Parton Distribution Functions and their Generalizations

A. Metz (Temple U.); B. Pasquini (Pavia U.; C\'edric Lorc\'e (Ecole polytechnique; CPHT); INFN; Pavia); P. Schweitzer (Connecticut U.)

Parton Distribution Functions and their Generalizations

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that PDFs, TMDs, GPDs, and GTMDs are all projections of a single Wilson-line-dressed quark correlator, and that QCD factorization ties each projection to measurable scattering cross sections.

desk verdict A reliable, clearly written introduction to the PDF/TMD/GPD/GTMD hierarchy; no new research content, but as a pedagogical overview it earns a careful read. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.12664 v2 pith:5LJMIFFR submitted 2025-07-16 hep-ph hep-exhep-latnucl-exnucl-th

Cédric Lorcé (Ecole Polytechnique , CPHT) , A. Metz (Temple U.) , B. Pasquini (Pavia U. , INFN , Pavia) , P. Schweitzer (Connecticut U.) This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-phhep-exhep-latnucl-exnucl-th

keywords partondistributionfunctionstransversemomentumdependentdistributionsgeneralizedWignerQCDfactorizationnucleonstructureorbitalangular

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This article is a pedagogical review that tries to establish a unified picture of the objects describing hadron structure at high energy: parton distribution functions (PDFs), transverse-momentum-dependent distributions (TMDs), generalized parton distributions (GPDs), and generalized transverse-momentum-dependent distributions (GTMDs). Its organizing claim is that all of these are projections of a single non-perturbative quark-gluon correlator, differing by which momentum components are integrated out and whether the hadron state is forward or off-forward. The review's stated payoff is that these functions can be extracted from deep-inelastic scattering, semi-inclusive DIS, Drell-Yan, and hard exclusive reactions, and together give a tomographic picture of hadron structure, including spatial distributions, spin-orbit correlations, and the internal pressure of the nucleon. A sympathetic reader would take the paper's contribution to be the coherent presentation of this hierarchy and the evidence that its pieces are measurable.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the quark correlation function $\Phi^{[\Gamma]}(P,k,\Delta)$ of Eq. (8), a bilocal quark-antiquark matrix element with a path-ordered Wilson line. The projections in Eqs. (10a)-(10e) generate the whole family: integrating over $k$ gives form factors; setting $\Delta=0$ and fixing $k^+$ gives PDFs; keeping the transverse momentum $k_\perp$ gives TMDs; keeping $\Delta$ and integrating over $k_\perp$ gives GPDs; keeping both $k_\perp$ and $\Delta$ gives GTMDs. The argument is carried by this projection scheme together with QCD factorization theorems that split cross sections into perturbative hard parts and these non-perturbative functions, and by the evolution equations (DGLAP, ERBL, and rapidity evolution) that control their scale dependence.

What would settle it

Measure the Sivers asymmetry in polarized pion-nucleon Drell-Yan and compare the extracted Sivers function with the one from SIDIS: the framework predicts a sign flip between the two. If high-statistics data show the same sign, the TMD universality relation (42) is wrong and the factorization-based hierarchy fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the quark and gluon structure of a hadron is not a set of unrelated functions but a hierarchy generated from one master object, the Wilson-line-dressed quark correlator $\Phi^{[\Gamma]}(P,k,\Delta)$. PDFs, TMDs, GPDs, and GTMDs are defined by taking specific projections of this correlator, implying the forward limit $\Delta\to 0$, integration over $k^\perp$, or both, and the relations between them are summarized in a single diagram (Fig. 4). The same correlator produces form factors in the fully integrated limit, and Fourier transforms of the GPD and GTMD projections produce impact-parameter densities and Wigner phase-space distributions. The paper further claims that QCD factorization connects each class of functions to specific cross sections, making them measurable: PDFs through inclusive DIS and Drell-Yan, TMDs through low-transverse-momentum SIDIS and Drell-Yan, and GPDs through deeply virtual Compton scattering and hard exclusive meson production. It also argues that the second Mellin moments of GPDs give the form factors of the energy-momentum tensor, hence the nucleon mass radius, pressure distribution, and a partonic decomposition of spin.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that QCD factorization holds in every channel discussed: measured cross sections can be cleanly separated into a perturbatively calculable hard part and a universal, process-independent non-perturbative distribution, for DIS, low-transverse-momentum SIDIS and Drell-Yan, and hard exclusive reactions alike. If factorization fails in any of these channels, the link between data and the extracted functions breaks.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the hierarchy is right, the same PDFs extracted from inclusive DIS must predict Drell-Yan cross sections, because factorization and universality make the functions process-independent.
The predicted sign change of the Sivers and Boer-Mulders functions between SIDIS and Drell-Yan is a sharp testable consequence of TMD universality.
Extracting the second Mellin moments of GPDs from DVCS and related exclusive reactions would yield the quark and gluon contributions to nucleon spin and the internal pressure distribution, which inclusive measurements cannot reach.
GTMDs, if accessed through the proposed diffractive and exclusive channels, would provide the most complete phase-space image of partons, including orbital angular momentum and spin-orbit correlations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial inference: the same projection logic can serve as a classification principle for future observables, since any proposed one-body measurement can be located in the Fig. 4 scheme and thereby identified with the variable it isolates.
Editorial inference: the review's emphasis on factorization implies that a confirmed factorization breakdown in any channel, for instance color entanglement in back-to-back dihadron production, would not merely complicate one measurement but would force the universality claim to be process-dependent.
Editorial inference: a natural extension would be to reconstruct Wigner distributions directly from a sufficiently rich set of exclusive and semi-inclusive data rather than through the current staged GPD and TMD extractions, which would require deconvolution methods beyond what the paper outlines.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a book chapter, self-described as an introduction and an update of a previous edition. There is no new result, no new derivation, no new data. What it does well is give a coherent map of the whole hierarchy — PDFs, TMDs, GPDs, GTMDs, Wigner distributions — with mostly standard definitions and honestly flagged caveats. The authors themselves say in Sec. 1.3 that it is 'not intended as a review' but an 'introduction and (incomplete) overview,' and that is what it is.

I checked the load-bearing equations that matter to me: the correlator projections in Eq. (10), the TMD parameterization in Eq. (37), the GPD parameterizations in Eqs. (49)–(52), and the factorization formulas in Eqs. (22), (43), (60). They match the primary literature. The text is careful to point out where things are not straightforward — Eq. (48) explicitly notes that TMDs do not integrate to PDFs in QCD, Sec. 3.4 notes where TMD factorization fails due to color entanglement, and the model-dependence of GPD–TMD connections is spelled out in Sec. 4.2. The reader's stated 'weakest assumption' about factorization being unproven is not really a weakness: for DIS and Drell-Yan, factorization is a proven theorem, and the chapter cites the proofs and notes the failure cases. So the central scientific content, such as it is, is sound.

Soft spots: there are no new claims, so as a research submission it would be an odd fit. The value is pedagogical and referential. The experimental overview in Sec. 1.4 is lively but necessarily selective, and some numbers (e.g., the LHC Q2 value in Table 1) look like placeholders — typical for a book chapter. The 'reprint' tagline raises a mild question about overlap with the previous edition; the authors should clarify what changed. For the target audience — graduate students or researchers entering the field — this is a good entry point, and the figures summarizing recent extractions are genuinely useful.

Would I bring it to a reading group? Maybe, for students. Would I cite it? Possibly as a background reference in a lecture or review, but not as a primary source. Would a serious editor send it to referees? For a review journal or handbook, yes: accuracy matters in a pedagogical chapter like this, and these authors are well equipped to produce it. For a regular research journal, it would be a desk reject because there is no original claim to adjudicate. My recommendation: if the venue is a review or handbook, engage with it; if it is a research journal, pass — but it is not a bad paper.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript is an invited introductory chapter, identified as an 'update of previous edition, reprint', surveying collinear PDFs, TMDs, GPDs, GTMDs/Wigner distributions, and their QCD definitions, interrelations, experimental access, extractions, and theoretical approaches. It explicitly disclaims completeness and presents no new derivations, data, or numerical results; its central claim is that the definitions in Eqs. (25), (37), (49), and (61), the interrelation diagram in Fig. 4, the factorization formulas in Eqs. (22), (43), and (60), and the phenomenological summaries are accurate and representative of the cited literature. The chapter is careful to include important caveats, including the non-integration of TMDs to PDFs (Eq. (48)), the failure of TMD factorization in color-entangled processes (Sec. 3.4), the bare-level status of GTMD relations (Sec. 5.2), and the absence of model-independent GPD-TMD connections (Sec. 4.2).

Significance. If the claims are accurate, the chapter is a useful pedagogical reference for a broad audience. It is not original research: there is no new theorem, no new data, and no machine-checked code. Its strengths are the explicit QCD correlator framework, the clear interrelation diagram, up-to-date global-fit examples (NNPDF4.0, BDSSV24, MAPNN/ART25, JAMDiFF/JAM3D*, PV20), and, notably, its willingness to flag limitations rather than overstate the field. I checked representative load-bearing technical statements against the cited primary literature—the correlator projections in Eq. (10), the TMD parameterization in Eq. (37), the GPD parameterization in Eq. (49), the GTMD parameterization in Eq. (61), and the factorization formulas in Eqs. (22), (43), and (60)—and found no internal inconsistency. The concern that the chapter assumes rather than proves QCD factorization does not, on close reading, constitute an objection: for an introductory overview, citing the factorization theorems and noting where they fail is the appropriate level of support.

minor comments (4)

[Fig. 4] The caption describes the left panel as 'Experimentally observable functions', but GTMDs have, as Sec. 5.1 states, only recently proposed channels with extremely low rates; consider 'Functions discussed in this chapter and their interrelations' to avoid overclaiming current observability.
[Abstract] The phrase 'can be measured in various high-energy scattering processes' is ambiguous when applied to GTMDs; suggest 'can be addressed in' or 'can in principle be accessed in' to match the body's careful hedging.
[Sec. 2.4, Eq. (27)] The typeset 'Mdn−kn−2 had' should be M_had^{d_n-k_n-2}; the arXiv text also shows several '□' artifacts in place of minus signs (e.g., Fig. 9 and Fig. 20 axes), so a final typesetting proof is needed.
[Sec. 4.1, paragraph after Eq. (50)] Minor grammar: 'describe the emission a quark-antiquark pair' should read 'describe the emission of a quark-antiquark pair'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is an explicitly introductory overview whose definitions, inter-relations, and phenomenological summaries draw on external, citable results rather than on its own outputs.

