REVIEW 2 cited by
How to quantify fields or textures? A guide to the scattering transform
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Extracting information from stochastic fields or textures is a ubiquitous task in science, from exploratory data analysis to classification and parameter estimation. From physics to biology, it tends to be done either through a power spectrum analysis, which is often too limited, or the use of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which require large training sets and lack interpretability. In this paper, we advocate for the use of the scattering transform (Mallat 2012), a powerful statistic which borrows mathematical ideas from CNNs but does not require any training, and is interpretable. We show that it provides a relatively compact set of summary statistics with visual interpretation and which carries most of the relevant information in a wide range of scientific applications. We present a non-technical introduction to this estimator and we argue that it can benefit data analysis, comparison to models and parameter inference in many fields of science. Interestingly, understanding the core operations of the scattering transform allows one to decipher many key aspects of the inner workings of CNNs.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Learning Balanced Field Summaries of the Large-Scale Structure with the Neural Field Scattering Transform
On simulated weak lensing maps, the Neural Field Scattering Transform with trained filters improves constraints on sigma_8 and w by 6-11% and posterior density by about 17% over the standard Wavelet Scattering Transform.
-
Multi-branch classification of diffuse cluster radio emission
DualSSN (scattering + SE dual-branch) with beam-normalised cropping and mild uv-tapering reaches ~0.86 accuracy (top-5 ensemble 0.94) on LoTSS-DR2/PSZ2 diffuse-emission labels, beating simple CNNs and fixed FoV/pixel crops.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.