Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning Post-Hoc Causal Explanations for Recommendation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.16977 v2 pith:5TGFHMT6 submitted 2020-06-30 cs.IR cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.IRcs.AIcs.LG
keywords causalexplanationsrecommendationmodelblack-boxmodelsrulespersonalized
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

State-of-the-art recommender systems have the ability to generate high-quality recommendations, but usually cannot provide intuitive explanations to humans due to the usage of black-box prediction models. The lack of transparency has highlighted the critical importance of improving the explainability of recommender systems. In this paper, we propose to extract causal rules from the user interaction history as post-hoc explanations for the black-box sequential recommendation mechanisms, whilst maintain the predictive accuracy of the recommendation model. Our approach firstly achieves counterfactual examples with the aid of a perturbation model, and then extracts personalized causal relationships for the recommendation model through a causal rule mining algorithm. Experiments are conducted on several state-of-the-art sequential recommendation models and real-world datasets to verify the performance of our model on generating causal explanations. Meanwhile, We evaluate the discovered causal explanations in terms of quality and fidelity, which show that compared with conventional association rules, causal rules can provide personalized and more effective explanations for the behavior of black-box recommendation models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Causal Structure Discovery for Error Diagnostics of Children's ASR

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Applying PC and FCI causal discovery to children's ASR shows that gender does not cause word errors, age mainly causes substitution errors, and fine-tuning does not reduce the impact of utterance length.

Pith tools