full rationale

The manuscript is self-described as an introduction and incomplete overview (Sec. 1.3: 'This article is not intended as a review... an introduction and (incomplete) overview'), and it claims no new derivation, fit, or prediction. The inter-relational diagram (Fig. 4) is presented as a consequence of the explicit correlator projections in Eqs. (10a)-(10e): PDFs, TMDs, GPDs, and GTMDs are defined as different limits or integrals of the same bilocal correlator, so the arrows are identities by definition, not fitted outputs masquerading as predictions. The factorization formulas (Eqs. (22), (43), and (60)) are cited to the original factorization literature, with caveats stated where factorization fails (e.g., color entanglement in Sec. 3.4). The review's examples of phenomenological extractions (NNPDF4.0, BDSSV24, MAPNN, ART25, JAM) are external benchmarks and are not used to define the chapter's conclusions. Some cited works involve the authors themselves (for example, the GTMD parametrization in Refs. [22,23] includes a co-author, and Wigner-distribution and OAM relations cite the present authors' prior work), but these citations supply standard definitions or previously derived, independently checkable results and do not constitute the load-bearing justification for any claim in this review. No step was found in which a 'prediction' reduces by construction to fitted inputs, nor does the paper invoke an author-uniqueness theorem to exclude alternatives. The circularity score is therefore 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are introduced because the article is a review and reports parameter values and model results from the cited literature rather than fitting anything. No new entities are introduced; GTMDs, Wigner distributions, and related constructs are prior literature. The axioms listed are the background physics that any overview of this field must take for granted.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption QCD factorization theorems for DIS, SIDIS, Drell-Yan and hard exclusive processes hold at leading power with the stated non-perturbative functions.
Used throughout, e.g., Eq. (22) for DIS and Eq. (43) for SIDIS, to define PDFs, TMDs, GPDs and their observables.
standard math Asymptotic freedom allows a perturbative expansion of the hard-scattering kernels and evolution equations at the relevant scales.
Invoked in Sec 2.3-2.7 to justify DGLAP and BFKL evolution and the twist expansion.
domain assumption Light-front quantization and parton density interpretations in impact-parameter space are legitimate for the leading-twist distributions.
Underlies the physical interpretation of GPDs in Sec 4.2 and Wigner distributions in Sec 5.2.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Parton Distribution Functions and their Generalizations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5LJMIFFR

@misc{pith2026250712664,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Parton Distribution Functions and their Generalizations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5LJMIFFR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.12664}
}

read the original abstract

This article is an introduction to parton distribution functions and their generalizations which describe the quark and gluon structure of hadrons, and can be measured in various high-energy scattering processes. We provide the theoretical background, highlight both historical and recent developments, explain the connections between the different functions, and expose in which processes these functions can be accessed and what we can learn from them about hadron structure.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Parton distributions in the shockwave formalism
hep-ph 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

A single shockwave Feynman-rule framework reproduces and extends prior small-x parton distributions, yielding new quark GTMD/GPD/PDF and diffractive-TMD results.
Radiative corrections in neutral-current (anti)neutrino elastic scattering at $\text{GeV}$ energies I: Nucleon targets
hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Radiative corrections to neutral-current (anti)neutrino-nucleon elastic scattering are computed within low-energy EFT and reach a few percent, comparable to the strange-quark effects they must be disentangled from.
Gluon Generalized TMD signatures at the EIC from exclusive heavy (axial-)vector meson production
hep-ph 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Exclusive heavy vector-meson electroproduction can yield cos2φ and sin2φ azimuthal asymmetries whose coefficients contain moments of gluon GTMDs F_{1,4} and G_{1,1}.
Perception in Plan: Coupled Perception and Planning for End-to-End Autonomous Driving
cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

The supplied body text is an unrelated physics preprint (arXiv:2508.11491), so the advertised autonomous-driving results cannot be verified from this submission.
Electromagnetic structure of charged and neutral strange vector mesons
hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

Covariant NJL calculations give K*+ charge radius 0.45 fm² and magnetic moment 2.67 μ_N, and K*0 radius −0.04 fm² and moment 0.032 μ_N.
Effects of flavor-mixings on charged kaon and pion parton distribution functions
hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

Vacuum-polarization flavor mixing in the U(3) NJL model produces small, mass-difference-driven shifts in charged pion and kaon valence PDFs that mildly improve agreement with data at 4 and 27 GeV².
Three-dimensional imaging of hadrons with hard exclusive reactions: advances in experiment, theory, phenomenology, and lattice QCD
hep-ph 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

A community white paper reviewing GPD-based 3D imaging of hadrons — experiment, theory, phenomenology, lattice QCD — and the roadmap toward precision tomography at JLab, COMPASS, J-PARC, and future electron-ion colliders.
Non-diagonal DVCS and studies of hadronic structure with $N \to N^*$ transition GPDs
hep-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

A proceedings review of transition GPDs for non-diagonal DVCS: model estimates for JLab@12 GeV, a qualitative match to CLAS BSA data, and spin-J Froissart-Gribov projections for resonance spectroscopy.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

299 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · cited by 8 Pith papers

[1]

Frisch, O

R. Frisch, O. Stern, ¨Uber die magnetische Ablenkung von Wasserstoffmolek¨ulen und das magnetische Moment des Protons, Z. Phys. 85 (1933) 4–16, doi:https://note.org/10.1007/BF01330773

doi:10.1007/bf01330773 1933
[2]

L. W. Alvarez, F . Bloch, A Quantitative Determination of the Neutron Moment in Absolute Nuclear Magnetons, Phys. Rev. 57 (1940) 111–122, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.57.111

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.57.111 1940
[3]

R. L. Workman, et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2022 (2022) 083C01, doi: 10.1093/ptep/ptac097

doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac097 2022
[4]

R. W. Mcallister, R. Hofstadter, Elastic Scattering of 188-MeV Electrons From the Proton and the α Particle, Phys. Rev. 102 (1956) 851–856, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.102.851

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.102.851 1956
[5]

Hofstadter, Electron scattering and nuclear structure, Rev

R. Hofstadter, Electron scattering and nuclear structure, Rev. Mod. Phys. 28 (1956) 214–254, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.28.214

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.28.214 1956
[7]

Burkardt, Impact parameter dependent parton distributions and off forward parton distributions for z→ 0, Phys

M. Burkardt, Impact parameter dependent parton distributions and off forward parton distributions for z→ 0, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 071503, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.071503, hep-ph/0005108

arXiv 2000
[8]

G. A. Miller, Transverse Charge Densities, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60 (2010) 1–25, doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.012809.104508, 1002.0355

arXiv 2010
[9]

Punjabi, C

V. Punjabi, C. F . Perdrisat, M. K. Jones, E. J. Brash, C. E. Carlson, The Structure of the Nucleon: Elastic Electromagnetic Form Factors, Eur. Phys. J. A 51 (2015) 79, doi:10.1140/epja/i2015-15079-x, 1503.01452

arXiv 2015

Show all 299 references

[10]

H. Gao, M. Vanderhaeghen, The proton charge radius, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94 (1) (2022) 015002, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.94.015002, 2105. 00571

2022 doi
[11]

R. P . Feynman, Photon-hadron Interactions, W. A. Benjamin 1972, ISBN 0-805-32510-7

1972
[12]

J. P . Ralston, D. E. Soper, Production of Dimuons from High-Energy Polarized Proton Proton Collisions, Nucl. Phys. B 152 (1979) 109, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90082-8

1979 doi
[13]

J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, Parton Distribution and Decay Functions, Nucl. Phys. B 194 (1982) 445–492, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(82)90021-9

1982 doi
[14]

M ¨uller, D

D. M ¨uller, D. Robaschik, B. Geyer, F . M. Dittes, J. Ho ˇrejˇsi, Wave functions, evolution equations and evolution kernels from light ray operators of QCD, Fortsch. Phys. 42 (1994) 101–141, doi:10.1002/prop.2190420202, hep-ph/9812448

1994 arXiv
[15]

Ji, Gauge-Invariant Decomposition of Nucleon Spin, Phys

X.-D. Ji, Gauge-Invariant Decomposition of Nucleon Spin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 610–613, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.610, hep-ph/ 9603249

1997 doi
[16]

Ji, Deeply virtual Compton scattering, Phys

X.-D. Ji, Deeply virtual Compton scattering, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 7114–7125, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.7114, hep-ph/9609381

1997 arXiv
[17]

A. V. Radyushkin, Scaling limit of deeply virtual Compton scattering, Phys. Lett. B 380 (1996) 417–425, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00528-X, hep-ph/9604317

1996 arXiv
[18]

A. V. Radyushkin, Asymmetric gluon distributions and hard diffractive electroproduction, Phys. Lett. B 385 (1996) 333–342, doi: 10.1016/ 0370-2693(96)00844-1, hep-ph/9605431

1996 arXiv
[19]

J. C. Collins, L. Frankfurt, M. Strikman, Factorization for hard exclusive electroproduction of mesons in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 2982–3006, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.56.2982, hep-ph/9611433

1997 arXiv
[20]

Ji, Viewing the proton through ’color’ filters, Phys

X.-D. Ji, Viewing the proton through ’color’ filters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 062001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.062001, hep-ph/0304037

2003 arXiv
[21]

A. V. Belitsky, X.-D. Ji, F . Yuan, Quark imaging in the proton via quantum phase space distributions, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 074014, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.074014, hep-ph/0307383

2004 arXiv
[22]

Meissner, A

S. Meissner, A. Metz, M. Schlegel, K. Goeke, Generalized parton correlation functions for a spin-0 hadron, JHEP 08 (2008) 038, doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/08/038, 0805.3165

2008 arXiv
[23]

Meissner, A

S. Meissner, A. Metz, M. Schlegel, Generalized parton correlation functions for a spin-1/2 hadron, JHEP 08 (2009) 056, doi: 10.1088/ 1126-6708/2009/08/056, 0906.5323

2009 arXiv
[24]

Gross, et al., 50 Y ears of Quantum Chromodynamics, Eur

F . Gross, et al., 50 Y ears of Quantum Chromodynamics, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 1125, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11949-2 , 2212.11107

2023 arXiv
[25]

’t Hooft, M

G. ’t Hooft, M. J. G. Veltman, Regularization and Renormalization of Gauge Fields, Nucl. Phys. B 44 (1972) 189–213, doi: 10.1016/ 0550-3213(72)90279-9

1972
[26]

Deur, The QCD Running Coupling (2025), 2502.06535

A. Deur, The QCD Running Coupling (2025), 2502.06535

2025
[27]

Diehl, J

M. Diehl, J. R. Gaunt, Double parton scattering theory overview, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 29 (2018) 7–28, doi: 10.1142/ 9789813227767 0002, 1710.04408

2018 arXiv
[28]

Bartalini, J

P . Bartalini, J. R. Gaunt (Eds.), Multiple Parton Interactions at the LHC, vol. 29, WSP 2019, ISBN 978-981-322-775-0, 978-981-322-777-4, doi:10.1142/10646

2019 doi
[29]

E. D. Bloom, et al., High-Energy Inelastic e p Scattering at 6-Degrees and 10-Degrees, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (1969) 930–934, doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.23.930

1969
[30]

Breidenbach, J

M. Breidenbach, J. I. Friedman, H. W. Kendall, E. D. Bloom, D. H. Coward, H. C. DeStaebler, J. Drees, L. W. Mo, R. E. Taylor, Observed behavior of highly inelastic electron-proton scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (1969) 935–939, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.935

1969 doi
[31]

Eichten, et al., Measurement of the Neutrino - Nucleon Anti-neutrino - Nucleon Total Cross-sections, Phys

T. Eichten, et al., Measurement of the Neutrino - Nucleon Anti-neutrino - Nucleon Total Cross-sections, Phys. Lett. B 46 (1973) 274–280, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(73)90702-8

1973 doi
[32]

