Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 52 references

Low-energy, ultrafast spin reorientation at competing hybrid interfaces with tunable operating temperature

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A magnetic easy axis can be flipped by a 50 K warming, a small current, or a 0.12 mJ/cm² laser pulse.

desk verdict The static spin-reorientation transition in Pt/Co/molecular stacks is well supported and tunable, but the ultrafast optical 'switch' claim is oversold and likely needs reframing as a transient precessional excursion. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.21300 v1 pith:64XD7AGP submitted 2025-05-27 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Servet Ozdemir , Matthew Rogers , Jaka Strohsack , Hari Babu Vasili , Manuel Valvidares , Thahabh Haddadi , Parvathy Harikumar , David ORegan
show 7 more authors
Gilberto Teobaldi Timothy Moorsom Mannan Ali Gavin Burnell B J Hickey Tomaz Mertelj Oscar Cespedes
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Magnetismspin-reorientationtransitionultrafastswitchingcurrentinducedphasemolecularspinterfaceperpendicularmagneticanisotropyheat-assistedrecording
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that a thin cobalt film sandwiched between a platinum underlayer and a layer of organic molecules can be made to change its magnetic easy axis from in-plane to out-of-plane simply by warming it through a narrow temperature window. The low-temperature in-plane state comes from hybridisation between Co and the molecules' hexagonal-pentagonal carbon units, while the high-temperature out-of-plane state comes from the platinum-cobalt interface anisotropy. The transition temperature can be moved between about 245 K and above 300 K by changing the Co thickness from 1.4 to 1.9 nm or by choosing different molecules such as C60, H2Pc, CuPc, and CoPc. Near the transition, the easy-axis flip can be triggered electrically at a current density near $10^5$ A/cm$^2$ or optically at a fluence as low as 0.12 mJ/cm$^2$. These numbers are one to two orders of magnitude below those of established heat-assisted or all-optical switching schemes, so the paper argues the effect is a viable low-power mechanism for heat-assisted memory.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the competition between two interfacial anisotropies with opposite temperature dependencies. The lower Pt/Co interface contributes a perpendicular anisotropy from spin-orbit coupling that dominates above the transition temperature, while the upper metallo-molecular interface generates an in-plane anisotropy through d-pi orbital hybridisation between Co and the hexagonal-pentagonal carbon units of the molecules, which weakens at higher temperatures as molecular vibrations, rotation, and repositioning reduce coupling. The paper identifies the common structural motif across C60, H2Pc, CuPc, and CoPc as four hexagon-pentagon units per roughly 1.54 nm$^2$, linking the effect to the same hybridisation units in all molecules. The transition temperature is set by how strongly the molecular overlayer couples, tunable by Co thickness and molecule choice, and the sharp temperature window is phenomenologically fit with a logistic remanence function that gives an activation energy on the order of 18 meV.

