and Soft Hair in Kerr-MOG Black Hole

Parthapratim Pradhan This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qc
keywords Kerr-MOG black holeKerr/CFT correspondencehidden conformal symmetrymonodromysoft hairCardy formulacentral chargeentropy product
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to establish a holographic duality for the Kerr-MOG black hole, a rotating black hole in a modified theory of gravity, by showing it is described by a two-dimensional conformal field theory (CFT). Three independent routes — monodromy data of the near-horizon scalar wave equation, the hidden SL(2,R)×SL(2,R) conformal symmetry of that equation, and horizon Virasoro (soft-hair) charges with a covariant counterterm — converge on the same left/right temperatures and the same central charge c_L=c_R=12J. Feeding these into the Cardy formula gives exactly the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of both horizons, and the near-region scalar absorption cross section matches the finite-temperature CFT result. If the claim holds, it extends the Kerr/CFT type of holography beyond general relativity and supports the broader conjecture that generic rotating black holes are effectively 2D CFTs.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the non-extremal Kerr-MOG black hole is dual to a 2D CFT with temperatures T_L and T_R fixed by the horizon data and central charge c_L=c_R=6(r_+ + r_-) sqrt(r_+ r_- - (α/(1+α))((r_+ + r_-)/2)^2)=12J. From these data the Cardy formula reproduces the Bekenstein-Hawking entropies S_±=A_±/4 of both outer and inner horizons exactly, and the near-region absorption cross section of a massless scalar matches the finite-temperature CFT absorption formula. The same central charge and temperatures emerge from the monodromy of the scalar equation, from the hidden SL(2,R)_L × SL(2,R)_R Casimir structure, and from the horizon Virasoro charges with a covariant counterterm

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the near-horizon, low-frequency Klein-Gordon equation for a massless scalar. Its monodromy data at the two horizons fix the left/right temperatures; the same equation is rewritten as a Casimir operator of SL(2,R)_L × SL(2,R)_R, which is the hidden conformal symmetry; and horizon vector fields obeying the Virasoro algebra, together with a covariant counterterm for integrability, produce the right-moving central charge. The Cardy formula, S=π²/3(c_L T_L + c_R T_R), then turns these data into the black hole entropy.

Load-bearing premise

The result assumes that the left- and right-moving CFT central charges are equal and equal to the extremal value, but only one of them is actually derived; if they are not equal, the entropy and absorption matches fail.

What would settle it

Compute the left-moving central charge directly from the horizon Virasoro charge algebra for a generic MOG parameter α, without assuming c_L=c_R. If the result is anything other than 12J, the Cardy formula no longer reproduces the horizon entropies and the absorption cross section will not take the CFT form. An independent check is to verify that the extremal central charge quoted in the conclusion reduces to the generic c=12J in the extremal limit.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • For generic Kerr-MOG black holes, the outer and inner horizon Bekenstein-Hawking entropies are exactly reproduced by the Cardy formula from the derived CFT data.
  • The low-frequency scalar absorption cross section in the near region equals the finite-temperature absorption cross section of the dual 2D CFT, so the black hole's low-energy dynamics is captured by the CFT.
  • The hidden conformal symmetry is realized as Vir_L × Vir_R diffeomorphisms acting on the horizon, giving soft-hair degrees of freedom and a Virasoro algebra with the derived central charge.
  • The entropy product S_+ S_- = π²[4J² + (α/(1+α))²(G_N M_α)^4] is mass-dependent, hence neither universal nor quantized, in contrast to general-relativity expectations.
  • In the extremal limit T_R→0, the left-moving sector alone reproduces the horizon entropy through the Cardy formula, providing an extremal consistency check.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If correct, the same three-way match (monodromy, hidden symmetry, soft hair) could be used as a template for other rotating black holes in modified theories of gravity, turning a microscopic-entropy check into a diagnostic for holographic duals.
  • The equality c_L=c_R is assumed rather than independently derived; a direct computation of the left-moving central charge from the full horizon charge algebra would settle whether the Cardy matches are real or an artifact of the postulate.
  • The extremal central charge quoted in the conclusion differs from the generic c=12J by a factor (1+α) in that limit; reconciling the two formulas is a concrete consistency check the paper leaves implicit.
  • A natural next step would be to test the CFT prediction against numerically computed greybody factors at finite frequency, where the near-region approximation breaks down; agreement there would strengthen the duality beyond the low-frequency sector.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to establish a 2D CFT dual of the four-dimensional Kerr-MOG black hole through three approaches: thermodynamics, monodromy analysis, and soft-hair charges. It derives left/right temperatures T_L and T_R from monodromy data, proposes a central charge c = 6(r_+ + r_-) sqrt(r_+ r_- - α/(1+α)(r_+ + r_-)^2/4) = 12J, and uses the Cardy formula to 'reproduce' the Bekenstein-Hawking entropies S_±. It also matches the low-frequency scalar absorption cross section to a finite-temperature 2D CFT formula, and computes a right-moving central charge from horizon diffeomorphisms with a generalized Wald-Zoupas counterterm. The paper concludes that the entropy product is neither universal nor quantized in MOG.