Deden, et al

H. Deden, et al. (Gargamelle Neutrino), Experimental Study of Structure Functions and Sum Rules in Charge Changing Interactions of Neutrinos and anti-neutrinos on Nucleons, Nucl. Phys. B 85 (1975) 269–288, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(75)90008-5

1975 doi
[33]

J. H. Christenson, G. S. Hicks, L. M. Lederman, P . J. Limon, B. G. Pope, E. Zavattini, Observation of massive muon pairs in hadron collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25 (1970) 1523–1526, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.25.1523

1970 doi
[34]

A. L. S. Angelis, et al. (CERN-Columbia-Oxford-Rockefeller, CCOR), A Measurement of the Production of Massive e+e− Pairs in Proton Proton Collisions at√s=62.4 GeV, Phys. Lett. B 87 (1979) 398–402, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(79)90563-X

1979 doi
[35]

Antreasyan, et al., Measurement of Dimuon Production at the ISR, Phys

D. Antreasyan, et al., Measurement of Dimuon Production at the ISR, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 (1980) 863, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.863

1980 doi
[36]

Badier, et al

J. Badier, et al. (NA3), Experimental Determination of the pi Meson Structure Functions by the Drell-Y an Mechanism, Z. Phys. C 18 (1983) 281, doi:10.1007/BF01573728

1983 doi
[37]

Falciano, et al

S. Falciano, et al. (NA10), Angular Distributions of Muon Pairs Produced by 194-GeV/ c Negative Pions, Z. Phys. C 31 (1986) 513, doi: 10.1007/BF01551072

1986 doi
[38]

Guanziroli, et al

M. Guanziroli, et al. (NA10), Angular Distributions of Muon Pairs Produced by Negative Pions on Deuterium and Tungsten, Z. Phys. C 37 (1988) 545, doi:10.1007/BF01549713

1988 doi
[39]

Bonesini, et al

M. Bonesini, et al. (WA70), Production of High Transverse Momentum Prompt Photons and Neutral Pions in Proton Proton Interactions at 280-GeV/c, Z. Phys. C 38 (1988) 371, doi:10.1007/BF01584385

1988 doi
[40]

J. J. Aubert, et al. (European Muon), The ratio of the nucleon structure functions F2n for iron and deuterium, Phys. Lett. B 123 (1983) 275–278, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90437-9

1983 doi
[41]

Ashman, et al

J. Ashman, et al. (European Muon), An Investigation of the Spin Structure of the Proton in Deep Inelastic Scattering of Polarized Muons on Polarized Protons, Nucl. Phys. B 328 (1989) 1, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90089-8

1989 doi
[42]

Adams, et al

D. Adams, et al. (Spin Muon (SMC)), Measurement of the spin dependent structure function g1(x) of the proton, Phys. Lett. B 329 (1994) 399–406, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)90793-5, hep-ph/9404270

1994 arXiv
[43]

Abbott, et al

B. Abbott, et al. (D0), Measurement of the inclusive differential cross section for Z bosons as a function of transverse momentum in ¯pp collisions at√s = 1.8 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 032004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.61.032004, hep-ex/9907009

2000 arXiv
[44]

Affolder, et al

T. Affolder, et al. (CDF), The transverse momentum and total cross section of e+e− pairs in the Z boson region from p ¯p collisions at√s = 1.8 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 845–850, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.845, hep-ex/0001021

2000 arXiv
[45]

V. M. Abazov, et al. (D0), Measurement of the Normalized Z/γ∗−>µ +µ− Transverse Momentum Distribution in p ¯p Collisions at√s = 1.96 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 693 (2010) 522–530, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.09.012, 1006.0618

2010 arXiv
[46]

Aaltonen, et al

T. Aaltonen, et al. (CDF), Transverse momentum cross section of e+e− pairs in the Z-boson region from p ¯p collisions at √s = 1.96 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 052010, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.052010, 1207.7138. Parton Distribution Functions and their Generalizations 37

2012 arXiv
[47]

Adloff, et al

C. Adloff, et al. (H1), Elastic photoproduction of J/psi and Upsilon mesons at HERA, Phys. Lett. B 483 (2000) 23–35, doi: 10.1016/ S0370-2693(00)00530-X, hep-ex/0003020

2000 arXiv
[48]

Chekanov, et al

S. Chekanov, et al. (ZEUS), Measurement of the neutral current cross-section and F(2) structure function for deep inelastic e + p scattering at HERA, Eur. Phys. J. C 21 (2001) 443–471, doi:10.1007/s100520100749, hep-ex/0105090

2001 arXiv
[49]

Chekanov, et al

S. Chekanov, et al. (ZEUS), Exclusive photoproduction of J / psi mesons at HERA, Eur. Phys. J. C 24 (2002) 345–360, doi: 10.1007/ s10052-002-0953-7 , hep-ex/0201043

2002 arXiv
[50]

Aktas, et al

A. Aktas, et al. (H1), Elastic J/psi production at HERA, Eur. Phys. J. C 46 (2006) 585–603, doi: 10.1140/epjc/s2006-02519-5, hep-ex/ 0510016

2006 doi
[51]

F . D. Aaron, et al. (H1, ZEUS), Combined Measurement and QCD Analysis of the Inclusivee± p Scattering Cross Sections at HERA, JHEP 01 (2010) 109, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2010)109, 0911.0884

2010 arXiv
[52]

Abramowicz, et al

H. Abramowicz, et al. (H1, ZEUS), Combination of measurements of inclusive deep inelastic e± p scattering cross sections and QCD analysis of HERA data, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (12) (2015) 580, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3710-4 , 1506.06042

2015 arXiv
[53]

Ackerstaff, et al

K. Ackerstaff, et al. (HERMES), Measurement of the neutron spin structure function gn 1 with a polarized He-3 internal target, Phys. Lett. B 404 (1997) 383–389, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00611-4, hep-ex/9703005

1997 arXiv
[54]

Airapetian, et al

A. Airapetian, et al. (HERMES), Observation of a single spin azimuthal asymmetry in semiinclusive pion electro production, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 4047–4051, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4047, hep-ex/9910062

2000 arXiv
[55]

Airapetian, et al

A. Airapetian, et al. (HERMES), Single-spin asymmetries in semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering on a transversely polarized hydrogen target, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 012002, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.012002, hep-ex/0408013

2005 arXiv
[56]

Airapetian, et al

A. Airapetian, et al. (HERMES), Precise determination of the spin structure function g1 of the proton, deuteron and neutron, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 012007, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.012007, hep-ex/0609039

2007 arXiv
[57]

Airapetian, et al

A. Airapetian, et al. (HERMES), Measurement of Azimuthal Asymmetries With Respect To Both Beam Charge and Transverse Target Polarization in Exclusive Electroproduction of Real Photons, JHEP 06 (2008) 066, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/06/066, 0802.2499

2008 arXiv
[58]

Airapetian, et al

A. Airapetian, et al. (HERMES), Observation of the Naive-T -odd Sivers Effect in Deep-Inelastic Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 152002, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.152002, 0906.3918

2009 arXiv
[59]

Airapetian, et al

A. Airapetian, et al. (HERMES), Multiplicities of charged pions and kaons from semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering by the proton and the deuteron, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 074029, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.074029, 1212.5407

2013 arXiv
[60]

Airapetian, et al

A. Airapetian, et al. (HERMES), Azimuthal single- and double-spin asymmetries in semi-inclusive deep-inelastic lepton scattering by transversely polarized protons, JHEP 12 (2020) 010, doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2020)010, 2007.07755

2020 arXiv
[61]

Stepanyan, et al

S. Stepanyan, et al. (CLAS), Observation of exclusive deeply virtual Compton scattering in polarized electron beam asymmetry measure- ments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 182002, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.182002, hep-ex/0107043

2001 arXiv
[62]

Avakian, et al

H. Avakian, et al. (CLAS), Measurement of beam-spin asymmetries for pi + electroproduction above the baryon resonance region, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 112004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.112004, hep-ex/0301005

2004 arXiv
[63]

Zheng, et al

X. Zheng, et al. (Jefferson Lab Hall A), Precision measurement of the neutron spin asymmetry An 1 and spin flavor decomposition in the valence quark region, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 012004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.012004, nucl-ex/0308011

2004 arXiv
[64]

F . X. Girod, et al. (CLAS), Measurement of Deeply virtual Compton scattering beam-spin asymmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 162002, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.162002, 0711.4805

2008 arXiv
[65]

Qian, et al

X. Qian, et al. (Jefferson Lab Hall A), Single Spin Asymmetries in Charged Pion Production from Semi-Inclusive Deep Inelastic Scattering on a Transversely Polarized3He Target, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 072003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.072003, 1106.0363

2011 arXiv
[66]

Adhikari, et al

S. Adhikari, et al. (GlueX), Measurement of the J/ ψ photoproduction cross section over the full near-threshold kinematic region, Phys. Rev. C 108 (2) (2023) 025201, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.108.025201, 2304.03845

2023 arXiv
[67]

E. S. Ageev, et al. (COMPASS), Gluon polarization in the nucleon from quasi-real photoproduction of high-p(T) hadron pairs, Phys. Lett. B 633 (2006) 25–32, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.11.049, hep-ex/0511028

2006 arXiv
[68]

Alekseev, et al

M. Alekseev, et al. (COMPASS), Collins and Sivers asymmetries for pions and kaons in muon-deuteron DIS, Phys. Lett. B 673 (2009) 127–135, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.01.060, 0802.2160

2009 arXiv
[69]

M. G. Alekseev, et al. (COMPASS), The Spin-dependent Structure Function of the Proton gp 1 and a Test of the Bjorken Sum Rule, Phys. Lett. B 690 (2010) 466–472, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.05.069, 1001.4654

2010 arXiv
[70]

M. G. Alekseev, et al. (COMPASS), Measurement of the Collins and Sivers asymmetries on transversely polarised protons, Phys. Lett. B 692 (2010) 240–246, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.08.001, 1005.5609

2010 arXiv
[71]

Adolph, et al

C. Adolph, et al. (COMPASS), Hadron Transverse Momentum Distributions in Muon Deep Inelastic Scattering at 160 GeV/c, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (8) (2013) 2531, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2531-6 , 1305.7317

2013 arXiv
[72]

Adolph, et al

C. Adolph, et al. (COMPASS), Collins and Sivers asymmetries in muonproduction of pions and kaons off transversely polarised protons, Phys. Lett. B 744 (2015) 250–259, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.03.056, 1408.4405

2015 arXiv
[73]

Aghasyan, et al

M. Aghasyan, et al. (COMPASS), First measurement of transverse-spin-dependent azimuthal asymmetries in the Drell-Y an process, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (11) (2017) 112002, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.112002, 1704.00488

2017 arXiv
[74]

Aghasyan, et al

M. Aghasyan, et al. (COMPASS), Transverse-momentum-dependent Multiplicities of Charged Hadrons in Muon-Deuteron Deep Inelastic Scattering, Phys. Rev. D 97 (3) (2018) 032006, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.032006, 1709.07374

2018 arXiv
[75]

G. D. Alexeev, et al. (COMPASS), Transverse-spin-dependent azimuthal asymmetries of pion and kaon pairs produced in muon-proton and muon-deuteron semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering, Phys. Lett. B 845 (2023) 138155, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138155, 2301.02013

