Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 4 cited by

The Higher Structure of Symmetries of Axion-Maxwell Theory

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The non-invertible electric 1-form symmetry of 4d axion-Maxwell theory has an explicitly computable associator, and in the worked example it is a winding condensate.

desk verdict First explicit F-symbol for a non-invertible 1-form symmetry in 4d; solid worked example, but the unproven frame-anomaly assumption makes it conditional rather than a clean accept. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.09685 v2 pith:65VZBJTB submitted 2024-11-14 hep-th math-phmath.CTmath.MP

Michele Del Zotto , Matteo Dell'Acqua , Elias Riedel G{aa}rding This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath-phmath.CTmath.MP
keywords axion-Maxwelltheorygeneralizedsymmetriesnon-invertiblesymmetryhigherstructureF-symbols1-formtopologicaldefectscondensation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper works out, explicitly, a piece of the higher structure of the symmetries of four-dimensional axion-Maxwell theory: the data controlling how non-invertible electric 1-form symmetry defects fuse associatively. The authors show that this associativity is governed not by numbers or phases but by one-dimensional topological field theories, and they compute these TQFTs from the physics living on the defects themselves. In the concrete example they work through, the F-symbol comes out to be a winding condensate, a sum over integer windings of the axion string. If correct, the paper completes the associator-level description of the electric 1-form symmetry category for axion-Maxwell theory, including its action on 't Hooft lines and axion strings, and shows that this higher data is in principle detectable.

What carries the argument

The engine of the computation is the family of minimal 2d TQFTs $A^{{N,p}}$_2, defined as the smallest two-dimensional theories with a $Z_N^{{(0)}}$ × $Z_N^{{(1)}}$ symmetry and a mixed anomaly; stacked with the naive electric defect, they turn a non-conserved current into a topological operator. The paper combines these with half gauging: inserting a mesh of topological lines and points in a subregion to build fusion interfaces between $D^{{(e)}}$_{p_1/N_1} ⊗ $D^{{(e)}}$_{p_2/N_2} and $D^{{(e)}}$_{p_3/N_3}. When three defects fuse, the two possible bracketing orders differ by an F-symbol bubble; shrinking that bubble leaves a 1d TQFT whose local operators are labelled by the gauged algebras. In the example, the surviving point operator V has order four and the resulting quantum mechanics is exactly the winding condensate $C^{{(2,w)}}$_4.

What would settle it

Recompute the F-symbol for $D^{{(e)}}$_{1/4} ⊗ $D^{{(e)}}$_{1/4} ⊗ $D^{{(e)}}$_{1/2} in an independent construction of the defect category, for instance by realizing the same defects as boundary conditions of a three-dimensional TQFT instead of via worldvolume gauging; any result different from the winding condensate $C^{{(2,w)}}$_4 would falsify the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that for axion-Maxwell theory at axion-photon coupling K=1, the generalized F-symbols of the non-invertible electric 1-form symmetry are 1d TQFTs determined by the same minimal two-dimensional theories $A^{{N,p}}$_2 used to build the defects. Concretely, the fusion of two electric defects $D^{{(e)}}$_{p_1/N_1} and $D^{{(e)}}$_{p_2/N_2} is realized by a topological interface built from gauging subgroups of the line and point symmetries on the defect worldvolume, and the associator comparing two ways of fusing three defects is a one-dimensional topological quantum mechanics carrying a winding label. In the worked example with labels 1/4, 1/4, 1/2, the paper concludes that $F^{{(e)}}$ = $C^{{(2,w)}}$_4: the F-symbol is the condensation defect of the Z_4 winding symmetry, a sum over winding sectors rather than just a phase.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that the two-dimensional minimal theories $A^{{N,p}}$_2 are truly minimal, meaning that no extra decoupled TQFT factor appears when two electric defects fuse; the authors explicitly say they are not aware of a proof of this.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the derivation is right, the electric 1-form symmetry category of axion-Maxwell theory is now specified at associator level, so any duality or symmetry-preserving RG flow must preserve these F-symbol TQFTs.
  • The F-symbol is observable in principle: an axion string or 't Hooft line swept through the F-symbol bubble picks up a factor that vanishes when the bubble is nontrivial, so associators with J > 1 are detectable.
  • The paper's rotational and swap manipulations produce nontrivial identities among F-symbols, showing the higher structure is tightly constrained by consistency even without a full categorical classification.
  • The same half-gauging calculus yields fusion interfaces and associators for general rational labels p/N, giving a family of F-symbol TQFTs rather than a single example.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One could reasonably expect that all higher associators of axion-Maxwell, not just the electric ones, are condensates built from the invertible winding and magnetic symmetries; the explicit electric example is consistent with that pattern, though the paper only proves it there.
  • The minimality gap in A^{N,p}_2 means the F-symbol formulas are conditional: a proof of minimality would upgrade them to theorems, while a counterexample would add a decoupled T' factor to the fusion interfaces.
  • The detection mechanism via 't Hooft lines and axion strings suggests a lattice or low-energy analogue could measure whether J > 1, offering a numerical check of the associator.
  • The same bottom-up defect calculus should extend to other 4d theories with axion-photon couplings, for instance K > 1, where the Q/Z symmetry is reduced to Z_K and the F-symbol structure becomes correspondingly coarser.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies the higher categorical structure of the symmetries of four-dimensional axion-Maxwell theory in the worldvolume approach. Building on prior constructions of the non-invertible defects D^{(s)}_{p/N} and D^{(e)}_{p/N} by Choi–Lam–Shao and Hidaka–Nitta–Yokokura, the authors derive fusion interfaces for the electric 1-form symmetry (Theorem 1) and analyze the associator (F-symbol), which is a one-dimensional TQFT. In Section 7.5 they compute a representative example and obtain F^{(e)} = C^{(2,w)}_4, a winding condensate, and then verify a proposed rotational duality by relabeling. The paper also reviews generalized gauging and the minimal theories A^{N,p}_1 and A^{N,p}_2, and includes an alternative Lagrangian derivation of fusion rules in Appendix C.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a significant step: it provides associator-level data for a non-invertible higher-form symmetry of a four-dimensional QFT beyond the chiral symmetry of massless QED studied in [48]. The paper is methodical: the F-symbol is constructed via half-gauging interfaces and consistency conditions, with no fitted parameters, and the explicit example in Section 7.5 is worked out in detail. The concrete Lagrangian description of A^{N,p}_2 (Remark 8, Eq. (23)), the derivation of fusion interfaces in Theorem 1, and the detection arguments of Section 7.3 are genuine strengths. However, the central determination rests on two assumptions that are explicitly flagged as unproven in the text: the trivial frame anomaly of the defects used in the rotational duality (99), and the equal population of twisted sectors in the decomposition formulas (86) and (89). The minimality of A^{N,p}_2 is also not established. These gaps do not make the derivation circular, but they currently leave the headline F-symbol formula conditional.

major comments (3)
  1. [§7.4–§7.5, Eq. (99)] The rotational duality identity (99) is used in Section 7.5 to verify the explicit F-symbol computation by relabeling, but the identity is stated to hold only if the electric and shift defects have trivial frame anomaly, a property the authors explicitly say they cannot prove at the end of Section 7.4. If the frame anomaly is nontrivial, the two sides of (99) differ by a phase and the claimed consistency check in Section 7.5 fails, so the main example would not be verified. This concern is distinct from the minimality caveat in Appendix C.3: the Section 7.5 computation uses the concrete BF-theory presentation of A^{N,p}_2, but the verification via (99) depends directly on the unproven frame-anomaly assumption. Please either prove the trivial frame anomaly from the Lagrangian presentations (23)/(C75), or state the final determination of the F-symbol as conditional on this assumption and identify which parts of the conclusions depend on it.
  2. [§7.2, Eqs. (86) and (89)] The final equalities in (86) and (89) state that the F-symbol TQFT decomposes as a direct sum over winding sectors with equal multiplicities d_q = d_0, justified only by the sentence 'twisted sectors of different labels are equally populated by d_q = d_0 defects.' This assertion is load-bearing: the detection argument in Section 7.3 (Eqs. (93)–(96)) uses the explicit sum over q with equal coefficients to conclude that a nontrivial F-symbol is detected by a vanishing factor for J > 1. Please provide a derivation of the equal-population statement from the data of the gauging interfaces, or weaken the formulas to include unequal multiplicities and re-derive the detection consequences.
  3. [Appendix C.3 and §6.2 (Theorem 1, Example 2)] The paper relies on a minimality property for the 2d theories A^{N,p}_2 that is not established: Appendix C.3 explicitly states 'While we are not aware of such result, we will still refer to these theories as minimal.' This property is used when the proof of the electric fusion interface (Theorem 1, Section 6.2) and the exhaustion argument in Example 2 conclude that the gauged theory contains no extra decoupled TQFT factor T'. If minimality fails, the interface formula (67) and the subsequent F-symbol formulas could miss a decoupled factor. Please either prove the minimality statement, cite a proof, or reformulate the results to make the possible extra factor explicit.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§7.5, second computation (Eqs. (107)–(108))] In the second computation of Section 7.5, the text refers to defects living on D^{(s)}_{12}, D^{(s)}_{23}, and D^{(s)}_{2} = D^{(s)}_{-1/4}; since this is a computation of the electric F-symbol, these should presumably be D^{(e)}. Please correct the notation and the self-referential 'D^{(s)}_{12} = D^{(s)}_{12}' in the sentence preceding Eq. (108).
  2. [§7.5, Eq. (102)] The notation '1 m_{4,4} → D^{(e)}_{1/4} ⊗ D^{(e)}_{1/4} ⊗ D^{(e)}_{1/2} m_{2,2}◦m_{2,4} → 1' is not defined before use; a sentence explaining the arrows as fusion interfaces and the labels m_{M',M} would help the reader follow the example.
  3. [Abstract and Section 1] The abstract and introduction claim that the paper determines 'the generalized F-symbols' for the non-invertible electric 1-form symmetry, while Section 7.5 provides one explicit worked example together with a rotational-duality check. Suggest qualifying the claim to 'determine the F-symbol in a class of examples' or adding the general formulas that justify the plural.
  4. [Eq. (16)] In Eq. (16), the condensation defect C^{(2,w)}_N (Σ^{(1)}) sums over φ ∈ H^0(Σ^{(1)}, Z_N) = Z_N, which is not a higher-form condensation in the same sense as the other entries in the list; the formula is correct, but a brief comment would avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the F-symbol is computed from independent gauging data, not fitted; the flagged gaps (frame anomaly, 2d minimality) are unproven assumptions, not circular reductions.