Significance. If the three methods were genuinely independent and the c_L = c_R identification were derived rather than assumed, the paper would be a useful extension of the Kerr/CFT correspondence to modified gravity, with concrete predictions for the greybody factor and the entropy product. The manuscript contains explicit near-region wave equations, hypergeometric solutions, and Iyer-Wald charge computations, and it correctly reduces to Kerr results when α = 0. However, as it stands, the central charge is fixed by requiring Cardy entropy to equal the macroscopic entropy, the equality c_L = c_R is a postulate, the soft-hair section derives only c_R, and the extremal limit contains an algebraic inconsistency. The central claim is therefore not yet independently established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3, Eqs. (23)-(24); Sec. 8, Eqs. (79)-(82)] The central charge c in Eq. (24) is obtained by imposing S_Cardy = S_BH in Eq. (23). Reusing this same c in Eqs. (37)-(38) and Eqs. (79)-(82) is not an independent derivation or a 'reproduction' of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy; it is an identity by construction. The monodromy analysis determines T_L and T_R, but it does not determine c independently. The paper should either present this as an assumption/fit or supply a genuinely independent derivation before claiming that three methods converge on the same CFT data.
  2. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (37)-(38); Sec. 7.1, Eq. (78)] The equality c_L = c_R is explicitly postulated in Sec. 4 after Eq. (36): 'we also postulate that the central charges for the non-extremal Kerr-MOG are identical to those of the extremal case, specifically cL=cR=...'. The soft-hair calculation in Sec. 7 computes only c_R (Eq. (78)) from the ζ_n Virasoro algebra; no analogous computation for the left-moving ¯ζ_n charges is presented. Both the Cardy entropies (37)-(38) and the CFT absorption matching in Eq. (48) require both c_L and c_R. An independent derivation of c_L, or a proof that c_L = c_R, is needed for the central claim.
  3. [Sec. 10, extremal limit] The extremal limit contains an internal inconsistency. The paper states c_L = 12 G_N^2 M_α^2 sqrt(1+α), but the formula c = 12J at extremality gives c = 12 G_N^2 M_α^2 / sqrt(1+α). Using the stated c_L and T_L = (α+2)/(4π sqrt(1+α)), the Cardy entropy is π(α+2) G_N^2 M_α^2, which equals π(α+2) r_+^2 because r_+ = G_N M_α at extremality. This is not the stated value π((2+α)/(1+α)) r_+^2 unless α = 0. Thus the claimed extremal check is off by a factor (1+α), confirming that the left-moving sector is not reliably controlled.
  4. [Sec. 7, Eqs. (66)-(69); Appendix A] The derivation of c_R depends on the generalized Wald-Zoupas counterterm in Eq. (66). The paper states that this counterterm is introduced to ensure integrability and associativity, but it does not prove those properties or establish uniqueness. Appendix A repeats the computation with a related counterterm, but it is not an independent derivation because it uses the same framework and the same Christoffel-symbol input. Since the central charge is load-bearing for the subsequent Cardy and absorption matches, this missing support should be supplied or the result should be presented as conditional on the counterterm choice.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract; Sec. 3] The abstract refers to temperatures 'derived in Sec. 3' and again in Eq. (22); the duplicate definitions of T_L, T_R in Sec. 4 should be cross-referenced to avoid confusion.
  2. [Sec. 2, Eq. (5)] The signs of κ_- and T_- should be checked: as written, T_- is negative for r_- < r_+. If this is intentional (inner-horizon temperature), it should be stated.
  3. [Sec. 6, Eq. (50)] The claim that the θ-leaves near the bifurcation surface resemble a quotient of a deformed AdS3 is asserted but not quantified; a short explanation or a reference to the analogous Kerr computation would help.
  4. [References and notation] There are several typographical and referencing inconsistencies, including incomplete reference entries and occasional forward citations. The notation G_± and α_± in Sec. 3 should be defined more explicitly before use.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Cardy entropy 'reproduction' is a fit: c in Eq. (24) is solved from S_Cardy=S_BH, then reused at (37)-(38) and (79)-(82); c_L=c_R is an explicit postulate, with only c_R derived from soft hair.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 3, Eqs. (23)-(24); Sec. 4, Eqs. (37)-(38); Sec. 8, Eqs. (79)-(82)]
    "By utilizing the Cardy formula for a chiral CFT, we discover that the entropy of H± adheres to S+ = SCardy |H+ = π2/3 c (TL + TR), S− = SCardy |H− = π2/3 c (TL − TR), provided the central charge c = cL = cR for the black hole geometry obeys c = 6(r+ + r−)√(r+r− − (α/(1+α))((r+ + r−)^2)/4). Instead of attempting to demonstrate the applicability of the Cardy formula, we consider the exact entropy agreement derived from our monodromy analysis as the initial piece of evidence supporting this correlation."