2023
[76]

Adare, et al

A. Adare, et al. (PHENIX), Inclusive cross-section and double helicity asymmetry for π0 production in p + p collisions at √s = 200 GeV: Implications for the polarized gluon distribution in the proton, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 051106, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.051106, 0704.3599

2007 arXiv
[77]

Arsene, et al

I. Arsene, et al. (BRAHMS), Single Transverse Spin Asymmetries of Identified Charged Hadrons in Polarized pp Collisions at √s = 62.4 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 042001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.042001, 0801.1078

2008 arXiv
[78]

Adamczyk, et al

L. Adamczyk, et al. (STAR), Transverse Single-Spin Asymmetry and Cross-Section for π0 andη Mesons at Large Feynman-x in Polarized p + p Collisions at√s = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 051101, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.051101, 1205.6826

2012 arXiv
[79]

Adamczyk, et al

L. Adamczyk, et al. (STAR), Precision Measurement of the Longitudinal Double-spin Asymmetry for Inclusive Jet Production in Polarized Proton Collisions at√s = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (9) (2015) 092002, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.092002, 1405.5134

2015 arXiv
[80]

Adamczyk, et al

L. Adamczyk, et al. (STAR), Measurement of longitudinal spin asymmetries for weak boson production in polarized proton-proton collisions at RHIC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 072301, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.072301, 1404.6880

2014 arXiv
[81]

Adamczyk, et al

L. Adamczyk, et al. (STAR), Measurement of the transverse single-spin asymmetry in p↑ + p→ W±/Z0 at RHIC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (13) (2016) 132301, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.132301, 1511.06003

2016 arXiv
[82]

Adamczyk, et al

L. Adamczyk, et al. (STAR), Transverse spin-dependent azimuthal correlations of charged pion pairs measured in p↑+p collisions at√s = 500 GeV, Phys. Lett. B 780 (2018) 332–339, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.02.069, 1710.10215. 38 Parton Distribution Functions and their Generalizations

2018 arXiv
[83]

Aidala, et al

C. Aidala, et al. (PHENIX), Measurements of µµ pairs from open heavy flavor and Drell-Y an in p + p collisions at √s = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 99 (7) (2019) 072003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.072003, 1805.02448

2019
[84]

STAR Coll., Measurements of the Z0/γ∗ cross section and transverse single spin asymmetry in 510 GeV p + p collisions, Phys. Lett. B 854 (2024) 138715, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138715, 2308.15496

2024
[85]

Aaij, et al

R. Aaij, et al. (LHCb), Measurement of forward W and Z boson production in pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV, JHEP 01 (2016) 155, doi: 10.1007/JHEP01(2016)155, 1511.08039

2016 arXiv
[86]

Aad, et al

G. Aad, et al. (ATLAS), Measurement of the transverse momentum distribution of Drell–Y an lepton pairs in proton–proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (7) (2020) 616, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8001-z , 1912.02844

2020 arXiv
[87]

Tumasyan, et al

A. Tumasyan, et al. (CMS), Measurement of the mass dependence of the transverse momentum of lepton pairs in Drell-Y an production in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (7) (2023) 628, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11631-7 , 2205.04897

2023 arXiv
[88]

A. J. Bevan, et al. (BaBar, Belle), The Physics of the B Factories, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3026, doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3026-9 , 1406.6311

2014 arXiv
[89]

Abe, et al

K. Abe, et al. (Belle), Measurement of azimuthal asymmetries in inclusive production of hadron pairs in e+e− annihilation at Belle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 232002, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.232002, hep-ex/0507063

2006 arXiv
[90]

Seidl, et al

R. Seidl, et al. (Belle), Measurement of Azimuthal Asymmetries in Inclusive Production of Hadron Pairs in e+e− Annihilation at√s = 10.58 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 032011, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.032011, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 86, 039905 (2012)], 0805.2975

2008 arXiv
[91]

Vossen, et al

A. Vossen, et al. (Belle), Observation of transverse polarization asymmetries of charged pion pairs in e+e− annihilation near √s = 10.58 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 072004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.072004, 1104.2425

2011 arXiv
[92]

J. P . Lees, et al. (BaBar), Measurement of Collins asymmetries in inclusive production of charged pion pairs ine+e− annihilation at BABAR, Phys. Rev. D 90 (5) (2014) 052003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.052003, 1309.5278

2014 arXiv
[93]

Seidl, et al

R. Seidl, et al. (Belle), Invariant-mass and fractional-energy dependence of inclusive production of di-hadrons in e+e− annihilation at√s = 10.58 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 96 (3) (2017) 032005, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.032005, 1706.08348

2017 arXiv
[94]

Giorgio Parisi, From Bjorken Scaling to Scaling Violations, HiHEP 1 (1) (2025) 17, doi: 10.53941/hihep.2025.100017, 2506.03383

2025
[95]

Navas, et al

S. Navas, et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110 (3) (2024) 030001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

2024 doi
[96]

J. D. Bjorken, Current algebra at small distances, Conf. Proc. C 670717 (1967) 55–81

1967
[97]

J. D. Bjorken, Asymptotic Sum Rules at Infinite Momentum, Phys. Rev. 179 (1969) 1547–1553, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.179.1547

1969 doi
[98]

D. J. Gross, Nobel Lecture: The discovery of asymptotic freedom and the emergence of QCD, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77 (2005) 837–849, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.77.837

2005 doi
[99]

R. P . Feynman, Very high-energy collisions of hadrons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (1969) 1415–1417, doi:[,494(1969)]

1969
[100]

J. D. Bjorken, E. A. Paschos, Inelastic Electron-Proton and γ-Proton Scattering, and the Structure of the Nucleon, Phys. Rev. 185 (1969) 1975–1982, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.185.1975

1969 doi
[101]

C. G. Callan, Jr., D. J. Gross, High-energy electroproduction and the constitution of the electric current, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22 (1969) 156– 159, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.22.156

1969 doi
[102]

S. D. Drell, Tung-Mow Y an, Massive Lepton Pair Production in Hadron-Hadron Collisions at High-Energies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25 (1970) 316–320, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.25.316

1970 doi
[103]

D. R. Entem, F . Fern´andez, P . G. Ortega, J. Segovia, The Constituent Quark Model (2025),2504.07897

2025 arXiv
[104]

J. C. Collins, Davison E. Soper, G. F . Sterman, Factorization of Hard Processes in QCD, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 5 (1989) 1–91, doi:10.1142/9789814503266 0001, hep-ph/0409313

1989 arXiv
[105]

Brock, et al

R. Brock, et al. (CTEQ), Handbook of perturbative QCD: Version 1.0, Rev. Mod. Phys. 67 (1995) 157–248, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.67.157

1995 doi
[106]

Collins, Foundations of Perturbative QCD, vol

J. Collins, Foundations of Perturbative QCD, vol. 32, Cambridge University Press 2011, ISBN 978-1-009-40184-5, 978-1-009-40183-8, 978-1-009-40182-1, doi:10.1017/9781009401845

2011 doi
[107]

S. Moch, J. A. M. Vermaseren, A. Vogt, The Three loop splitting functions in QCD: The Nonsinglet case, Nucl. Phys. B 688 (2004) 101–134, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.03.030, hep-ph/0403192

2004 arXiv
[108]

A. Vogt, S. Moch, J. A. M. Vermaseren, The Three-loop splitting functions in QCD: The Singlet case, Nucl. Phys. B 691 (2004) 129–181, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.04.024, hep-ph/0404111

2004 arXiv
[109]

S. Moch, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren, A. Vogt, Four-Loop Non-Singlet Splitting Functions in the Planar Limit and Beyond, JHEP 10 (2017) 041, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)041, 1707.08315

2017 arXiv
[110]

C. G. Bollini, J. J. Giambiagi, Dimensional Renormalization: The Number of Dimensions as a Regularizing Parameter, Nuovo Cim. B 12 (1972) 20–26, doi:10.1007/BF02895558

1972 doi
[111]

G. M. Cicuta, E. Montaldi, Analytic renormalization via continuous space dimension, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 4 (1972) 329–332, doi: 10.1007/ BF02756527

1972
[112]

W. A. Bardeen, A. J. Buras, D. W. Duke, T. Muta, Deep Inelastic Scattering Beyond the Leading Order in Asymptotically Free Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. D 18 (1978) 3998, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.18.3998

1978 doi
[113]

Y . L. Dokshitzer, Calculation of the structure functions for deep inelastic scattering ande=e− annihilation by perturbation theory in Quantum Chromodynamics., Sov. Phys. JETP 46 (1977) 641–653

1977
[114]

V. N. Gribov, L. N. Lipatov, Deep inelastic e p scattering in perturbation theory, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 15 (1972) 438–450

1972
[115]

Altarelli, G

G. Altarelli, G. Parisi, Asymptotic Freedom in Parton Language, Nucl. Phys. B 126 (1977) 298–318, doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(77)90384-4

1977 doi
[116]

Altarelli, R

G. Altarelli, R. K. Ellis, G. Martinelli, Large Perturbative Corrections to the Drell-Y an Process in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 157 (1979) 461–497, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90116-0

1979 doi
[117]

G. T. Bodwin, Factorization of the Drell-Y an Cross-Section in Perturbation Theory, Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 2616, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.34. 3932

1985 doi
[118]

J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, G. F . Sterman, Factorization for Short Distance Hadron - Hadron Scattering, Nucl. Phys. B 261 (1985) 104–142, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90565-6

1985 doi
[119]

Hollands, R

S. Hollands, R. M. Wald, The Operator Product Expansion in Quantum Field Theory (2023), 2312.01096

2023 arXiv
[120]

J. C. Collins, Renormalization : An Introduction to Renormalization, the Renormalization Group and the Operator-Product Expansion, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, vol. 26, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1984, ISBN 978-0-521-31177-9, 978-0-511-86739-2, 978-...