full rationale

The derivation is not circular. The electric defect D^(e)_{p/N} (eq. 24) is built from A^{N,p}_2, whose Lagrangian presentation is taken from the external work [199] (eq. 23); the fusion interfaces in Theorem 1 are derived by half-gauging explicit Z_{M'} line and Z_M point subgroups (Lemmas 1–2), with the interface action fixed by the requirement of coherent coupling to bulk winding and magnetic currents (eqs. 64–65). The F-symbol is then computed in Section 7 as the difference between two sequences of these gauging interfaces, and the worked example in Section 7.5 evaluates the resulting 1d TQFT and identifies it with C^{(2,w)}_4 via the spectrum V^4 = Φ^4 = 1. No parameter is fitted to the target answer C^{(2,w)}_4, and the result is not inserted by hand: it is an output of the gauging computation. The rotational duality (99) used as a consistency check rests on an admitted unproven premise, stated in Section 7.4: "The identity could actually be spoiled by phase factors which detects the framing dependence of the defects. While we are not able to formally prove it, we believe both the electric and the shift defects to have trivial frame anomaly." Likewise, the minimality of the A^{N,p}_2 theories is explicitly confessed to be unproven in Appendix C.3: "While we are not aware of such result, we will still refer to these theories as minimal." These are honest gaps in justification, not circular definitions: failure of either assumption would change the claimed result, but would not make the result equivalent to its own input by construction. The cited prior results [48], [199], [207], and [158] are external to this paper, and the self-citations ([48] as a methodological template and [59], listed as "in preparation") are not the load-bearing justification for the central F-symbol computation. The paper therefore exhibits no self-definitional step, no fitted-input-called-prediction, and no self-citation chain forcing its conclusions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central F-symbol computation rests on prior results for the A^{N,p}_1 minimal TQFTs and on an unproven analog for A^{N,p}_2, plus a belief about trivial framing anomalies. No parameters are fitted to data, and no new physical particles or forces are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Minimality of A^{N,p}_1: any 3d theory with Z_N^(1) symmetry and anomaly inflow of the form (C36) factorizes as A^{N,p}_1 ⊗ T'.
    Invoked in Appendix C.2 and Section 6.1 to identify unwanted decoupled TQFT factors after gauging in the shift and electric fusion rules. It is a cited theorem from [207], not proven in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper Minimality of A^{N,p}_2: the 2d theories A^{N,p}_2 are the minimal theories with Z_N^(0) × Z_N^(1) symmetry and nontrivial mixed anomaly, so no extra decoupled TQFT factor can appear.
    The authors explicitly say in Appendix C.3: 'While we are not aware of such result, we will still refer to these theories as minimal.' This is load-bearing for the electric F-symbol computation.
  • ad hoc to paper Trivial framing anomaly for the electric and shift defects D^e_{p/N} and D^s_{p/N}.
    Required for the rotational duality identity (99) between F-symbols. In Section 7.4 the authors say they cannot formally prove it and only state a belief that the frame anomaly is trivial.
  • domain assumption Self-duality of axion-Maxwell under 1-gauging of Z_N^(m) × Z_N^(w) with discrete torsion p, so the condensation defect C^{(0,m,w)}_{N,N,0,β} is trivial.
    Taken from [199] and used in Section 5 to construct the non-invertible electric and shift defects via half higher gauging.
  • ad hoc to paper Twisted sectors of different labels are equally populated by d_q = d_0 defects in the F-symbol decomposition formulas (86) and (89).
    Used to write the final decomposition of the F-symbol TQFTs into sums of winding defects. The equality is asserted without a complete derivation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Higher Structure of Symmetries of Axion-Maxwell Theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/65VZBJTB

@misc{pith2026241109685,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Higher Structure of Symmetries of Axion-Maxwell Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/65VZBJTB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.09685}
}
read the original abstract

Generalized symmetries of quantum field theories can be characterized by topological defects/operators organized into a higher category. In this paper we consider the Axion-Maxwell field theory in four dimensions and, building on the construction of its topological defects by Choi, Lam, Shao, Hidaka, Nitta and Yokokura, we discuss field theoretical methods to compute some aspects of the higher structure of such category. In particular, we determine explicitly the generalized F-symbols for the non-invertible electric 1-form symmetry of the theory. Along the way, we clarify various aspects of the bottom-up worldvolume approach towards the calculus of defects.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SymTFT, Protected Gaplessness, and Spontaneous Breaking of Non-invertible Symmetries

    hep-th 2025-04 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The authors classify, via Galois theory of cyclotomic polynomials, when finite duality symmetry groups of 4d BF-type SymTFTs admit invariant Lagrangian boundary conditions, thereby determining when symmetry-preserving...

  2. Non-invertible symmetries in the axiverse, and the imaginary wormholes

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Imaginary wormholes and the IDB imply that towers of BPS EFT instantons generate infinitely many superpotential terms that break non-invertible axion shift symmetries in N=1 axiverse models.

  3. SymTFT for Continuous Symmetries: Non-linear Realizations and Spontaneous Breaking

    hep-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Continuous-symmetry SymTFTs are extended to non-linear coset realizations and to spontaneous breaking using boundary and corner constructions, recovering CCWZ actions and SSB Ward identities.

  4. ADE triality via (non-)invertible symmetry gauging

    hep-th 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Gauging a non-invertible symmetry exchanges the D7 and E6 minimal models, completing the ADE triality.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

216 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [48]

    Higher Structure of Chiral Symmetry

    Christian Copetti et al. “Higher Structure of Chiral Symmetry”. In: Commun. Math. Phys. 406.4 (2025), p. 73. doi: 10.1007/s00220-024-05227-9. arXiv: 2305.18282 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  2. [1]

    Generalized global symmetries

    Davide Gaiotto et al. “Generalized global symmetries”. In: Journal of High Energy Physics 2015.2 (Feb. 2015). issn: 1029-8479. doi: 10.1007/jhep02(2015)172. url: http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/JHEP02(2015)172

    doi:10.1007/jhep02(2015)172 2015

  3. [2]

    Snowmass White Paper: Generalized Symmetries in Quantum Field Theory and Beyond

    Clay Cordova et al. “Snowmass White Paper: Generalized Symmetries in Quantum Field Theory and Beyond”. In: 2022 Snowmass Summer Study . May 2022. arXiv: 2205 . 09545 [hep-th]

    2022

  4. [3]

    Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter

    John McGreevy. “Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter”. In: (Apr. 2022). doi: 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-040721-021029. arXiv: 2204.03045 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2022

  5. [4]

    Daniel S. Freed. Introduction to topological symmetry in QFT. Nov. 2022. arXiv: 2212.00195 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2022

  6. [5]

    An introduction to higher-form symmetries

    Pedro R. S. Gomes. “An introduction to higher-form symmetries”. In: SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 74 (2023), p. 1.doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.74. arXiv: 2303.01817[hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  7. [6]

    ICTP Lectures on (Non-)Invertible Generalized Symmetries

    Sakura Schafer-Nameki. “ICTP Lectures on (Non-)Invertible Generalized Symmetries”. In: (May 2023). arXiv: 2305.18296 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  8. [7]

    Introduction to Generalized Global Symmetries in QFT and Particle Physics

    T. Daniel Brennan and Sungwoo Hong. “Introduction to Generalized Global Symmetries in QFT and Particle Physics”. In: (June 2023). arXiv: 2306.00912 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

Show all 216 references
  1. [8]

    Lectures on Generalized Symmetries

    Lakshya Bhardwaj et al. “Lectures on Generalized Symmetries”. In: (July 2023). arXiv: 2307.07547 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  2. [9]

    What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetry

    Shu-Heng Shao. “What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetry”. In: (Aug. 2023). arXiv: 2308.00747 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Topological defects

    Nils Carqueville, Michele Del Zotto, and Ingo Runkel. “Topological defects”. In: (Nov. 2023). arXiv: 2311.02449 [math-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions

    Chi-Ming Chang et al. “Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions”. In: JHEP 01 (2019), p. 026. doi: 10.1007/JHEP01(2019)026. arXiv: 1802.04445 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Symmetries and strings of adjoint QCD 2

    Zohar Komargodski et al. “Symmetries and strings of adjoint QCD 2”. In: JHEP 03 (2021), p. 103. doi: 10.1007/JHEP03(2021)103. arXiv: 2008.07567 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Noninvertible 1-form symmetry and Casimir scaling in 2D Yang-Mills theory

    Mendel Nguyen, Yuya Tanizaki, and Mithat ¨Unsal. “Noninvertible 1-form symmetry and Casimir scaling in 2D Yang-Mills theory”. In: Phys. Rev. D 104.6 (2021), p. 065003. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.065003. arXiv: 2104.01824 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Non-invertible global symmetries and completeness of the spec- trum

    Ben Heidenreich et al. “Non-invertible global symmetries and completeness of the spec- trum”. In: JHEP 09 (2021), p. 203. doi: 10.1007/JHEP09(2021)203. arXiv: 2104.07036 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Fusion Category Symmetry II: Categoriosities at c = 1 and Beyond