    In Eqs. (23)-(24) the central charge is not computed from a Virasoro algebra; it is chosen so that the Cardy formula reproduces the Bekenstein-Hawking entropies S±. The same c is then inserted back into the Cardy formula at (37)-(38) and (79)-(82) to 'obtain' S±=A±/4. That later computation is exactly the equation used to define c, so the entropy agreement is an identity, not an independent prediction. The soft-hair derivation of c_R in Sec. 7 is an independent check of the right-moving central charge, but it does not make the earlier Cardy identity a prediction, and c_L is still only assumed equal to c_R.

  2. other [Sec. 4 (postulate after Eq. 36); Conclusion; Sec. 7/Appendix derive only c_R]
    "However, the method to calculate the corresponding central charges cL and cR remains unknown. In alignment with the approach taken in [17], we also postulate that the central charges for the non-extremal Kerr-MOG are identical to those of the extremal case, specifically, cL = cR = 6(r+ + r−)√(r+r− − (α/(1+α))((r+ + r−)^2)/4)."

    The conclusion states 'employing the generalized Wald-Zoupas counterterm (66), we derived identical left- and right-moving central charges, (cL=cR)', but Sec. 7 and the Appendix evaluate the Virasoro central term only for the right-moving ζ_n charges, obtaining c_R in (78) and (86). No analogous left-moving computation is given. Thus the c_L=c_R used in the Cardy entropy (37)-(38) and (79)-(82) is an admitted postulate, not a derived result. If c_L differs from c_R, the claimed entropy reproduction fails. The extremal left-moving charge quoted in the Conclusion, cL = 12G_N²M_α²√(1+α), is also inconsistent with c=12J=12G_N²M_α²/√(1+α), further indicating the left sector is not independently controlled.

full rationale

Most of the paper is not circular. The monodromy temperatures (22), the hidden SL(2,R) symmetry of the radial equation, and the greybody rewriting in (48) are self-contained computations in the Kerr-MOG background. The soft-hair computation of c_R in Eq. (78) is a genuine, independent Virasoro central-charge calculation. The circularity is localized in the central Cardy step: Eq. (24) fixes c by demanding S_Cardy = S_BH, and the subsequent 'reproduction' of the same entropy at (37)-(38) and (79)-(82) is the defining equation itself. This fits the pattern of a fitted input called a prediction. Additionally, the equality c_L=c_R is an explicit postulate, while only c_R is computed from a Virasoro algebra, so the claimed three-way independent confirmation is overstated. There is no load-bearing self-citation chain: references [17,55,64,65] are external prior work, not the present author's own results. Because the right-moving central charge and the greybody matching are independently derived, the paper has real content, but its central entropy 'prediction' reduces by construction. Score 6 reflects this partial circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on the MOG background solution from the literature, the CMS near-region approximation, the Cardy formula, a postulated equality c_L=c_R=c_extremal, and an assumed Wald-Zoupas counterterm. No new particles or entities are introduced. The central charge c is effectively fixed by matching entropy, which is the main circular element.

