Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

MS2: Multi-Document Summarization of Medical Studies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.06486 v3 pith:5YV6XXMN submitted 2021-04-13 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords summarizationassessdatasetmedicalmulti-documentstudiesavailableliterature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

To assess the effectiveness of any medical intervention, researchers must conduct a time-intensive and highly manual literature review. NLP systems can help to automate or assist in parts of this expensive process. In support of this goal, we release MS^2 (Multi-Document Summarization of Medical Studies), a dataset of over 470k documents and 20k summaries derived from the scientific literature. This dataset facilitates the development of systems that can assess and aggregate contradictory evidence across multiple studies, and is the first large-scale, publicly available multi-document summarization dataset in the biomedical domain. We experiment with a summarization system based on BART, with promising early results. We formulate our summarization inputs and targets in both free text and structured forms and modify a recently proposed metric to assess the quality of our system's generated summaries. Data and models are available at https://github.com/allenai/ms2

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Machine Understanding of Scientific Language

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The thesis defines and evaluates tasks and datasets for automatic fact checking, cite-worthiness, exaggeration detection, and information change measurement in science communication, culminating in SPICED, a cross-med...

  2. RAG for Geoscience: What We Expect, Gaps and Opportunities

    cs.ET 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Geoscience AI needs a new RAG paradigm that retrieves multimodal Earth data, reasons under physical constraints, generates machine-readable artifacts, and verifies outputs against models and sensors.

  3. A Comprehensive Survey of Electronic Health Record Modeling: From Deep Learning Approaches to Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that taxonomizes EHR modeling research into data-centric, architectural, learning-focused, multimodal, and LLM-based categories, with datasets and metrics.

  4. AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes AI-for-research work into five tasks, comprehension, survey, discovery, writing, and peer review, and compiles associated tools and benchmarks.

  5. Evolutionary Perspectives on the Evaluation of LLM-Based AI Agents: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that classifies AI agent evaluation benchmarks along environment and capability axes, and proposes five traits that distinguish agents from chatbots.

Pith tools