    Ryan Thorngren and Yifan Wang. “Fusion Category Symmetry II: Categoriosities at c = 1 and Beyond”. In: (June 2021). arXiv: 2106.12577 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Topological operators, noninvertible symmetries and decomposition

    E. Sharpe. “Topological operators, noninvertible symmetries and decomposition”. In: (Aug. 2021). arXiv: 2108.13423 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Construction of two- dimensional topological field theories with non-invertible symmetries

    Tzu-Chen Huang, Ying-Hsuan Lin, and Sahand Seifnashri. “Construction of two- dimensional topological field theories with non-invertible symmetries”. In: JHEP 12 (2021), p. 028. doi: 10.1007/JHEP12(2021)028. arXiv: 2110.02958 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions

    Yichul Choi et al. “Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions”. In: Phys. Rev. D 105.12 (2022), p. 125016. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.125016. arXiv: 2111.01139 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Kramers-Wannier-like Duality Defects in (3+1)D Gauge Theories

    Justin Kaidi, Kantaro Ohmori, and Yunqin Zheng. “Kramers-Wannier-like Duality Defects in (3+1)D Gauge Theories”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 128.11 (2022), p. 111601. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.128.111601. arXiv: 2111.01141 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Higher Gauging and Non-invertible Condensation Defects

    Konstantinos Roumpedakis, Sahand Seifnashri, and Shu-Heng Shao. “Higher Gauging and Non-invertible Condensation Defects”. In: (Apr. 2022). arXiv: 2204.02407 [hep-th]. 53

    2022 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Non-Invertible Higher-Categorical Symmetries

    Lakshya Bhardwaj et al. “Non-Invertible Higher-Categorical Symmetries”. In: (Apr. 2022). arXiv: 2204.06564 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Non-invertible symmetries from discrete gauging and completeness of the spectrum

    Guillermo Arias-Tamargo and Diego Rodriguez-Gomez. “Non-invertible symmetries from discrete gauging and completeness of the spectrum”. In: JHEP 04 (2023), p. 093. doi: 10.1007/JHEP04(2023)093. arXiv: 2204.07523 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Non-invertible Condensation, Duality, and Triality Defects in 3+1 Dimensions

    Yichul Choi et al. “Non-invertible Condensation, Duality, and Triality Defects in 3+1 Dimensions”. In: (Apr. 2022). arXiv: 2204.09025 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Non-invertible symmetries of N = 4 SYM and twisted compactification

    Justin Kaidi, Gabi Zafrir, and Yunqin Zheng. “Non-invertible symmetries of N = 4 SYM and twisted compactification”. In: JHEP 08 (2022), p. 053. doi: 10.1007/JHEP08(2022)053. arXiv: 2205.01104 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [28]

    On continuous 2-category symme- tries and Yang-Mills theory

    Andrea Antinucci, Giovanni Galati, and Giovanni Rizi. “On continuous 2-category symme- tries and Yang-Mills theory”. In: JHEP 12 (2022), p. 061. doi: 10.1007/JHEP12(2022)061. arXiv: 2206.05646 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  19. [29]

    Non- invertible defects in 5d, boundaries and holography

    Jeremias Aguilera Damia, Riccardo Argurio, and Eduardo Garcia-Valdecasas. “Non- invertible defects in 5d, boundaries and holography”. In: SciPost Phys. 14.4 (2023), p. 067. doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.14.4.067. arXiv: 2207.02831 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [30]

    Topological defect lines in two dimensional fermionic CFTs

    Chi-Ming Chang, Jin Chen, and Fengjun Xu. “Topological defect lines in two dimensional fermionic CFTs”. In: SciPost Phys. 15.5 (2023), p. 216. doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.5.216. arXiv: 2208.02757 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [31]

    Noninvertible Time-Reversal Symmetry

    Yichul Choi, Ho Tat Lam, and Shu-Heng Shao. “Noninvertible Time-Reversal Symmetry”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 130.13 (2023), p. 131602. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.131602. arXiv: 2208.04331 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [32]

    Universal Non-Invertible Symmetries

    Lakshya Bhardwaj, Sakura Schafer-Nameki, and Jingxiang Wu. “Universal Non-Invertible Symmetries”. In: Fortsch. Phys. 70.11 (2022), p. 2200143. doi: 10.1002/prop.202200143. arXiv: 2208.05973 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  23. [33]

    Non-invertible Symmetries and Higher Representation Theory I

    Thomas Bartsch et al. “Non-invertible Symmetries and Higher Representation Theory I”. In: (Aug. 2022). arXiv: 2208.05993 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  24. [34]

    Exploring non-invertible symme- tries in free theories

    Pierluigi Niro, Konstantinos Roumpedakis, and Orr Sela. “Exploring non-invertible symme- tries in free theories”. In: JHEP 03 (2023), p. 005. doi: 10.1007/JHEP03(2023)005. arXiv: 2209.11166 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [35]

    Solitonic Symmetry beyond Homotopy: Invertibility from Bordism and Noninvertibility from Topological Quantum Field Theory

    Shi Chen and Yuya Tanizaki. “Solitonic Symmetry beyond Homotopy: Invertibility from Bordism and Noninvertibility from Topological Quantum Field Theory”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 131.1 (2023), p. 011602. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.011602. arXiv: 2210.13780 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [36]

    On anomalies and gauging of U(1) non-invertible symmetries in 4d QED

    Avner Karasik. “On anomalies and gauging of U(1) non-invertible symmetries in 4d QED”. In: SciPost Phys. 15.1 (2023), p. 002. doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.1.002. arXiv: 2211. 05802 [hep-th]

    2023 doi

  27. [37]

    Gauging noninvertible defects: a 2-categorical perspective

    Thibault D. D´ ecoppet and Matthew Yu. “Gauging noninvertible defects: a 2-categorical perspective”. In: Lett. Math. Phys. 113.2 (2023), p. 36. doi: 10.1007/s11005-023-01655-1. arXiv: 2211.08436 [math.CT]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [38]

    A Goldstone theorem for continuous non- invertible symmetries

    I˜ naki Garc ´ ıa Etxebarria and Nabil Iqbal. “A Goldstone theorem for continuous non- invertible symmetries”. In: JHEP 09 (2023), p. 145. doi: 10.1007/JHEP09(2023)145. arXiv: 2211.09570 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [39]

    Unifying Constructions of Non-Invertible Symmetries

    Lakshya Bhardwaj, Sakura Schafer-Nameki, and Apoorv Tiwari. “Unifying Constructions of Non-Invertible Symmetries”. In: (Dec. 2022). arXiv: 2212.06159 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  30. [40]

    Non-Invertible Symmetry Webs

    Lakshya Bhardwaj et al. “Non-Invertible Symmetry Webs”. In: (Dec. 2022). arXiv: 2212. 06842 [hep-th]

    2022

  31. [41]

    Non-invertible Symmetries and Higher Representation Theory II

    Thomas Bartsch et al. “Non-invertible Symmetries and Higher Representation Theory II”. In: (Dec. 2022). arXiv: 2212.07393 [hep-th]. 54

    2022 arXiv

  32. [42]

    Non-Invertible Defects in Nonlinear Sigma Models and Coupling to Topological Orders

    Po-Shen Hsin. “Non-Invertible Defects in Nonlinear Sigma Models and Coupling to Topological Orders”. In: (Dec. 2022). arXiv: 2212.08608 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2022 arXiv

  33. [43]

    Anomalies of (1 + 1) D categorical symmetries

    Carolyn Zhang and Clay C´ ordova. “Anomalies of (1 + 1) D categorical symmetries”. In: (Apr. 2023). arXiv: 2304.01262 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [44]

    Comments on Boundaries, Anomalies, and Non-Invertible Symmetries

    Yichul Choi et al. “Comments on Boundaries, Anomalies, and Non-Invertible Symmetries”. In: (May 2023). arXiv: 2305.09713 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [45]

    Noninvertible anomalies in SU(N) × U(1) gauge theories

    Mohamed M. Anber and Erich Poppitz. “Noninvertible anomalies in SU(N) × U(1) gauge theories”. In: JHEP 08 (2023), p. 149. doi: 10.1007/JHEP08(2023)149. arXiv: 2305.14425 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [46]

    Generalized Charges, Part II: Non- Invertible Symmetries and the Symmetry TFT

    Lakshya Bhardwaj and Sakura Schafer-Nameki. “Generalized Charges, Part II: Non- Invertible Symmetries and the Symmetry TFT”. In: (May 2023). arXiv: 2305 . 17159 [hep-th]

    2023

  37. [47]

    Representation theory for categorical symmetries

    Thomas Bartsch, Mathew Bullimore, and Andrea Grigoletto. “Representation theory for categorical symmetries”. In: (May 2023). arXiv: 2305.17165 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  38. [49]

    Fiber 2-Functors and Tambara-Yamagami Fusion 2-Categories

    Thibault D. D´ ecoppet and Matthew Yu. “Fiber 2-Functors and Tambara-Yamagami Fusion 2-Categories”. In: (June 2023). arXiv: 2306.08117 [math.CT]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [50]

    Solitonic symmetry as non-invertible symmetry: cohomology theories with TQFT coefficients

    Shi Chen and Yuya Tanizaki. “Solitonic symmetry as non-invertible symmetry: cohomology theories with TQFT coefficients”. In: (July 2023). arXiv: 2307.00939 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  40. [51]

    When are Duality Defects Group-Theoretical? July 2023

    Zhengdi Sun and Yunqin Zheng. When are Duality Defects Group-Theoretical? July 2023. arXiv: 2307.14428 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  41. [52]

    Anomalies of Non-Invertible Symmetries in (3+1)d

    Clay Cordova, Po-Shen Hsin, and Carolyn Zhang. Anomalies of Non-Invertible Symmetries in (3+1)d . Aug. 2023. arXiv: 2308.11706 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  42. [53]

    Anomalies of non-invertible self-duality symmetries: fractionaliza- tion and gauging