What would settle it

Perform element-specific time-resolved X-ray magnetic dichroism on Pt/Co(1.4 nm)/H2Pc at 250 K under a 0.12 mJ/cm$^2$ femtosecond pump: if the out-of-plane Co moment does not rise on a tens-of-picoseconds timescale while the Kerr transient stays positive, the optical reorientation interpretation is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a spin reorientation transition occurs at the interface between a high-magnetisation 3d ferromagnet and an organic overlayer because two competing anisotropies have opposite temperature dependences: the Pt/Co interface generates perpendicular magnetic anisotropy that dominates at high temperature, while molecule-induced in-plane anisotropy from d-pi hybridisation dominates at low temperature. The paper demonstrates this in Pt/Co stacks with C60, metal-free phthalocyanine, and copper or cobalt phthalocyanines, with the easy axis switching from planar to perpendicular as temperature rises through a window around room temperature. X-ray magnetic circular dichroism shows Co2+ charge transfer at the interface and a planar magnetisation onset below 200 K whose temperature dependence follows a $(T-T_C)^{1/2}$ scaling, and time-resolved Kerr measurements show a positive out-of-plane magnetisation transient with roughly 40 ps rise time after a femtosecond laser pulse. The authors conclude that the easy axis can be rotated by local heating, requiring only about 50 K of temperature change, and that the switching fluence and current density are an order of magnitude lower than those used in heat-assisted magnetic recording or all-optical helicity-independent switching.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the positive signal in the time-resolved magneto-optical measurement really is the magnetization pointing out of plane, not a precession wobble, a change in Kerr ellipticity, or thermal lensing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Easy-axis switching requires only a local temperature change of about 50 K, so the transition can be used for heat-assisted writing without approaching the Curie temperature.
  • The operating temperature is tunable between about 245 K and above 300 K by choosing Co thickness from 1.4 to 1.9 nm or by selecting the molecular overlayer.
  • Electrical switching at $10^5$ A/cm$^2$ is an order of magnitude lower than current-induced FeRh transitions and proposed spin-reorientation-assisted spin-transfer-torque devices.
  • Optical switching at 0.12 to 0.5 mJ/cm$^2$ occurs on a sub-300 ps timescale, with fluences an order of magnitude lower than heat-assisted magnetic recording or all-optical helicity-independent switching.
  • Because the same hexagon-pentagon carbon motif appears in fullerenes and phthalocyanines, the effect should transfer to other ferromagnet/molecule combinations with similar carbon units.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This interpretation predicts that the same positive transient should appear in other Pt/Co/molecule stacks with different transition temperatures, and its amplitude should peak near the transition; that is directly testable with time-resolved magneto-optical Kerr measurements.
  • If electrical switching is purely Joule heating, then a pulsed current measurement with simultaneous resistive thermometry should show the easy-axis jump only when the local temperature crosses the transition temperature; a jump before that would imply an additional non-thermal spin torque contribution.
  • The logistic remanence model suggests a two-well anisotropy picture, from which one could derive a Landau-type free energy for the spin reorientation transition and predict critical thickness and molecule combinations beyond the ones measured.
  • The proposed correlated spin-lattice order at the interface could be probed directly with spin-polarized scanning tunnelling microscopy or neutron scattering as a function of temperature, which the paper does not report.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports a spin reorientation transition (SRT) in Pt/Co/molecular heterostructures, where the easy axis changes from in-plane at low temperatures to perpendicular at high temperatures. The transition temperature is shown to depend on Co thickness and on the molecular overlayer (C60, H2Pc, CoPc, CuPc), and the authors demonstrate electrical control by Joule heating at about 10^5 A/cm^2 and a putative optical control by femtosecond laser pulses at fluences down to 0.12 mJ/cm^2. The static SRT is supported by SQUID magnetometry, anisotropic magnetoresistance, and XMCD measurements with appropriate references, and the XMCD analysis includes forward crystal-field multiplet simulations. The ultrafast optical claim rests on the positive part of polar TR-MOKE transients measured near the transition temperature, which the authors interpret as a laser-induced increase of out-of-plane magnetisation.