1984 doi
[121]

R. L. Jaffe, Spin, twist and hadron structure in deep inelastic processes, in: Ettore Majorana International School of Nucleon Structure: 1st Course: The Spin Structure of the Nucleon 1996, pp. 42–129, hep-ph/9602236

1996 arXiv
[122]

Itzykson, J

C. Itzykson, J. B. Zuber, Quantum Field Theory, International Series In Pure and Applied Physics, McGraw-Hill, New Y ork 1980, ISBN 978-0-486-44568-7

1980
[123]

R. L. Jaffe, X.-D. Ji, Chiral odd parton distributions and Drell-Y an processes, Nucl. Phys. B 375 (1992) 527–560, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(92) 90110-W. Parton Distribution Functions and their Generalizations 39

1992 doi
[124]

D. E. Soper, Infinite-momentum helicity states, Phys. Rev. D 5 (1972) 1956–1962, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.5.1956

1972 doi
[125]

Soffer, Positivity constraints for spin dependent parton distributions, Phys

J. Soffer, Positivity constraints for spin dependent parton distributions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 1292–1294, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74. 1292, hep-ph/9409254

1995 arXiv
[126]

J. P . Ralston, Exploring Confinement with Spin, in: 2nd International Workshop on Transverse Polarization Phenomena in Hard Processes 2008, pp. 229–236, doi:10.1142/9789814277785 0028, 0810.0871

2008 arXiv
[127]

Collins, T

J. Collins, T. C. Rogers, N. Sato, Positivity and renormalization of parton densities, Phys. Rev. D 105 (7) (2022) 076010, doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevD.105.076010, 2111.01170

2022 arXiv
[128]

Vogelsang, Next-to-leading order evolution of transversity distributions and Soffer’s inequality, Phys

W. Vogelsang, Next-to-leading order evolution of transversity distributions and Soffer’s inequality, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 1886–1894, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.57.1886, hep-ph/9706511

1998 arXiv
[129]

Candido, S

A. Candido, S. Forte, T. Giani, F . Hekhorn, On the positivity ofMS parton distributions, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (3) (2024) 335, doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-024-12681-1 , 2308.00025

2024 arXiv
[130]

M. L. Goldberger, S. B. Treiman, Form-factors in Beta decay and muon capture, Phys. Rev. 111 (1958) 354–361, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.111. 354

1958 doi
[131]

S. L. Adler, Calculation of the axial vector coupling constant renormalization in beta decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14 (1965) 1051–1055, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.1051

1965 doi
[132]

S. L. Adler, Axial vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 2426–2438, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.177.2426

1969 doi
[133]

J. D. Bjorken, Applications of the Chiral U(6) x U(6) Algebra of Current Densities, Phys. Rev. 148 (1966) 1467–1478, doi:10.1103/PhysRev. 148.1467

1966 doi
[134]

J. D. Bjorken, Inelastic Scattering of Polarized Leptons from Polarized Nucleons, Phys. Rev. D 1 (1970) 1376–1379, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 1.1376

1970 doi
[135]

P . A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin, J. H. Kuhn, Adler Function, Bjorken Sum Rule, and the Crewther Relation to Order α4 s in a General Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 132004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.132004, 1001.3606

2010 arXiv
[136]

Boer, et al., Gluons and the quark sea at high energies: Distributions, polarization, tomography (2011), 1108.1713

D. Boer, et al., Gluons and the quark sea at high energies: Distributions, polarization, tomography (2011), 1108.1713

2011 arXiv
[137]

Altarelli, R

G. Altarelli, R. D. Ball, S. Forte, G. Ridolfi, Determination of the Bjorken sum and strong coupling from polarized structure functions, Nucl. Phys. B 496 (1997) 337–357, doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00201-0, hep-ph/9701289

1997 arXiv
[138]

Accardi, et al., Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier: Understanding the glue that binds us all, Eur

A. Accardi, et al., Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier: Understanding the glue that binds us all, Eur. Phys. J. A 52 (9) (2016) 268, doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16268-9, 1212.1701

2016 arXiv
[139]

D. J. Gross, Frank Wilczek, Asymptotically free gauge theories. 2., Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 980–993, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.9.980

1974 doi
[140]

H. D. Politzer, Asymptotic Freedom: An Approach to Strong Interactions, Phys. Rept. 14 (1974) 129–180, doi: 10.1016/0370-1573(74) 90014-3

1974 doi
[141]

Georgi, H

H. Georgi, H. D. Politzer, Electroproduction scaling in an asymptotically free theory of strong interactions, Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 416–420, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.9.416

1974 doi
[142]

R. K. Ellis, W. Furmanski, R. Petronzio, Unraveling Higher Twists, Nucl. Phys. B 212 (1983) 29, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90597-7

1983 doi
[143]

R. L. Jaffe, Parton Distribution Functions for Twist Four, Nucl. Phys. B 229 (1983) 205–230, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90361-9

1983 doi
[144]

I. I. Balitsky, V. M. Braun, Evolution Equations for QCD String Operators, Nucl. Phys. B 311 (1989) 541–584, doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(89) 90168-5

1989 doi
[145]

Kanazawa, Y

K. Kanazawa, Y . Koike, A. Metz, D. Pitonyak, M. Schlegel, Operator Constraints for Twist-3 Functions and Lorentz Invariance Properties of Twist-3 Observables, Phys. Rev. D 93 (5) (2016) 054024, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.054024, 1512.07233

2016 arXiv
[146]

Caldwell, S

A. Caldwell, S. Dalla Torre, R. Ent, A. Levy, P . Newman, F . Olness, J. Rojo, Future Opportunities with Lepton-Hadron Collisions 2025, 2503.18208

2025 arXiv
[147]

Accardi, et al., Strong interaction physics at the luminosity frontier with 22 GeV electrons at Jefferson Lab, Eur

A. Accardi, et al., Strong interaction physics at the luminosity frontier with 22 GeV electrons at Jefferson Lab, Eur. Phys. J. A 60 (9) (2024) 173, doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01282-x , 2306.09360

2024 arXiv
[148]

Ahmadova, et al., The Large Hadron electron Collider as a bridge project for CERN (2025), 2503.17727

F . Ahmadova, et al., The Large Hadron electron Collider as a bridge project for CERN (2025), 2503.17727

2025
[149]

Abdul Khalek, et al., Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Y ellow Report, Nucl

R. Abdul Khalek, et al., Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Y ellow Report, Nucl. Phys. A 1026 (2022) 122447, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122447, 2103.05419

2022
[150]

D. P . Anderle, et al., Electron-ion collider in China, Front. Phys. (Beijing) 16 (6) (2021) 64701, doi:10.1007/s11467-021-1062-0 , 2102.09222

2021 arXiv
[151]

Buckley, J

A. Buckley, J. Ferrando, Stephen Lloyd, K. Nordstr ¨om, B. Page, M. R¨ufenacht, M. Sch¨onherr, G. Watt, LHAPDF6: parton density access in the LHC precision era, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 132, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3318-8 , 1412.7420

2015 arXiv
[152]

R. D. Ball, et al. (NNPDF), The path to proton structure at 1% accuracy, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (5) (2022) 428, doi: 10.1140/epjc/ s10052-022-10328-7 , 2109.02653

2022 arXiv
[153]

Borsa, M

I. Borsa, M. Stratmann, W. Vogelsang, D. de Florian, R. Sassot, Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order Global Analysis of Polarized Parton Distribution Functions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (15) (2024) 151901, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.151901, 2407.11635

2024 arXiv
[154]

Bailey, T

S. Bailey, T. Cridge, L. A. Harland-Lang, A. D. Martin, R. S. Thorne, Parton distributions from LHC, HERA, Tevatron and fixed target data: MSHT20 PDFs, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (4) (2021) 341, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09057-0 , 2012.04684

2021 arXiv
[155]

Hou, et al., Progress in the CTEQ-TEA NNLO global QCD analysis (2019), 1908.11394

T.-J. Hou, et al., Progress in the CTEQ-TEA NNLO global QCD analysis (2019), 1908.11394

2019 arXiv
[156]

J. J. Ethier, E. R. Nocera, Parton Distributions in Nucleons and Nuclei, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70 (2020) 43–76, doi: 10.1146/ annurev-nucl-011720-042725 , 2001.07722

2020 arXiv
[157]

R. D. Ball, V. Bertone, M. Bonvini, S. Marzani, J. Rojo, L. Rottoli, Parton distributions with small-x resummation: evidence for BFKL dynamics in HERA data, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (4) (2018) 321, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5774-4 , 1710.05935

2018 arXiv
[158]

Kumano, Flavor asymmetry of anti-quark distributions in the nucleon, Phys

S. Kumano, Flavor asymmetry of anti-quark distributions in the nucleon, Phys. Rept. 303 (1998) 183–257, doi: 10.1016/S0370-1573(98) 00016-7, hep-ph/9702367

1998 arXiv
[159]

Cocuzza, W

C. Cocuzza, W. Melnitchouk, A. Metz, N. Sato (Jefferson Lab Angular Momentum (JAM)), Bayesian Monte Carlo extraction of the sea asymmetry with SeaQuest and STAR data, Phys. Rev. D 104 (7) (2021) 074031, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.074031, 2109.00677

2021 arXiv
[160]

S. J. Brodsky, P . Hoyer, C. Peterson, N. Sakai, The Intrinsic Charm of the Proton, Phys. Lett. B 93 (1980) 451–455, doi: 10.1016/ 0370-2693(80)90364-0

1980
[161]

R. D. Ball, A. Candido, J. Cruz-Martinez, S. Forte, T. Giani, F . Hekhorn, K. Kudashkin, G. Magni, J. Rojo (NNPDF), Evidence for intrinsic charm quarks in the proton, Nature 608 (7923) (2022) 483–487, doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04998-2 , 2208.08372

2022 arXiv
[162]

Guzzi, T

M. Guzzi, T. J. Hobbs, K. Xie, J. Huston, P . Nadolsky, C. P . Yuan, The persistent nonperturbative charm enigma, Phys. Lett. B 843 (2023) 137975, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137975, 2211.01387

2023
[163]

Bertone, A

V. Bertone, A. Chiefa, E. R. Nocera (MAP (Multi-dimensional Analyses of Partonic distributions)), Helicity-dependent parton distribution functions at next-to-next-to-leading order accuracy from inclusive and semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering data, Phys. Lett. B 865 (202...

2025
[164]

Nocera, Tanjona R

Juan Cruz-Martinez, Toon Hasenack, Felix Hekhorn, Giacomo Magni, Emanuele R. Nocera, Tanjona R. Rabemananjara, Juan Rojo, Tanishq Sharma, Gijs van Seeventer, NNPDFpol2.0: a global determination of polarised PDFs and their uncertainties at next-to-next-to- leading order, JHEP 0...

2025 arXiv
[165]

Cocuzza, N

C. Cocuzza, N. T. Hunt-Smith, W. Melnitchouk, N. Sato, A. W. Thomas (JAM Collaboration (Spin PDF Analysis Group)), Global QCD analysis of spin PDFs in the proton with high-x and lattice constraints, Phys. Rev. D 112 (11) (2025) 114017, doi: 10.1103/6fn9-1wqb, 2506.13616

2025
[166]

Cocuzza, W

C. Cocuzza, W. Melnitchouk, A. Metz, N. Sato (Jefferson Lab Angular Momentum (JAM)), Polarized antimatter in the proton from a global QCD analysis, Phys. Rev. D 106 (3) (2022) L031502, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.L031502, 2202.03372

2022 arXiv
[167]

E. C. Aschenauer, R. Sassot, M. Stratmann, Unveiling the Proton Spin Decomposition at a Future Electron-Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. D 92 (9) (2015) 094030, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.094030, 1509.06489

2015 arXiv
[168]

R. D. Ball, S. Forte, A. Guffanti, E. R. Nocera, G. Ridolfi, J. Rojo (NNPDF), Polarized Parton Distributions at an Electron-Ion Collider, Phys. Lett. B 728 (2014) 524–531, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.12.023, 1310.0461

2014 arXiv
[169]

Barshay, C

S. Barshay, C. B. Dover, J. P . Vary, Nucleus-nucleus cross sections and the validity of the factorization hypothesis at intermediate and high energies, Phys. Rev. C 11 (1975) 360–369, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.11.360

1975 doi
[170]

Klasen, H

M. Klasen, H. Paukkunen, Nuclear PDFs After the First Decade of LHC Data, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 74 (2024) 49–87, doi: 10.1146/ annurev-nucl-102122-022747 , 2311.00450