    Andrea Antinucci et al. Anomalies of non-invertible self-duality symmetries: fractionaliza- tion and gauging . Aug. 2023. arXiv: 2308.11707 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  43. [54]

    Self-duality under gauging a non-invertible symmetry

    Yichul Choi, Da-Chuan Lu, and Zhengdi Sun. “Self-duality under gauging a non-invertible symmetry”. In: JHEP 01 (2024), p. 142. doi: 10.1007/JHEP01(2024)142. arXiv: 2310.19867 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  44. [55]

    Gauging Non-Invertible Symmetries: Topological Interfaces and Generalized Orbifold Groupoid in 2d QFT

    Oleksandr Diatlyk et al. “Gauging Non-Invertible Symmetries: Topological Interfaces and Generalized Orbifold Groupoid in 2d QFT”. In: (Nov. 2023). arXiv: 2311.17044 [hep-th]

    2023

  45. [56]

    Non-invertible duality defect and non-commutative fusion algebra

    Yuta Nagoya and Soichiro Shimamori. “Non-invertible duality defect and non-commutative fusion algebra”. In: JHEP 12 (2023), p. 062. doi: 10 . 1007 / JHEP12(2023 ) 062. arXiv: 2309.05294 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [57]

    Notes on gauging noninvertible symmetries. Part I. Multiplicity-free cases

    A. Perez-Lona et al. “Notes on gauging noninvertible symmetries. Part I. Multiplicity-free cases”. In: JHEP 02 (2024), p. 154. doi: 10.1007/JHEP02(2024)154. arXiv: 2311.16230 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [58]

    Emergent non-invertible symmetries in N = 4 Super-Yang-Mills theory

    Orr Sela. “Emergent non-invertible symmetries in N = 4 Super-Yang-Mills theory”. In: (Jan. 2024). arXiv: 2401.05032 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  48. [59]

    In preparation

    Michele Del Zotto, Elias Riedel G ˚ arding, and Azeem Hasan. “In preparation”. In: (2024)

    2024

  49. [60]

    Theta, Time Reversal, and Temperature

    Davide Gaiotto et al. “Theta, Time Reversal, and Temperature”. In: JHEP 05 (2017), p. 091. doi: 10.1007/JHEP05(2017)091. arXiv: 1703.00501 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  50. [61]

    Comments on One-Form Global Sym- metries and Their Gauging in 3d and 4d

    Po-Shen Hsin, Ho Tat Lam, and Nathan Seiberg. “Comments on One-Form Global Sym- metries and Their Gauging in 3d and 4d”. In: SciPost Phys. 6.3 (2019), p. 039. doi: 10. 21468/SciPostPhys.6.3.039. arXiv: 1812.04716 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  51. [62]

    Dai-Freed anomalies in particle physics

    I˜ naki Garc ´ ıa-Etxebarria and Miguel Montero. “Dai-Freed anomalies in particle physics”. In: JHEP 08 (2019), p. 003. doi: 10.1007/JHEP08(2019)003. arXiv: 1808.00009 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  52. [63]

    Quantum codes, CFTs, and defects

    Matthew Buican, Anatoly Dymarsky, and Rajath Radhakrishnan. “Quantum codes, CFTs, and defects”. In: JHEP 03 (2023), p. 017. doi: 10.1007/JHEP03(2023)017. arXiv: 2112. 12162 [hep-th]

    2023 doi

  53. [64]

    Non-invertible self-duality defects of Cardy-Rabinovici model and mixed gravitational anomaly

    Yui Hayashi and Yuya Tanizaki. “Non-invertible self-duality defects of Cardy-Rabinovici model and mixed gravitational anomaly”. In: EPJ Web Conf. 274 (2022), p. 02010. doi: 10.1051/epjconf/202227402010. 55

    2022

  54. [65]

    Higher-group symmetries and weak gravity conjecture mix- ing

    Sami Kaya and Tom Rudelius. “Higher-group symmetries and weak gravity conjecture mix- ing”. In: JHEP 07 (2022), p. 040. doi: 10 . 1007 / JHEP07(2022 ) 040. arXiv: 2202 . 04655 [hep-th]

    2022

  55. [66]

    Generalized symmetry breaking scales and weak gravity conjectures

    Clay Cordova, Kantaro Ohmori, and Tom Rudelius. “Generalized symmetry breaking scales and weak gravity conjectures”. In:JHEP 11 (2022), p. 154. doi: 10.1007/JHEP11(2022)154. arXiv: 2202.05866 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  56. [67]

    Global structures from the infrared

    Michele Del Zotto and I˜ naki Garc ´ ıa Etxebarria. “Global structures from the infrared”. In: JHEP 11 (2023), p. 058. doi: 10.1007/JHEP11(2023)058. arXiv: 2204.06495 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  57. [68]

    Non-invertible self-duality defects of Cardy-Rabinovici model and mixed gravitational anomaly

    Yui Hayashi and Yuya Tanizaki. “Non-invertible self-duality defects of Cardy-Rabinovici model and mixed gravitational anomaly”. In: JHEP 08 (2022), p. 036. doi: 10 . 1007 / JHEP08(2022)036. arXiv: 2204.07440 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  58. [69]

    Anomalies of Generalized Symmetries from Solitonic Defects

    Lakshya Bhardwaj et al. “Anomalies of Generalized Symmetries from Solitonic Defects”. In: (May 2022). arXiv: 2205.15330 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  59. [70]

    Decomposition, Condensation Defects, and Fusion

    Ling Lin, Daniel G. Robbins, and Eric Sharpe. “Decomposition, Condensation Defects, and Fusion”. In: Fortsch. Phys. 70.11 (2022), p. 2200130. doi: 10.1002/prop.202200130. arXiv: 2208.05982 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  60. [71]

    Neutrino Masses from Generalized Symmetry Breaking

    Clay Cordova et al. “Neutrino Masses from Generalized Symmetry Breaking”. In: (Nov. 2022). arXiv: 2211.07639 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  61. [74]

    A fresh view on string orbifolds

    Stefano Giaccari and Roberto Volpato. “A fresh view on string orbifolds”. In: JHEP 01 (2023), p. 173. doi: 10.1007/JHEP01(2023)173. arXiv: 2210.10034 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  62. [75]

    Higher Flavor Symmetries in the Standard Model

    Clay Cordova and Seth Koren. “Higher Flavor Symmetries in the Standard Model”. In: (Dec. 2022). doi: 10.1002/andp.202300031. arXiv: 2212.13193 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  63. [76]

    Obstructions to Gapped Phases from Non- Invertible Symmetries

    Anuj Apte, Clay Cordova, and Ho Tat Lam. Obstructions to Gapped Phases from Non- Invertible Symmetries . Dec. 2022. arXiv: 2212.14605 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  64. [77]

    Bootstrapping noninvertible symmetries

    Ying-Hsuan Lin and Shu-Heng Shao. “Bootstrapping noninvertible symmetries”. In: Phys. Rev. D 107.12 (2023), p. 125025. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.125025. arXiv: 2302.13900 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  65. [78]

    Categorical Symmetry of the Standard Model from Gravitational Anomaly

    Pavel Putrov and Juven Wang. “Categorical Symmetry of the Standard Model from Gravitational Anomaly”. In: (Feb. 2023). arXiv: 2302.14862 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  66. [79]

    Non-invertible symmetries along 4d RG flows

    Jeremias Aguilera Damia et al. “Non-invertible symmetries along 4d RG flows”. In: (May 2023). arXiv: 2305.17084 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  67. [80]

    When Z2 one-form symmetry leads to non- invertible axial symmetries

    Riccardo Argurio and Romain Vandepopeliere. “When Z2 one-form symmetry leads to non- invertible axial symmetries”. In: JHEP 08 (2023), p. 205. doi: 10.1007/JHEP08(2023)205. arXiv: 2306.01414 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  68. [81]

    Monopoles, Scattering, and Generalized Symmetries

    Marieke van Beest et al. “Monopoles, Scattering, and Generalized Symmetries”. In: (June 2023). arXiv: 2306.07318 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  69. [82]

    Fermion-Monopole Scattering in the Standard Model

    Marieke van Beest et al. “Fermion-Monopole Scattering in the Standard Model”. In: (Dec. 2023). arXiv: 2312.17746 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  70. [83]

    Quantum Duality in Electromagnetism and the Fine- Structure Constant

    Clay Cordova and Kantaro Ohmori. “Quantum Duality in Electromagnetism and the Fine- Structure Constant”. In: (July 2023). arXiv: 2307.12927 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  71. [84]

    Emergent generalized symmetries in ordered phases

    Salvatore D. Pace. “Emergent generalized symmetries in ordered phases”. In: (Aug. 2023). arXiv: 2308.05730 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  72. [85]

    Quantization of Axion-Gauge Couplings and Noninvertible Higher Sym- metries

    Yichul Choi et al. “Quantization of Axion-Gauge Couplings and Noninvertible Higher Sym- metries”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 132.12 (2024), p. 121601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132. 121601. arXiv: 2309.03937 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  73. [86]

    Axion Domain Walls, Small In- stantons, and Non-Invertible Symmetry Breaking

    Clay Cordova, Sungwoo Hong, and Lian-Tao Wang. “Axion Domain Walls, Small In- stantons, and Non-Invertible Symmetry Breaking”. In: (Sept. 2023). arXiv: 2309 . 05636 [hep-ph]

    2023

  74. [87]

    When the mod- uli space is an orbifold: Spontaneous breaking of continuous non-invertible symmetries

    Jeremias Aguilera Damia, Riccardo Argurio, and Soumyadeep Chaudhuri. “When the mod- uli space is an orbifold: Spontaneous breaking of continuous non-invertible symmetries”. In: (Sept. 2023). arXiv: 2309.06491 [hep-th]. 56

    2023 arXiv

  75. [88]