free parameters (2)
  • Central charge c = c = 6(r_+ + r_-) sqrt(r_+ r_- - (α/(1+α))((r_+ + r_-)/2)^2)
    Eq. (24): c is solved from requiring the Cardy entropy to equal the macroscopic S± of Eq. (5); it is then reused as an input in Eqs. (37)-(38), (48), (79)-(82). Not determined by the SL(2,R) symmetry.
  • Left-moving central charge c_L = c_L = c_R (assumed)
    Sec. 4 postulates c_L = c_R = c_extremal; no left-moving Virasoro computation is given, so c_L is an input rather than a derived number.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Kerr-MOG metric and thermodynamic quantities (S±, κ±, T±, Ω±) are as given in Refs. [68,69].
    Eqs. (1)-(5) are imported from the MOG literature; all subsequent entropy and Cardy checks depend on these macroscopic quantities.
  • domain assumption Near-region approximation (ωG_N M_α << 1, rω << 1) reduces the radial equation to Eq. (14).
    This is the CMS near-region approximation adapted to MOG; the reduction is stated rather than derived.
  • domain assumption Cardy formula is valid for the dual CFT.
    The paper assumes validity of the Cardy formula throughout; the microscopic entropy identification depends on it.
  • ad hoc to paper Central charges of non-extremal Kerr-MOG equal extremal values and c_L = c_R.
    Sec. 4 explicit postulate; no derivation of c_L is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper Generalized Wald-Zoupas counterterm (66) ensures integrability/associativity and gives the correct central charge.
    The counterterm is imported from [55,64] and is not derived for Kerr-MOG; the central-charge result depends on it.
  • standard math Virasoro charges obey the standard central algebra K_{m,n} = (c/12) m^3 δ_{m+n,0}.
    Eq. (63); standard Brown-Henneaux/Cardy algebra used to read off c.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 18876 in / 24138 out tokens · 227888 ms · 2026-08-01T03:07:44.429199+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the two-dimensional conformal field theory (2D CFT) dual of the four-dimensional Kerr-MOG (Kerr-modified gravity) black hole using three complementary approaches: (i) black hole thermodynamics, (ii) monodromy analysis, and (iii) the soft-hair formalism. From these independent methods, we derive consistent expressions for the left- and right-moving temperatures and the central charge of the dual CFT. Finally, we derive the entropy product using these approaches. We show that the product is not universal as well as not quantized. We further explore the hidden conformal symmetry of the non-extremal Kerr-MOG black hole by analyzing the near-region dynamics of a massless scalar field. The resulting Kerr-MOG/CFT correspondence identifies the near-region geometry with a two-dimensional CFT characterized by the temperatures ($T_{L}, T_{R}$) derived in Sec. 3. Moreover, using the Cardy formula, we reproduce the microscopic entropy of the dual CFT and find exact agreement with the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of the Kerr-MOG black hole. We also show that the low-frequency scalar absorption cross section~(greybody factor) in the near-region Kerr-MOG geometry precisely matches the finite-temperature absorption cross section of the dual 2D CFT. In addition, the near-region scalar wave equation exhibits a hidden $(SL(2,\mathbb{R})_L \times SL(2,\mathbb{R})_R)$ conformal symmetry. These independent results provide strong evidence for the existence of a Kerr/CFT-type holographic duality for the Kerr-MOG black hole, establishing a consistent correspondence between the four-dimensional Kerr-MOG spacetime and a two-dimensional conformal field theory. Furthermore, the hidden conformal symmetry is realized in the form of $\rm {Vir_L} \otimes \rm{ Vir_R}$ diffeomorphisms which act non-trivially on the black hole horizon.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The Kerr/CF T Correspondence

    M. Guica, T. Hartman, W. Song and A. Strominger, “The Kerr/CF T Correspondence”, Phys. Rev. D 80, 124008 (2009) [arXiv:0809.4266 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  2. [2]

    General rotating black holes in string t heory: Greybody factors and event horizons,

    M. Cvetic and F. Larsen, “General rotating black holes in string t heory: Greybody factors and event horizons,” Phys. Rev. D 56, 4994 (1997) [arXiv:hep-th/9705192]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  3. [3]

    General Rotating Five Dimensional Black H oles of Toroidally Compactified Heterotic String,

    M. Cvetic and D. Youm, “General Rotating Five Dimensional Black H oles of Toroidally Compactified Heterotic String,” Nucl. Phys. B 476, 118 (1996) [arXiv:hep-th/9603100]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  4. [4]

    Rotation and the AdS /CFT correspon- dence,

    S. W. Hawking, C. J. Hunter and M. Taylor, “Rotation and the AdS /CFT correspon- dence,” Phys. Rev. D 59, 064005 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9811056]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  5. [5]

    Extremal Sta tic AdS Black Hole/CFT Correspondence in Gauged Supergravities,

    H. Lu, J. Mei, C. N. Pope and J. Vazquez-Poritz, “Extremal Sta tic AdS Black Hole/CFT Correspondence in Gauged Supergravities,” Phys. Lett. B 673, 77 (2009) [arXiv:0901.1677 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  6. [6]

    Extremal Black H ole/CFT Correspondence in (Gauged) Supergravities,

    D. D. K. Chow, M. Cvetic, H. Lu and C. N. Pope, “Extremal Black H ole/CFT Correspondence in (Gauged) Supergravities,” Phys. Rev. D 79, 084018 (2009) [arXiv:0812.2918 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  7. [7]

    Kerr/CFT Correspondence in Low Energy Lim it of Heterotic String Theory,

    A. M. Ghezelbash, “Kerr/CFT Correspondence in Low Energy Lim it of Heterotic String Theory,” JHEP 0908, 045 (2009) [arXiv:0901.1670 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  8. [8]

    The Kerr/CFT Corre spondence and String Theory,

    T. Azeyanagi, N. Ogawa and S. Terashima, “The Kerr/CFT Corre spondence and String Theory,” Phys. Rev. D 79, 106009 (2009) [arXiv:0812.4883 [hep-th]]. 18

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  9. [9]

    Holographic descriptions of (near-)extremal black holes in five dimensional minimal supergravity,

    W. Y. Wen, “Holographic descriptions of (near-)extremal black holes in five dimensional minimal supergravity,” [arXiv:0903.4030 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    Holographic Duals of Black Holes in Five -dimensional Minimal Supergravity,