Significance. If the static SRT is real, it is a valuable result: a molecule-dependent, thickness-tunable easy-axis transition near room temperature, switchable by current densities an order of magnitude lower than in FeRh or proposed STT devices, would be of clear interest for heat-assisted magnetic technologies. The equilibrium transition is supported by multiple independent techniques and by control samples without molecules, and the XMCD forward modelling is a strength. However, the headline optical 'switching' claim is not yet established: the supporting TR-MOKE data show a field-dependent, sub-300 ps transient that has not been shown to persist at zero field, and the paper's own Figure S22 caption states that the rise time decreases with increasing out-of-plane field, indicating precession dynamics. The manuscript is therefore scientifically promising but requires substantial revision of the claims and, ideally, additional measurements before the ultrafast-switching conclusion can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.4 and Figure S22] The interpretation of the positive TR-MOKE transient as a laser-induced spin reorientation is directly contradicted by the paper's own Supporting Information, which states that 'the risetime is decreasing with increasing OOP magnetic field indicating precession dynamics.' Near the SRT the perpendicular anisotropy is weak, so a photo-induced temperature excursion can allow a field-assisted precessional canting of the magnetisation toward the applied out-of-plane field; such a transient would look exactly like the observed positive Kerr signal without any reorientation of the easy axis. Please provide data at zero applied field or a quantitative separation of the precession contribution, or revise the claim to a transient out-of-plane excursion rather than a spin reorientation.
  2. [Section 2.4, Figure 4a and abstract] The word 'switched' in the abstract and conclusion exceeds what is demonstrated. The positive transient decays with a sub-300 ps time constant, and no data are shown at delays beyond about 300 ps or at zero field to show that a new magnetization orientation persists after the pump pulse. A transient excursion that relaxes back to the initial state is not a switch. The authors should either demonstrate a persistent optically induced easy-axis change (for example, by delayed probing or two-pulse experiments) or change the terminology throughout to 'transient out-of-plane excursion' and adjust the abstract accordingly.
  3. [Section 2.3 and Figure 3c] The claim of a correlated spin-lattice phase transition at the molecular interface rests on scaling fits of the XMCD-derived moments to (T-TC)^1/2 and tanh(1.74 sqrt(TC/T - 1)), but TC is taken from the same dataset and the fits are not compared with competing forms, nor are uncertainties or fit residuals reported. As presented, the fits are descriptive rather than evidence for a specific universality class. The static SRT does not depend on this identification, but the physical-mechanism claim in Section 3 should be softened or supported by additional, independent order-parameter data (e.g., specific heat or a clear critical exponent determination with a documented fitting procedure).
  4. [Section 2.2] The manuscript alternates between 'onset' temperatures (200-285 K in Figure 1e) and 'switching temperatures' defined as the 50% point of the logistic remanence model (245 K or higher in Table S2 and the text). These are different observables, and the current wording makes it difficult to compare samples and to assess the width of the transition window. Please define both quantities explicitly and report them consistently for all samples.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'rewrite the storage by changing the magnetic moment' is grammatically awkward; the sentence should be rewritten for clarity, and the symbol '10^5' is corrupted in the rendered text.
  2. [Supporting Note 1] Please check the sign convention in the logistic function: the text first writes exp(-k(T-TS)) and then rewrites it as exp(-(T-TS)/Tw); with the latter form the 50% crossing occurs at T=TS only if the numerator is -(T-TS)/Tw, but the sign should be stated explicitly.
  3. [Figure 4d] The normalization of the transient OOP magnetisation to the 'static saturated value' is not fully specified; clarify whether the static value is measured at the same temperature and applied field as the transient, or at saturation in a higher field.
  4. [Figure S22 caption] The caption lists the fluence as '0.12 mJ/m2' while the text and Figure 4 use mJ/cm2; the units should be made consistent.
  5. [Section 2.4] The phrase 'onset OOP magnetisation' is used where 'peak transient OOP magnetisation' or 'maximum OOP excursion' seems intended; consider using a consistent term.
  6. [Methods, XMCD] The sum-rule analysis should state the assumed number of 3d holes for Co and the uncertainty propagation from background subtraction more explicitly, since the absolute spin and orbital moments in Figure 3 depend on these choices.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the spin-reorientation transition, its tunability, and the current/optical control are experimentally measured and independently benchmarked; the phenomenological fits are descriptive, not used to manufacture predictions.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are supported by direct experimental measurements: magnetometry hysteresis and remanence curves (Figures 1d-f, 2a), AMR transport (Figures 2b-c), XAS/XMCD sum-rule analyses (Figure 3), and TR-MOKE transients (Figure 4). The spin-reorientation transition is evidenced by a crossover in measured in-plane remanence and by XMCD-extracted moments in grazing versus normal incidence; this crossover is not derived from a fitted parameter but observed in multiple independent probes. The phenomenological logistic fit (Supporting Note 1) is used to parameterise the transition temperature Ts from the measured remanence curves, and the activation energy of ~18 meV is a descriptive fit, not an input used to predict the transition. The XMCD analysis uses crystal-field multiplet simulations that are compared to measured spectra; the 15% Co2+/85% Co composition is fitted to the XMCD line shape, but the conclusion of interfacial charge transfer is corroborated by the absence of Co2+ in reference samples and by the authors' DFT calculations, and it is not used to force the spin-reorientation result. The ultrafast optical claim depends on interpreting the positive polar TR-MOKE transient as an increase of out-of-plane magnetisation; whether this is a true easy-axis switch or a field-assisted precessional excursion is a scientific interpretation concern, not a circularity, because the transient is a measured observable and no equation reduces the conclusion to its input. Some prior work by the same authors is cited for interfacial hybridisation and hexagon-pentagon chemistry, but those citations are supporting context; the load-bearing evidence for the reported transition is the new experimental data presented here. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem from the authors is invoked, and no central result is defined in terms of itself.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles or forces are introduced. The central experiment rests on standard measurement techniques, but several quantitative parameters are fitted to the data. The main speculative element is the correlated spin lattice mechanism, which is proposed but not directly observed.