    Gapped Phases with Non-Invertible Symmetries: (1+1)d

    Lakshya Bhardwaj et al. “Gapped Phases with Non-Invertible Symmetries: (1+1)d”. In: (Oct. 2023). arXiv: 2310.03784 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  76. [89]

    Categorical Landau Paradigm for Gapped Phases

    Lakshya Bhardwaj et al. Categorical Landau Paradigm for Gapped Phases. Oct. 2023. arXiv: 2310.03786 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  77. [90]

    Anomaly Enforced Gaplessness and Symmetry Fractionalization for SpinG Symmetries

    T. Daniel Brennan. “Anomaly Enforced Gaplessness and Symmetry Fractionalization for SpinG Symmetries”. In: (Aug. 2023). arXiv: 2308.12999 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  78. [91]

    Anomalies of 4d SpinG Theories

    T. Daniel Brennan and Kenneth Intriligator. “Anomalies of 4d SpinG Theories”. In: (Dec. 2023). arXiv: 2312.04756 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  79. [92]

    Non-Invertible Symmetry in Calabi-Yau Conformal Field Theories

    Clay Cordova and Giovanni Rizi. “Non-Invertible Symmetry in Calabi-Yau Conformal Field Theories”. In: (Dec. 2023). arXiv: 2312.17308 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  80. [93]

    The Club Sandwich: Gapless Phases and Phase Transitions with Non-Invertible Symmetries

    Lakshya Bhardwaj et al. “The Club Sandwich: Gapless Phases and Phase Transitions with Non-Invertible Symmetries”. In: (Dec. 2023). arXiv: 2312.17322 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  81. [94]

    Anomaly Enforced Gaplessness for Background Flux Anomalies and Symmetry Fractionalization

    T. Daniel Brennan and Aiden Sheckler. “Anomaly Enforced Gaplessness for Background Flux Anomalies and Symmetry Fractionalization”. In: (Oct. 2023). arXiv: 2311 . 00093 [hep-th]

    2023

  82. [95]

    Higgs-Confinement Transitions in QCD from Symmetry Protected Topological Phases

    Thomas T. Dumitrescu and Po-Shen Hsin. “Higgs-Confinement Transitions in QCD from Symmetry Protected Topological Phases”. In: (Dec. 2023). arXiv: 2312.16898 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  83. [96]

    Non-Invertible Anyon Condensation and Level- Rank Dualities

    Clay Cordova and Diego Garc ´ ıa-Sep´ ulveda. “Non-Invertible Anyon Condensation and Level- Rank Dualities”. In: (Dec. 2023). arXiv: 2312.16317 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  84. [97]

    Non-Invertible Peccei-Quinn Symmetry and the Massless Quark Solution to the Strong CP Problem

    Clay Cordova, Sungwoo Hong, and Seth Koren. “Non-Invertible Peccei-Quinn Symmetry and the Massless Quark Solution to the Strong CP Problem”. In: (Feb. 2024). arXiv: 2402. 12453 [hep-ph]

    2024

  85. [98]

    Lattice realization of the axial U (1) non-invertible symmetry

    Yamato Honda et al. “Lattice realization of the axial U (1) non-invertible symmetry”. In: (Jan. 2024). arXiv: 2401.01331 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  86. [99]

    On the Holographic Dual of a Topological Symmetry Operator

    Jonathan J. Heckman, Max H¨ ubner, and Chitraang Murdia. “On the Holographic Dual of a Topological Symmetry Operator”. In: (Jan. 2024). arXiv: 2401.09538 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  87. [100]

    Anomalies and gauging of U(1) symmetries

    Andrea Antinucci and Francesco Benini. Anomalies and gauging of U(1) symmetries . Jan

  88. [101]

    Non-invertible symmetries and LSM-type constraints on a tensor product Hilbert space

    Nathan Seiberg, Sahand Seifnashri, and Shu-Heng Shao. “Non-invertible symmetries and LSM-type constraints on a tensor product Hilbert space”. In: (Jan. 2024). arXiv: 2401.12281 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  89. [102]

    Spontaneously broken (-1)-form U(1) symmetries

    Daniel Aloni et al. “Spontaneously broken (-1)-form U(1) symmetries”. In: SciPost Phys. 17.2 (2024), p. 031. doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.17.2.031. arXiv: 2402.00117 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  90. [103]

    On the Fate of Stringy Non-Invertible Symmetries

    Jonathan J. Heckman et al. “On the Fate of Stringy Non-Invertible Symmetries”. In: (Jan. 2024). arXiv: 2402.00118 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  91. [104]

    Discrete global symmetries: gauging and twisted compactifica- tion

    Simone Giacomelli et al. “Discrete global symmetries: gauging and twisted compactifica- tion”. In: JHEP 05 (2024), p. 304. doi: 10 . 1007 / JHEP05(2024 ) 304. arXiv: 2402 . 03424 [hep-th]

    2024

  92. [105]

    Generalized symmetries and Noether currents

    Valentin Benedetti. “Generalized symmetries and Noether currents”. PhD thesis. Balseiro Inst., San Carlos de Bariloche, Sept. 2024

    2024

  93. [106]

    SymTFTs for Continuous non- Abelian Symmetries

    Federico Bonetti, Michele Del Zotto, and Ruben Minasian. SymTFTs for Continuous non- Abelian Symmetries. Feb. 2024. arXiv: 2402.12347 [hep-th]

    2024

  94. [107]

    SymTh for non-finite symmetries

    Fabio Apruzzi, Francesco Bedogna, and Nicola Dondi. SymTh for non-finite symmetries . Feb. 2024. arXiv: 2402.14813 [hep-th]

    2024

  95. [108]

    Remarks on geometric engineering, symmetry TFTs and anomalies

    Michele Del Zotto, Shani Nadir Meynet, and Robert Moscrop. “Remarks on geometric engineering, symmetry TFTs and anomalies”. In: JHEP 07 (2024), p. 220. doi: 10.1007/ JHEP07(2024)220. arXiv: 2402.18646 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  96. [109]

    Higher-group global symmetry and the bosonic M5 brane

    Jay Armas, Giorgos Batzios, and Akash Jain. “Higher-group global symmetry and the bosonic M5 brane”. In: JHEP 08 (2024), p. 003. doi: 10.1007/JHEP08(2024)003. arXiv: 2402.19458 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  97. [110]

    Higher form symmetries and orbifolds of two- dimensional Yang-Mills theory

    Leonardo Santilli and Richard J. Szabo. “Higher form symmetries and orbifolds of two- dimensional Yang-Mills theory”. In: (Mar. 2024). arXiv: 2403.03119 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  98. [111]

    On finite group global and gauged q-form symmetries in TQFT

    Manuel Furlan and Pavel Putrov. “On finite group global and gauged q-form symmetries in TQFT”. In: (Mar. 2024). arXiv: 2403.04677 [math-ph]. 57

    2024 arXiv

  99. [112]

    Noninvertible Symmetries, Anoma- lies, and Scattering Amplitudes

    Christian Copetti, Lucia Cordova, and Shota Komatsu. “Noninvertible Symmetries, Anoma- lies, and Scattering Amplitudes”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 133.18 (2024), p. 181601. doi: 10. 1103/PhysRevLett.133.181601. arXiv: 2403.04835 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  100. [113]

    Particle-soliton degenera- cies from spontaneously broken non-invertible symmetry

    Clay Cordova, Diego Garc ´ ıa-Sep´ ulveda, and Nicholas Holfester. “Particle-soliton degenera- cies from spontaneously broken non-invertible symmetry”. In: JHEP 07 (2024), p. 154. doi: 10.1007/JHEP07(2024)154. arXiv: 2403.08883 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  101. [114]

    Subsystem Symmetry Fractionalization and Foliated Field Theory

    Po-Shen Hsin et al. “Subsystem Symmetry Fractionalization and Foliated Field Theory”. In: (Mar. 2024). arXiv: 2403.09098 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  102. [115]

    Dimensionally reducing generalized symmetries from (3+1)- dimensions

    Emily Nardoni et al. “Dimensionally reducing generalized symmetries from (3+1)- dimensions”. In: JHEP 07 (2024), p. 110. doi: 10.1007/JHEP07(2024)110. arXiv: 2403. 15995 [hep-th]

    2024 doi

  103. [116]

    Action of the Axial U(1) Non-Invertible Symmetry on the ’t Hooft Line Operator: A Lattice Gauge Theory Study

    Yamato Honda, Soma Onoda, and Hiroshi Suzuki. “Action of the Axial U(1) Non-Invertible Symmetry on the ’t Hooft Line Operator: A Lattice Gauge Theory Study”. In:PTEP 2024.7 (2024), 073B04. doi: 10.1093/ptep/ptae093. arXiv: 2403.16752 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  104. [117]

    Cluster State as a Noninvertible Symmetry- Protected Topological Phase

    Sahand Seifnashri and Shu-Heng Shao. “Cluster State as a Noninvertible Symmetry- Protected Topological Phase”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 133.11 (2024), p. 116601. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.133.116601. arXiv: 2404.01369 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024

  105. [118]

    On the symmetry TFT of Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons theory

    Riccardo Argurio et al. “On the symmetry TFT of Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons theory”. In: JHEP 07 (2024), p. 130. doi: 10.1007/JHEP07(2024)130. arXiv: 2404.06601 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  106. [119]

    Understanding Fermionic Generalized Symmetries

    Federico Ambrosino et al. “Understanding Fermionic Generalized Symmetries”. In: (Apr. 2024). arXiv: 2404.12301 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  107. [120]

    Symmetry fractionalization and duality defects in Maxwell theory

    Naoto Kan, Kohki Kawabata, and Hiroki Wada. “Symmetry fractionalization and duality defects in Maxwell theory”. In: JHEP 10 (2024), p. 238. doi: 10.1007/JHEP10(2024)238. arXiv: 2404.14481 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  108. [121]

