REVIEW
Classification of the Chess Endgame problem using Logistic Regression, Decision Trees, and Neural Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Classification of the Chess Endgame problem using Logistic Regression, Decision Trees, and Neural Networks
read the original abstract
In this study we worked on the classification of the Chess Endgame problem using different algorithms like logistic regression, decision trees and neural networks. Our experiments indicates that the Neural Networks provides the best accuracy (85%) then the decision trees (79%). We did these experiments using Microsoft Azure Machine Learning as a case-study on using Visual Programming in classification. Our experiments demonstrates that this tool is powerful and save a lot of time, also it could be improved with more features that increase the usability and reduce the learning curve. We also developed an application for dataset visualization using a new programming language called Ring, our experiments demonstrates that this language have simple design like Python while integrates RAD tools like Visual Basic which is good for GUI development in the open-source world
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.