free parameters (4)
  • Activation energy E_a in thermally activated remanence model = 18 meV
    Fitted to the in-plane remanence curve of Pt/Co(1.5 nm)/H2Pc using (1-exp(-E_a/k_B T)) times a logistic function (Supporting Note 1, Fig 2a inset).
  • Transition temperature T_S and window T_w in logistic remanence model = T_S from 245 K to above 300 K depending on sample; T_w not tabulated
    The logistic fit parameters define the spin reorientation onset for each sample (Table S2); they are fitted to the measured remanence, not independently predicted.
  • Co2+ fraction in XMCD spectral simulation = 15% Co2+, 10Dq = 0 eV
    CTM4XAS simulations matching the XAS/XMCD spectra require a 15% Co2+ component with 10Dq = 0 eV in pristine Co/H2Pc (Methods, Fig S15).
  • Scaling fit parameters in Fig 3c = T_C = 200 K; tanh prefactor 1.74
    The (T-T_C)^1/2 and tanh(1.74 sqrt(T_C/T - 1)) curves are fitted to the temperature dependence of extracted moments, with T_C set to the onset at 200 K.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption XMCD sum rules convert integrated dichroism to spin and orbital moments.
    Standard analysis from Chen et al. (ref 31); used in Section 2.3 to extract moments.
  • domain assumption Crystal field multiplet simulation reproduces Co2+ spectra.
    CTM4XAS with chosen parameters is assumed to identify Co2+ and distinguish it from oxidation (Methods, Fig S15-S16).
  • domain assumption Molecule-induced in-plane anisotropy arises from d-pi hybridization and charge transfer at the interface.
    Supported by DFT (Fig S2-S3, Table S1) and reference samples, but the microscopic mechanism is assumed, not directly measured.
  • domain assumption Polar TR-MOKE signal is proportional to out-of-plane magnetization during pump-probe delay.
    Needed to interpret the positive transient in Fig 4a as an optically induced spin reorientation; no independent polarization/ellipsometry disentanglement is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper Molecular thermal motion reduces coupling at high temperature, letting Pt/Co PMA dominate.
    Suggested in Section 2.2 to explain why PMA returns above T_S; no direct measurement of molecular dynamics is presented.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Low-energy, ultrafast spin reorientation at competing hybrid interfaces with tunable operating temperature." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/64XD7AGP

@misc{pith2026250521300,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Low-energy, ultrafast spin reorientation at competing hybrid interfaces with tunable operating temperature},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/64XD7AGP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.21300}
}
read the original abstract