    Non-anomalous non-invertible symmetries in 1+1D from gapped boundaries of SymTFTs

    Pavel Putrov and Rajath Radhakrishnan. “Non-anomalous non-invertible symmetries in 1+1D from gapped boundaries of SymTFTs”. In: (May 2024). arXiv: 2405.04619 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  109. [122]

    Illustrating the Categorical Landau Paradigm in Lattice Models

    Lakshya Bhardwaj et al. “Illustrating the Categorical Landau Paradigm in Lattice Models”. In: (May 2024). arXiv: 2405.05302 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  110. [123]

    Lattice Models for Phases and Transitions with Non-Invertible Symmetries

    Lakshya Bhardwaj et al. “Lattice Models for Phases and Transitions with Non-Invertible Symmetries”. In: (May 2024). arXiv: 2405.05964 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  111. [124]

    The Non-Invertible Axial Symmetry in QED Comes Full Circle

    Adrien Arbalestrier, Riccardo Argurio, and Luigi Tizzano. The Non-Invertible Axial Symmetry in QED Comes Full Circle . May 2024. arXiv: 2405.06596 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  112. [125]

    Action of the axial U (1) non-invertible symmetry on the ’t˜Hooft line operator: A simple argument

    Yamato Honda, Soma Onoda, and Hiroshi Suzuki. “Action of the axial U (1) non-invertible symmetry on the ’t˜Hooft line operator: A simple argument”. In: (May 2024). arXiv: 2405. 07669 [hep-lat]

    2024

  113. [126]

    Fermionic Non-Invertible Sym- metries in (1+1)d: Gapped and Gapless Phases, Transitions, and Symmetry TFTs

    Lakshya Bhardwaj, Kansei Inamura, and Apoorv Tiwari. “Fermionic Non-Invertible Sym- metries in (1+1)d: Gapped and Gapless Phases, Transitions, and Symmetry TFTs”. In: (May 2024). arXiv: 2405.09754 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  114. [127]

    Non-invertible and higher-form symmetries in 2+1d lattice gauge theories

    Yichul Choi et al. “Non-invertible and higher-form symmetries in 2+1d lattice gauge theories”. In: (May 2024). arXiv: 2405.13105 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  115. [128]

    A mass for the dual axion

    Arthur Platschorre. “A mass for the dual axion”. In: JHEP 10 (2024), p. 253. doi: 10.1007/ JHEP10(2024)253. arXiv: 2405.14931 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  116. [129]

    The SL2(R) duality and the non- invertible U (1) symmetry of Maxwell theory

    Azeem Hasan, Shani Meynet, and Daniele Migliorati. The SL2(R) duality and the non- invertible U (1) symmetry of Maxwell theory . May 2024. arXiv: 2405.19218 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  117. [130]

    Bosonization of 2+1 dimensional fermions on the surface of topological insulators

    Andrea Cappelli, Lorenzo Maffi, and Riccardo Villa. “Bosonization of 2+1 dimensional fermions on the surface of topological insulators”. In: JHEP 09 (2024), p. 031. doi: 10 . 1007/JHEP09(2024)031. arXiv: 2406.01787 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  118. [131]

    Ferromagnets, a New Anomaly, Instantons, and (noninvertible) Continu- ous Translations

    Nathan Seiberg. “Ferromagnets, a New Anomaly, Instantons, and (noninvertible) Continu- ous Translations”. In: (June 2024). arXiv: 2406.06698 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  119. [132]

    Celestial Topology, Symmetry Theories, and Evidence for a Non-SUSY D3-Brane CFT

    Jonathan J. Heckman and Max H¨ ubner. “Celestial Topology, Symmetry Theories, and Evidence for a Non-SUSY D3-Brane CFT”. In: (June 2024). arXiv: 2406.08485 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  120. [133]

    Extra-Dimensional Axion Expectations

    Matthew Reece. “Extra-Dimensional Axion Expectations”. In: (June 2024). arXiv: 2406. 08543 [hep-ph]

    2024

  121. [134]

    Non-Invertible Surface Defects in 2+1d QFTs from Half Spacetime Gauging

    Wei Cui, Babak Haghighat, and Lorenzo Ruggeri. “Non-Invertible Surface Defects in 2+1d QFTs from Half Spacetime Gauging”. In: (June 2024). arXiv: 2406.09261 [hep-th]. 58

    2024 arXiv

  122. [135]

    Global aspects of 3-form gauge theory: implications for axion-Yang-Mills systems

    Mohamed M. Anber and Samson Y. L. Chan. “Global aspects of 3-form gauge theory: implications for axion-Yang-Mills systems”. In: JHEP 10 (2024), p. 113. doi: 10 . 1007 / JHEP10(2024)113. arXiv: 2407.03416 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  123. [136]

    Non-invertible symmetries in finite group gauge theory

    Clay Cordova, Davi B. Costa, and Po-Shen Hsin. “Non-invertible symmetries in finite group gauge theory”. In: (July 2024). arXiv: 2407.07964 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  124. [137]

    Entanglement asymmetry in conformal field theory and holography

    Francesco Benini, Victor Godet, and Amartya Harsh Singh. “Entanglement asymmetry in conformal field theory and holography”. In: (July 2024). arXiv: 2407.07969 [hep-th]

    2024

  125. [138]

    Monopole Breaking of Chern-Weil Symmetries

    Eduardo Garc ´ ıa-Valdecasas, Matthew Reece, and Motoo Suzuki. “Monopole Breaking of Chern-Weil Symmetries”. In: (July 2024). arXiv: 2408.00067 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  126. [139]

    Holographic duals of symmetry broken phases

    Andrea Antinucci, Francesco Benini, and Giovanni Rizi. “Holographic duals of symmetry broken phases”. In: (Aug. 2024).doi: 10.1002/prop.202400172. arXiv: 2408.01418[hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  127. [140]

    Defect Charges, Gapped Boundary Conditions, and the Symmetry TFT

    Christian Copetti. “Defect Charges, Gapped Boundary Conditions, and the Symmetry TFT”. In: (Aug. 2024). arXiv: 2408.01490 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  128. [141]

    SymTFT for (3+1)d Gapless SPTs and Obstructions to Confinement

    Andrea Antinucci, Christian Copetti, and Sakura Schafer-Nameki. “SymTFT for (3+1)d Gapless SPTs and Obstructions to Confinement”. In: (Aug. 2024). arXiv: 2408 . 05585 [hep-th]

    2024

  129. [142]

    Symmetry topological field theory and non-abelian Kramers-Wannier dualities of generalised Ising models

    Clement Delcamp and Nafiz Ishtiaque. “Symmetry topological field theory and non-abelian Kramers-Wannier dualities of generalised Ising models”. In: (Aug. 2024). arXiv: 2408.06074 [hep-th]

    2024

  130. [143]

    Emergent Non-Invertible Symmetries Bridging UV and IR Phases – The Adjoint QCD Example

    Michele Del Zotto et al. “Emergent Non-Invertible Symmetries Bridging UV and IR Phases – The Adjoint QCD Example”. In: (Aug. 2024). arXiv: 2408.07123 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  131. [144]

    Representation Theory of Solitons

    Clay Cordova, Nicholas Holfester, and Kantaro Ohmori. “Representation Theory of Solitons”. In: (Aug. 2024). arXiv: 2408.11045 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  132. [145]

    S-Matrix Bootstrap and Non- Invertible Symmetries

    Christian Copetti, Lucia Cordova, and Shota Komatsu. “S-Matrix Bootstrap and Non- Invertible Symmetries”. In: (Aug. 2024). arXiv: 2408.13132 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  133. [146]

    Non-invertible defects on the worldsheet

    Sriram Bharadwaj, Pierluigi Niro, and Konstantinos Roumpedakis. “Non-invertible defects on the worldsheet”. In: (Aug. 2024). arXiv: 2408.14556 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  134. [147]

    Generalized Tube Algebras, Symmetry-Resolved Partition Functions, and Twisted Boundary States

    Yichul Choi, Brandon C. Rayhaun, and Yunqin Zheng. “Generalized Tube Algebras, Symmetry-Resolved Partition Functions, and Twisted Boundary States”. In: (Sept. 2024). arXiv: 2409.02159 [hep-th]

    2024

  135. [148]

    The Axion is Going Dark

    Markus Dierigl and Duˇ san Noviˇ ci´ c. “The Axion is Going Dark”. In: (Sept. 2024). arXiv: 2409.02180 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  136. [149]

    SymTFT Fans: The Sym- metry Theory of 4d N=4 Super Yang-Mills on spaces with boundaries

    I˜ naki Garc ´ ıa Etxebarria, Jes´ us Huertas, and Angel M. Uranga. “SymTFT Fans: The Sym- metry Theory of 4d N=4 Super Yang-Mills on spaces with boundaries”. In: (Sept. 2024). arXiv: 2409.02156 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  137. [150]

    A Non-Invertible Symmetry- Resolved Affleck-Ludwig-Cardy Formula and Entanglement Entropy from the Boundary Tube Algebra

    Yichul Choi, Brandon C. Rayhaun, and Yunqin Zheng. “A Non-Invertible Symmetry- Resolved Affleck-Ludwig-Cardy Formula and Entanglement Entropy from the Boundary Tube Algebra”. In: (Sept. 2024). arXiv: 2409.02806 [hep-th]

    2024

  138. [151]

    Non-Invertible T-duality at Any Radius via Non-Compact SymTFT

    Riccardo Argurio et al. “Non-Invertible T-duality at Any Radius via Non-Compact SymTFT”. In: (Sept. 2024). arXiv: 2409.11822 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  139. [152]

    Natural Anomaly Matching

    Stefano Bolognesi et al. “Natural Anomaly Matching”. In: (Oct. 2024). arXiv: 2410.01315 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  140. [153]