2024 arXiv
[171]

Ruiz, et al., Target mass corrections in lepton–nucleus DIS: Theory and applications to nuclear PDFs, Prog

R. Ruiz, et al., Target mass corrections in lepton–nucleus DIS: Theory and applications to nuclear PDFs, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 136 (2024) 104096, doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104096, 2301.07715

2024
[172]

Schienbein, J

I. Schienbein, J. Y . Yu, C. Keppel, J. G. Morfin, F . Olness, J. F . Owens, Nuclear parton distribution functions from neutrino deep inelastic scattering, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 054013, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.054013, 0710.4897

2008 arXiv
[173]

Bari, et al

G. Bari, et al. (BCDMS), A Measurement of Nuclear Effects in Deep Inelastic Muon Scattering on Deuterium, Nitrogen and Iron Targets, Phys. Lett. B 163 (1985) 282, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90238-2

1985 doi
[174]

A. C. Benvenuti, et al. (BCDMS), Nuclear Effects in Deep Inelastic Muon Scattering on Deuterium and Iron Targets, Phys. Lett. B 189 (1987) 483–487, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)90664-2

1987 doi
[175]

Bodek, et al., Electron Scattering from Nuclear Targets and Quark Distributions in Nuclei, Phys

A. Bodek, et al., Electron Scattering from Nuclear Targets and Quark Distributions in Nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 (1983) 1431, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1431

1983 doi
[176]

Gomez, et al., Measurement of the A-dependence of deep inelastic electron scattering, Phys

J. Gomez, et al., Measurement of the A-dependence of deep inelastic electron scattering, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 4348–4372, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.4348

1994 doi
[177]

Dasu, et al., Measurement of kinematic and nuclear dependence of R = sigma-L / sigma-t in deep inelastic electron scattering, Phys

S. Dasu, et al., Measurement of kinematic and nuclear dependence of R = sigma-L / sigma-t in deep inelastic electron scattering, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 5641–5670, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.49.5641

1994 doi
[178]

Amaudruz, et al

P . Amaudruz, et al. (New Muon), A Reevaluation of the nuclear structure function ratios for D, He, Li-6, C and Ca, Nucl. Phys. B 441 (1995) 3–11, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)00023-9, hep-ph/9503291

1995 arXiv
[179]

Arneodo, et al

M. Arneodo, et al. (New Muon), The A dependence of the nuclear structure function ratios, Nucl. Phys. B 481 (1996) 3–22, doi: 10.1016/ S0550-3213(96)90117-0

1996
[180]

Aicher, A

M. Aicher, A. Sch ¨afer, W. Vogelsang, Soft-gluon resummation and the valence parton distribution function of the pion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 252003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.252003, 1009.2481

2010 arXiv
[181]

P . C. Barry, C.-R. Ji, N. Sato, W. Melnitchouk (Jefferson Lab Angular Momentum (JAM)), Global QCD Analysis of Pion Parton Distributions with Threshold Resummation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (23) (2021) 232001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.232001, 2108.05822

2021 arXiv
[182]

C. D. Roberts, D. G. Richards, T. Horn, L. Chang, Insights into the emergence of mass from studies of pion and kaon structure, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 120 (2021) 103883, doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103883, 2102.01765

2021
[183]

L. Kotz, A. Courtoy, P . Nadolsky, F . Olness, M. Ponce-Chavez, Analysis of parton distributions in a pion with B ´ezier parametrizations, Phys. Rev. D 109 (7) (2024) 074027, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.074027, 2311.08447

2024 arXiv
[184]

Pasquini, S

B. Pasquini, S. Rodini, S. Venturini (MAP (Multi-dimensional Analyses of Partonic distributions)), Valence quark, sea, and gluon content of the pion from the parton distribution functions and the electromagnetic form factor, Phys. Rev. D 107 (11) (2023) 114023, doi: 10.1103/ P...

2023 arXiv
[185]

Badier, et al

J. Badier, et al. (Saclay-CERN-College de France-Ecole Poly-Orsay), Measurement of the K−/π− Structure Function Ratio Using the Drell-Y an Process, Phys. Lett. B 93 (1980) 354–356, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90530-4

1980 doi
[186]

Bourrely, F

C. Bourrely, F . Buccella, W.-C. Chang, J.-C. Peng, Extraction of kaon partonic distribution functions from Drell-Y an and J/ ψ production data, Phys. Lett. B 848 (2024) 138395, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138395, 2305.18117

2024
[187]

Chang, J.-C

W.-C. Chang, J.-C. Peng, S. Platchkov, T. Sawada, Constraining kaon PDFs from Drell-Y an and J/ψ production, Phys. Lett. B 855 (2024) 138820, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138820, 2402.02860

2024
[188]

Adams, et al., Letter of Intent: A New QCD facility at the M2 beam line of the CERN SPS (COMPASS++/AMBER) (2018), 1808.00848

B. Adams, et al., Letter of Intent: A New QCD facility at the M2 beam line of the CERN SPS (COMPASS++/AMBER) (2018), 1808.00848

2018 arXiv
[189]

Arrington, et al., Physics with CEBAF at 12 GeV and future opportunities, Prog

J. Arrington, et al., Physics with CEBAF at 12 GeV and future opportunities, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 127 (2022) 103985, doi: 10.1016/j. ppnp.2022.103985, 2112.00060

2022
[190]

Arrington, et al., Revealing the structure of light pseudoscalar mesons at the electron–ion collider, J

J. Arrington, et al., Revealing the structure of light pseudoscalar mesons at the electron–ion collider, J. Phys. G 48 (7) (2021) 075106, doi:10.1088/1361-6471/abf5c3, 2102.11788

2021 arXiv
[191]

E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov, V. S. Fadin, The Pomeranchuk Singularity in Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Sov. Phys. JETP 45 (1977) 199–204

1977
[192]

I. I. Balitsky, L. N. Lipatov, The Pomeranchuk Singularity in Quantum Chromodynamics, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 28 (1978) 822–829

1978
[193]

V. S. Fadin, L. N. Lipatov, BFKL pomeron in the next-to-leading approximation, Phys. Lett. B 429 (1998) 127–134, doi: 10.1016/ S0370-2693(98)00473-0, hep-ph/9802290

1998 arXiv
[194]

Ciafaloni, G

M. Ciafaloni, G. Camici, Energy scale(s) and next-to-leading BFKL equation, Phys. Lett. B 430 (1998) 349–354, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98) 00551-6, hep-ph/9803389

1998 arXiv
[195]

Kovchegov, D

Y .V. Kovchegov, D. Pitonyak, M.D. Sievert, Helicity Evolution at Small-x, JHEP 01 (2016) 072, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2016)072, 1511.06737

2016 arXiv
[196]

Kovchegov, D

Y .V. Kovchegov, D. Pitonyak, M.D. Sievert, Small- x Asymptotics of the Gluon Helicity Distribution, JHEP 10 (2017) 198, doi: 10.1007/ JHEP10(2017)198, 1706.04236

2017 arXiv
[197]

Y . V. Kovchegov, M. D. Sievert, Valence Quark Transversity at Smallx, Phys. Rev. D 99 (5) (2019) 054033, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.054033, 1808.10354

2019 arXiv
[198]

Cougoulic, Y

F . Cougoulic, Y . V. Kovchegov, A. Tarasov, Y . Tawabutr, Quark and gluon helicity evolution at small x: revised and updated, JHEP 07 (2022) 095, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)095, 2204.11898

2022 arXiv
[199]

Adamiak, N

D. Adamiak, N. Baldonado, Y . V. Kovchegov, W. Melnitchouk, D. Pitonyak, N. Sato, M. D. Sievert, A. Tarasov, Y . Tawabutr (Jefferson Lab Angular Momentum (JAM)), Global analysis of polarized DIS and SIDIS data with improved small-x helicity evolution, Phys. Rev. D 108 (11) (20...

2023 arXiv
[200]

Kovchegov, Ming Li, W

Daniel Adamiak, Nicholas Baldonado, Yuri V. Kovchegov, Ming Li, W. Melnitchouk, Daniel Pitonyak, Nobuo Sato, Matthew D. Sievert, Andrey Tarasov, Y ossathorn Tawabutr (JAM Collaboration (Small-x Analysis Group)), First study of polarized proton-proton scattering with small-x he...

2025 arXiv
[201]

Cocuzza, A

C. Cocuzza, A. Metz, D. Pitonyak, A. Prokudin, N. Sato, R. Seidl (JAM), Transversity Distributions and Tensor Charges of the Nucleon: Extraction from Dihadron Production and Their Universal Nature, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (9) (2024) 091901, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132. 091901, 2...

2024 arXiv
[202]

Cocuzza, A

C. Cocuzza, A. Metz, D. Pitonyak, A. Prokudin, N. Sato, R. Seidl (Jefferson Lab Angular Momentum (JAM)), First simultaneous global QCD analysis of dihadron fragmentation functions and transversity parton distribution functions, Phys. Rev. D 109 (3) (2024) 034024, doi:10.1103/P...

2024 arXiv
[203]

Froissart, Asymptotic behavior and subtractions in the Mandelstam representation, Phys

M. Froissart, Asymptotic behavior and subtractions in the Mandelstam representation, Phys. Rev. 123 (1961) 1053–1057, doi: 10.1103/ PhysRev.123.1053

1961
[204]

L. V. Gribov, E. M. Levin, M. G. Ryskin, Semihard Processes in QCD, Phys. Rept. 100 (1983) 1–150, doi:10.1016/0370-1573(83)90022-4

1983 doi
[205]

L. D. McLerran, R. Venugopalan, Computing quark and gluon distribution functions for very large nuclei, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 2233– 2241, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.49.2233, hep-ph/9309289

1994 arXiv
[206]

L. D. McLerran, R. Venugopalan, Gluon distribution functions for very large nuclei at small transverse momentum, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 3352–3355, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.49.3352, hep-ph/9311205

1994 arXiv
[207]

Gelis, E

F . Gelis, E. Iancu, J. Jalilian-Marian, R. Venugopalan, The Color Glass Condensate, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60 (2010) 463–489, doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.010909.083629, 1002.0333

2010
[208]

Morreale, F

A. Morreale, F . Salazar, Mining for Gluon Saturation at Colliders, Universe 7 (8) (2021) 312, doi:10.3390/universe7080312, 2108.08254

2021 arXiv
[209]

Jalilian-Marian, A

J. Jalilian-Marian, A. Kovner, A. Leonidov, H. Weigert, The BFKL equation from the Wilson renormalization group, Nucl. Phys. B 504 (1997) 415–431, doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00440-9, hep-ph/9701284

1997 arXiv
[210]

Jalilian-Marian, A

J. Jalilian-Marian, A. Kovner, A. Leonidov, H. Weigert, The Wilson renormalization group for low x physics: Towards the high density regime, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1998) 014014, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.014014, hep-ph/9706377

1998 arXiv
[211]

Heribert Weigert, Unitarity at small Bjorken x, Nucl. Phys. A 703 (2002) 823–860, doi: 10.1016/S0375-9474(01)01668-2, hep-ph/0004044

2002 arXiv
[212]

