Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Social Support Detection from Social Media Texts

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.02580 v1 pith:5UALPZRN submitted 2024-11-04 cs.CL cs.AIcs.DBcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.DBcs.LG
keywords socialsupportdetectionmodelssubtaskstaskacrossdataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Social support, conveyed through a multitude of interactions and platforms such as social media, plays a pivotal role in fostering a sense of belonging, aiding resilience in the face of challenges, and enhancing overall well-being. This paper introduces Social Support Detection (SSD) as a Natural language processing (NLP) task aimed at identifying supportive interactions within online communities. The study presents the task of Social Support Detection (SSD) in three subtasks: two binary classification tasks and one multiclass task, with labels detailed in the dataset section. We conducted experiments on a dataset comprising 10,000 YouTube comments. Traditional machine learning models were employed, utilizing various feature combinations that encompass linguistic, psycholinguistic, emotional, and sentiment information. Additionally, we experimented with neural network-based models using various word embeddings to enhance the performance of our models across these subtasks.The results reveal a prevalence of group-oriented support in online dialogues, reflecting broader societal patterns. The findings demonstrate the effectiveness of integrating psycholinguistic, emotional, and sentiment features with n-grams in detecting social support and distinguishing whether it is directed toward an individual or a group. The best results for different subtasks across all experiments range from 0.72 to 0.82.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Improving statistical learning methods via features selection without replacement sampling and random projection

    q-bio.QM 2025-05 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A routine feature-selection and random-subspace pipeline for brain cancer classification reports a 96% score, but the paper's own tables show 93.8% and the method is a known technique.

Pith tools