Information can be stored in magnetic materials by encoding with the direction of the magnetic moment of elements. A figure of merit for these systems is the energy needed to change the information rewrite the storage by changing the magnetic moment. Organic molecules offer a playground to manipulate spin order, with metallo molecular interfaces being a promising direction for sustainable devices. Here, we demonstrate a spin reorientation transition in molecular interfaces of high magnetisation 3d ferromagnetic films due to a competition between a perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) induced by a heavy metal that dominates at high temperatures, and an in-plane anisotropy generated by molecular coupling at low temperatures. The transition can be tuned around room temperature by varying the ferromagnet thickness (1.4 to 1.9 nm) or the choice of molecular overlayer, with the organic molecules being C60, hydrogen and metal (Cu, Co) phthalocyanines. Near the transition temperature, the magnetisation easy axis can be switched with a small energy input, either electrically with a current density of 10^5 A per cm2, or optically by a fs laser pulse of fluence as low as 0.12 mJ per cm2, suggesting heat assisted technology applications. Magnetic dichroism measurements point toward a phase transition at the organic interface being responsible for the spin reorientation transition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.21300 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Cobalt thickness dependence of the spin reorientation transition and its electrical current control. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The effect has been widely studied since the 1940s[1] for both rare earth systems[2] and magnetic semiconductors[3]

    Introduction Conventional spin reorientation transitions take place when the easy axis of magnetization rotates with respect to the crystallographic axes due to changes in temperature, pressure or magnetic field. The effect has been widely studied since the 1940s[1] for both rare earth systems[2] and magnetic semiconductors[3]. The exponential increase of...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Results and Discussion 2.1. Universal magnetic hardening and spin-reorientation transition at magneto-molecular interfaces A comparative study involving molecules of different geometric and magnetic properties is needed to understand the magnetic interactions at the interface[13–15], see Figure 1a-c. Although different crystal structures are possible, Pht...

    work page

  3. [3]

    The transition onset and window are controlled by the ferromagnet thickness and molecule used

    Conclusion In conclusion, a low-energy, ultrafast unconventional spin-reorientation transition has been observed near room temperature in Pt/Co/molecular heterostructures with competing magnetic interactions. The transition onset and window are controlled by the ferromagnet thickness and molecule used. For appropriate ferromagnetic film thickness range, t...

    work page

  4. [4]

    The (111) textured Pt layers of ≈4 nm thickness (Figure S24, Supporting Information, shows the XRD peak) were grown at 500 °C with e-beam evaporation at a growth rate of ≈0.1Ȧ/s

    Experimental Section Thin film growth and characterisation: Thin-film structures were grown on 0.65 mm thick c-plane sapphire films. The (111) textured Pt layers of ≈4 nm thickness (Figure S24, Supporting Information, shows the XRD peak) were grown at 500 °C with e-beam evaporation at a growth rate of ≈0.1Ȧ/s. The substrate was than cooled down to room te...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Horner, C

    H. Horner, C. M. Varma, Phys Rev Lett 1968, 20, 845

    work page 1968

  6. [6]

    K. P . Belov, A. K. Zvezdin, A. M. Kadomtseva, R. Z. Levitin, Soviet Physics Uspekhi 1976, 19, 574

    work page 1976

  7. [7]

    K.-Y . Wang, M. Sawicki, K. W. Edmonds, R. P . Campion, S. Maat, C. T. Foxon, B. L. Gallagher, T. Dietl, Phys Rev Lett 2005, 95, 217204

    work page 2005

  8. [8]

    A. M. Ionescu, in 2017 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), IEEE, 2017, pp. 1.2.1-1.2.8

    work page 2017

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Brataas, A

    A. Brataas, A. D. Kent, H. Ohno, Nat Mater 2012, 11, 372

    2012

  2. [10]

    Manchon, J

    A. Manchon, J. Železný, I. M. Miron, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Thiaville, K. Garello, P . Gambardella, Rev Mod Phys 2019, 91, 035004

    2019

  3. [11]

    M. H. Kryder, E. C. Gage, T. W. McDaniel, W. A. Challener, R. E. Rottmayer, Ganping Ju, Yiao-Tee Hsia, M. F. Erden, Proceedings of the IEEE 2008, 96, 1810

    2008

  4. [12]

    Chiba, M

    D. Chiba, M. Sawicki, Y . Nishitani, Y . Nakatani, F. Matsukura, H. Ohno, Nature 2008, 455, 515

    2008

  5. [13]