    C. M. Chen and J. E. Wang, “Holographic Duals of Black Holes in Five -dimensional Minimal Supergravity,” arXiv:0901.0538 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    Stationary black holes a nd attractor mechanism,

    D. Astefanesei and H. Yavartanoo, “Stationary black holes a nd attractor mechanism,” Nucl. Phys. B 794, 13 (2008) [arXiv:0706.1847 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  12. [12]

    Decay of a charged scalar and Dirac fields in the Kerr-Newman-de Sitter background,

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, “Decay of a charged scalar and Dirac fields in the Kerr-Newman-de Sitter background,” Phys. Rev. D 76, 084018 (2007) [arXiv:0707.1890 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  13. [13]

    Quasi-normal modes of warped black hole s and warped AdS/CFT correspondence,

    B. Chen and Z. b. Xu, “Quasi-normal modes of warped black hole s and warped AdS/CFT correspondence,” JHEP 0911, 091 (2009) [arXiv:0908.0057 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  14. [14]

    Real-time correlators in warped A dS/CFT correspon- dence,

    B. Chen, B. Ning and Z. b. Xu, “Real-time correlators in warped A dS/CFT correspon- dence,” JHEP 1002, 031 (2010) [arXiv:0911.0167 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  15. [15]

    Real-time correlators in Kerr/CFT corr espondence,

    B. Chen and C. S. Chu, “Real-time correlators in Kerr/CFT corr espondence,” JHEP 1005, 004 (2010) [arXiv:1001.3208 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  16. [16]

    CFT Du als for Extreme Black Holes,

    T. Hartman, K. Murata, T. Nishioka and A. Strominger, “CFT Du als for Extreme Black Holes,” JHEP 0904, 019 (2009) [arXiv:0811.4393 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  17. [17]

    Hidden Conformal S ymmetry of the Kerr Black Hole,

    A. Castro, A. Maloney and A. Strominger, “Hidden Conformal S ymmetry of the Kerr Black Hole,” Phys. Rev. D 82, 024008 (2010) arXiv:1004.0996 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  18. [18]

    CFT Duals for Attract or Horizons,

    D. Astefanesei and Y. K. Srivastava, “CFT Duals for Attract or Horizons,” Nucl. Phys. B 822, 283 (2009) [arXiv:0902.4033 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  19. [19]

    Kerr-Bolt Spacetimes and Kerr/CFT Corre spondence,

    A. M. Ghezelbash, “Kerr-Bolt Spacetimes and Kerr/CFT Corre spondence,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 27, 1250046 (2012) arXiv:0902.4662 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  20. [20]

    The RN/CFT Correspondence,

    M. R. Garousi and A. Ghodsi, “The RN/CFT Correspondence,” P hys. Lett. B 687, 79 (2010) [arXiv:0902.4387 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  21. [21]

    Holographic RG flow dual to attractor flow in extrem al black holes,

    K. Hotta, “Holographic RG flow dual to attractor flow in extrem al black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 79, 104018 (2009) [arXiv:0902.3529 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  22. [22]

    SO(2,d-1) Gauge Theory of Gravity in d Dimension al Spacetime and AdSd/CF Td−1 Correspondence,

    T. Fukuyama, “SO(2,d-1) Gauge Theory of Gravity in d Dimension al Spacetime and AdSd/CF Td−1 Correspondence,” arXiv:0902.2820 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Hawking radiation from covariant anoma lies in 2+1 dimen- sional black holes,

    S. Nam and J. D. Park, “Hawking radiation from covariant anoma lies in 2+1 dimen- sional black holes,” Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 145015 (2009) [arXiv:0902.0982 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  24. [24]

    Quasinormal modes of warped AdS3 black holes and AdS/CFT correspondence,

    B. Chen and Z. b. Xu, “Quasinormal modes of warped AdS3 black holes and AdS/CFT correspondence,” Phys. Lett. B 675, 246 (2009) [arXiv:0901.3588 [hep-th]]; 19

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  25. [25]

    5D Extremal Rotating Black Hole s and CFT duals,

    F. Loran and H. Soltanpanahi, “5D Extremal Rotating Black Hole s and CFT duals,” Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 155019 (2009) [arXiv:0901.1595 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  26. [26]

    Extremal Kerr black hole/CFT corres pondence in the five dimensional G´ odel universe,

    J. J. Peng and S. Q. Wu, “Extremal Kerr black hole/CFT corres pondence in the five dimensional G´ odel universe,” Phys. Lett. B673, 216 (2009) [arXiv:0901.0311 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  27. [27]

    Kerr/CFT correspondenc e and five-dimensional BMPV black holes,

    H. Isono, T. S. Tai and W. Y. Wen, “Kerr/CFT correspondenc e and five-dimensional BMPV black holes,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 24, 5659 (2009) [arXiv:0812.4440 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  28. [28]

