Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

MOND theory

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1404.7661 v2 pith:5HUIV2TB submitted 2014-04-30 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GAgr-qchep-ph

MOND theory

classification astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GAgr-qchep-ph
keywords mondtheoriessomethentheoryaccelerationaccelerationsaspects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

A general account of MOND theory is given. I start with the basic tenets of MOND, which posit departure from standard dynamics in the limit of low acceleration -- below an acceleration constant a0 -- where dynamics become scale invariant. I list some of the salient predictions of these tenets. The special role of a0 and its significance are then discussed. In particular, I stress its coincidence with cosmologically relevant accelerations. The deep-MOND limit and the consequences of its scale invariance are considered in some detail. General aspects of MOND theories are then described, after which I list briefly presently known theories, both nonrelativistic and relativistic. Most full-fledged theories modify the gravitational action, hinge on a0, introduce an interpolating function between the low and high accelerations, and obey MOND requirements in the opposite limits. These theories have much heuristic value as proofs of various concepts (e.g., that covariant MOND theories can be written with correct gravitational lensing). But, probably, they are, at best, effective theories of limited applicability. I then outline several other promising approaches to constructing MOND theories that strive to obtain MOND as an effective theory from deeper concepts, for example, by modifying inertia and/or gravity as a result of interactions with some omnipresent agent. Some theories do enjoy a natural appearance of a cosmological-constant-like contribution that, furthermore, exhibits the observed connection with a0. However, none were shown to address fully the mass discrepancies in cosmology and structure formation that are otherwise explained by cosmological dark matter. We have no clues as to whether and how MOND aspects enter non-gravitational phenomena, but I discuss briefly some possibilities.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Bridging Superfluid and Nonminimally Coupled BEC Dark Matter through RAQUAL

    gr-qc 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    SFDM’s MONDian phonon–baryon interaction is the Einstein-frame image of BECDM’s Einstein-tensor coupling plus a small Ricci non-minimal term; the kinetic sectors stay inequivalent.

  2. Bridging Superfluid and Nonminimally Coupled BEC Dark Matter through RAQUAL

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    SFDM's phonon–baryon force maps onto BECDM's non-minimal Einstein-tensor coupling plus a small Ricci coupling, but the non-analytic kinetic term prevents full dynamical equivalence.