    K. V. Raman, A. M. Kamerbeek, A. Mukherjee, N. Atodiresei, T. K. Sen, P . Lazić, V. Caciuc, R. Michel, D. Stalke, S. K. Mandal, S. Blügel, M. Münzenberg, J. S. Moodera, Nature 2013, 493, 509

    2013

  6. [14]

    Al Ma’Mari, T

    F. Al Ma’Mari, T. Moorsom, G. Teobaldi, W. Deacon, T. Prokscha, H. Luetkens, S. Lee, G. E. Sterbinsky, D. A. Arena, D. A. Maclaren, M. Flokstra, M. Ali, M. C. Wheeler, G. Burnell, B. J. Hickey, O. Cespedes, Nature 2015, 524, 69

    2015

  7. [15]

    Callsen, V

    M. Callsen, V. Caciuc, N. Kiselev, N. Atodiresei, S. Blügel, Phys Rev Lett 2013, 111, 106805

    2013

  8. [16]

    Moorsom, M

    T. Moorsom, M. Wheeler, T. Mohd Khan, F. Al Ma’Mari, C. Kinane, S. Langridge, D. Ciudad, A. Bedoya-Pinto, L. Hueso, G. Teobaldi, V. K. Lazarov, D. Gilks, G. Burnell, B. J. Hickey, O. Cespedes, Phys Rev B 2014, 90, 125311

    2014

  9. [17]

    Gruber, F

    M. Gruber, F. Ibrahim, S. Boukari, H. Isshiki, L. Joly, M. Peter, M. Studniarek, V. Da Costa, H. Jabbar, V. Davesne, U. Halisdemir, J. Chen, J. Arabski, E. Otero, F. Choueikani, K. Chen, P . Ohresser, W. Wulfhekel, F. Scheurer, W. Weber, M. Alouani, E. Beaurepaire, M. Bowen, N...

    2015

  10. [18]

    Boukari, H

    S. Boukari, H. Jabbar, F. Schleicher, M. Gruber, G. Avedissian, J. Arabski, V. Da Costa, G. Schmerber, P . Rengasamy, B. Vileno, W. Weber, M. Bowen, E. Beaurepaire, Nano Lett 2018, 18, 4659

    2018

  11. [19]

    Moorsom, S

    T. Moorsom, S. Alghamdi, S. Stansill, E. Poli, G. Teobaldi, M. Beg, H. Fangohr, M. Rogers, Z. Aslam, M. Ali, B. J. Hickey, O. Cespedes, Phys Rev B 2020, 101, 1

    2020

  12. [20]

    S. Yim, S. Heutz, T. S. Jones, Phys Rev B 2003, 67, 165308

    2003

  13. [21]

    Tsukahara, S

    N. Tsukahara, S. Shiraki, S. Itou, N. Ohta, N. Takagi, M. Kawai, Phys Rev Lett 2011, 106, 187201

    2011

  14. [22]

    Tao, Y .-B

    M.-L. Tao, Y .-B. Tu, K. Sun, Y . Zhang, X. Zhang, Z.-B. Li, S.-J. Hao, H.-F. Xiao, J. Ye, J.-Z. Wang, J Phys D Appl Phys 2016, 49, 015307

    2016

  15. [23]

    Tuerhong, F

    R. Tuerhong, F. Ngassam, S. Watanabe, J. Onoe, M. Alouani, J. P . Bucher, Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 20046

    2018

  16. [24]

    Serri, W

    M. Serri, W. Wu, L. R. Fleet, N. M. Harrison, C. F. Hirjibehedin, C. W. M. Kay, A. J. Fisher, G. Aeppli, S. Heutz, Nat Commun 2014, 5, 1

    2014

  17. [25]

    Heutz, C

    S. Heutz, C. Mitra, W. Wu, A. J. Fisher, A. Kerridge, M. Stoneham, T. H. Harker, J. Gardener, H. H. Tseng, T. S. Jones, C. Renner, G. Aeppli, Advanced Materials 2007, 19, 3618

    2007

  18. [26]

    Katcko, E

    K. Katcko, E. Urbain, F. Ngassam, L. Kandpal, B. Chowrira, F. Schleicher, U. Halisdemir, D. Wang, T. Scherer, D. Mertz, B. Leconte, N. Beyer, D. Spor, P . Panissod, A. Boulard, J. Arabski, C. Kieber, E. Sternitzky, V. Da Costa, M. Hehn, F. Montaigne, A. Bahouka, W. Weber, E. B...