    Symmetry Breaking from Monopole Condensation in QED 3

    Thomas T. Dumitrescu, Pierluigi Niro, and Ryan Thorngren. “Symmetry Breaking from Monopole Condensation in QED 3”. In: (Oct. 2024). arXiv: 2410.05366 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  141. [154]

    A Gapless Phase with Haagerup Symmetry

    Lea E. Bottini and Sakura Schafer-Nameki. “A Gapless Phase with Haagerup Symmetry”. In: (Oct. 2024). arXiv: 2410.19040 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  142. [155]

    On Unitary 2-Group Symmetries

    Thomas Bartsch. “On Unitary 2-Group Symmetries”. In: (Nov. 2024). arXiv: 2411.05067 [math-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  143. [156]

    Selection rules of topological solitons from non-invertible symmetries in axion electrodynamics

    Yoshimasa Hidaka, Muneto Nitta, and Ryo Yokokura. Selection rules of topological solitons from non-invertible symmetries in axion electrodynamics . Nov. 2024. arXiv: 2411 . 05434 [hep-th]

    2024

  144. [157]

    Understanding the SM gauge group from SMEFT

    Hao-Lin Li and Ling-Xiao Xu. “Understanding the SM gauge group from SMEFT”. In: JHEP 07 (2024), p. 199. doi: 10.1007/JHEP07(2024)199. arXiv: 2404.04229 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  145. [158]

    Non-invertible Global Symmetries in the Standard Model

    Yichul Choi, Ho Tat Lam, and Shu-Heng Shao. Non-invertible Global Symmetries in the Standard Model. 2022. arXiv: 2205.05086 [hep-th]. 59

    2022 arXiv

  146. [159]

    Topological order in the color-flavor locked phase of a ( 3+1 )- dimensional U(N) gauge-Higgs system

    Yoshimasa Hidaka et al. “Topological order in the color-flavor locked phase of a ( 3+1 )- dimensional U(N) gauge-Higgs system”. In: Phys. Rev. D 100.12 (2019), p. 125016. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.125016. arXiv: 1903.06389 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  147. [161]

    Global 3-group symmetry and ’t Hooft anomalies in axion electrodynamics

    Yoshimasa Hidaka, Muneto Nitta, and Ryo Yokokura. “Global 3-group symmetry and ’t Hooft anomalies in axion electrodynamics”. In: JHEP 01 (2021), p. 173. doi: 10 . 1007 / JHEP01(2021)173. arXiv: 2009.14368 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  148. [162]

    Global 4-group symmetry and ’t Hooft anomalies in topological axion electrodynamics

    Yoshimasa Hidaka, Muneto Nitta, and Ryo Yokokura. “Global 4-group symmetry and ’t Hooft anomalies in topological axion electrodynamics”. In: PTEP 2022.4 (2022), 04A109. doi: 10.1093/ptep/ptab150. arXiv: 2108.12564 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  149. [163]

    Topological axion electrodynamics and 4-group symmetry

    Yoshimasa Hidaka, Muneto Nitta, and Ryo Yokokura. “Topological axion electrodynamics and 4-group symmetry”. In: Phys. Lett. B 823 (2021), p. 136762. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb. 2021.136762. arXiv: 2107.08753 [hep-th]

    2021

  150. [164]

    Q/Z symmetry

    Pavel Putrov. Q/Z symmetry. Aug. 2022. arXiv: 2208.12071 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  151. [165]

    Categorical symmetry and noninvertible anomaly in symmetry-breaking and topological phase transitions

    Wenjie Ji and Xiao-Gang Wen. “Categorical symmetry and noninvertible anomaly in symmetry-breaking and topological phase transitions”. In: Phys. Rev. Res. 2.3 (2020), p. 033417. doi: 10 . 1103 / PhysRevResearch . 2 . 033417. arXiv: 1912 . 13492 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2020

  152. [166]

    Orbifold groupoids

    Davide Gaiotto and Justin Kulp. “Orbifold groupoids”. In: JHEP 02 (2021), p. 132. doi: 10.1007/JHEP02(2021)132. arXiv: 2008.05960 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  153. [167]

    Symmetry TFTs from String Theory

    Fabio Apruzzi et al. “Symmetry TFTs from String Theory”. In: Commun. Math. Phys. 402.1 (2023), pp. 895–949. doi: 10.1007/s00220-023-04737-2. arXiv: 2112.02092 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  154. [168]

    Symmetry TFTs for Non-Invertible Defects

    Justin Kaidi, Kantaro Ohmori, and Yunqin Zheng. Symmetry TFTs for Non-Invertible Defects. Sept. 2022. arXiv: 2209.11062 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  155. [169]

    Topological symmetry in quantum field theory

    Daniel S. Freed, Gregory W. Moore, and Constantin Teleman. “Topological symmetry in quantum field theory”. In: (Sept. 2022). arXiv: 2209.07471 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  156. [170]

    Generalized Charges, Part I: Invertible Symmetries and Higher Representations

    Lakshya Bhardwaj and Sakura Schafer-Nameki. “Generalized Charges, Part I: Invertible Symmetries and Higher Representations”. In: (Apr. 2023). arXiv: 2304.02660 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  157. [171]

    SymTrees and Multi-Sector QFTs

    Florent Baume et al. “SymTrees and Multi-Sector QFTs”. In: (Oct. 2023). arXiv: 2310.12980 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  158. [172]

    Symmetry TFTs and Anomalies of Non-Invertible Symmetries

    Justin Kaidi et al. Symmetry TFTs and Anomalies of Non-Invertible Symmetries . Jan

  159. [173]

    Cornering Relative Symmetry Theories

    Mirjam Cvetiˇ c et al. Cornering Relative Symmetry Theories . Aug. 2024. arXiv: 2408.12600 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  160. [174]

    Daniel Brennan and Zhengdi Sun

    T. Daniel Brennan and Zhengdi Sun. A SymTFT for Continuous Symmetries . Jan. 2024. arXiv: 2401.06128 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  161. [175]

    Reading between the lines of four- dimensional gauge theories

    Ofer Aharony, Nathan Seiberg, and Yuji Tachikawa. “Reading between the lines of four- dimensional gauge theories”. In: JHEP 08 (2013), p. 115. doi: 10.1007/JHEP08(2013)115. arXiv: 1305.0318 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  162. [176]

    Higher symmetry and gapped phases of gauge theories

    Anton Kapustin and Ryan Thorngren. “Higher symmetry and gapped phases of gauge theories”. In: (Sept. 2013). arXiv: 1309.4721 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  163. [177]

    Coupling a QFT to a TQFT and Duality

    Anton Kapustin and Nathan Seiberg. “Coupling a QFT to a TQFT and Duality”. In: JHEP 04 (2014), p. 001. doi: 10.1007/JHEP04(2014)001. arXiv: 1401.0740 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  164. [178]

    Anomalies of discrete symmetries in various dimensions and group cohomology

    Anton Kapustin and Ryan Thorngren. “Anomalies of discrete symmetries in various dimensions and group cohomology”. In: (Apr. 2014). arXiv: 1404.3230 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  165. [179]

    Topological phases with generalized global symmetries

    Beni Yoshida. “Topological phases with generalized global symmetries”. In: Phys. Rev. B 93.15 (2016), p. 155131. doi: 10 . 1103 / PhysRevB . 93 . 155131. arXiv: 1508 . 03468 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2016

  166. [180]

    Higher SPT’s and a generalization of anomaly in-flow

    Ryan Thorngren and Curt von Keyserlingk. “Higher SPT’s and a generalization of anomaly in-flow”. In: (Nov. 2015). arXiv: 1511.02929 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2015 arXiv

  167. [181]

    On gauging finite subgroups

    Yuji Tachikawa. “On gauging finite subgroups”. In: SciPost Phys. 8.1 (2020), p. 015. doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.8.1.015. arXiv: 1712.09542 [hep-th]. 60

    2020 arXiv

  168. [182]

    Exploring 2-Group Global Symmetries

    Clay C´ ordova, Thomas T. Dumitrescu, and Kenneth Intriligator. “Exploring 2-Group Global Symmetries”. In: JHEP 02 (2019), p. 184. doi: 10.1007/JHEP02(2019)184. arXiv: 1802.04790 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  169. [183]

    On 2-Group Global Symmetries and their Anomalies

    Francesco Benini, Clay C´ ordova, and Po-Shen Hsin. “On 2-Group Global Symmetries and their Anomalies”. In: JHEP 03 (2019), p. 118. doi: 10 . 1007 / JHEP03(2019 ) 118. arXiv: 1803.09336 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  170. [184]

    Topological Operators and Completeness of Spectrum in Discrete Gauge Theories

    Tom Rudelius and Shu-Heng Shao. “Topological Operators and Completeness of Spectrum in Discrete Gauge Theories”. In: JHEP 12 (2020), p. 172. doi: 10.1007/JHEP12(2020)172. arXiv: 2006.10052 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  171. [185]

    Discrete theta angles, symmetries and anomalies

    Po-Shen Hsin and Ho Tat Lam. “Discrete theta angles, symmetries and anomalies”. In: SciPost Phys. 10.2 (2021), p. 032. doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.10.2.032. arXiv: 2007.05915 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  172. [186]

    2-Group Global Sym- metries and Anomalies in Six-Dimensional Quantum Field Theories

    Clay Cordova, Thomas T. Dumitrescu, and Kenneth Intriligator. “2-Group Global Sym- metries and Anomalies in Six-Dimensional Quantum Field Theories”. In: JHEP 04 (2021), p. 252. doi: 10.1007/JHEP04(2021)252. arXiv: 2009.00138 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  173. [187]

    Instantons, symmetries and anomalies in five dimensions

    Pietro Benetti Genolini and Luigi Tizzano. “Instantons, symmetries and anomalies in five dimensions”. In: JHEP 04 (2021), p. 188. doi: 10.1007/JHEP04(2021)188. arXiv: 2009. 07873 [hep-th]