    Emerging AdS from Extremally Rotating NS5-bra nes,

    Y. Nakayama, “Emerging AdS from Extremally Rotating NS5-bra nes,” Phys. Lett. B 673, 272 (2009) [arXiv:0812.2234 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  29. [29]

    Asymptotically AdS3 So lutions to Topologi- cally Massive Gravity at Special Values of the Coupling Constants,

    A. Garbarz, G. Giribet and Y. Vasquez, “Asymptotically AdS3 So lutions to Topologi- cally Massive Gravity at Special Values of the Coupling Constants,” Ph ys. Rev. D 79, 044036 (2009) [arXiv:0811.4464 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  30. [30]

    Holographic Duals of Kaluza-Klein Black Holes,

    T. Azeyanagi, N. Ogawa and S. Terashima, “Holographic Duals of Kaluza-Klein Black Holes,” JHEP 0904, 061 (2009) [arXiv:0811.4177 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  31. [31]

    Stationary Metrics and Optical Zermelo-Randers-Finsler Geometry,

    G. W. Gibbons, C. A. R. Herdeiro, C. M. Warnick and M. C. Werner , “Stationary Metrics and Optical Zermelo-Randers-Finsler Geometry,” Phys. Re v. D 79, 044022 (2009) [arXiv:0811.2877 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  32. [32]

    The CFT-interpolating Black Hole in Three Dimensions,

    K. Hotta, Y. Hyakutake, T. Kubota, T. Nishinaka and H. Tanida , “The CFT-interpolating Black Hole in Three Dimensions,” JHEP 0901, 010 (2009) [arXiv:0811.0910 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  33. [33]

    Kerr-AdS black holes and non-relativistic conf ormal QM theories in diverse dimensions,

    M. Schvellinger, “Kerr-AdS black holes and non-relativistic conf ormal QM theories in diverse dimensions,” JHEP 0812, 004 (2008) [arXiv:0810.3011 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  34. [34]

    Extremal Three-po int Correlators in Kerr/CFT,

    M. Becker, S. Cremonini and W. Schulgin, “Extremal Three-po int Correlators in Kerr/CFT,” JHEP 1102, 007 (2011) [arXiv:1004.1174 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  35. [35]

    The Entropy for General Extremal Black Holes,

    J. Mei, “The Entropy for General Extremal Black Holes,” JHEP 1004, 005 (2010) [arXiv:1002.1349 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  36. [36]

    Holographic Duals of Nea r-extremal Reissner- Nordstrom Black Holes,

    C. M. Chen, Y. M. Huang and S. J. Zou, “Holographic Duals of Nea r-extremal Reissner- Nordstrom Black Holes,” JHEP 1003, 123 (2010) [arXiv:1001.2833 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  37. [37]

    Extremal Kerr/CFT correspondenc e of five-dimensional rotating (charged) black holes with squashed horizons,

    J. J. Peng and S. Q. Wu, “Extremal Kerr/CFT correspondenc e of five-dimensional rotating (charged) black holes with squashed horizons,” Nucl. Phys . B 828, 273 (2010) [arXiv:0911.5070 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  38. [38]

    Tomograms of Spinning Black Holes,

    C. Krishnan, “Tomograms of Spinning Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. D 80, 126014 (2009) [arXiv:0911.0597 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  39. [39]

    The RN/CFT Corresponde nce Revisited,

    C. M. Chen, J. R. Sun and S. J. Zou, “The RN/CFT Corresponde nce Revisited,” JHEP 1001, 057 (2010) [arXiv:0910.2076 [hep-th]]; 20

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  40. [40]

    A note on Kerr/CFT and free fields,

    J. Rasmussen, “A note on Kerr/CFT and free fields,” Int. J. Mo d. Phys. A 25, 3965 (2010) arXiv:0909.2924 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  41. [41]

    Exact relativistic viscous fluid solution s in near horizon extremal Kerr background,

    D. Grumiller and A. M. Piso, “Exact relativistic viscous fluid solution s in near horizon extremal Kerr background,” arXiv:0909.2041 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  42. [42]

    Isometry-preserving boundary conditions in the Kerr/CFT correspon- dence,

    J. Rasmussen, “Isometry-preserving boundary conditions in the Kerr/CFT correspon- dence,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 25, 1597 (2010) [arXiv:0908.0184 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  43. [43]

    Yet Another Realization of Kerr/CFT Cor- respondence,

    Y. Matsuo, T. Tsukioka and C. M. Yoo, “Yet Another Realization of Kerr/CFT Cor- respondence,” Europhys. Lett. 89, 60001 (2010) [arXiv:0907.4272 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  44. [44]

    Another Realization of K err/CFT Correspon- dence,

    Y. Matsuo, T. Tsukioka and C. M. Yoo, “Another Realization of K err/CFT Correspon- dence,” Nucl. Phys. B 825, 231 (2010) [arXiv:0907.0303 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  45. [45]