Iancu, A

E. Iancu, A. Leonidov, L. D. McLerran, Nonlinear gluon evolution in the color glass condensate. 1., Nucl. Phys. A 692 (2001) 583–645, doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(01)00642-X, hep-ph/0011241

2001 arXiv
[213]

Iancu, A

E. Iancu, A. Leonidov, L. D. McLerran, The Renormalization group equation for the color glass condensate, Phys. Lett. B 510 (2001) 133–144, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00524-X, hep-ph/0102009

2001 arXiv
[214]

Y . V. Kovchegov, Small x F(2) structure function of a nucleus including multiple pomeron exchanges, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 034008, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.034008, hep-ph/9901281

1999 arXiv
[215]

Kowalski, T

H. Kowalski, T. Lappi, R. Venugopalan, Nuclear enhancement of universal dynamics of high parton densities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 022303, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.022303, 0705.3047

2008 arXiv
[216]

Kowalski, L

H. Kowalski, L. Motyka, G. Watt, Exclusive diffractive processes at HERA within the dipole picture, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 074016, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.074016, hep-ph/0606272

2006 arXiv
[217]

Kowalski, D

H. Kowalski, D. Teaney, An Impact parameter dipole saturation model, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 114005, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.114005, hep-ph/0304189

2003 arXiv
[218]

V. A. Matveev, R. M. Muradian, A. N. Tavkhelidze, Automodellism in the large-angle elastic scattering and structure of hadrons, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 7 (1973) 719–723, doi:10.1007/BF02728133

1973 doi
[219]

S. J. Brodsky, G. R. Farrar, Scaling Laws at Large Transverse Momentum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31 (1973) 1153–1156, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 31.1153

1973 doi
[220]

S. J. Brodsky, M. Burkardt, I. Schmidt, Perturbative QCD constraints on the shape of polarized quark and gluon distributions, Nucl. Phys. B 441 (1995) 197–214, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00009-H, hep-ph/9401328

1995 arXiv
[221]

R. D. Ball, E. R. Nocera, J. Rojo, The asymptotic behaviour of parton distributions at small and large x, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (7) (2016) 383, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4240-4 , 1604.00024

2016 arXiv
[222]

E. D. Bloom, F . J. Gilman, Scaling, Duality, and the Behavior of Resonances in Inelastic electron-Proton Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25 (1970) 1140, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.25.1140

1970 doi
[223]

Accardi, M

A. Accardi, M. E. Christy, C. E. Keppel, W. Melnitchouk, P . Monaghan, J. G. Morf´ın, J. F . Owens, New parton distributions from large-x and low-Q2 data, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 034016, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.034016, 0911.2254

2010 arXiv
[224]

Accardi, L

A. Accardi, L. T. Brady, W. Melnitchouk, J. F . Owens, N. Sato, Constraints on large-x parton distributions from new weak boson production and deep-inelastic scattering data, Phys. Rev. D 93 (11) (2016) 114017, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.114017, 1602.03154

2016 arXiv
[225]

G. F . Sterman, Summation of Large Corrections to Short Distance Hadronic Cross-Sections, Nucl. Phys. B 281 (1987) 310–364, doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(87)90258-6

1987 doi
[226]

Catani, L

S. Catani, L. Trentadue, Resummation of the QCD Perturbative Series for Hard Processes, Nucl. Phys. B 327 (1989) 323–352, doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(89)90273-3

1989 doi
[227]

Aicher, A

M. Aicher, A. Sch ¨afer, W. Vogelsang, Threshold-Resummed Cross Section for the Drell-Y an Process in Pion-Nucleon Collisions at COM- PASS, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 114023, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.114023, 1104.3512

2011 arXiv
[228]

Corcella, L

G. Corcella, L. Magnea, Soft-gluon resummation effects on parton distributions, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 074017, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD. 72.074017, hep-ph/0506278

2005 arXiv
[229]

Ravndal, On the azimuthal dependence of semiinclusive, deep inelastic electroproduction cross-sections, Phys

F . Ravndal, On the azimuthal dependence of semiinclusive, deep inelastic electroproduction cross-sections, Phys. Lett. B 43 (1973) 301–303, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(73)90445-0

1973 doi
[230]

R. N. Cahn, Azimuthal Dependence in Leptoproduction: A Simple Parton Model Calculation, Phys. Lett. B 78 (1978) 269–273, doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(78)90020-5

1978 doi
[231]

J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, G. F . Sterman, Transverse Momentum Distribution in Drell-Y an Pair and W and Z Boson Production, Nucl. Phys. B 250 (1985) 199–224, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90479-1

1985 doi
[232]

D. W. Sivers, Single Spin Production Asymmetries from the Hard Scattering of Point-Like Constituents, Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 83, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.41.83

1990 doi
[233]

J. C. Collins, Fragmentation of transversely polarized quarks probed in transverse momentum distributions, Nucl. Phys. B 396 (1993) 161–182, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90262-N, hep-ph/9208213

1993 arXiv
[234]

Anselmino, M

M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, F . Murgia, Single spin asymmetry for p↑ p→πX in perturbative QCD, Phys. Lett. B 362 (1995) 164–172, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(95)01168-P, hep-ph/9503290

1995 arXiv
[235]

R. D. Tangerman, P . J. Mulders, Intrinsic transverse momentum and the polarized Drell-Y an process, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 3357–3372, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.3357, hep-ph/9403227. 42 Parton Distribution Functions and their Generalizations

1995 arXiv
[236]

Kotzinian, New quark distributions and semiinclusive electroproduction on the polarized nucleons, Nucl

A. Kotzinian, New quark distributions and semiinclusive electroproduction on the polarized nucleons, Nucl. Phys. B 441 (1995) 234–248, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00098-D, hep-ph/9412283

1995 arXiv
[237]

P . J. Mulders, R. D. Tangerman, The Complete tree level result up to order 1/Q for polarized deep inelastic leptoproduction, Nucl. Phys. B 461 (1996) 197–237, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00632-X, hep-ph/9510301

1996 arXiv
[238]

D. Boer, P . J. Mulders, Time reversal odd distribution functions in leptoproduction, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 5780–5786, doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevD.57.5780, hep-ph/9711485

1998 arXiv
[239]

Boussarie, et al., TMD Handbook (2023), 2304.03302

R. Boussarie, et al., TMD Handbook (2023), 2304.03302

2023 arXiv
[240]

D’Alesio, F

U. D’Alesio, F . Murgia, Azimuthal and Single Spin Asymmetries in Hard Scattering Processes, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 61 (2008) 394–454, doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2008.01.001, 0712.4328

2008 arXiv
[241]

Anselmino, M

M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, A. Kotzinian, F . Murgia, A. Prokudin, The Role of Cahn and sivers effects in deep inelastic scattering, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 074006, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.074006, hep-ph/0501196

2005 arXiv
[242]

D’Alesio, F

U. D’Alesio, F . Murgia, Parton intrinsic motion in inclusive particle production: Unpolarized cross sections, single spin asymmetries and the Sivers effect, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 074009, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.074009, hep-ph/0408092

2004 arXiv
[243]

Schweitzer, T

P . Schweitzer, T. Teckentrup, A. Metz, Intrinsic transverse parton momenta in deeply inelastic reactions, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 094019, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.094019, 1003.2190

2010 arXiv
[244]

G. L. Kane, J. Pumplin, W. Repko, Transverse Quark Polarization in Large pT Reactions, e+e− Jets, and Leptoproduction: A Test of QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41 (1978) 1689, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.41.1689

1978 doi
[245]

Dick, et al., Spin effects in the inclusive reactions π± + p(↑)→π±+ anything at 8 GeV/c, Phys

L. Dick, et al., Spin effects in the inclusive reactions π± + p(↑)→π±+ anything at 8 GeV/c, Phys. Lett. B 57 (1975) 93–96, doi: 10.1016/ 0370-2693(75)90252-X

1975
[246]

C. S. Lam, Wu-Ki Tung, A Parton Model Relation Sans QCD Modifications in Lepton Pair Productions, Phys. Rev. D 21 (1980) 2712, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2712

1980 doi
[247]

J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, Angular Distribution of Dileptons in High-Energy Hadron Collisions, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 2219, doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevD.16.2219

1977
[248]

Boer, Investigating the origins of transverse spin asymmetries at RHIC, Phys

D. Boer, Investigating the origins of transverse spin asymmetries at RHIC, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 014012, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.60. 014012, hep-ph/9902255

1999 arXiv
[249]

Peng, W.-C

J.-C. Peng, W.-C. Chang, R. E. McClellan, O. Teryaev, Interpretation of Angular Distributions of Z-boson Production at Colliders, Phys. Lett. B 758 (2016) 384–388, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.05.035, 1511.08932

2016 arXiv
[250]

Lambertsen, W

M. Lambertsen, W. Vogelsang, Drell-Y an lepton angular distributions in perturbative QCD, Phys. Rev. D 93 (11) (2016) 114013, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.114013, 1605.02625

2016 arXiv
[251]

Bacchetta, M

A. Bacchetta, M. Diehl, K. Goeke, A. Metz, P .J. Mulders, M. Schlegel, Semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering at small transverse mo- mentum, JHEP 02 (2007) 093, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/02/093, hep-ph/0611265

2007 arXiv
[252]

P . J. Mulders, J. Rodrigues, Transverse momentum dependence in gluon distribution and fragmentation functions, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 094021, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63.094021, hep-ph/0009343

2001 arXiv
[253]

Meissner, A

S. Meissner, A. Metz, K. Goeke, Relations between generalized and transverse momentum dependent parton distributions, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 034002, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.034002, hep-ph/0703176

2007 arXiv
[254]

A. V. Efremov, O. V. Teryaev, QCD Asymmetry and Polarized Hadron Structure Functions, Phys. Lett. B 150 (1985) 383, doi: 10.1016/ 0370-2693(85)90999-2

1985
[255]

J.-W. Qiu, G. F . Sterman, Single transverse spin asymmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 2264–2267, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.2264

1991 doi
[256]

Kouvaris, J.-W

C. Kouvaris, J.-W. Qiu, W. Vogelsang, F . Yuan, Single transverse-spin asymmetry in high transverse momentum pion production in pp collisions, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 114013, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.114013, hep-ph/0609238

2006 arXiv
[257]

Koike, T

Y . Koike, T. Tomita, Soft-fermion-pole contribution to single-spin asymmetry for pion production in pp collisions, Phys. Lett. B 675 (2009) 181–189, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.04.017, 0903.1923

2009 arXiv
[258]

Z.-B. Kang, F . Yuan, J. Zhou, Twist-three fragmentation function contribution to the single spin asymmetry in pp collisions, Phys. Lett. B 691 (2010) 243–248, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.07.003, 1002.0399

2010 arXiv
[259]

A. Metz, D. Pitonyak, Fragmentation contribution to the transverse single-spin asymmetry in proton-proton collisions, Phys. Lett. B 723 (2013) 365–370, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.05.043, 1212.5037

2013 arXiv
[260]

Anselmino, M

M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, E. Leader, S. Melis, F . Murgia, The general partonic structure for hadronic spin asymmetries, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 014020, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.014020, hep-ph/0509035

2006 arXiv
[261]

Bacchetta, M

A. Bacchetta, M. Boglione, A. Henneman, P . J. Mulders, Bounds on transverse momentum dependent distribution and fragmentation functions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 712–715, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.712, hep-ph/9912490