    2021

  19. [27]

    Nakajima, T

    N. Nakajima, T. Koide, T. Shidara, H. Miyauchi, H. Fukutani, A. Fujimori, K. Iio, T. Katayama, M. Nývlt, Y . Suzuki, Phys Rev Lett 1998, 81, 5229

    1998

  20. [28]

    Sanvito, Nat Phys 2010, 6, 562

    S. Sanvito, Nat Phys 2010, 6, 562

    2010

  21. [29]

    Djeghloul, M

    F. Djeghloul, M. Gruber, E. Urbain, D. Xenioti, L. Joly, S. Boukari, J. Arabski, H. Bulou, F. Scheurer, F. Bertran, P . Le Fèvre, A. Taleb-Ibrahimi, W. Wulfhekel, G. Garreau, S. Hajjar- Garreau, P . Wetzel, M. Alouani, E. Beaurepaire, M. Bowen, W. Weber, Journal of Physical Ch...

    2016

  22. [30]

    Atodiresei, J

    N. Atodiresei, J. Brede, P . Lazić, V. Caciuc, G. Hoffmann, R. Wiesendanger, S. Blügel, Phys Rev Lett 2010, 105, 066601

    2010

  23. [31]

    Bairagi, A

    K. Bairagi, A. Bellec, V. Repain, C. Fourmental, C. Chacon, Y . Girard, J. Lagoute, S. Rousset, L. Le Laurent, A. Smogunov, C. Barreteau, Phys Rev B 2018, 98, 085432

    2018

  24. [32]

    Y . Deng, Z. Xiang, B. Lei, K. Zhu, H. Mu, W. Zhuo, X. Hua, M. Wang, Z. Wang, G. Wang, M. Tian, X. Chen, Nano Lett 2022, 22, 9839

    2022

  25. [33]

    M. Song, Y . Xu, J. OuYang, Y . Zhang, D. Liu, X. Yang, X. Zou, L. You, Mater Des 2016, 92, 1046

    2016

  26. [34]

    H. Wu, H. Zhang, B. Wang, F. Groß, C.-Y . Yang, G. Li, C. Guo, H. He, K. Wong, D. Wu, X. Han, C.- H. Lai, J. Gräfe, R. Cheng, K. L. Wang, Nat Commun 2022, 13, 1629

    2022

  27. [35]

    C. T. Chen, Y . U. Idzerda, H.-J. Lin, N. V. Smith, G. Meigs, E. Chaban, G. H. Ho, E. Pellegrin, F. Sette, Phys Rev Lett 1995, 75, 152

    1995

  28. [36]

    V. Yu. Irkhin, M. I. Katsnelson, Phys Rev B 2000, 61, 14640

    2000

  29. [37]

    V. Y . Irkhin, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 2020, 32, 125601

    2020

  30. [38]

    Girovsky, J

    J. Girovsky, J. Nowakowski, Md. E. Ali, M. Baljozovic, H. R. Rossmann, T. Nijs, E. A. Aeby, S. Nowakowska, D. Siewert, G. Srivastava, C. Wäckerlin, J. Dreiser, S. Decurtins, S.-X. Liu, P . M. Oppeneer, T. A. Jung, N. Ballav, Nat Commun 2017, 8, 15388

    2017

  31. [39]

    W. A. Challener, C. Peng, A. V. Itagi, D. Karns, W. Peng, Y . Peng, X. Yang, X. Zhu, N. J. Gokemeijer, Y . T. Hsia, G. Ju, R. E. Rottmayer, M. A. Seigler, E. C. Gage, Nat Photonics 2009, 3, 220

    2009

  32. [40]