    Kerr-CFT and grav itational perturbations,

    O. J. C. Dias, H. S. Reall and J. E. Santos, “Kerr-CFT and grav itational perturbations,” JHEP 0908, 101 (2009) [arXiv:0906.2380 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  46. [46]

    Conformal S ymmetry for Rotating D-branes,

    L. M. Cao, Y. Matsuo, T. Tsukioka and C. M. Yoo, “Conformal S ymmetry for Rotating D-branes,” Phys. Lett. B 679, 390 (2009) [arXiv:0906.2267 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  47. [47]

    Central Charges in 2d Reduced Cosmologic al Massive Gravity,

    W. Kim and E. J. Son, “Central Charges in 2d Reduced Cosmologic al Massive Gravity,” Phys. Lett. B 678, 107 (2009) [arXiv:0904.4538 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  48. [48]

    Extremal Isolated Horizon/CFT Corresp ondence,

    X. N. Wu and Y. Tian, “Extremal Isolated Horizon/CFT Corresp ondence,” Phys. Rev. D 80, 024014 (2009) [arXiv:0904.1554 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  49. [49]

    A Comment on Kerr-CFT and Wa ld Entropy,

    C. Krishnan and S. Kuperstein, “A Comment on Kerr-CFT and Wa ld Entropy,” Phys. Lett. B 677, 326 (2009) [arXiv:0903.2169 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  50. [50]

    Higher- Derivative Corrections to the Asymptotic Virasoro Symmetry of 4d Extremal Black Holes,

    T. Azeyanagi, G. Compere, N. Ogawa, Y. Tachikawa and S. Tera shima, “Higher- Derivative Corrections to the Asymptotic Virasoro Symmetry of 4d Extremal Black Holes,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 122, 355 (2009) [arXiv:0903.4176 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  51. [51]

    Greybody Factors and Charges in Ke rr/CFT,

    M. Cvetic and F. Larsen, “Greybody Factors and Charges in Ke rr/CFT,” JHEP 0909, 088 (2009) [arXiv:0908.1136 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  52. [52]

    Holographic Derivatio n of Kerr-Newman Scattering Amplitudes for General Charge and Spin,

    T. Hartman, W. Song and A. Strominger, “Holographic Derivatio n of Kerr-Newman Scattering Amplitudes for General Charge and Spin,” JHEP 1003, 118 (2010) [arXiv:0908.3909 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  53. [53]

    Kerr/CFT Correspondence in Div erse Dimensions,

    H. Lu, J. Mei and C. N. Pope, “Kerr/CFT Correspondence in Div erse Dimensions,” JHEP 0904, 054 (2009) [arXiv:0811.2225 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  54. [54]

    Black H ole Superradiance From Kerr/CFT,

    I. Bredberg, T. Hartman, W. Song and A. Strominger, “Black H ole Superradiance From Kerr/CFT,” JHEP 1004, 019 (2010). [arXiv:0907.3477 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  55. [55]

    Black H ole Entropy and Soft Hair,

    S. Haco, S. W. Hawking, M. J. Perry and A. Strominger, “Black H ole Entropy and Soft Hair,” JHEP 12 (2018), 098 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2018)098 [arXiv:1810.01847 [hep- th]]. 21

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  56. [56]

    Soft Hair on Blac k Holes,

    S. W. Hawking, M. J. Perry and A. Strominger, “Soft Hair on Blac k Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, no. 23, 231301 (2016) [arXiv:1601.00921 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  57. [57]

    Superrotation Charge and Supertrans- lation Hair on Black Holes,

    S. W. Hawking, M. J. Perry and A. Strominger, “Superrotation Charge and Supertrans- lation Hair on Black Holes,” JHEP 1705, 161 (2017) [arXiv:1611.09175 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  58. [58]

    Hidden Conformal Symmetries of Five-Dimensiona l Black Holes,

    C. Krishnan, “Hidden Conformal Symmetries of Five-Dimensiona l Black Holes,” JHEP 1007, 039 (2010) arXiv:1004.3537 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  59. [59]

    Hidden Conformal Symmetry of the R eissner-Nordstrøm Black Holes,

    C.-M. Chen and J.-R. Sun, “Hidden Conformal Symmetry of the R eissner-Nordstrøm Black Holes,” JHEP 1008, 034 (2010) arXiv:1004.3963 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  60. [60]

    Greybody factors for rotating blac k holes in four dimensions,

    M. Cvetic and F. Larsen, “Greybody factors for rotating blac k holes in four dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B 506, 107 (1997) [arXiv:hep-th/9706071]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  61. [61]

    Greybody factors for black holes in f our dimensions: Particles with spin,

    M. Cvetic and F. Larsen, “Greybody factors for black holes in f our dimensions: Particles with spin,” Phys. Rev. D 57, 6297 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9712118]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  62. [62]

    Universal low-energy dyn amics for rotating black holes,

    J. M. Maldacena and A. Strominger, “Universal low-energy dyn amics for rotating black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 56, 4975 (1997) [arXiv:hep-th/9702015]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  63. [63]