2000 arXiv
[262]

A. Metz, A. Vossen, Parton Fragmentation Functions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 91 (2016) 136–202, doi: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.08.003, 1607. 02521

2016 doi
[263]

Arnold, A

S. Arnold, A. Metz, M. Schlegel, Dilepton production from polarized hadron hadron collisions, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 034005, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.034005, 0809.2262

2009 arXiv
[264]

X. Liu, F . Ringer, W. Vogelsang, F . Yuan, Lepton-jet Correlations in Deep Inelastic Scattering at the Electron-Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (19) (2019) 192003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.192003, 1812.08077

2019 arXiv
[265]

D. Boer, W. J. den Dunnen, C. Pisano, M. Schlegel, W. Vogelsang, Linearly Polarized Gluons and the Higgs Transverse Momentum Distribution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 032002, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.032002, 1109.1444

2012 arXiv
[266]

M. G. Echevarria, T. Kasemets, P . J. Mulders, C. Pisano, QCD evolution of (un)polarized gluon TMDPDFs and the Higgs qT -distribution, JHEP 07 (2015) 158, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2015)158, 1502.05354

2015 arXiv
[267]

M. G. Echevarria, Proper TMD factorization for quarkonia production: pp→ηc,b as a study case, JHEP 10 (2019) 144, doi: 10.1007/ JHEP10(2019)144, 1907.06494

2019 arXiv
[268]

A. Metz, J. Zhou, Distribution of linearly polarized gluons inside a large nucleus, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 051503, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD. 84.051503, 1105.1991

2011 arXiv
[269]

Dominguez, J.-W

F . Dominguez, J.-W. Qiu, B.-W. Xiao, F . Yuan, On the linearly polarized gluon distributions in the color dipole model, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 045003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.045003, 1109.6293

2012 arXiv
[270]

J. C. Collins, Leading twist single transverse-spin asymmetries: Drell-Y an and deep inelastic scattering, Phys. Lett. B 536 (2002) 43–48, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)01819-1, hep-ph/0204004

2002 arXiv
[271]

C. J. Bomhof, P . J. Mulders, F . Pijlman, The Construction of gauge-links in arbitrary hard processes, Eur. Phys. J. C 47 (2006) 147–162, doi:10.1140/epjc/s2006-02554-2, hep-ph/0601171

2006 arXiv
[272]

Collins, J.-W

J. Collins, J.-W. Qiu, kT factorization is violated in production of high-transverse-momentum particles in hadron-hadron collisions, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 114014, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.114014, 0705.2141. Parton Distribution Functions and their Generalizations 43

2007 arXiv
[273]

T. C. Rogers, P . J. Mulders, No Generalized TMD-Factorization in Hadro-Production of High Transverse Momentum Hadrons, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 094006, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.094006, 1001.2977

2010 arXiv
[274]

Metz, Gluon-exchange in spin-dependent fragmentation, Phys

A. Metz, Gluon-exchange in spin-dependent fragmentation, Phys. Lett. B 549 (2002) 139–145, doi: 10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02899-X, hep-ph/0209054

2002 arXiv
[275]

J. C. Collins, A. Metz, Universality of soft and collinear factors in hard-scattering factorization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 252001, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.252001, hep-ph/0408249

2004 arXiv
[276]

Yuan, Collins Asymmetry at Hadron Colliders, Phys

F . Yuan, Collins Asymmetry at Hadron Colliders, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 074019, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.074019, 0801.3441

2008 arXiv
[277]

L. P . Gamberg, A. Mukherjee, P . J. Mulders, Spectral analysis of gluonic pole matrix elements for fragmentation, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 114026, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.114026, 0803.2632

2008 arXiv
[278]

Meissner, A

S. Meissner, A. Metz, Partonic pole matrix elements for fragmentation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 172003, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102. 172003, 0812.3783

2009 arXiv
[279]

J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, Back-To-Back Jets in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 193 (1981) 381, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90339-4

1981 doi
[280]

Ji, J.-P

X.-D. Ji, J.-P . Ma, F . Yuan, QCD factorization for semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering at low transverse momentum, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 034005, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.034005, hep-ph/0404183

2005 arXiv
[281]

M. A. Ebert, A. Gao, I. W. Stewart, Factorization for azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at next-to-leading power, JHEP 06 (2022) 007, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2022)007, 2112.07680

2022 arXiv
[282]

Gamberg, Z.-B

L. Gamberg, Z.-B. Kang, D. Y . Shao, J. Terry, F . Zhao, Transverse-momentum-dependent factorization at next-to-leading power (2022), 2211.13209

2022 arXiv
[283]

Rodini, A

S. Rodini, A. Vladimirov, Transverse momentum dependent factorization for SIDIS at next-to-leading power, Phys. Rev. D 110 (3) (2024) 034009, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.034009, 2306.09495

2024 arXiv
[284]

Y . L. Dokshitzer, D. Diakonov, S. I. Troian, On the Transverse Momentum Distribution of Massive Lepton Pairs, Phys. Lett. B 79 (1978) 269–272, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90240-X

1978 doi
[285]

Parisi, R

G. Parisi, R. Petronzio, Small Transverse Momentum Distributions in Hard Processes, Nucl. Phys. B 154 (1979) 427–440, doi: 10.1016/ 0550-3213(79)90040-3

1979
[286]

Ji, J.-W

X.-D. Ji, J.-W. Qiu, W. Vogelsang, F . Yuan, Single-transverse spin asymmetry in semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering, Phys. Lett. B 638 (2006) 178–186, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.05.044, hep-ph/0604128

2006 arXiv
[287]

Bacchetta, D

A. Bacchetta, D. Boer, M. Diehl, P .J. Mulders, Matches and mismatches in the descriptions of semi-inclusive processes at low and high transverse momentum, JHEP 08 (2008) 023, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/08/023, 0803.0227

2008 arXiv
[288]

Boglione, J

M. Boglione, J. O. Gonzalez Hernandez, S. Melis, A. Prokudin, A study on the interplay between perturbative QCD and CSS/TMD formalism in SIDIS processes, JHEP 02 (2015) 095, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2015)095, 1412.1383

2015 arXiv
[289]

Collins, L

J. Collins, L. Gamberg, A. Prokudin, T. C. Rogers, N. Sato, B. Wang, Relating Transverse Momentum Dependent and Collinear Factoriza- tion Theorems in a Generalized Formalism, Phys. Rev. D 94 (3) (2016) 034014, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.034014, 1605.00671

2016 arXiv
[290]

J. O. Gonzalez-Hernandez, T. Rainaldi, T. C. Rogers, Resolution to the problem of consistent large transverse momentum in TMDs, Phys. Rev. D 107 (9) (2023) 094029, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.094029, 2303.04921

2023 arXiv
[291]

J. C. Collins, What exactly is a parton density?, Acta Phys. Polon. B 34 (2003) 3103, hep-ph/0304122

2003 arXiv
[292]

S. M. Aybat, T. C. Rogers, TMD Parton Distribution and Fragmentation Functions with QCD Evolution, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 114042, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.114042, 1101.5057

2011 arXiv
[293]

Gehrmann, T

T. Gehrmann, T. Luebbert, L. L. Y ang, Calculation of the transverse parton distribution functions at next-to-next-to-leading order, JHEP 06 (2014) 155, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2014)155, 1403.6451

2014 arXiv
[294]

Kang, B.-W

Z.-B. Kang, B.-W. Xiao, F . Yuan, QCD Resummation for Single Spin Asymmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 152002, doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.107.152002, 1106.0266

2011 arXiv
[295]

S. M. Aybat, J. C. Collins, J.-W. Qiu, T. C. Rogers, The QCD Evolution of the Sivers Function, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 034043, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.034043, 1110.6428

2012 arXiv
[296]

M. A. Ebert, J. K. L. Michel, I. W. Stewart, Z. Sun, Disentangling long and short distances in momentum-space TMDs, JHEP 07 (2022) 129, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)129, 2201.07237

2022 arXiv
[297]

del Rio, A

O. del Rio, A. Prokudin, I. Scimemi, A. Vladimirov, Transverse momentum moments, Phys. Rev. D 110 (1) (2024) 016003, doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevD.110.016003, 2402.01836

2024 arXiv
[298]

Bacchetta, V

A. Bacchetta, V. Bertone, C. Bissolotti, M. Cerutti, M. Radici, S. Rodini, L. Rossi (MAP (Multi-dimensional Analyses of Partonic dis- tributions)), Neural-Network Extraction of Unpolarized Transverse-Momentum-Dependent Distributions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135 (2) (2025) 021904, doi...

2025 arXiv
[299]

Valentin Moos, Ignazio Scimemi, Alexey Vladimirov, Pia Zurita, Determination of unpolarized TMD distributions from the fit of Drell-Y an and SIDIS data at N4LL, JHEP 11 (2025) 134, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2025)134, 2503.11201

2025
[300]

Cammarota, L

J. Cammarota, L. Gamberg, Z.-B. Kang, J. A. Miller, D. Pitonyak, A. Prokudin, T. C. Rogers, N. Sato (Jefferson Lab Angular Momentum), Origin of single transverse-spin asymmetries in high-energy collisions, Phys. Rev. D 102 (5) (2020) 054002, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102. 054002, ...

2020 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Frisch, O

R. Frisch, O. Stern, ¨Uber die magnetische Ablenkung von Wasserstoffmolek¨ulen und das magnetische Moment des Protons, Z. Phys. 85 (1933) 4–16, doi:https://note.org/10.1007/BF01330773

doi:10.1007/bf01330773 1933

[2] [2]

L. W. Alvarez, F . Bloch, A Quantitative Determination of the Neutron Moment in Absolute Nuclear Magnetons, Phys. Rev. 57 (1940) 111–122, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.57.111

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.57.111 1940

[3] [3]

R. L. Workman, et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2022 (2022) 083C01, doi: 10.1093/ptep/ptac097

doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac097 2022

[4] [4]

R. W. Mcallister, R. Hofstadter, Elastic Scattering of 188-MeV Electrons From the Proton and the α Particle, Phys. Rev. 102 (1956) 851–856, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.102.851

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.102.851 1956

[5] [5]

Hofstadter, Electron scattering and nuclear structure, Rev

R. Hofstadter, Electron scattering and nuclear structure, Rev. Mod. Phys. 28 (1956) 214–254, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.28.214

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.28.214 1956

[6] [7]

Burkardt, Impact parameter dependent parton distributions and off forward parton distributions for z→ 0, Phys

M. Burkardt, Impact parameter dependent parton distributions and off forward parton distributions for z→ 0, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 071503, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.071503, hep-ph/0005108

arXiv 2000

[7] [8]

G. A. Miller, Transverse Charge Densities, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60 (2010) 1–25, doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.012809.104508, 1002.0355

arXiv 2010

[8] [9]

Punjabi, C

V. Punjabi, C. F . Perdrisat, M. K. Jones, E. J. Brash, C. E. Carlson, The Structure of the Nucleon: Elastic Electromagnetic Form Factors, Eur. Phys. J. A 51 (2015) 79, doi:10.1140/epja/i2015-15079-x, 1503.01452

arXiv 2015