    R. E. Rottmayer, S. Batra, D. Buechel, W. A. Challener, J. Hohlfeld, Y . Kubota, L. Li, B. Lu, C. Mihalcea, K. Mountfield, K. Pelhos, C. Peng, T. Rausch, M. A. Seigler, D. Weller, X. M. Yang, IEEE Trans Magn 2006, 42, 2417

    2006

  33. [41]

    Y . Xu, S. Mangin, J Magn Magn Mater 2022, 564, 170169

    2022

  34. [42]

    T. A. Ostler, J. Barker, R. F. L. Evans, R. W. Chantrell, U. Atxitia, O. Chubykalo-Fesenko, S. El Moussaoui, L. Le Guyader, E. Mengotti, L. J. Heyderman, F. Nolting, A. Tsukamoto, A. Itoh, D. Afanasiev, B. A. Ivanov, A. M. Kalashnikova, K. Vahaplar, J. Mentink, A. Kirilyuk, Th...

    2012

  35. [43]

    Banerjee, N

    C. Banerjee, N. Teichert, K. E. Siewierska, Z. Gercsi, G. Y . P . Atcheson, P . Stamenov, K. Rode, J. M. D. Coey, J. Besbas, Nat Commun 2020, 11, 4444

    2020

  36. [44]

    Stupakiewicz, K

    A. Stupakiewicz, K. Szerenos, D. Afanasiev, A. Kirilyuk, A. V. Kimel, Nature 2017, 542, 71

    2017

  37. [45]

    J. Wei, B. Zhang, M. Hehn, W. Zhang, G. Malinowski, Y . Xu, W. Zhao, S. Mangin, Phys Rev Appl 2021, 15, 054065

    2021

  38. [46]

    L. A. Shelukhin, R. R. Gareev, V. Zbarsky, J. Walowski, M. Münzenberg, N. A. Pertsev, A. M. Kalashnikova, Nanoscale 2022, 14, 8153

    2022

  39. [47]

    Atxabal, M

    A. Atxabal, M. Ribeiro, S. Parui, L. Urreta, E. Sagasta, X. Sun, R. Llopis, F. Casanova, L. E. Hueso, Nat Commun 2016, 7, 13751

    2016

  40. [48]

    Tamai, A

    A. Tamai, A. P . Seitsonen, F. Baumberger, M. Hengsberger, Z. X. Shen, T. Greber, J. Osterwalder, Phys Rev B Condens Matter Mater Phys 2008, 77, 1

    2008

  41. [49]

    Rogers, A

    M. Rogers, A. Walton, M. G. Flokstra, F. Al Ma’Mari, R. Stewart, S. L. Lee, T. Prokscha, A. J. Caruana, C. J. Kinane, S. Langridge, H. Bradshaw, T. Moorsom, M. Ali, G. Burnell, B. J. Hickey, O. Cespedes, Commun Phys 2021, 4, 69

    2021

  42. [50]

    Moorsom, M

    T. Moorsom, M. Rogers, I. Scivetti, S. Bandaru, G. Teobaldi, M. Valvidares, M. Flokstra, S. Lee, R. Stewart, T. Prokscha, P . Gargiani, N. Alosaimi, G. Stefanou, M. Ali, F. Al Ma’Mari, G. Burnell, B. J. Hickey, O. Cespedes, Sci Adv 2020, 6, 1

    2020

  43. [51]

    Barla, J

    A. Barla, J. Nicolás, D. Cocco, S. M. Valvidares, J. Herrero-Martín, P . Gargiani, J. Moldes, C. Ruget, E. Pellegrin, S. Ferrer, J Synchrotron Radiat 2016, 23, 1507

    2016

  44. [52]

    Stavitski, F

    E. Stavitski, F. M. F. de Groot, Micron 2010, 41, 687. Supporting Information Low-energy, ultrafast spin reorientation at competing hybrid interfaces with tunable operating temperature Servet Ozdemir*, Matthew Rogers, Jaka Strohsack, Hari Babu Vasili, Manuel Valvidares, Thahab...

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.