    2021 doi

  174. [189]

    Chern-Weil global symmetries and how quantum gravity avoids them

    Ben Heidenreich et al. “Chern-Weil global symmetries and how quantum gravity avoids them”. In: JHEP 11 (2021), p. 053. doi: 10.1007/JHEP11(2021)053. arXiv: 2012.00009 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  175. [190]

    Higher-form symmetries and 3-group in axion electrodynamics

    Yoshimasa Hidaka, Muneto Nitta, and Ryo Yokokura. “Higher-form symmetries and 3-group in axion electrodynamics”. In: Physics Letters B 808 (Sept. 2020), p. 135672. issn: 0370-

    2020

  176. [191]

    Global 3-group symmetry and ’t Hooft anomalies in axion electrodynamics

    Yoshimasa Hidaka, Muneto Nitta, and Ryo Yokokura. “Global 3-group symmetry and ’t Hooft anomalies in axion electrodynamics”. In: Journal of High Energy Physics 2021.1 (Jan. 2021). issn: 1029-8479. doi: 10.1007/jhep01(2021)173. url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ JHEP01(2021)173

    2021 doi

  177. [192]

    2-Group symmetries and their classification in 6d

    Fabio Apruzzi et al. “2-Group symmetries and their classification in 6d”. In: SciPost Phys. 12.3 (2022), p. 098. doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.3.098. arXiv: 2110.14647 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  178. [193]

    2-Group symmetries in class S

    Lakshya Bhardwaj. “2-Group symmetries in class S”. In: SciPost Phys. 12.5 (2022), p. 152. doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.5.152. arXiv: 2107.06816 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  179. [194]

    Comments on Global Symmetries and Anomalies of 5 d SCFTs

    Pietro Benetti Genolini and Luigi Tizzano. “Comments on Global Symmetries and Anomalies of 5 d SCFTs”. In: (Jan. 2022). arXiv: 2201.02190 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  180. [195]

    Continuous Generalized Symmetries in Three Dimensions

    Jeremias Aguilera Damia, Riccardo Argurio, and Luigi Tizzano. “Continuous Generalized Symmetries in Three Dimensions”. In: JHEP 05 (2023), p. 164. doi: 10.1007/JHEP05(2023)

    2023 doi

  181. [196]

    Anomalies and Symmetry Fractionalization

    Diego Delmastro et al. “Anomalies and Symmetry Fractionalization”. In: SciPost Phys. 15 (2023), p. 079. doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.3.079. arXiv: 2206.15118 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  182. [197]

    Daniel Brennan and Clay Cordova

    T. Daniel Brennan and Clay Cordova. Axions, Higher-Groups, and Emergent Symmetry

  183. [198]

    Non-invertible symmetries in axion electrodynamics

    Ryo Yokokura. Non-invertible symmetries in axion electrodynamics. 2022. arXiv: 2212.05001 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  184. [199]

    arXiv: 2206.14093 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  185. [200]

    Clay C´ ordova and Kantaro Ohmori.Anomaly Obstructions to Symmetry Preserving Gapped Phases. Oct. 2019. arXiv: 1910.04962 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  186. [201]

    An introduction to decomposition

    Eric Sharpe. An introduction to decomposition. 2022. arXiv: 2204.09117 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  187. [202]

    Anomaly inflow and p-form gauge theories

    Chang-Tse Hsieh, Yuji Tachikawa, and Kazuya Yonekura. Anomaly inflow and p-form gauge theories. 2022. arXiv: 2003.11550 [hep-th]. 61

    2022

  188. [203]

    Symmetry TFTs from String Theory

    Fabio Apruzzi et al. “Symmetry TFTs from String Theory”. In: Communications in Math- ematical Physics 402.1 (May 2023), pp. 895–949. issn: 1432-0916. doi: 10.1007/s00220- 023-04737-2. url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-023-04737-2

    2023 doi

  189. [204]

    Non-Invertible Gauss Law and Axions

    Yichul Choi, Ho Tat Lam, and Shu-Heng Shao. Non-Invertible Gauss Law and Axions. 2023. arXiv: 2212.04499 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  190. [205]

    Non-invertible Condensation, Duality, and Triality Defects in 3+1 Di- mensions

    Yichul Choi et al. “Non-invertible Condensation, Duality, and Triality Defects in 3+1 Di- mensions”. In: Communications in Mathematical Physics 402.1 (May 2023), pp. 489–542. issn: 1432-0916. doi: 10.1007/s00220-023-04727-4. url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220- 023-04727-4

    2023 doi

  191. [206]

    Non-Invertible Chiral Symmetry and Exponential Hierarchies

    Clay Cordova and Kantaro Ohmori. Non-Invertible Chiral Symmetry and Exponential Hierarchies. 2022. arXiv: 2205.06243 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  192. [207]

    Comments on one-form global symmetries and their gauging in 3d and 4d

    Po-Shen Hsin, Ho Tat Lam, and Nathan Seiberg. “Comments on one-form global symmetries and their gauging in 3d and 4d”. In: SciPost Physics 6.3 (Mar. 2019). issn: 2542-4653. doi: 10.21468/scipostphys.6.3.039. url: http://dx.doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.6.3.039

    2019 doi

  193. [208]

    On 2-group global symmetries and their anomalies

    Francesco Benini, Clay C´ ordova, and Po-Shen Hsin. “On 2-group global symmetries and their anomalies”. In: Journal of High Energy Physics 2019.3 (Mar. 2019). issn: 1029-8479. doi: 10.1007/jhep03(2019)118. url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2019)118

    2019 doi

  194. [209]

    Higher Gauging and Non-invertible Condensation Defects

    Konstantinos Roumpedakis, Sahand Seifnashri, and Shu-Heng Shao. “Higher Gauging and Non-invertible Condensation Defects”. In: Communications in Mathematical Physics 401.3 (May 2023), pp. 3043–3107. issn: 1432-0916. doi: 10.1007/s00220-023-04706-9. url: http: //dx.doi.org/10.10...

    2023 doi

  195. [210]

    Topological gauge theories and group cohomol- ogy

    Robbert Dijkgraaf and Edward Witten. “Topological gauge theories and group cohomol- ogy”. In: Communications in Mathematical Physics 129 (1990), pp. 393–429

    1990

  196. [211]

    Field-Theory Representation of Gauge-Gravity Symmetry-Protected Topological Invariants, Group Cohomology, and Be- yond

    Juven C. Wang, Zheng-Cheng Gu, and Xiao-Gang Wen. “Field-Theory Representation of Gauge-Gravity Symmetry-Protected Topological Invariants, Group Cohomology, and Be- yond”. In: Physical Review Letters 114.3 (Jan. 2015). issn: 1079-7114. doi: 10 . 1103 / physrevlett.114.031601. ...

    2015 doi

  197. [212]

    TFT construction of RCFT corre- lators I: partition functions

    J¨ urgen Fuchs, Ingo Runkel, and Christoph Schweigert. “TFT construction of RCFT corre- lators I: partition functions”. In: Nuclear Physics B 646.3 (Dec. 2002), pp. 353–497. issn: 0550-3213. doi: 10.1016/s0550-3213(02)00744-7. url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0550- 3213(02)00744-7

    2002 doi

  198. [213]

    On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions

    Lakshya Bhardwaj and Yuji Tachikawa. “On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions”. In: Journal of High Energy Physics 2018.3 (Mar. 2018). issn: 1029-8479. doi: 10.1007/jhep03(2018)189. url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2018)189

    2018 doi

  199. [214]

    On the Groups H(Π, n), II: Methods of Com- putation

    Samuel Eilenberg and Saunders MacLane. “On the Groups H(Π, n), II: Methods of Com- putation”. In: Annals of Mathematics 60.1 (1954), pp. 49–139. issn: 0003486X. url: http: //www.jstor.org/stable/1969702 (visited on 05/05/2024)

    1954

  200. [215]

    Orbifolds of Reshetikhin-Turaev TQFTs

    Nils Carqueville, Ingo Runkel, and Gregor Schaumann. “Orbifolds of Reshetikhin-Turaev TQFTs”. In: Theor. Appl. Categor. 35 (2020), pp. 513–561. arXiv: 1809.01483 [math.QA]

    2020 arXiv

  201. [216]

    Constructing modular categories from orbifold data

    Vincentas Muleviˇ cius and Ingo Runkel. “Constructing modular categories from orbifold data”. In: Quantum Topol. 13.3 (2023), pp. 459–523. doi: 10.4171/qt/170. arXiv: 2002.00663 [math.QA]

    2023 arXiv

  202. [217]

    Condensation inversion and Witt equivalence via generalised orbifolds

    Vincentas Mulevicius. “Condensation inversion and Witt equivalence via generalised orbifolds”. In: (June 2022). arXiv: 2206.02611 [math.QA]

    2022 arXiv

  203. [218]

    Construction of two- dimensional topological field theories with non-invertible symmetries

    Tzu-Chen Huang, Ying-Hsuan Lin, and Sahand Seifnashri. “Construction of two- dimensional topological field theories with non-invertible symmetries”. In: Journal of High Energy Physics 2021.12 (Dec. 2021). issn: 1029-8479. doi: 10.1007/jhep12(2021)028. url: http://dx.doi.org/10...

    2021 doi

  204. [219]

    Symmetry Fractionalization, Defects, and Gauging of Topological Phases

    Maissam Barkeshli et al. “Symmetry Fractionalization, Defects, and Gauging of Topological Phases”. In: Phys. Rev. B 100.11 (2019), p. 115147. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.115147. arXiv: 1410.4540 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2019 arXiv

  205. [2021]

    arXiv: 2011.09600 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  206. [2023]

    arXiv: 2301.07112 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  207. [2024]

    arXiv: 2401.10165 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  208. [2693]

    url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb

    doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135672. url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb. 2020.135672

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.