    Kerr-Newman Black H ole Entropy and Soft Hair,

    S. Haco, M. J. Perry and A. Strominger, “Kerr-Newman Black H ole Entropy and Soft Hair,” [arXiv:1902.02247 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1902

  64. [64]

    Central Charges for AdS Black Holes,

    M. Perry and M. J. Rodriguez, “Central Charges for AdS Black Holes,” Class. Quantum Grav. 39 045009 (2022) [arXiv:2007.03709 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  65. [65]

    CFT duals of Kerr-Taub-NUT an d beyond

    M. Perry and M. J. Rodriguez, “CFT duals of Kerr-Taub-NUT an d beyond” JHEP 10 (2024), 078

    2024

  66. [66]

    Isomonodromy, Painlev´ e tran- scendents and scattering off of black holes,

    F. Novaes and B. Carneiro da Cunha, “Isomonodromy, Painlev´ e tran- scendents and scattering off of black holes,”JHEP 07 (2014), 132 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)132[arXiv:1404.5188 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  67. [67]

    Large Gauge Transformations and Black Hole Entrop y,

    S. Haco, “Large Gauge Transformations and Black Hole Entrop y,” doi:10.17863/CAM.48185

    work page doi:10.17863/cam.48185

  68. [68]

    Mass and spin of a K err black hole in modified gravity and a test of the Kerr black hole hypothesis,

    P. Sheoran, A. H. Aguilar and U. Nucamendi, “Mass and spin of a K err black hole in modified gravity and a test of the Kerr black hole hypothesis,” Phys. Rev. D 97, 124049 (2018) [arXiv:1712.03344]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  69. [69]

    Scalar-Tensor-Vector Gravity Theory

    J. W. Moffat, “Scalar-Tensor-Vector Gravity Theory”, JCAP 0603, 004 (2006)

    2006

  70. [70]

    The Bullet Cluster 1E0657-5 58 evidence shows Modified Gravity in the absence of Dark Matter

    J. R. Brownstein and J. W. Moffat, “The Bullet Cluster 1E0657-5 58 evidence shows Modified Gravity in the absence of Dark Matter”, MNRAS 382, 29 (2007)

    2007

  71. [71]

    Emergent black hole thermodynamics from monodromy,

    A. B. Chanson, J. Ciafre and M. J. Rodriguez, “Emergent black hole thermodynamics from monodromy,” Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) No.2, 024055 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.024055 [arXiv:2004.14405 [gr-qc]]. 22

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    Hidden Conformal Symmetry in Higher Derivative Dynamics,

    V. G. M. Puletti and V. L. Martin, “Hidden Conformal Symmetry in Higher Derivative Dynamics,” [arXiv:2112.14544 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  73. [73]

    Warped Symmetrie s of the Kerr Black Hole,

    A. Aggarwal, A. Castro and S. Detournay, “Warped Symmetrie s of the Kerr Black Hole,” JHEP 01 (2020), 016 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2020)016 [arXiv:1909.03137 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  74. [74]

    Black Hole Monodromy and Conformal Field Theory,

    A. Castro, J. M. Lapan, A. Maloney and M. J. Rodriguez, “Black Hole Monodromy and Conformal Field Theory,” Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013), 044003 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.044003 [arXiv:1303.0759 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  75. [75]

    AdS(3) black holes and a st ringy exclusion princi- ple,

    J. M. Maldacena and A. Strominger, “AdS(3) black holes and a st ringy exclusion princi- ple,” JHEP 12 (1998), 005 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1998/12/005 [arXiv:hep-th/ 9804085 [hep-th]]

    doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1998/12/005 1998

  76. [76]

    Central Charges in the Canonic al Realization of Asymp- totic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,

    J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux, “Central Charges in the Canonic al Realization of Asymp- totic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,” Com mun. Math. Phys. 104 (1986), 207-226 doi:10.1007/BF01211590

    doi:10.1007/bf01211590 1986

  77. [77]

    Virasoro hair and entropy for axisymmetric Killing horizons,

    L. Q. Chen, W. Z. Chua, S. Liu, A. J. Speranza and B. d. . Torre s, “Virasoro hair and entropy for axisymmetric Killing horizons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020), 241302 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.241302 [arXiv:2006.02430 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  78. [78]

    Anomalies in gravitat ional charge al- gebras of null boundaries and black hole entropy,

    V. Chandrasekaran and A. J. Speranza, “Anomalies in gravitat ional charge al- gebras of null boundaries and black hole entropy,” JHEP 01 (2021), 137 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2021)137 [arXiv:2009.10739 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  79. [79]

    Wald, General Relativity, The University of Chicago Pr ess, p

    Robert M. Wald, General Relativity, The University of Chicago Pr ess, p. 314 (1984). 23

    1984